Anterior
David Tornheim
•
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Genetically modified organisms
•
en.wikipedia.org
Mayores ediciones d'un artículu
Toles ediciones feches a una páxina por un usuariu, n'orde cronolóxicu.
Artículu | Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Genetically modified organisms (Rexistru · Historial de páxina) |
Usuariu | David Tornheim (Contador d'ediciones· Máx. ediciones) |
Total d'ediciones | 125 |
Ediciones menores | 8 (6,4%) |
Ediciones (semi)automatizaes | 0 (0%) |
Ediciones revertíes | 0 (0%) |
atbe1 | 0,4 |
Añadío (bytes)2 | 110.238 |
Desaniciao (bytes) | -453 |
Ediciones menores
·
8 (6,4%)
Ediciones mayores
·
117 (93,6%)
Ediciones (semi)automatizaes
·
0 (0%)
Ediciones manuales
·
125 (100%)
Ediciones revertíes
·
0 (0%)
Ediciones ensin desfacer
·
125 (100%)
1 Tiempu mediu entre ediciones (díes)
2 El testu amestáu ye cualquier añadíu positivu que nun se desficiera (aproximao)
Data | Enllaces | Tamañu | Comentariu |
---|---|---|---|
2016-07-09 02:26 | Diff · Historial | 136 | →Note about template: agree |
2016-07-09 02:25 | Diff · Historial | 1.191 | →Note about template: I agree with Dialectric that spamming the statement with DS to non-previously identified articles is a potential problem |
2016-07-07 10:46 | Diff · Historial | 445 | →Domingo 2016 review (and RS it cites) makes this RfC Stale: thank Petra re: availability of full text; note: other literature reviews mentioned in Domingo not considered in this RfC |
2016-07-07 10:28 | Diff · Historial | 93 | →New review by Domingo: add new section titles --> /* Domingo 2016 review (and RS it cites) makes this RfC Stale */ /*Transgenic Soybeans*/ |
2016-07-07 02:15 | Diff · Historial | 827 | →New review by Domingo: why is call for long term study absent from proposals? |
2016-07-07 01:53 | Diff · Historial | 168 | →New review by Domingo: add more diffs |
2016-07-07 01:48 | Diff · Historial | 586 | →New review by Domingo: 143 results for search of Domingo / diffs |
2016-07-07 01:36 | Diff · Historial | 1.348 | →New review by Domingo: the release of this study on eve of RfC's closing causes the RfC to be stale if not re-opened for comment on the new RS |
2016-07-02 21:32 | Diff · Historial | 3.942 | →On the existence of "scientific consensus": response to SM Candlish |
2016-07-01 21:17 | Diff · Historial | 338 | →On the existence of "scientific consensus": which RS are you using? |
2016-06-30 09:13 | Diff · Historial | 454 | →Notice of release: |
2016-06-30 08:35 | Diff · Historial | -282 | →On the existence of "scientific consensus": fix Snell ref |
2016-06-30 08:22 | Diff · Historial | 116 | →On the existence of "scientific consensus": citation template for Maghari |
2016-06-30 08:16 | Diff · Historial | 307 | →On the existence of "scientific consensus": journal citation for Zhang |
2016-06-30 08:13 | Diff · Historial | 70 | →On the existence of "scientific consensus": note that two reviews were added |
2016-06-30 08:10 | Diff · Historial | 339 | →On the existence of "scientific consensus": add Zhang quotes |
2016-06-30 08:00 | Diff · Historial | 795 | →On the existence of "scientific consensus": add maghari + quotes |
2016-06-30 07:48 | Diff · Historial | -78 | →On the existence of "scientific consensus": add EFSA quotes |
2016-06-30 07:36 | Diff · Historial | 208 | →On the existence of "scientific consensus": add quote from Bawa; reformat quote from previous item |
2016-06-30 07:24 | Diff · Historial | 554 | →On the existence of "scientific consensus": add quote from Magana-Gomez |
2016-06-30 07:13 | Diff · Historial | 531 | →On the existence of "scientific consensus": improve Domingo quotes |
2016-06-29 05:58 | Diff · Historial | 577 | →On the existence of "scientific consensus": add meta data and link to Snell |
