![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
IP Rangeblock Calculator | IP Range Edit Check | Checkusers | Oversighters |
Bureaucrats' noticeboard (1 thread) Most recent:
|
---|
Bots noticeboard (2 threads) |
---|
Arbitration Committee noticeboard (4 threads) |
---|
Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard (4 threads) Most recent:
|
---|
Neutral point of view noticeboard (15 threads) Most recent:
|
---|
External links noticeboard (5 threads) |
---|
Dispute resolution noticeboard (1 thread) Most recent:
|
---|
Media copyright questions (6 threads) |
---|
Village Pump (WMF) (6 threads) |
---|
Village Pump (miscellaneous) (10 threads) |
---|
|}
Administrative backlog
WP:AIV
Reports
Bot-reported
- 116.68.80.18 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Tripped filter 61 (New user removing references, details). DatBot (talk) 14:19, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
User-reported
- 108.46.160.250 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Disruptive editing on television network pages, adding shows with sources not pertaining to said shows. BrickMaster02 (talk) 16:22, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. User has received 0 warnings. If this is block evasion/long term abuse, please indicate as such. SpencerT•C 16:34, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Kwalaw (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log) – WP:NOTCOOKBOOK violations. BangJan1999 17:35, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Page deleted. – using an improvable deletion reason, but relatively certain to get the point across at least. The user hasn't edited since. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:52, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
CSD / PRODs
WP:UAA / WP:RFPP
Bot-reported
- VF NOOB (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- KSK industries (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- Researchinnovationteams (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username and implying shared use. Adakiko (talk) 08:32, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
|
Khadim Hussain Rizvi
- Khadim Hussain Rizvi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Supporters of the subject are routinely removing sourced information that is critical and trying to inflate things like how many people attended his funeral. Lard Almighty (talk) 15:34, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Note: Well-sourced criticism is fine, but this edit you keep restoring is a questionable opinion piece that doesn't sufficiently substantiate it's claim. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:01, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- This is is not a WP:BLP so the sourcing threshold is not as high. But the RPP is not about this edit. (I have no problem with removing that bit if there are good reasons to do so.) If you look at the history, there have been multiple attempts to remove critical content and to inflate things like the numbers of mourners at his funeral. This protecting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lard Almighty (talk • contribs) 17:13, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Elagabalus
- Elagabalus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, often by IPs or very new editors who registered just to edit this article. The problem is about the gender identity of Elagabalus, who has been described as a trans woman in some non-reliable sources, but academic sources do not support this. As a result, gender pronouns are changed regularly, mostly in good faith. There was a temporarily 1-year protection in February 2021 (diff), but it did not solve the problem. I am therefore requesting a permanent protection. T8612 (talk) 15:42, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Note: I'm tempted to semi-protect the article indefinitely as an arbitation enforcement per WP:ARBGSDS. Comments? Favonian (talk) 16:50, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action Favonian (talk) 17:59, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Template:Twin Atlantic
- Template:Twin Atlantic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Twin Atlantic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Brettandelle, using sockpuppets that have gained autoconfirmed permission. Same protection neede for Twin Atlantic. Binksternet (talk) 17:42, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for the duration (both). El_C 17:49, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. El_C 18:02, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
|
Yves Nyami
- Yves Nyami (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: There is a well sourced article at Yves Nyami (footballer) which should be moved here. Inwind (talk) 09:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Wugapodes and Number 57: Looking through the logs, it appears that it was salted due to repeated recreations of a page that was declined by AfC review. I am inclined to unprotect, given that the repeated draftifications and its accompanying protection seem to be against WP:DRAFTOBJECT. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:23, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Sdrqaz: no objection here. Imo, salting just means "don't create without running it past some admin" so always feel free to undo my saltings if you think it no longer is needed. Thanks for the heads up though. — Wug·a·po·des 01:48, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- I think given the efforts made to get the original article published, I strongly suspect the new article is a paid-for one (looking at the creator's talk page, the issue of COI and paid editing has been raised on multiple occasions). The subject fails the old NFOOTBALL notability guideline and I am not convinced the new article passes GNG (most of the references are databases). Number 57 08:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Sdrqaz: no objection here. Imo, salting just means "don't create without running it past some admin" so always feel free to undo my saltings if you think it no longer is needed. Thanks for the heads up though. — Wug·a·po·des 01:48, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
Reshma Pasupuleti
