Welcome
![New-Bouncywikilogo.gif](https://web.archive.org/web/20220816005045im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/98/New-Bouncywikilogo.gif/50px-New-Bouncywikilogo.gif)
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Your submission at Articles for creation
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SarahStierch (talk) 22:32, 30 August 2012 (UTC)Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
![]() |
Hello! Richard Bruce Bradford,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!
|
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 05:19, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
Speedy deletion nomination of Hugh Morgan (Apothecary)
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220816005045im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/48px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Hugh Morgan (Apothecary) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. VQuakr (talk) 06:44, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Removing Speedy at Hugh Morgan (Apothecary)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.
I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.
If you don't want the article to get deleted, please .
The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.
We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 07:17, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:17, 24 December 2012 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for January 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henry Sutton (inventor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bonkers The Clown (Nonsensical Babble) 09:31, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Rushton2010 (talk) 20:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Dora Meeson, Richard Bruce Bradford!
Wikipedia editor Anne Delong just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I have added a reference to the ROI membership. I hope that you will write more about Meeson's art. There are lots of examples, but no description of her style, reviews, influences, etc.
To reply, leave a comment on Anne Delong's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Talkback
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. (You can at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Flat Out let's discuss it 02:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Cannot find anything helpful in manual of style. Would like to see definitive policy for titles e.g. where using (name) MBE displays full title in tooltip, but is using redirect in link. I don't like to see (name) MBE which doesn't use redirect in link, but doesn't expand to full title in Richard_Bruce_Bradford
- I posted an answer at the Teahouse, aware that I may not have done the best possible job answering your question. I am uncertain that tooltip is the best solution to your need, but am unsure exactly what you want. Do you expect that a reader will get some sort of brief explanation of what "MBE" means while hovering the cursor over the link, without clicking? I apologize if I have misunderstood you. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:58, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
A page you started (Johnny Bulunbulun) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Johnny Bulunbulun, Richard Bruce Bradford!
Wikipedia editor Op47 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Article looks ok to me. You don't need to have an unreviewed tag on the article. It will be flagged to be reviewed anyway. So you can save yourself time putting it on and me taking it off again. regards.
To reply, leave a comment on Op47's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Disambiguation link notification for February 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Presidents of the Methodist Conference, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harold Roberts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at AfC Margaret Dawn Hamilton was accepted
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 13:35, 17 May 2014 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for October 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Art museums and galleries in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ararat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Ballarat cemeteries
Hi Richard, I just moved Ballaarat Old Cemetery to Ballarat Old Cemetery thinking that there was a typo in the name, but I note that some of the sources use two "a"s, while others don't. Please move this back if I'm mistaken (if my move was OK, Ballaarat New Cemetery may also need to change). Regards, Nick-D (talk) 06:38, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Have used the archaic spelling of Ballaarat as that is what is on the official Ballarat Cemeteries website Richard Bruce Bradford (talk) 06:47, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geelong Eastern Cemetery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Infoboxes
Hello. I just wondered if you knew that infoboxes are optional in Wikipedia articles, and most articles do not need infoboxes. Please see WP:DISINFOBOX for more information. If you do think that an article needs an infobox, I suggest that you make a suggestion on the Talk page first, as the regular editors of the article may disagree. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:33, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
![]() | Hello, Richard Bruce Bradford. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for April 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Woden Cemetery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Treloar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
![]() | Hello, Richard Bruce Bradford. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) |
Prasophyllum petilum
Hello Richard,
Interesting edits to Prasophyllum petilum and Hall Cemetery. I'm not sure it's correct to say that the type specimen of P. petilum was found in that cemetery though. I have the journal (Australian Orchid Research) in front of me and it has: "Typus: Australian Capital Territory; Hall, 5 November 1988, D.L. Jones 3431 and M.A.Clements (holo CBG, iso CBG)". No mention of a cemetery. Since the orchid's description, it has been collected in many places as noted in "Distribution and habitat", including Hall. There is no mention in any of the references I can find that the type of P. petilum was collected in Hall cemetery. I hope you will not object if I revert your change to the orchid article. Please correct me if you can find a reliable reference. (And yes, I know I'm nit-picking! Rare orchids are sometimes found in cemeteries - Prasophyllum taphanyx, the graveside leek orchid is a good example.) Gderrin (talk) 09:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- Hello again. I got your message and yep, you are perfectly correct. I have reverted my revert. (Embarassing. You would think I would read my own references more carefully.) The orchid was first collected in the Hall cemetery in 1988 and described by Jones in 1991. Grovelling apologies. Gderrin (talk) 12:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
![]() | Hello, Richard Bruce Bradford. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) |
Henry Sutton
On the basis that you have made ever so many useful amendments and valuable additions to the article of Henry Sutton, and, in particular, given that it seems that you have access to one or more important sources that are not available to me, I was wondering if you could supply any more details about his two wives (births, deaths), and his five sons (names, births, deaths)? – I think that one of the three sons from his first marriage was dead at the time that Sutton died in 1912. Best to you, Lindsay658 (talk) 06:24, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, your last move -- moving the "external media" template to the "external links" section at the bottom of the article -- seems to have been driven by a misunderstood belief that the "external media" template's function is to embellish the "external links" section of an article. The Wikipedia policy w.r.t. its placement within the article, rather than in the "external links" section, is expressed at: Template:External_media#Where_to_use. Suggest that you re-place it somewhere near to where it was. Some examples of this special template in use: Maud Jeffries; Norman Hetherington. Best, Lindsay658 (talk) 10:46, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- Yes you are right I misunderstood the function, just assumed they were another type of external link, But I see the external media can be broken up, named and used against different sections - I think this may be better fit than one large chunk? regards Richard Bruce Bradford (talk) 15:00, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. I'm very, very busy at the moment, and unable to attend to Wikipedia matters. The article looks ever so much better now, thanks to your recent work. What you've done, in breaking it up into relevant sections is, I believe, one of the major reasons for having the special template in the first place.
