Happy New YearHappy New Year Peaceray. Hope this ping finds you well. Wishing the new year brings along all the joy and happiness you can wish for! Ktin (talk) 02:25, 1 January 2022 (UTC) Feedback request: Social sciences and society Good Article nominationYour feedback is requested at Talk:Shadow docket on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 1 January 2022 (UTC) Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Visual arts - William TurnerSorry for being answerable after a long time, working in a different wiki project, English version is not my default. Thank you very much for the literature and other sources. Greetings--SkrzydlatyMuflon (talk) 21:08, 1 January 2022 (UTC) Feedback request: History Good Article nominationYour feedback is requested at Talk:Coup of Gitarama on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 1 January 2022 (UTC) WelcomeHi Peaceray, thanks for the excellent welcome message! Best, Hazedon (talk) 05:51, 7 January 2022 (UTC) Reversion of removal of "correct information"You told me it was "correct information" that the claims of fraud in the 2020 election were false. You asked me to cite contrary information, although you did not cite any yourself, and rather stacked the deck by declaring a host of establishment and left-wing sources to be reliable while disallowing those that I might appeal to. Obviously you do all of this in good conscience, but it adds up to major bias. The last time Ohio and Florida voted for a "losing" candidate was in 1960. That election was very likely rigged in Illinois and Texas, and probably in the new state of Hawaii also. I'm a PhD in political science, but of course, appeal to one you prefer to align with. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.71.28.174 (talk) 18:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
References
Help plsHi Peaceray. You said I could post questions to you. Thank you. I've been trying to tidy up the entries on aspirin because there is a widespread myth that it occurs in willow bark, when actually it was synthesised in a lab by scientists. But the story is so widespread that millions believe it and there are plenty of references to support it (all of which go in circles, just referencing each other). So, for example, you find a quote that Hippocrates used willow as a painkiller. In fact, Hippocrates never mentioned willow at all and I can link to complete texts of Hippocrates which show this. But when I say that, I get my posts deleted because there are lots of people who claim it. A negative reference isn't a reference, apparently. What's the correct thing to do? Visit the Salicylic acid page and look at the history section for an example. Is there any way of removing widespread misinformation from Wikipedia, or does it just keep coming back? E Wusk (talk) 17:36, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you Peaceray. I understand, and I shall make reference to those articles. Fortunately, this isn't an area where I have done any original research and I don't feel emotionally involved. But if it helps Wikipedia, I'm happy to try to improve the articles. Can I ask one more favour? Is my work on History of Aspirin - history of willow in medicine - section OK? I fear it may read like it is biased. It's frustrating if I add a perfectly good reference and it is deleted rather than incorporated because someone assumes I'm biased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by E Wusk (talk • contribs) 08:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC) Moka Ma's editsI see you are an experienced editor, and I noticed this edit. I'm wondering at what point this should go to ANI. The editor seems to be hopelessly struggling, and continues to edit very high-traffic articles. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Women in RedHi there, Peaceray. I see that you've recently been creating or improving at least three biographies of women and helping with others. As you may know, WikiProject Women in Red is trying to chip away at the Wikipedia gender gap. If you intend to continue writing about women, you might like to become a member of our project. You can do so by registering at the top of the project's main page. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 18:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Arden, DelawareHey, So I fixed the titling of that section from "Notable residents" to "Notable people" still, that is an edit that should remain. As for the other part, I was just trying to fix formatting so as to maintain consistency across thousands of other sections of this type, and proper grammar. If you know a way to do so without removing the annotated link, then please help. So all I am trying to do, is have the names, then a comma, then the text. That is how these are formatted literally tens of thousands of other places across the globe (this is my primary editing hobby is these "Notable people" lists...). Please let me know how we could fix that. I tried without removing the "annotated link", but was not successful. I then removed it, but kept all the wikilinks intact as you saw next, and that was the edit that you reverted. Thanks for your help in advance. ♥Th78blue (talk)♥ 23:16, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Minor thing[1] My indent was where I wanted it, I prefer to go by WP:INDENT. Also, since I use the beta "Discussion tools" these days, it's automatic. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:26, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Jump server misinformationHello I created a topic on the jump server article talk page about a bunch of misinformation you added back into the article, please come discuss. Thank you 2600:1700:12B0:3000:85A4:3E9A:69B1:D576 (talk) 05:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Feedback request: Social sciences and society Good Article nominationYour feedback is requested at Talk:William H. Davis (educator) on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC) Feedback request: History Good Article nominationYour feedback is requested at Talk:Friday (Arapaho chief) on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 2 February 2022 (UTC) Saturday Feb 5: ONLINE Met Afrofuturist edit-a-thon (and monthlong campaign)
