Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
Article | Template talk:Cite journal (Log · Page History) |
User | LeadSongDog (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 80 |
Minor edits | 5 (6.2%) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
atbe1 | 18.4 |
Added (bytes)2 | 44,387 |
Deleted (bytes) | -2 |
Minor edits
·
5 (6.2%)
Major edits
·
75 (93.8%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
80 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
80 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
---|---|---|---|
2012-03-06 15:24 | Diff · History | 1 | →The volume, issue and page number output is non-encyclopedically geeky: typo |
2012-03-06 15:23 | Diff · History | 879 | →The volume, issue and page number output is non-encyclopedically geeky: sorry |
2012-03-05 15:00 | Diff · History | 351 | →The volume, issue and page number output is non-encyclopedically geeky: TT isn't T:MOS |
2012-01-10 18:11 | Diff · History | 11 | →RFC on identifiers: linked page to archive |
2011-09-08 16:53 | Diff · History | 2 | oops, wrong section |
2011-09-08 14:30 | Diff · History | 897 | →Recent edit to remove URL generation from PMC parameter: c |
2011-08-31 05:03 | Diff · History | 509 | →Redundant to cite both issn and oclc?: thanks for sending me there |
2011-08-27 03:05 | Diff · History | 571 | →Redundant to cite both issn and oclc?: reliable? |
2011-08-26 18:31 | Diff · History | 955 | →Redundant to cite both issn and oclc?: details matter most for scarce sources |
2011-08-23 15:00 | Diff · History | 693 | →Redundant to cite both issn and oclc?: issn doesn't replace oclc, oclc can replace issn |
2011-08-12 03:24 | Diff · History | 80 | →Redundant to cite both issn and oclc?: amplify |
2011-08-12 03:19 | Diff · History | 499 | →Redundant to cite both issn and oclc?: Y and n |
2011-03-31 02:50 | Diff · History | 992 | →PMID when there's a PMC: extreme example |
2011-03-18 19:28 | Diff · History | 452 | →Cochrane?: Wow, thank you! |
2011-03-18 14:23 | Diff · History | 707 | →Cochrane?: expl+ |
2011-03-18 14:12 | Diff · History | 833 | →Cochrane?: expl |
2011-03-18 13:05 | Diff · History | 600 | →Cochrane?: MedlinePgn vice Page |
2011-03-18 07:28 | Diff · History | 530 | →Cochrane?: r |
2011-03-18 05:23 | Diff · History | 1,158 | →Cochrane?: great start, thank you |
2011-03-17 21:36 | Diff · History | 447 | →Cochrane?: not good |
2011-03-17 19:35 | Diff · History | 802 | →Cochrane?: new section |
2011-01-18 19:14 | Diff · History | 200 | →So how are we to handle these?: c |
2010-11-02 13:19 | Diff · History | 821 | →What the E-ISSN and P-ISSN tags will be used for: r |
2010-10-30 06:17 | Diff · History | 765 | →What the E-ISSN and P-ISSN tags will be used for: in lieu of an identified DOI, PMID, or Bibcode |
2010-10-05 05:00 | Diff · History | 227 | →What the E-ISSN and P-ISSN tags will be used for: q |
2010-09-13 17:06 | Diff · History | 256 | →Paper codes: OK, template:afri is available for use in your id parameter |
2010-09-13 16:21 | Diff · History | 364 | →Paper codes: c |
2010-09-10 21:24 | Diff · History | 276 | →Paper codes: c |
2010-05-21 06:02 | Diff · History | 226 | →last/first vs last1/first1: error message needed |
2010-05-03 17:04 | Diff · History | -1 | →PMID Not Indexed: typo |
2010-05-03 03:43 | Diff · History | 667 | →PMID Not Indexed: c |
2010-05-02 03:49 | Diff · History | 419 | →PMID Not Indexed: c |
2010-01-28 04:23 | Diff · History | 1,013 | →Online vs print ISSN: c |
2009-12-14 21:22 | Diff · History | 232 | →Breaking ISSNs: DOIbot to the rescue? |
2009-12-14 21:01 | Diff · History | 59 | show list of archives |
2009-12-08 20:20 | Diff · History | 708 | →Separators in parameter names: r |
