Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
Article | Andy Ngo (Log · Page History) |
User | Wikieditor19920 (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 75 |
Minor edits | 0 (0%) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 4 (5.3%) |
Reverted edits | 12 (16%) |
atbe1 | 0.7 |
Added (bytes)2 | 8,314 |
Deleted (bytes) | -8,536 |
Minor edits
·
0 (0%)
Major edits
·
75 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
4 (5.3%)
Manual edits
·
71 (94.7%)
Reverted edits
·
12 (16%)
Unreverted edits
·
63 (84%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
---|---|---|---|
2020-10-25 18:16 | Diff · History | 296 | (reverted) Vox reported he was assaulted by counterprotesters, current wording seems to suggest "Proud Boys" attacked Ngo |
2020-10-24 03:49 | Diff · History | 2 | →Assault during coverage of the Proud Boys rally and counter protest: WP:SYNTH Media confirms he was attacked by counter protesters, don't juxtapose like this . . . |
2020-10-24 03:48 | Diff · History | 404 | →Assault during coverage of the Proud Boys rally: This is so misleading -- it almost reads like the "Proud Boys" assaulted Ngo. It has been confirmed in the media that counterprotesters were the attackers, even though they have not been identified individually |
2020-10-24 03:46 | Diff · History | 14 | blue links, further edits |
2020-10-24 03:44 | Diff · History | 96 | Fixes needed here -- first, dont link the Quillette departure to the "Proud Boys" coverage -- inadequate sourcing. also, include the full context of what he was fired for, his response, and why this resulted in national profile |
2020-10-24 03:27 | Diff · History | -1,089 | Block quote are not appropriate for the lead. |
2020-10-22 12:05 | Diff · History | -1,435 | These changes are completely out of whack with the sources and defamatory |
2020-10-20 02:56 | Diff · History | 17 | |
2020-10-20 02:55 | Diff · History | 11 | |
2020-10-20 02:55 | Diff · History | 4 | |
2020-10-20 02:54 | Diff · History | 379 | Re-adding portions, citing Daily Beast |
2020-10-20 02:50 | Diff · History | 302 | Sourcing lead, language needs to better reflect sources |
2020-10-20 02:46 | Diff · History | 20 | His testimony was broader than this |
2020-10-20 02:44 | Diff · History | -49 | Remove the piece about Quillette -- they confirmed the incident was entirely unrelated to his departure |
2020-10-20 02:43 | Diff · History | 4 | Undid revision 984417840 by Bacondrum (talk) False, and against consensus on the talk page |
2020-10-18 13:22 | Diff · History | 34 | WP:CLAIM |
2020-10-18 13:19 | Diff · History | -381 | Again, there is NO CONSENSUS for this "Proud Boys" paragraph. These are unverified and salacious allegations, which have been disproven by other reporting. |
2020-10-18 13:18 | Diff · History | -544 | We discussed moving these to the body |
2020-10-17 07:21 | Diff · History | 343 | (reverted) Undid revision 983951150 by Wikieditor19920 (talk) You know what -- I'm just going to self-revert here and not perpetuate the 1RR violations. Reports will be filed at AE. |
2020-10-17 07:19 | Diff · History | -343 | (reverted) You are both violating 1RR. Restoring to last version by NBSB. |
2020-10-17 05:25 | Diff · History | -17 | covering a counter protest |
2020-10-17 02:48 | Diff · History | 56 | WP:CLAIM, name the publication |
2020-10-17 02:47 | Diff · History | 35 | Restoring this part of the lead from a few weeks ago -- think this is appropriate to include |
2020-10-17 02:47 | Diff · History | 468 | citation |
2020-10-17 02:42 | Diff · History | 2 | →Patriot Prayer and antifa conflict: --> presence at dueling counter protests |
2020-10-17 02:42 | Diff · History | 14 | Canada gets a blue |
2020-10-17 02:41 | Diff · History | 31 | Clarifying here, blue is not necessary for a common phrase (I originally blued this, now changing my mind0 |
2020-10-17 02:40 | Diff · History | -2 | Antifa is treated as a proper noun, rewording headings |
2020-10-17 02:39 | Diff · History | -2,617 | describe his career in sequence rather than putting criticisms at the top |
2020-10-17 02:38 | Diff · History | -465 | Contentious claims with poor sourcing do not belong in the lead |
2020-10-06 22:04 | Diff · History | -80 | (reverted) Undid revision 982229948 by 65.254.109.1 (talk) RV random IP restoring errors into article. |
2020-10-06 13:32 | Diff · History | -80 | (reverted) Show me another page where we identify political ideology in the opening line. And "Proud Boys" incident is barely related to Ngo and completely unwarranted for the lead of this piece. |
2020-10-06 13:31 | Diff · History | -777 | (reverted) Clear developing consensus against "provocateur." |
2020-10-05 04:37 | Diff · History | 10 | Undid revision 981917997 by Wikieditor19920 (talk) Realized I went over 1RR - reverting |
