Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
Article | Ebook (Log · Page History) |
User | Ds13 (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 33 |
Minor edits | 0 (0%) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
atbe1 | 8.1 |
Added (bytes)2 | 4,570 |
Deleted (bytes) | -2,017 |
Minor edits
·
0 (0%)
Major edits
·
33 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
33 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
33 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
---|---|---|---|
2012-10-17 05:19 | Diff · History | 25 | who has this "book length" criteria? reader must be able to verify. |
2012-09-07 16:49 | Diff · History | -108 | removed uncited nonsense by 109.212.217.54. clearly many/all popular books sold by Apple are also sold elsewhere. |
2012-07-18 08:09 | Diff · History | -392 | removed multiple ICARUS entires. spam? no WP article or ext references supplied. if these are notable in ebook history, please consider writing company/product articles first. |
2012-07-12 18:38 | Diff · History | -31 | removed POV "successful" & "innovative" |
2012-07-12 18:37 | Diff · History | 42 | specified awards actually won. a non-primary-source for verifiability is needed. |
2012-06-07 22:26 | Diff · History | -219 | removed redlinked product. (if notable, please write the article first.) sole ref [pocketbook.com] is broken. |
2012-06-07 22:21 | Diff · History | -104 | removed list item that was vague (was there a specific product or milestone in 2010?) and worded POV |
2012-05-29 06:29 | Diff · History | -154 | "continuous reading for weeks at a time" is not an advantage of e-books -- it applies equally to paper books |
2012-05-16 04:45 | Diff · History | 52 | many things are "possible". pls give examples or attribute the speculation to a reliable source if these features are notable. |
2012-05-16 04:42 | Diff · History | 21 | "high cost" is POV. pls quantify or attribute the weasel-worded "much of the world's population" |
2012-05-16 04:39 | Diff · History | -24 | removed unsourced opinion: "ease of readability". pls add back if attributed to reliable source. |
2012-04-30 15:53 | Diff · History | -144 | Undid test edit (?) by 117.201.73.156 (talk) |
2012-04-17 00:34 | Diff · History | 35 | Yankelovich/Meyrowitz/vanDam paper does not verify the "coined the term" claim |
2012-04-11 21:53 | Diff · History | 41 | clarify caption (this article isn't about e-book readers) |
2012-04-02 22:31 | Diff · History | -482 | removed dead & redlinks -- if these organizations are notable, please write the article first |
2012-04-02 22:29 | Diff · History | 24 | how can reader verify that a bestseller list does not exist? |
2012-04-02 22:27 | Diff · History | 12 | clarified what the source actually claims: the 2 million figure was a limited time offer |
2012-04-02 22:22 | Diff · History | 46 | grammar. quant tag. some e-books do not allow font changes (e.g. PDF) |
2012-04-02 20:46 | Diff · History | 34 | this pro-and-con section is getting large and suffers from several of these problems |
2012-03-29 07:59 | Diff · History | 38 | reliable source for the idefix.com blurb? (gif rendering of an unnamed source) |
2012-03-09 20:23 | Diff · History | -10 | Amazon is a rival to only one defendant in the suit (the rest have a supply relationship) |
2012-03-09 20:21 | Diff · History | 452 | clarified that the potential lawsuit names 6 defendants, including Apple (edited with ProveIt) |
2012-02-06 05:52 | Diff · History | -93 | neutralized opinion and clarified timeframe |
2012-02-06 05:43 | Diff · History | 27 | "five of the six largest publishers" fact is not verifiable with given references |
2012-02-06 01:23 | Diff · History | -161 | removed non-notable link (blog entry that isn't directly supporting any article claims) |
2012-02-06 01:19 | Diff · History | 32 | dead link in reference |
2012-02-01 20:35 | Diff · History | -95 | reverted ext link in middle of section, without explanation of its relevance |
2012-01-28 07:53 | Diff · History | 847 | added and cited additional example of the "inventor of e-books". made text reflect fact that who and when e-books began is not widely agreed upon. |
2012-01-28 07:29 | Diff · History | 351 | +refs for missing amazon & sony format support (edited with ProveIt) |
2012-01-28 07:20 | Diff · History | 25 | need verifiability for "coined the term" fact |
2012-01-28 07:18 | Diff · History | 27 | this is not a place to present persuasion or argument, so a reliable source is necessary to verify the "first e-book" claim |
2012-01-24 03:01 | Diff · History | 1,606 | removed opinion and blog link (not reliable source). added basic format list. |
2012-01-22 22:40 | Diff · History | 833 | timeline: +iBooks Author, textbook section of iBooks bookstore |
All times are in UTC.