Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived. |
I must say...
...you feel very strongly about these titling conventions, which is great. But you really don't need to be so blunt and unpleasant. Maybe as an alternative you could simply say - "moved page per <policy/MOS stanard>". TL;DR: It would be nice if you were kind to your fellow editors. --VersaceSpace 🌃 15:27, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- This isn't the first time I encounter AfD moves who just accept articles without doing the minimal check to see if the title is correct. That creates additional work for other editors that now have to clean up after. I might have been blunt, but I wasn't wrong. Looking over WP:NCTV would have taken you 2 minutes to get familiar and pick a better disambiguation then the one you used. And that is only the title issue, the article itself had quite a few errors in it, so even the content itself wasn't fit for main space. Gonnym (talk) 15:31, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- The "additional work" in question being that you had to change a title (by one word)...doesn't seem very labor intensive. And the article's issues are quite standard for many articles in the mainspace. An article needing copy-editing shouldn't inhibit it from entering or being in the mainspace, much less so when the issues are in no more than a paragraph (you didn't fix them either).
- Anyway, my point is that you don't need to be so rude. Instead of telling me I "should've taken two minutes" to read some guideline or policy you could tell me (kindly) how I could do better in the future — a much more collaborative way to do things. --VersaceSpace 🌃 15:47, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Anyway, my point is that you don't need to be so rude. Instead of telling me I "should've taken two minutes" to read some guideline or policy you could tell me (kindly) how I could do better in the future — a much more collaborative way to do things.
In this conversation I wasn't rude at all yet dismiss your bad move which caused additional work, both with an additional page move and with many content fixes (some of which were just false or completely incorrect). Gonnym (talk) 15:51, 9 July 2022 (UTC)- I don't doubt your intentions, but your mono-tone voice in comments and telling me I "should've taken two minutes" to read some guidelines absolutely comes off that way. I'm not a robot — some things could get past me, and yes, I may forget the occasional titling convention! I apologize, but I'd appreciate it if you could point out my in-corrections in a way that doesn't make it seem like you're going to fall and die because you have to make a few edits. --VersaceSpace 🌃 16:01, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rhine-Ruhr S-Bahn succession templates
A tag has been placed on Category:Rhine-Ruhr S-Bahn succession templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:20, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hey, Gonnym,
- Do you want me to delete these empty categories as CSD G7 and stop posting notices on your talk page or do you want to check each one out and tag it yourself? Either way is fine with me but I don't want to clutter up your talk pages with CSD notices if they are unwanted. Some editors who create a lot of categories in the process of their editing have asked me to tag them for CSD C1 but not to notify them as they have created hundreds of categories and don't particularly care when one of them was no longer needed. 01:28, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Süd-Thüringen-Bahn succession templates
A tag has been placed on Category:Süd-Thüringen-Bahn succession templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for help with Cosima Wagner! I have pics from vacation days to offer. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:09, 31 July 2022 (UTC)