Student unionism in Australia
It was noted years ago on the talk page that the article has a decidedly Leninist bent, with talk of "bourgeoisie" and "petit-bourgeois" and that bent is still there. That was my concern with the article. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 04:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Capital of Ukraine
Hi, I wonder why? The self-name is Kyiv, it's pronounced like Kyiv as well. What's the reason to use old Soviet-Russian name instead of an official one? Thanks. --Goo3 (talk) 17:51, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Your change in "Dream speech" article
Hi, Wasell. You undid a change I made, restoring "censured" where I had corrected the word, as I thought, to "censored." You commented "That makes no sense." Please explain: how does censuring (i.e.,, disapproving, criticizing) make sense in this context? Is "censured" really the word that fits here? Thanks. Cognita (talk) 02:04, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- Replied on User talk:Cognita. —Wasell(T) 10:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
![]() | Hello, Wasell. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Hi
I'm NTS. You have been reverting my edits and I think that we should fix that. I got my iPad account blocked, and I'm forced to use a phone for 6 months. I had good faith and great resources, so I don't really understand why you are doing this exactly. Hopefully, we can settle this. I'll edit Chuck Jones Tom and Jerry shorts, and until spring, I'll remain there. Have a nice evening, and I hope you understand. -NTS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:147:4001:1AA0:446E:A433:A57A:EA72 (talk) 01:27, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- There are a number of problems here:
- It's extremely obvious that you are Ritvik12. According to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ritvik12/Archive you have been socking enough to be regarded as banned per WP:3X.
- You're block-evading right now. When you were blocked as 73.135.4.140, that meant that you, the person, were blocked -- not just the particular device you were using.
- Your editing is very problematic: You're going against the manual of style in almost every way imaginable. You're not using reliable sources. You're edit warring.
- What you should do:
- Stop editing Wikipedia.
- Contact WP:UTRS and ask to be unblocked.
- That's really all there is to it. —Wasell(T) 08:21, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Hlo!!!
Hey !!! I'm Tanisha . So I'm a new user at wiki. And I'm trying to be a part of here by editing some articles with just more informations. But you have been reverting my edits ,that I have done on "Auxins". So is there anything wrong on my edit , so that you are forced to revert mine ??? I just wanna know, why you reverted that one ? Tanisha priyadarshini (talk) 16:26, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Wasell:, I was just going through contributions of Tanisha priyadarshini and saw that she has added a message here. Just wanted to tell you that I had reverted your edit on Auxin and later found that you had already reverted the wrong edit done by Tanisha priyadarshini. My error!
Tanisha priyadarshini, Wikipedia has layout rules which you need to follow. Regards - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 02:31, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Ohhh then I'm really sry Wasell ..... I had thought that u had reverted it . Tanisha priyadarshini (talk) 11:03, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
removal of content on user talk:Kermitmailbox99
I see you removed two large pieces of content on User talk:Kermitmailbox99. Were you aware that this was a second chance attempt by the user thus should be kept so admin's can review it as part of his unblock process? Tknifton (talk) 21:45, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, crap! No, I did not see that. Very sorry, I acted much too quickly. —Wasell(T) 04:27, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Reverting edits
Hi Wasell, please be careful and check before you revert other people's edits. In your reversion to List of Indian folk dances, you reverted the change from "center" to "centre", the latter being the most commonly used variant in India, which typically follows British English spelling conventions. Both British and American spelllings are acceptable on Wikipedia; please read WP:ENGVAR for full guidance on what is and isn't acceptable concerning national varieties of English. Thank you. Baffle☿gab 19:24, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
The intellectual disability editing is reverted
Can somebody please clarify why my editing was classified not global and reverted? I feel condemned, embarrassed and objectified when my edits get reverted with improper explanation or without (enough) explanation for being reverted to begin with. People don't know it's harder than one thinks for seeing and finding other countries' references to intellectual disability, not to mention not just any references can be used and there's controversy over the terms relating to intellectual disability. How can anyone, let alone I, be constructive or a good editor on Wikipedia content sites while everybody else feels my changes may be substandard, not proper or questionable? Angela Kate Maureen Pears 09:23, 20 March 2022 (UTC)