- Reshma Pasupuleti (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reshma Pasupuleti's actual date of birth is 23 July 1983, I also have necessary sources to prove it correct, you please allow me editing Rajeshagarwal786 (talk) 09:41, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Considering you're the reason the article is protected, I would like to see the sources you intend to cite first. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 11:24, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Not done – Editor has found their way to the article talk page. Favonian (talk) 15:46, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Technoblade
- Technoblade (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
I would massively be appreciative if I could improve the article of Technoblade as there is some information I need to add. Glitch TTG (talk) 16:55, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Glitch TTG. The article is temporarily protected due to some particularly severe disruption earlier and is not likely to be lifted soon. In the meantime, if you have suggestions for improving the article, please raise them on the article talk page and make an edit request if there is a specific edit you would like to see. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:37, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 15:44, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
1 protected edit request | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 17:22, 2 July 2022 (UTC) |
13 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 17:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
Requests for accountcreator |
---|
Account creator
User:Mleczekofficial
I would like the account creator right as I would like to help people. I work in IT Support and that means I have call-outs to help users. I once had this call out where a 64-year old person who could not set up a Google account. I want to request this permission so that I can help users having problems to create accounts. Everyone deserves a chance to be helped out, and everyone deserves to help those in need. Mleczekofficial (talk) 14:06, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for the autopatrolled flag. |
---|
Autopatrolled
|
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
---|
Confirmed
|
Requests for extended confirmation |
---|
Extended confirmed
|
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer
User:HeinzMaster
Hi, I am requesting New Page Reviewer rights on Wikipedia. I believe that I have built a strong foundation and understanding of the requirements necessary for mainspace articles, shown through my created, active articles, draft articles, and contributions to them. As new page reviewer I'd like to apply this knowledge towards newly created articles and suggest any improvements when necessary. HeinzMaster (talk) 04:24, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
User:Grabup
I am contributing Wikipedia for about 8 months. I have now quite good knowledge about Guidelines of Wikipedia and now I understand that which page should be accepted and which not. I am genuinely improved Wikipedia by reverting vandalisms. I always prefer to discuss instead of an edit war. Thanks Grabup (talk) 02:42, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
User:Johannes Maximilian
Hi there, I've recently seen the backlog and think that some help might be needed. I have been on Wikipedia for more than 13 years now, and I have made well over 30,000 edits across all projects, with multiple B class articles here on en-wp and several good and featured articles on the German language Wikipedia. I have done dozens of AfCs and I am thus very familiar with what people throw at Wikipedia. I know various different languages and I am (obviously) familiar with virtually all Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:42, 29 June 2022 (UTC) Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:42, 29 June 2022 (UTC) User:Reading Beans
Hi, I'd like to help out with reviewing new pages. I have read and understand the reviewing guidelines, I'm comfortable with notability and deletion processes, and will carefully apply the flowchart to each page that I review if this request is approved. Furthermore, I am also an AFC reviewer, with this right, I’ll help ease some burden on the backlog. R E A D I N G Talk to the Beans? 05:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
User:Netherzone
I am requesting new page reviewer rights to help with the backlog. I have a clear understanding of notability criteria, and am active at AfD, especially in the area of visual arts and culture. I have been an editor for over 10 years and have created over 160 active articles. I've read and understand the tutorial for reviewers. Netherzone (talk) 17:11, 30 June 2022 (UTC) User:Tigraan
My one-month trial recently expired (I learnt this when trying to greentick Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas after cleaning up the bad state it was in). In a month, I must have looked at 10-15 pages. I decided I did not want anything to do with most of them, made some small corrections to a few, marked one as patrolled, sent another one to AfD (it was kept, but I do not think the discussion reflects too badly on me). I think I CSD’d one or two but there is nothing in my Twinkle log so maybe I didn’t. I do not think I will really ramp up my rate of reviews in the future, so I think it’s roughly the same situation as this, where a trial extension is needed before a full grant of the rights. TigraanClick here for my talk page ("private" contact) 13:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC) User:Pppery
Since Buidhe requested I get involved with NPP on my talk page, and I meet the requirements with 10,000 mainspace edits and 6 years of activity, I might as well help out here. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:04, 1 July 2022 (UTC) User:Storchy
I'd like permission to review draft articles, as I've come across several good quality drafts waiting in the long review queue, while I was doing other cleanup tasks. I believe I have sufficient experience editing to offer help with the draft article backlog. Thanks. Storchy (talk) 20:44, 1 July 2022 (UTC) Storchy (talk) 20:44, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
User:ProClasher97
|
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover
