Usernames for administrator attention |
---|
This page is intended for reports of usernames that are blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block. Reports will be assessed in accordance with the username policy, the UAA instructions, and the following bullet points. Please ensure you are familiar with the assessment criteria before making a report.
|
This page was last updated at 00:10 on 16 July 2022 (UTC).
if it is out of date.
Bot-reported
- Doncasterroversfanxjxxj (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:30, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- This username matched "Used x instead of cks attempting to skip filter: long username without spaces. Violating string: doncasterroversfancksjckscksj" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:30, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Godofwar2022 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- SmellyRussian (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as offensive. Adakiko (talk) 10:14, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Being discussed with the user, since they have edited constructively. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 20:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Depsi69 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Firestar464 (talk) 08:45, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: I guess I'm not seeing what's offensive here other than possibly the "69", but there are legitimate uses of that number. 331dot (talk) 08:51, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- @331dot I suspect Firestar464 was thinking of "desi 69" which does returns a lot of porn-related results. Depsi69 may simply be a coincidence - I can't be sure. It's not enough to block, though they now have two warnings for adding uncited BLP content. Nick Moyes (talk) 09:16, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: I guess I'm not seeing what's offensive here other than possibly the "69", but there are legitimate uses of that number. 331dot (talk) 08:51, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Sign Design XYZ (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username that implies shared use. Elizium23 (talk) 14:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Elizium23: Could you please provide evidence that "Sign Design XYZ" is a phrase associated with a business or other multi-person entity? From a skim of their contribs and a quick Google search, it's not obvious to me. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 22:00, 15 July 2022 (UTC)