2020-10-05 04:33 | Diff · History | -10 | (reverted) The "longstanding version" was not that, it was in the reverse order and did not use the phrase activist. These phrases are under discussion on the talk page. |
2020-10-05 04:00 | Diff · History | -97 | Restoring stable version as requested by Springee |
2020-10-05 02:27 | Diff · History | 1,643 | Partial restore |
2020-10-01 17:32 | Diff · History | -323 | (reverted) 1RR violation (see DS) and potential BLP vio. Reverting. |
2020-09-15 20:40 | Diff · History | -478 | Do not make false accusations of blanking, do not restore this without establishing consensus. |
2020-09-14 19:58 | Diff · History | 12 | He did not have a "confrontation" with the activists -- the press reported that he was assaulted. Watch the wording. |
2020-09-14 19:54 | Diff · History | 27 | Again, mentioning that the "unidentified attackers" are unidentified is redundant, poor writing. These changes do not have consensus are are not the quality of writing necessary for the lead |
2020-09-14 19:53 | Diff · History | -712 | Removing undue emphasis on reporting on allegations from second-tier sources -- there is no consensus for this. Mentioning that he live-streams protests while already mentioning that he covers them is completely redundant. |
2020-09-13 18:42 | Diff · History | 39 | (reverted) Please cite this material. |
2020-09-13 16:46 | Diff · History | -1,346 | (reverted) I don't think so -- bring it to talk. More POV nonsense ruining a well-balanced & well-written lead |
2020-09-12 21:51 | Diff · History | -340 | (reverted) Attl subheading, moving material around |
2020-09-10 16:14 | Diff · History | 27 | more blue |
2020-09-10 16:14 | Diff · History | 19 | |
2020-09-10 16:13 | Diff · History | 34 | |
2020-09-10 16:12 | Diff · History | 34 | |
2020-09-10 16:11 | Diff · History | 6 | |
2020-09-10 16:10 | Diff · History | 4 | blue |
2020-09-10 16:10 | Diff · History | 989 | Updating lead, offering full accounting of events up to, during, and after firing |
2020-09-09 03:31 | Diff · History | -24 | Removing tautology |
2020-09-09 01:55 | Diff · History | 54 | There is no way you can not include the conservative influence in his notoriety, it is now in the body and can be summarized in the lead |
2020-09-07 16:15 | Diff · History | 16 | |
2020-09-07 13:49 | Diff · History | -1 | |
2020-09-07 13:17 | Diff · History | 450 | details of assault |
2020-09-07 13:15 | Diff · History | 2 | activists seems better word |
2020-09-07 11:25 | Diff · History | 0 | Editor-at-large is hyphenated |
2020-09-07 11:19 | Diff · History | -337 | We don't base career labels on single biased opinion pieces, and BuzzFeed is a poor quality source -- NyT, Vox, WaPo call him a journalist and not an "activist" |
2020-09-07 09:59 | Diff · History | -56 | shortening |
2020-09-07 09:57 | Diff · History | 3 | grammar |
2020-09-07 09:56 | Diff · History | 49 | Clarifying |
2020-09-07 09:15 | Diff · History | -3 | fixing wording |
2020-09-07 09:14 | Diff · History | 2 | Other editors have agreed breaking this into 3rd paragraph is necessary -- inserting compromise on who he was assaulted by, attributing the blame of "antifa" to statements by Ngo while providing context |
2020-09-07 09:12 | Diff · History | 675 | Check the source—the conservative reaction to the firing—whatever you think of it—is WHY the subject gained national attention, not just the firing alone—to omit this wholly neutral, sourced fact is to remove key parts of the subject's background and public profile |
2020-09-07 09:00 | Diff · History | -98 | This is literally false garbage based on an exaggeration of limited sources, DO NOT restore this now-challenged and misleading material |
2020-09-06 03:00 | Diff · History | 590 | Partial restore, see talk |
2020-09-04 22:08 | Diff · History | -32 | further language edits |
2020-09-04 22:07 | Diff · History | 17 | fixing language |
2020-09-04 22:06 | Diff · History | 11 | Fixing language |
2020-09-04 20:23 | Diff · History | 891 | Expanding lead, antifa confrontation |
2020-09-04 20:19 | Diff · History | 856 | Article inadequately summarizes opposing points of views in disputes that seem to be central to many themes of this BLP |
2020-09-04 20:14 | Diff · History | -99 | Excuse me -- where in the article does it point to these "alleged" connections as a result of his national profile? Can't find it! And "involved" is not the word, there's no indication he was a participating combatant -- injured is the correct descriptor |
2020-09-01 12:37 | Diff · History | 11 | (reverted) Is this really why he was known, or are these criticisms that were charged based on probing his background after the main event |
All times are in UTC.