2016-06-29 05:49 | Diff · Historial | 414 | →On the existence of "scientific consensus": improve Nicolia quotes |
2016-06-27 09:42 | Diff · Historial | 169 | →On the existence of "scientific consensus": point to discussion of the origin of the "scientific agreement" language |
2016-06-27 08:33 | Diff · Historial | 485 | →More on sources (from Opabinia): RS A -> RS B logic does not work to discredit RS C. |
2016-06-27 06:29 | Diff · Historial | 3.532 | →Geographical examination of sources: yes, looking at the RS is the correct way to do it |
2016-06-27 03:28 | Diff · Historial | 3.527 | →On the existence of "scientific consensus": response to SM Candlish |
2016-06-26 22:29 | Diff · Historial | -1 | →On the existence of "scientific consensus": ce |
2016-06-26 22:19 | Diff · Historial | 7.634 | →On the existence of "scientific consensus": new section |
2016-06-25 07:51 | Diff · Historial | 1.645 | →Panchin: agree with Petrarcha47 |
2016-06-25 06:59 | Diff · Historial | 271 | →Inquiry to JerryRussell: Proposal 21 looks good |
2016-06-25 06:56 | Diff · Historial | 1.077 | →JerryRussell: request for how to address concerns in revised proposal 20 |
2016-06-23 20:23 | Diff · Historial | 1.438 | →More on sources (from Opabinia): agree with Petrarch47 |
2016-06-23 19:54 | Diff · Historial | 906 | →More on sources (from Opabinia): Domingo is not the only review study of GMO food safety that shows concerns |
2016-06-23 14:37 | Diff · Historial | 586 | →Geographical examination of sources: |
2016-06-23 07:34 | Diff · Historial | -34 | →Current Version of Prop. 20: ce |
2016-06-23 07:28 | Diff · Historial | 283 | →Current Version of Prop. 20: ce |
2016-06-23 07:23 | Diff · Historial | 111 | →Current Version of Prop. 20: add Maghari |
2016-06-23 07:20 | Diff · Historial | 513 | →Current Version of Prop. 20: add more review articles |
2016-06-23 06:36 | Diff · Historial | 826 | →Inquiry to CCamp2013: thanks for feedback |
2016-06-23 06:30 | Diff · Historial | 2.584 | →Geographical examination of sources: science is not the same everywhere |
2016-06-23 05:14 | Diff · Historial | 1.340 | →Inquiry to CCamp2013: |
2016-06-22 21:39 | Diff · Historial | 7 | →Current Version of Prop. 20: strike "american approach" |
2016-06-22 21:37 | Diff · Historial | 152 | →Proposal 20 -- Revision of Proposal 4 (currently a Work-in-Progress): thanks |
2016-06-22 19:51 | Diff · Historial | 579 | →Current Version of Prop. 20: last sentence |
2016-06-22 19:47 | Diff · Historial | 201 | →Current Version of Prop. 20: how to address the concern? |
2016-06-22 19:01 | Diff · Historial | 641 | →Caution about "as food," labeling: Food safety yes. |
2016-06-22 18:53 | Diff · Historial | 479 | →Geographical examination of sources: |
2016-06-22 18:46 | Diff · Historial | 235 | →Geographical examination of sources: I do not believe the Panchin Paper was published in Russia |
2016-06-21 15:54 | Diff · Historial | 7 | →Current Version of Prop. 20: kill see also |
2016-06-21 15:47 | Diff · Historial | 239 | →Proposal 20 -- Revision of Proposal 4 (currently a Work-in-Progress): ping Hexafluoride |
2016-06-21 15:43 | Diff · Historial | 134 | →Proposal 20 -- Revision of Proposal 4 (currently a Work-in-Progress): ping Montanabw |
2016-06-21 15:42 | Diff · Historial | -17 | →Proposal 20: remove header |
2016-06-21 15:41 | Diff · Historial | 14.280 | →Proposal 20 -- Revision of Proposal 4 (currently a Work-in-Progress): per Montanabw's request |
2016-06-21 05:06 | Diff · Historial | 798 | →Way too many proposals: add more on having too many proposals |
2016-06-21 04:49 | Diff · Historial | 625 | →Proposal 20 -- Revision of Proposal 4 (currently a Work-in-Progress): re: Colonel_Wilhelm_Klink's comments |
2016-06-21 04:41 | Diff · Historial | 137 | →Proposal 20 -- Revision of Proposal 4 (currently a Work-in-Progress): another ping |
