Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
Article | Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship (Log · Page History) |
User | Ryan Vesey (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 45 |
Minor edits | 1 (2.2%) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 4 (8.9%) |
Reverted edits | 4 (8.9%) |
atbe1 | 14.6 |
Added (bytes)2 | 19,443 |
Deleted (bytes) | -288 |
Minor edits
·
1 (2.2%)
Major edits
·
44 (97.8%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
4 (8.9%)
Manual edits
·
41 (91.1%)
Reverted edits
·
4 (8.9%)
Unreverted edits
·
41 (91.1%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
---|---|---|---|
2013-04-01 18:26 | Diff · History | -1 | →April 1: fix red link |
2013-04-01 18:25 | Diff · History | 375 | →April 1: please no deletions/proper solution |
2012-10-17 19:19 | Diff · History | 164 | →RfC: yep |
2012-08-12 07:01 | Diff · History | 296 | →Minimum requirements: cmt |
2012-07-27 22:22 | Diff · History | 206 | →Live Table Suggestion: admin dashboard? |
2012-07-27 21:58 | Diff · History | 340 | →Blast of nostalgia: grab a nom and get on the other page |
2012-07-01 18:28 | Diff · History | 250 | →Drive by "voting": comment on editor review |
2012-06-23 05:44 | Diff · History | 516 | →Nominators creating RfAs and RfBs: sorry about that, a bit of miscommunication on my part |
2012-06-22 15:15 | Diff · History | 290 | →Nominators creating RfAs and RfBs: good point |
2012-06-22 15:06 | Diff · History | 481 | →Nominators creating RfAs and RfBs: new section |
2012-06-20 18:51 | Diff · History | 389 | →Request for comments about whether the RFA process should be changed: re and fixing red link |
2012-06-20 18:33 | Diff · History | 548 | →Request for comments about whether the RFA process should be changed: cmt |
2012-06-13 14:35 | Diff · History | -287 | Undid revision 497400862 by Ryan Vesey (talk) I find my comment unneccessary |
2012-06-13 14:34 | Diff · History | 287 | (reverted) →What if it is broke, but you can't fix it?: cmt |
2012-05-21 15:40 | Diff · History | 355 | →Admin's open to Recall: When it is allowed, not a community thing |
2012-05-21 15:13 | Diff · History | 435 | →Admin's open to Recall: comment |
2012-05-20 04:28 | Diff · History | 252 | →Kindly request: WP:AN? |
2012-05-16 19:29 | Diff · History | 1,469 | →Minimum requirement: Response to Leaky Cauldron with data |
2012-05-16 18:43 | Diff · History | 701 | →Minimum requirement: reply to Leaky Caldron |
2012-05-16 12:40 | Diff · History | 716 | →Minimum requirement: 2 comments |
2012-05-16 04:14 | Diff · History | 591 | →Minimum requirement: reply to kudpung |
2012-05-16 03:58 | Diff · History | 623 | →Minimum requirement: comment |
2012-05-16 03:05 | Diff · History | 393 | →Minimum requirement: cmt |
2012-05-16 03:02 | Diff · History | 24 | →Requests for adminship/Dannyboy1209: creating new section heading since this is a separate topic |
2012-05-16 03:01 | Diff · History | 508 | →Requests for adminship/Dannyboy1209: comment |
2012-05-16 02:48 | Diff · History | 388 | →Requests for adminship/Dannyboy1209: We need to have an RFC on this |
2012-05-16 02:35 | Diff · History | 784 | →Requests for adminship/Dannyboy1209: comment |
2012-05-08 16:11 | Diff · History | 543 | →So an Idea just struck me:: similar to my idea from last August |
2011-12-24 04:22 | Diff · History | 519 | (reverted) Undid revision 467444035 by Prodego (talk) I don't remember when we decided that guidelines don't apply to administrators, if you don't like it use Template:RPA |
2011-12-24 04:05 | Diff · History | 519 | (reverted) Undid revision 467419243 by Franamax (talk) Per WP:TPO Don't remove Kiefer's comments, you can hide it or ask him to refer it but don't remove it yourself |
2011-08-29 01:27 | Diff · History | 328 | →Changes to policy: comment to sandy |
2011-08-25 06:18 | Diff · History | 525 | →User talk:Jimbo Wales#RfA decision: comments and replies |
2011-07-22 02:34 | Diff · History | 418 | →Run Strat's got an idea: great idea |
2011-07-17 22:00 | Diff · History | 505 | →RfC on reconfirmation RfA standards: agree with Monty |
2011-07-11 15:05 | Diff · History | 347 | →Should he be able to do this?: commenting on Robofish |
2011-07-11 00:10 | Diff · History | 356 | →Should he be able to do this?: new section |
2011-07-08 15:59 | Diff · History | 112,292 | (reverted) Reverted 1 edit by Thanh T. Tran (talk) identified as vandalism to last revision by RL0919. (TW) |
2011-07-01 03:10 | Diff · History | 695 | →Why RFA is broken: Maybe RFA isn't broken, but it still isn't perfect |
2011-06-30 02:16 | Diff · History | 259 | →Why RFA is broken: response |
2011-06-29 13:30 | Diff · History | 173 | →Why RFA is broken: I'm gonna be gone |
2011-06-29 13:28 | Diff · History | 1,842 | →Why RFA is broken: new section |
2011-06-24 20:21 | Diff · History | 441 | →What would you who do if the vandal situation stopped?: Forced registration would break the encyclopedia |
2011-06-18 13:12 | Diff · History | 364 | →Why does it show 4 opposes for Curtis23?: new section |
2011-06-16 18:58 | Diff · History | 1,115 | →What would you who do if the vandal situation stopped?: Reply |
2011-06-13 01:24 | Diff · History | 438 | →Wikipedia is not broken enough: comment |
All times are in UTC.