Should the first sentence of the lead include the phrase de jure (as in "Palestine... is a de jure sovereign state"). Selfstudier (talk) 13:47, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Should the first line read "Aleksandr Gelyevich Dugin (Russian: Александр Гельевич Дугин; born 7 January 1962) is a Russian political philosopher,[6] analyst, and strategist, known for views widely characterized as fascist". ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥♥ Talk ♥ 13:47, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Should the infobox contain the pictured flag and emblem?
Yes
No
Survey
No in the infobox, sure in the article - per Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jerusalem Wikipedia does not state for either Israel or Palestine that the city of Jerusalem is either in their territory or an Israeli or Palestinian city. The flag given in the infobox does exactly that. It states that, as a fact, this is the flag of Jerusalem, when it is strictly an Israeli flag that lays claim to the city. It is already consensus that we do not do that in this article, and it is straightforward NPOV violation to do so with the flag when by established consensus we do not do so in the text. By all means, in a section on the Israeli conquest and later occupation and its effective (illegal) annexation of East Jerusalem, include the flag as an Israeli flag. But just claiming Jerusalem as an Israeli city is unacceptable for Wikipedia to do, and we already have consensus on that. nableezy - 15:07, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Is the current first sentence appropriate for this article (Jimmy Savile sexual abuse scandal not Jimmy Savile)? My edit got reverted (more information starts with the thread above, before this RFC subsection). Thinker78(talk) 22:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There are three questions on military objectives near civilians and Stara Krasnianka attack:
Should the article have a section dealing with placement of military objectives near civilian objects?
If the answer to Q1 is yes, should this version (here below in the collapse box) be used? If the answer to Q2 is no, please explain what changes are needed.
Should the subsection on Stara Krasnianka be included as proposed? Gitz (talk) (contribs) 06:36, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
QUESTION: Shall we put a template at the top of this essay saying, "This essay has sometimes been used or cited in a way that is not supported by Wikipedia guidelines and policies, or in a way that conflicts with them. Please do not do that at Wikipedia articles or their talk pages"? Anythingyouwant (talk) 00:23, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Some editors have used the conclusion of past RFCs, which were closed without consensus, as reason for blocking the use of images in this article. To ensure that this article is allowed to develop, I am asking that we take a moment to clarify whether any special image policy or policies (beyond the standards for any article) this article must follow.
When did women gain Universal Suffrage (the ability to have the same rights as men to vote) in Switzerland? Was it when they were granted the right to vote at the federal level, but not the local level, in 1971? Or was it when women went to the supreme court and won the additional right to vote in local elections in 1990? --51.9.184.124 (talk) 11:51, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Should any article written by Sydney Zatz on Royal Central be depreciated? The reason why I ask was because I found this article by the author on Royal Central which appeared to have directly copied a paragraph from our Queen of Rhodesia article. When I raised the initial discussion at RSN, @Mhawk10: made the point that WP:EARWIG shows that a number of her other articles also seem to copy from Wikipedia without attribution (example here but rest on RSN link). I sent an email through Royal Central's "Contact Us" page telling them of it about a month ago and had no reply and little advice from RSN on followup. But given this history of this author for seeming to use Wikipedia content without attribution, I would like to ask the community for their comments on this proposal or if it should be extended to all of Royal Central.
Which of the following best describes the reliability of Sydney Zatz's articles on Royal Central?
Option 1: Generally reliable for factual reporting
Option 2: Unclear or additional considerations apply
Option 3: Generally unreliable for factual reporting
Should conservatism or national liberalism be placed at the top of the ideology list in the infobox? Helper201 (talk) 16:15, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Is it acceptable to change the infobox to the format/layout seen on the talk page here, or should what is currently used on the article's page be retained? Helper201 (talk) 21:32, 26 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Should Western Sahara, up to the de facto border, be colored orange as part of Morocco, on the map of US-designated non-NATO allies, given the US recognition of Moroccan sovereignty of Western Sahara? — kwami (talk) 22:21, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Should Aaron Ironside, SAM (Smart Approaches to Marijuana), Patrick Drumm and James Farmer be included in the section "Notable opponents of cannabis legislation"? Helper201 (talk) 20:11, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
How should the section & subsections be shown in this article?
Keep United Kingdom as top section. Then have the other realms listed under a separate section or as a sub-section called Other Commonwealth realms. Leave section on royal titles at article bottom.
Create new top section Composition to include general overview, compare typical to UK's anomalous, and merge in section on differences in royal titles; make remainder of UK's section a sub-section of Commonwealth realms, placed in alphabetical order; or a variant thereof.
Which flag should be the main one used in Template:Country data Antarctica (Antarctica)? Should we continue using the current "True South" flag ("Option A"), or revert to the previously used Graham Bartram design 🇦🇶 ("Option B")? Update: As many editors have !voted to Avoid using flag icon templates for Antarctica entirely, I am adding this as a third option. Vanilla Wizard 💙 20:08, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.