2016-06-21 04:40 | Diff · Historial | 355 | →Proposal 20 -- Revision of Proposal 4 (currently a Work-in-Progress): |
2016-06-21 04:34 | Diff · Historial | -3 | →Proposal 20 -- Revision of Proposal 4 (currently a Work-in-Progress): add some other possibly changes to consider |
2016-06-21 04:34 | Diff · Historial | 203 | →Proposal 20 -- Revision of Proposal 4 (currently a Work-in-Progress): |
2016-06-21 04:23 | Diff · Historial | 62 | →Proposal 20 -- Revision of Proposal 4 (currently a Work-in-Progress): ce |
2016-06-21 04:18 | Diff · Historial | 1.076 | →Proposal 20 -- Revision of Proposal 4 (currently a Work-in-Progress): new section |
2016-06-21 01:03 | Diff · Historial | 55 | →Way too many proposals: ce |
2016-06-21 01:00 | Diff · Historial | 155 | →Way too many proposals: ce |
2016-06-21 00:57 | Diff · Historial | 545 | →Way too many proposals: ce |
2016-06-21 00:51 | Diff · Historial | 566 | →Way too many proposals: agree |
2016-06-18 20:01 | Diff · Historial | 533 | →More on sources (from Opabinia): RS needs to be provided for wild nasty claims about scientists |
2016-06-18 12:45 | Diff · Historial | 47 | →Domingo: add wikilink to discussion of Bonferroni method in our Post-Hoc Analysis article |
2016-06-18 12:43 | Diff · Historial | 1.477 | →Panchin/Tzuhikov v. Domingo: duplicate comments from above about conservative nature of Bonferroni method |
2016-06-18 12:36 | Diff · Historial | 1.400 | →Domingo: response about use of the "conservative" Bonferroni adjustments |
2016-06-18 02:38 | Diff · Historial | 1.975 | →Panchin/Tzuhikov v. Domingo: new section |
2016-06-18 01:52 | Diff · Historial | 177 | →Domingo: Reiterated Question to Kingoface43: Where does Panchin cited Domingo? |
2016-06-17 21:21 | Diff · Historial | 2.619 | →More on sources (from Opabinia): response to Capeo |
2016-06-17 20:03 | Diff · Historial | 1.536 | →The narrow scope of this RfC: inappropriate allegations the high quality RS is "fringe" |
2016-06-17 19:28 | Diff · Historial | 285 | →The narrow scope of this RfC: agree with Mark Bassett's analysis in point 1 |
2016-06-17 00:13 | Diff · Historial | 1.817 | →Question for Collect Re Proposal 4: response to claim 6 about "no signficiant health hazards" |
2016-06-14 09:17 | Diff · Historial | 3.195 | →More on sources (from Opabinia): response to Opabinia |
2016-06-14 08:09 | Diff · Historial | 216 | →More on sources (from Opabinia): mention of using GMOs for eliminating allergies |
2016-06-11 23:25 | Diff · Historial | 0 | →On RS -- Rhododendrites: ce |
2016-06-11 23:22 | Diff · Historial | 1.853 | →On RS -- Rhododendrites: assertions that Domingo and Krimsky are "fringe" have been made |
2016-06-11 22:53 | Diff · Historial | 1.668 | →On RS -- Rhododendrites: new section |
2016-06-09 05:08 | Diff · Historial | 311 | →Lack of Notification: thank aircorn |
2016-06-09 04:29 | Diff · Historial | 1.124 | →Proposal 11: new section |
2016-06-09 04:12 | Diff · Historial | 746 | →Warnings in Notifications: Lack of Notification |
2016-06-09 04:03 | Diff · Historial | -5 | →This amused me.: fix organization of sections |
2016-06-09 04:01 | Diff · Historial | 2 | →Warnings in Notifications: fix as subsction |
2016-06-09 04:01 | Diff · Historial | 36 | →Notifications: create new subsection: "Warnings in Notifications" |
2016-06-09 03:59 | Diff · Historial | 554 | →Notifications: agree with removing warnings |
2016-06-09 03:47 | Diff · Historial | 983 | →Question for Collect Re Proposal 4: new section |
2016-06-09 02:51 | Diff · Historial | 1.820 | →A shorter Proposal 1?: No. I do not oppose Proposal 1 in "any form". It is much better than what in the articles right now. |
2016-06-09 02:15 | Diff · Historial | -2 | →A shorter Proposal 1?: changed indentation so I can respond directly to Q |
