Autopatrolled
User:Lewolka
- Lewolka (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
Have been creating reliably sourced and copyvio-free articles, mainly about female martial art world champions, on a regular basis. Thank you Lewolka (talk) 10:44, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
User:Idoghor Melody
- Idoghor Melody (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
I have created over 45 articles with one deleted and over 250 redirects at Articles for creation/Redirects and categories. Since I am less busy now, I plan to create more and more articles. I'm familiar with the notability requirements and neutral point of view. With the huge backlog at NPP with 10,000+ articles yet to be reviewed, I don't want to bother the queue with my articles. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 20:37, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
User:VersaceSpace
- VersaceSpace (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
I'd like to avoid bothering NPP with my articles. Granting me this right would otherwise benefit the encyclopedia because, due to the type of articles I commonly write (musical content with definite release dates), having these articles indexed (or eligible for indexing) quickly would, in my view, make it easier for readers to find the information they seek when they need it most (i.e. a release date or announcement), and would also promote the addition of content to these types of articles. Thank you. --VersaceSpace 🌃 20:50, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has created roughly 24 articles. — MusikBot talk 03:30, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Non-Admin Comment: This user has roughly created 22 articles on mainspace and doesn't meet the criteria and most of his drafts are deleted. DIVINE 15:18, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- DIVINE, if you had done as much as looked at my user page, you'd see that I've created 39 articles, some of which are redirect-expansions. The bot only counts the first edit to a page. If you want to be the judge of me that's fine, but I expect you to do the proper research. My deleted drafts are because I stopped editing them. —VersaceSpace 🌃 16:28, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- Non-Admin Comment: This user has roughly created 22 articles on mainspace and doesn't meet the criteria and most of his drafts are deleted. DIVINE 15:18, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
User:Jóhannesbjarki
- Jóhannesbjarki (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
Creating many articles on species that don't appear to need patrolling. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:48, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
User:Materialscientist
- Materialscientist (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
Since (a) I just reviewed ~40 pages where a page was vandalistically moved outside mainspace and then moved back by Materialscientist, a mess that could have been avoided if they had had autopatrolled (b) They qualify for autopatrolled on their own merits anyway as a writer of several featured articles, requesting here * Pppery * it has begun... 01:27, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
User:Mustafdesam
- Mustafdesam (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Mustafdesam (talk) 06:45, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
I have been creating reliably sourced articles for the past 11 years. I mainly write articles based on films, film technicians, writers, artists, and painters on a regular basis. I would like to have requests for permission for auto-patrolled. Thank you Mustafdesam (talk) 12:15, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
User:Tulsi
- Tulsi (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
So far created 65+ new articles, only one controversial deletion of a promotional article created twice, back in 2020. I am ashamed of my activity. I should not have created that promotional article. It was completely my bad. Its been two years since then. And, I am (not perfect) very much improved. I am now focused, creating biographies of living persons about politicians. All new articles are reviewed okay by the reviewers; not a single article is nominated for deletion so to lower the workload of reviewers, I am here to kindly ask for autopatrolled. Thank you for your consideration. — Tulsi 24x7 09:58, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Not done. Your interest in writing articles seems to have only emerged very recently, and the overwhelming majority (if not all, I only checked about a dozen) of those creations seem to be stubs based off of a template of sorts, usually only backed by one or two sources; a number of them (e.g. [1][2][3][4][5]) also have maintenance tags on them. I'm not comfortable granting autopatrolled at this time, especially considering the past COI concerns. --Blablubbs (talk) 20:22, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- I am devastated to see that you have only 3 live creation on mainspace and you hold autopatrolled (Fair enough you're sysop you can hold it). I fear you might came out of nowhere on someone advice to solely reject this request. I feel this is unfair. As an admin you shouldn't involve yourself in such things and let other admins review who actually do that. This is heart-wrenching. — Tulsi 24x7 05:45, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Anything but a rare maintenance tag is a disqualifying feature, Blablubbs. Autopatrolled editors are supposed to create clean articles. Schwede66 21:22, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, I am not surprised. Adding tags is quite easy in comparison to look for references and add them into the article. Its difficult when it's come to find references for Nepalese politicians. Atleast I have managed to add one or two sources. No issues. I am glad that I have created those articles which will stays within Wikipedia till it lives. Anyway, Thank you Blablubbs and Schwede66 for your quick response. I appreciate it.
Kind regards, — Tulsi 24x7 00:50, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Tulsi: Up until a week a ago you had just a handful of created articles and would definitely have fallen under the "recommended minimum" criteria alone. The stubs you have created don't demonstrate to me a clear capability in writing appropriately sourced, notable articles. Personally I am not a fan of creating numerous stubs in the hope/expectation others will deal with them later on. It isn't my place to judge and that's already been done above, however don't take it to heart too much as whether you have AP or not is immaterial to editing ability. Bungle (talk • contribs) 06:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Bungle: LOL! 1)
"The stubs you have created don't demonstrate to me a clear capability in writing appropriately sourced, notable articles."
I am not open to your judgement/opinion/comment when you said,"It isn't my place to judge..."
. 2) You tried to change the whole scenario here,"...whether you have AP or not is immaterial to editing ability."
I know this. I have created "65+ valid articles" which passes the the suggested standard for obtaining Autopatrolled. This is why I applied. And, if you are not fan of stubs then, the guidelines could be changed to "25 Good articles"? Please don't demotivate to not create stubs. It's always better to have something than having nothing at all. 65 redlinks turned into bluelinks. Thank you for your understanding. — Tulsi 24x7 10:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)- No, Tulsi, that understanding is not correct. The minimum number of articles set at 25 is somewhat arbitrary and serves as a proxy for experience. I have assigned autopatrolled to editors with fewer than 25 new articles. What matters is that those articles must be clean and editors need to be able to demonstrate that they are competent. And when those 25 articles are mostly stubs then we don't know whether competence is there. Hence, there's a lot more at play here than just a numeric threshold. Schwede66 10:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, I don't think it's worth getting too exasperated over. I was just making the point that having AP or not is no big deal. Your application is essentially based on activity over the past week only. As noted, I don't make these decisions but you seem a bit taken aback by the decision when there is no reason to be. Bungle (talk • contribs) 10:36, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Bungle: LOL! 1)
- @Tulsi: Up until a week a ago you had just a handful of created articles and would definitely have fallen under the "recommended minimum" criteria alone. The stubs you have created don't demonstrate to me a clear capability in writing appropriately sourced, notable articles. Personally I am not a fan of creating numerous stubs in the hope/expectation others will deal with them later on. It isn't my place to judge and that's already been done above, however don't take it to heart too much as whether you have AP or not is immaterial to editing ability. Bungle (talk • contribs) 06:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, I am not surprised. Adding tags is quite easy in comparison to look for references and add them into the article. Its difficult when it's come to find references for Nepalese politicians. Atleast I have managed to add one or two sources. No issues. I am glad that I have created those articles which will stays within Wikipedia till it lives. Anyway, Thank you Blablubbs and Schwede66 for your quick response. I appreciate it.