User:DIVINE
I have been actively reviewing new pages and AFC reviewer too. I need this right not to create backlog while doing #CSDR2 as i often move article from Mainspace to Draft which can be found here [1] & to move accepted draft to mainspace without leaving any redirect. DIVINE 18:43, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
User:Zippybonzo
I do quite a lot of draftifying and a few uncontroversial page moves (e.g typos in the title) and I would like the right for a couple of months to see whether it saves me time when moving and whether it is easier for me to move pages with the right before requesting it permanently. Thanks, | Zippybonzo | Talk | 19:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
User:Jonteemil
Hello! I was about to move a page and also its category only find out that the latter needs this permission. I will probably not be taking advantage of this right very often but when I do want to move a category it would be neat. I am both here and on Commons already trusted as file mover, AWB rights and have far more edits than the demanded 3000. I am also admin at Swedish Wiktionary. Jonteemil (talk) 20:06, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
|
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer
User:Urban Versis 32
I have helped out Wikipedia in various ways (Adding short descriptions, creating userboxes, contributing images, etc.) and would love to expand that by becoming a Pending Changes Reviewer to help out removing vandalism. Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 17:39, 22 June 2022 (UTC) User:Grabup
I am contributing Wikipedia for about 8 months. I always keep my eyes to my Watchlist to undue vandalisms. I can use this user right very fairly. You can check my history of contribution. I always prefer to discuss instead of an edit war. I accept my mistake if someone prove me wrong. Thanks Grabup (talk) 02:59, 25 June 2022 (UTC) User:Chocmilk03
I've been editing for over a year and have ~4000 edits. I'm familiar with the vandalism policy, with the basic content policies and with the copyright policy. I've read the reviewing guidelines and the other relevant pages (WP:PC etc), and understand that accepting is the default position while reverting should be limited to clear-cut cases, for example this diff would have been a clear-cut case of reverting. Cheers, Chocmilk03 (talk) 22:51, 26 June 2022 (UTC) User:N8wilson
Like many editors with some history here I do much of this work already by way of my watchlist. I'm interested in this right as a toolset to speed up workflows. I enjoy working on pages that get tagged with {{Current}} and expect this toolset to help accelerate the incorporation of productive edits from new users and IPs. --N8wilson 🔔 17:13, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
User:Pulpfiction621
User:Banglahindu
HI, Im am interested in becoming a pending changes reviewer. Please do the needful. Banglahindu (talk) 03:22, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback
User:Dove's talk
Once again I want to dive in counter vandalism work. I need my rollback privileges (which was revoked for not giving the edit summaries and refusal to explain the improper use). I will try to leave better edit summaries in future. Dove's talk (talk) 18:05, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
User:Jochem van Hees
I spend most of my time on Wikipedia checking and occasionally reverting other people's edits, so this user right would be helpful. Of course I'll only use it in cases of obvious vandalism (or other uses outlined at WP:ROLLBACKUSE). ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 22:00, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
User:LisafBia6531
Hello, as I said in my first request, I am fighting vandalism via SWViewer. I think I have gained experience about vandalism and I request this user group again. LisafBia6531 (talk) 19:44, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
User:EnIRtpf09b
Hello, I am an active reverter of vandalism and I want to be a rollbacker so that I can fight vandalism in Wikipedia with more ease and efficiency. I have read the WP:Rollback policy and take full responsibility if I abuse my rollbacker right. EnIRtpf09b (talk) User:MehmoodS
I have made over 3,300 edits since I became active editor. I have several pages under my watch list and patrolled RecentChanges for possible disruption and vandalism. I have dealt with numerous vandalism on several pages and warned editors. Therefore, I would like to request Rollback rights to be able to deal with vandalism more effectively. MehmoodS (talk) 17:53, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
User:Blanchey
I have now spent a few more weeks patrolling Recent changes following Fastily's advice and I now feel that I have enough experience in anti vandalism work to use the rollback function properly. If you check my contributions, you will see all the articles I have been patrolling. Whilst I have been using Twinkle's Rollback–like function very intuitively when removing vandalism, I think that the official Wikipedia rollback function will be even more helpful, especially when I am using the mobile site. This is the 3rd request I have sent now, but I am very keen and I just want to help keep Wikipedia free of as much disruption as possible. On a couple of occasions, I did revert edits which turned out to be correct after all, and I also accidentally reverted several edits when I only meant to remove one and I take full responsibility. It was completely my fault and I apologised to the users in question. I look forward to hearing from you regarding my request. Kind Regards, Blanchey 💬 • 📝 14:11, 2 July 2022 (UTC) |
Requests for template editor |
---|
Template editor
User:Ilovemydoodle
Hi, I am frequent editor of Templates on (English) Wikiquote, I would like Template Editor here to better maintain Templates across wikis. Ilovemydoodle (talk) 05:55, 2 July 2022 (UTC) |
.
Template:Centralized discussion – Current discussions
)
|
|
- Newbie edits to templates
- Tagged speedy removed
- Tagged possible BLP issues
- Tagged article blanking
- Tagged shouting
- Tagged nonsense characters
- Tagged repeating characters
- Tagged possible vandalism
- Tagged possible userpage spam
- Tagged possible link spam #1
- Tagged possible link spam #2
Barnstars
|