Also, a word of explanation: when I set the "stuff" up in the template, it would not work properly. It would not make the url 'disappear from sight' on the articles page (obviously, you've had better luck than I did). That's why I included each of the urls in such a clumsy way ("Retrieved from [https so-and-so] on 5 December 2018"); simply so that the connection between the each item and the corresponding link would be 'preserved' until someone with greater skill came along to fix up whatever it was that I had omitted to do in the first place. Lindsay658 (talk) 22:19, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Wondering if the "A. Sutton" in [1] is a typo, and whether it ought to be "H. Sutton". Lindsay658 (talk) 22:27, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- Lindsay658 would be referring to his son Arthur Sutton who was also very involved in motoring. regards.
- Wondering if the "A. Sutton" in [1] is a typo, and whether it ought to be "H. Sutton". Lindsay658 (talk) 22:27, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
(1) Some of the footnote-URL-links you have added don't seem to go anywhere: e.g., "FR 285240", "AU 3354", "AU 16633", "AU 17127", "AU 17433", etc. (2) Haven't time to do anything about these links; thought they might be useful to you . . . 4784, [2], 5380, 15777, [3]. Best, Lindsay658 (talk) 12:55, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thankyou Lindsay658 gazette refs are good ...hoping someone can sort out links for other patent numbers
Had a couple of minutes: (1) Created [4];
(2) “Uploaded” [5] and [6] (3) Discovered a site that may have some useful new links and additional info. for you: [7] (or, translated into English, [8]). Best, Lindsay658 (talk) 04:03, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Endeavors
Thank you user:sirlanz endeavors is a good way to clarify Sutton's inventions and gives more flexibility in describing his other interests.
Proposed deletion of Niko Defence League
![Notice](https://web.archive.org/web/20220816005045im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Niko Defence League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable org created by a non-notable person
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ronz (talk) 23:59, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
January 2019
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Niko Defence League. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 00:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Niko Defence League for deletion
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220816005045im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Niko Defence League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niko Defence League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 08:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Disambiguation link notification for October 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Melbourne Town Hall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cinema. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:47, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Brighton
hey there - thank you for your addition to the Brighton article, and I see a new article on the film. This is very interesting...i had no idea. Is the film available to view in any way? Online even? --Merbabu (talk) 07:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Some of the references have a picture which may be a frame from the film of Brighton approaching the Manly pier, but I haven't found anything online. I seem to remember seeing some of the film on a television program about 40 years ago, so it may still exist somewhere. Richard Bruce Bradford (talk) 08:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Do you think this photo at IMDB be a still from the film? photo I've never seen this photo. And, I've subsequently read a comment online that there are no known copies of the film in existence. --Merbabu (talk) 21:37, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, this would be my preferred picture for the infobox if it is uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Richard Bruce Bradford (talk) 02:43, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- Do you think this photo at IMDB be a still from the film? photo I've never seen this photo. And, I've subsequently read a comment online that there are no known copies of the film in existence. --Merbabu (talk) 21:37, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- Some of the references have a picture which may be a frame from the film of Brighton approaching the Manly pier, but I haven't found anything online. I seem to remember seeing some of the film on a television program about 40 years ago, so it may still exist somewhere. Richard Bruce Bradford (talk) 08:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Richard Bruce Bradford
Thank you for creating Australian Dancing Society.
User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for this new article, but other editors have noted that it needs more reliable sources. A Wikipedia article cannot survive on self-published sources in which the group describes itself, and instead reliable media coverage is needed. If this matter is not addressed, future editors could call for the article to be deleted.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 21:48, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
August 2021
Your edit to W. D. Borrie has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:35, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Hamilton Gallery moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Hamilton Gallery, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 16:03, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Ways to improve Theatre Royal (Australian TV series)
Hello, Richard Bruce Bradford,
Thank you for creating Theatre Royal (Australian TV series).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The references for this article do not meet general notability.
More sources are needed. Individual sources must be evaluated separately and independently of each other and meet the four criteria below to determine if a source qualifies towards establishing notability.
- Contain significant coverage addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth.
- Be completely independent of the article subject.
- Meet the standard for being a reliable source.
- Be a secondary source; primary and tertiary sources do not count towards establishing notability.
- Interviews are Primary sources. See WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.