Archives |
Category:Shopping malls by management company
Hi, following your nomination that is currently relisted at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 8#Category:Shopping malls by management company, I added some questions. I did not mean to torpedo the whole idea, but if you don't reply it looks like it will go nowhere. Just notifying you again in case you missed the initial ping. – Fayenatic London 10:29, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Luckiestman.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Luckiestman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 13:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom case request
FYI, at the currently open RFAR (WP:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Requests for arbitration), there are people suggesting you be added as a party to the case. I'm just the messenger, I've no opinion either way. I just noticed that it appeared you hadn't been informed. If you have been informed somewhere, sorry for the extra notice. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:39, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- I think I was informed before, but I feel no reason to contribute here. To my eyes, the discussion has gotten so far out of hand that I feel there's nothing I could contribute. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
False HAMMERs
I recently spotted a dispute at Untitled Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles film and thought, "oh boy, that looks like a textbook WP:HAMMER" - but I can't in all good conscience send it to AfD as it's got too many sources to Variety, for one thing. Elsewhere I see Untitled Marvel Halloween special, Untitled fifth Indiana Jones film and Untitled Nas album. Have things started changing so that reliable sources are more likely to cover works in progress (possible if they've all been stalled because of COVID) or are these just exceptions to the rule? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:42, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- WP:HAMMER always had exceptions. That's why I said "likely". Even from the beginning, I added a notable exception. Also, the Untitled Nas album isn't a WP:HAMMER, as it was releasexd in 2008 and officially has no title. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 15:46, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oh right - shouldn't it be Untitled (Nas album) then? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:47, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- It's not called "Untitled" though; it really is untitled. I'm fine with the title as is. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 15:50, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Single charts
I've seen plenty of articles on albums that include charts for the album's singles. Personally, I think that these charts are useful, and even if it's more common for articles not to have these charts than to have them, I think it makes a lot of sense to have them. Is there a specific policy against them? Jpcase (talk) 21:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- My interpretation of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Album_article_style_advice#Charts is that it should only include the albums charts such as Top Country Albums or Billboard 200. To include the singles charts too is redundant to the artist discography and prone to clutter, especially if the artist has made a large number of charts. The chart info should be contained on the discography table and the articles of individual songs where applicable. Furthermore, if you look at good or featured articles on albums, such as 1989 (Taylor Swift album), they do not include the singles discographies in the album article proper. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:07, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Album_article_style_advice#Charts doesn't say that you should "only" include album charts. It leaves the matter open-ended. Personally, I don't think it makes the article cluttered. It's nice having all of that information together in one place. I don't really edit articles about albums that often, but whenever I read those articles, I'm generally interested in knowing how any album's singles charted, and it's nice not having to navigate to a separate discography article for that information. So I'm always glad whenever I see that chart info about singles has been included in an album's article. --Jpcase (talk) 21:25, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Arbitration case opened
You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing/Evidence. Please add your evidence by July 9, 2022, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 11:14, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Upcoming Meghan Trainor album
Hi! The same user has created another article for Meghan Trainor's yet-untitled upcoming album at MT4* (Placeholder). I wanted to ask what should be done with it, since WP:G4 does not apply(?). Does it need to go through a whole AfD or is there something quicker?--NØ 12:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Deletion review for Hablemos de Salud
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Hablemos de Salud. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:04, 19 June 2022 (UTC)