Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
Article | Kosovo Verification Mission (Log · Page History) |
User | Oranges Juicy (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 27 |
Minor edits | 2 (7.4%) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 7 (25.9%) |
Reverted edits | 3 (11.1%) |
atbe1 | 5.1 |
Added (bytes)2 | 1,128 |
Deleted (bytes) | -1,450 |
Minor edits
·
2 (7.4%)
Major edits
·
25 (92.6%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
7 (25.9%)
Manual edits
·
20 (74.1%)
Reverted edits
·
3 (11.1%)
Unreverted edits
·
24 (88.9%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
---|---|---|---|
2015-11-30 09:53 | Diff · History | -2 | →Operations: |
2015-11-30 09:53 | Diff · History | -470 | →Operations: rm quote per WP:COATRACK, the is about KVM and not Račak incident, furthermore the testament of Walker is very widely challenged in many sources |
2015-07-24 05:49 | Diff · History | -12 | Reverted edits by 195.99.196.131 (talk) to last version by Oranges Juicy |
2015-07-22 21:25 | Diff · History | 184 | Undid revision 672629513 by Bobrayner (talk). In a word, rubbish, and try reading the talk page |
2015-07-21 00:44 | Diff · History | 186 | Undid revision 672337252 by Bobrayner (talk). Neutral it was, state was called Yugoslavia |
2015-07-20 11:20 | Diff · History | 0 | →Withdrawal: |
2015-07-20 11:19 | Diff · History | 65 | →Withdrawal: three should be enough, feel free to have their reliability checked |
2015-07-20 11:14 | Diff · History | 61 | →Withdrawal: another... |
2015-07-20 11:13 | Diff · History | 0 | →Withdrawal: |
2015-07-20 11:12 | Diff · History | 69 | →Withdrawal: adding source |
2015-07-20 10:57 | Diff · History | -9 | Reverted edits by OppositeGradient (talk) to last version by Oranges Juicy |
2015-07-20 10:40 | Diff · History | -9 | (reverted) Reverted to revision 672231547 by Oranges Juicy (talk): Source explicitly uses "Serb" where Yugoslav is correct, in other words it is a lexicon issue. (TW) |
2015-07-20 05:54 | Diff · History | -11 | →Withdrawal: or how about avoid? |
2015-07-20 05:53 | Diff · History | 1 | that's as may be but "forces" alone does not specify where this was paramilitary or police. But we do know the affiliation was to the state. Furthermore no pages number are given and the source format cannot be managed |
2015-07-19 09:26 | Diff · History | 369 | Or maybe I was reading it wrong |
2015-07-19 09:25 | Diff · History | -369 | (reverted) hang on, this is a duplicate, same thing said twice on short article. Compressing |
2015-07-19 09:23 | Diff · History | 1 | →Withdrawal: |
2015-07-19 09:22 | Diff · History | -111 | how's this, mentions both AND is a lot shorter |
2015-07-19 08:28 | Diff · History | 71 | |
2015-07-19 08:27 | Diff · History | 41 | |
2015-07-19 08:26 | Diff · History | -388 | Rv disruptive editing |
2015-07-19 07:50 | Diff · History | -358 | →Withdrawal: this can be removed since the source is dead |
2015-07-19 07:49 | Diff · History | 4 | →Withdrawal: "Serb forces" is not listed in source, and this could give wrong impression of paramilitary activity which did indeed take place elsewhere in conflict |
2015-07-19 07:46 | Diff · History | 76 | restore expansion |
2015-07-19 07:45 | Diff · History | -73 | Reverted to revision 671956125 by Oranges Juicy (talk): It was already fixed, rv deliberate falsehoods. (TW) |
2015-07-18 06:03 | Diff · History | -16 | Reverted to revision 671475656 by Oranges Juicy (talk): No such thing as "Serb military" in FR Yug. One army, centralised. (TW) |
2015-07-14 23:23 | Diff · History | 17 | (reverted) Yugoslav - accuirate, copyedits |
All times are in UTC.