Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
Article | Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention (Log · Page History) |
User | David Tornheim (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 24 |
Minor edits | 2 (8.3%) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
atbe1 | 27.7 |
Added (bytes)2 | 22,490 |
Deleted (bytes) | -1 |
Minor edits
·
2 (8.3%)
Major edits
·
22 (91.7%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
24 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
24 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
---|---|---|---|
2019-01-01 23:41 | Diff · History | -1 | →Break for the New Year: fix typos |
2019-01-01 23:39 | Diff · History | 1,428 | →Break for the New Year: reply about espistemology |
2019-01-01 21:53 | Diff · History | 855 | →Break for the New Year: reply about epistemology |
2019-01-01 21:49 | Diff · History | 14 | →Break for the New Year: fix indent |
2019-01-01 21:09 | Diff · History | 235 | →Break for the New Year: reply |
2019-01-01 21:00 | Diff · History | 884 | →Break for the New Year: Foucault and power-knowledge |
2019-01-01 19:07 | Diff · History | 294 | →Break for the New Year: random article takes you to obscure sports person |
2019-01-01 19:03 | Diff · History | 477 | →Break for the New Year: reply about low notability requirements for some subjects |
2018-12-31 15:00 | Diff · History | 681 | thanks for that excellent post. |
2017-04-16 00:49 | Diff · History | 714 | →By advising editors to "be bold" and that there are "no rules", aren't we encouraging disruptive behavior, which might needlessly cause them to be banned?: thank respondents |
2017-03-26 08:04 | Diff · History | 7 | →New Editors who cite to BOLD + IGNORE all the rules -> entrapment?: striking all my comments here -- was mistake to mention the particular user |
2017-03-26 08:00 | Diff · History | 2,790 | →By advising editors to "be bold" and that there are "no rules", aren't we encouraging disruptive behavior, which might needlessly cause them to be banned?: new section |
2017-03-25 16:35 | Diff · History | 2,263 | →R.I.P. -- Lost Editors / MIA / Retired / Banned, etc.: reply |
2017-03-25 10:02 | Diff · History | 1,548 | →R.I.P. -- Lost Editors / MIA / Retired / Banned, etc.: new section |
2017-03-25 09:36 | Diff · History | 31 | →New Editors who cite to BOLD + IGNORE all the rules -> entrapment?: ce |
2017-03-25 09:35 | Diff · History | 55 | →New Editors who cite to BOLD + IGNORE all the rules -> entrapment?: struck comments about giving any examples -- apparently examples are a mistake |
2017-03-25 09:33 | Diff · History | 2 | →New Editors who cite to BOLD + IGNORE all the rules -> entrapment?: Move the hatting to only include the "squabble" |
2017-03-24 03:14 | Diff · History | 25 | →Long term planning: add wikicite to Metro Police Act 1829 |
2017-03-24 03:12 | Diff · History | 1,012 | →Long term planning: good commentary! |
2017-03-23 17:35 | Diff · History | 2,472 | →Long term planning: ideas |
2017-03-11 12:05 | Diff · History | 823 | →New Editors who cite to BOLD + IGNORE all the rules -> entrapment?: |
2017-03-11 07:13 | Diff · History | 819 | →New Editors who cite to BOLD + IGNORE all the rules -> entrapment?: |
2017-03-08 21:12 | Diff · History | 2,781 | →New Editors who cite to BOLD + IGNORE all the rules -> entrapment?: new section |
2017-03-08 07:06 | Diff · History | 2,280 | →Editor driven into retirement: thought on Anne Delong's post |
All times are in UTC.