2016-06-08 21:01 | Diff · Historial | 242 | →Question to Moderators: Is threaded discussion and >800 words acceptable here?: please stop unnecessary requests of review of my comments. |
2016-06-08 20:57 | Diff · Historial | 28 | →A shorter Proposal 1?: ce |
2016-06-08 20:56 | Diff · Historial | 227 | →A shorter Proposal 1?: My vote is no. |
2016-06-08 20:34 | Diff · Historial | 666 | →Question to Moderators: Is threaded discussion and >800 words acceptable here?: |
2016-06-08 19:03 | Diff · Historial | 1.346 | →Question to Moderators: Is threaded discussion and >800 words acceptable here?: new section |
2016-06-07 05:45 | Diff · Historial | 62 | →Creation of this RfC (rules, organization, timing, etc.): add 2 more |
2016-06-07 05:34 | Diff · Historial | 357 | →Creation of this RfC (rules, organization, timing, etc.): add 3 more locations of open discussions |
2016-06-07 05:18 | Diff · Historial | 1 | →Creation of this RfC (rules, organization, timing, etc.): changed history link to right before move |
2016-06-07 05:09 | Diff · Historial | 180 | →Creation of this RfC (rules, organization, timing, etc.): simplify link; add history |
2016-06-07 04:55 | Diff · Historial | 392 | →Creation of this RfC (rules, organization, timing, etc.): new section |
2016-06-02 23:07 | Diff · Historial | 2.360 | →Time to proceed: okay with timetable; please address dispute over Q1 |
2016-06-02 20:21 | Diff · Historial | 158 | →Simple is best: yes, please include WHO statement as another proposal |
2016-06-02 20:05 | Diff · Historial | -25 | →Simple is best: ce |
2016-06-02 20:03 | Diff · Historial | 3 | →Simple is best: change from u -> ping |
2016-06-02 20:02 | Diff · Historial | 458 | →Simple is best: regarding SlimVirgin's question about what the case-by-case phrase is about |
2016-06-01 15:04 | Diff · Historial | 1.649 | →Concerns about wording of questions: agreement unravelled |
2016-05-28 19:20 | Diff · Historial | 1.225 | →Concerns about wording of questions: It looks like we may have an agreement |
2016-05-28 18:26 | Diff · Historial | 616 | →Concerns about wording of questions: offering compromise language that incorporates ideas from Tryptofish and The Wordsmith |
2016-05-28 18:06 | Diff · Historial | 750 | →Concerns about wording of questions: disagree |
2016-05-27 06:58 | Diff · Historial | 515 | →Concerns about wording of questions: yes, Q1 should be eliminated or changed to "Should the language in the articles be changed?" |
2016-05-27 06:46 | Diff · Historial | 93 | →Concerns about wording of questions: more specific wikinks |
2016-05-27 06:39 | Diff · Historial | -1 | ce |
2016-05-27 06:38 | Diff · Historial | 1.140 | →Concerns about wording of questions: response to King |
2016-05-26 23:41 | Diff · Historial | 738 | →Concerns about wording of questions: citation overkill issue |
2016-05-26 23:23 | Diff · Historial | 1.591 | →Concerns about wording of questions: response to Tryptofish |
2016-05-26 21:56 | Diff · Historial | 16 | →Concerns about wording of questions: ce |
2016-05-26 21:54 | Diff · Historial | 1.887 | →Concerns about wording of questions: response to Trypto |
2016-05-26 21:30 | Diff · Historial | -5 | fix indents |
2016-05-26 21:28 | Diff · Historial | 3.129 | →Concerns about wording of questions: response to king |
2016-05-26 15:52 | Diff · Historial | 2 | →Concerns about wording of questions: ce |
2016-05-26 15:51 | Diff · Historial | 530 | →Concerns about wording of questions: location of conversation |
2016-05-18 04:45 | Diff · Historial | 1.271 | →Proposal 6: << unacceptable |
2016-05-18 03:38 | Diff · Historial | 228 | →Choice of Closing Admins: |
2016-05-18 03:24 | Diff · Historial | 2.107 | →Choice of Closing Admins: new section |
Toles hores tán en UTC.