2009-12-08 19:36 | Diff · History | 687 | →Separators in parameter names: new section |
2009-12-08 17:21 | Diff · History | 619 | →Page=/Pages=: c |
2009-10-08 18:11 | Diff · History | 276 | →COiNS bloat: Wikipedia:WikiProject Microformats/COinS |
2009-10-08 17:58 | Diff · History | 361 | →PMC to embargoed article?: great |
2009-10-07 23:47 | Diff · History | 382 | →Leadsongdog's suggestion: r |
2009-10-07 21:38 | Diff · History | 899 | →Leadsongdog's suggestion: r |
2009-10-07 20:50 | Diff · History | 325 | →Leadsongdog's suggestion: q |
2009-10-07 14:00 | Diff · History | -1 | →COiNS bloat: fmt |
2009-10-07 13:58 | Diff · History | 657 | →COiNS bloat: r |
2009-10-07 13:45 | Diff · History | 483 | →Leadsongdog's suggestion: r |
2009-10-07 07:20 | Diff · History | 298 | →ISSN proposition: c |
2009-10-07 06:23 | Diff · History | 829 | →COiNS bloat: (ec) clarification |
2009-10-07 00:59 | Diff · History | 510 | →COiNS bloat: related discussion ongoing |
2009-09-17 17:35 | Diff · History | 875 | →Should Citation bot always add ISSNs?: r |
2009-09-14 08:24 | Diff · History | 983 | →Should Citation bot always add ISSNs?: clarify |
2009-09-10 13:34 | Diff · History | 1,313 | →Should Citation bot always add ISSNs?: r |
2009-09-10 05:28 | Diff · History | 877 | →Should Citation bot always add ISSNs?: some display options |
2009-09-09 14:21 | Diff · History | 521 | →Should Citation bot always add ISSNs?: it's about disambiguation |
2009-09-08 13:49 | Diff · History | 1,076 | →Should Citation bot always add ISSNs?: let's not conflate functions |
2009-07-16 21:23 | Diff · History | 862 | →Adding a pub-type parameter: new section |
2009-07-03 21:55 | Diff · History | 748 | →"pp" in {cite journal} and {cite book}: OneSizeFitsNone |
2009-07-03 17:17 | Diff · History | 636 | →"pp" in {cite journal} and {cite book}: r |
2009-05-19 20:33 | Diff · History | 194 | →Date output with Harvard templates: Welcome |
2009-05-19 17:31 | Diff · History | 382 | →Date output with Harvard templates: r |
2009-04-18 15:26 | Diff · History | 450 | →ISSNs are useful, independent of DOIs: bot opportunity |
2009-04-17 18:07 | Diff · History | 918 | →ISSNs are useful, independent of DOIs: (ec) - r |
2009-03-04 18:30 | Diff · History | 634 | →Citing papers from collections published as books: if only the reprint is available |
2009-03-04 15:19 | Diff · History | 198 | →Citing papers from collections published as books: |
2009-03-02 21:12 | Diff · History | 557 | →Abbreviations "Vol." and "No.": r |
2009-03-02 20:52 | Diff · History | 94 | →Abbreviations "Vol." and "No.": belated signature |
2009-03-02 19:19 | Diff · History | 893 | →Abbreviations "Vol." and "No.": possible, but why? |
2009-03-02 16:43 | Diff · History | 434 | →Abbreviations "Vol." and "No.": r |
2008-12-08 15:28 | Diff · History | 316 | →archiveURL parameter?: + |
2008-11-18 06:59 | Diff · History | 538 | →Reprinted as: |
2008-11-17 20:30 | Diff · History | 486 | →Reprinted as: |
2008-11-12 16:30 | Diff · History | 1 | →Replacement for quotes=no for reprints, errata, etc.?: typo |
2008-11-12 16:30 | Diff · History | 405 | →Replacement for quotes=no for reprints, errata, etc.?: ambiguity of referencing |
2008-10-31 14:54 | Diff · History | 878 | →Are quotation marks necessary?: |
2008-10-30 21:50 | Diff · History | 528 | →Are quotation marks necessary?: r |
2008-10-22 15:45 | Diff · History | 384 | →Parallel activity: new section |
2008-10-07 19:43 | Diff · History | 929 | →A possible way out of the mess: |
2008-10-07 15:47 | Diff · History | 876 | →A possible way out of the mess: APA vs URM switch? |
2008-10-06 21:24 | Diff · History | 1,682 | →Discouragement of "authors" parameter: A possible way out |
2008-02-21 21:49 | Diff · History | 191 | →COinS gone?: |
All times are in UTC.