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.) --Wikimedia New York City Team 05:27, 3 February 2022 (UTC) I think there is still canvassing of the indonesian article caused by some "well known" editorshi peaceray, i thank you for adding the template to assume good faith in the article that has gone really bad and it's at the center the scrutiny of some WELL KNOWN editors that caused during the years lots of troubles, making Wikipedia seems it's a gameplay of those who wins and those who looses. I would report this incident to an admin notice board even though i can see one of these editors history of being an extremely revolting wikipedia editor as is well aware of the situation and caused me a ban for just posting sources on the article...and im sure it was a case of admin shopping.... for simply stating my opinions and sources i did state to improve the article. im sure he will get me banned, he is anyway...known for banning people just to win an argument...thanks for the attention Amoeba69th (talk) 02:37, 9 February 2022 (UTC) Wikimedia NYC: Strategic Planning Survey for our community
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.) --Wikimedia New York City Team 18:38, 10 February 2022 (UTC) Sarah AzhariHi Peaceray. As requested, I have provided my opinion at the Sarah Azhari talk page. Hope that helps. Regards, Naval Scene (talk) 10:51, 14 February 2022 (UTC) Thanks for the Welcome section!I really appreciated your useful Welcome section on my Talk page! I wish you all the best sending my thanks. --Corrado72 (talk) 21:23, 17 February 2022 (UTC) Feb 23: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.) --Wikimedia New York City Team 19:39, 22 February 2022 (UTC) Help: Apache Kafka entryHi, you did revert edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Apache_Kafka&diff=next&oldid=1072665876 and we are wondering why? The change seems ok to us? It would be great to understand what is wrong with the edit and how the proposed change can be accepted.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6c4e:1a7f:e00:f5a8:8f74:ff6d:1120 (talk) 21:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for clarification. You're Invited! Writing Black History of the Pacific Northwest into WikipediaOn, Friday, February 25, 2022, Oregon State University will be hosting an online editathon focused on Black history of the Pacific Northwest. You can learn more here and/or register here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:26, 23 February 2022 (UTC) March editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Gerhard SchröderRE the edit you reverted from ... is a member of the board of the Russian state owned company Gazprom, he is also a retired German politician, consultant and lobbyist, who served as the chancellor of Germany from 1998 to 2005..... TO ... is a German retired politician, consultant and lobbyist, who served as the chancellor of Germany from 1998 to 2005 ... ok, I added added lower with the other one that is still in the top paragraphs. Though, since when was it a banable offense not to follow the style manual? That previous edit that you reverted was not disruptive - all I did was list his current role first. At this time, it is HIGHLY POV whether he is most known globally for briefly running Germany, or for his current role working for the russian state, during a war. Outside Europe, few would have heard about him until recently until his role in the creation of Nord Stream was globally publicized, as was his new role as of Feb 2022 working for the Russian State owned Gazprom. 79.155.94.28 (talk) 17:58, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Social sciences and society Good Article nominationYour feedback is requested at Talk:John C. Young (college president) on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC) Feedback request: History Good Article nominationYour feedback is requested at Talk:2020–2021 Belarusian protests on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 1 March 2022 (UTC) Reverted changeHey Peaceray, I'm a trainer who does a lot of work for Google teaching about Google Cloud. I happened to notice that some of the information on the GCP Wikipedia page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Cloud_Platform was out of date. I updated the page about a month ago and today I received a notice that user Drmies reverted my changes. This is all new to me, and I'm not sure why my changes were reverted. I attempted to "Talk" to Drmies but I'm guessing his talk page is locked? Not sure. Since I know what I'm talking about when it comes to GCP, and since I include a reference to the GCP page containing the information I used to make the edit, I'm not sure why the revert. Though my impulse is just to revert his changes back to mine, I'd like to know if I did something wrong first :-) Thanks for your time. Cheers. Hagg (talk) 21:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Hey @Peaceray:, I may have not been clear. I work for a technical training provider, and we teach classes about Google Cloud, but I don't actually work for Google. I'm guessing that clears me of the conflict of interest. I went to the talk page for Drmies, but I'm seeing a lock in the upper right corner of that page and don't see the ability to add a new section, like I did here on your talk page. I'll put an entry on the talk page for where I'm doing my edit, as you suggested, and see what I can find out. I did include a technical reference for the information I edited, but as a link in my content rather than a bottom of the page sort of thing. I'm assuming my oversight was likely not putting any comments for my edit. Thanks for the help. Hagg (talk) 22:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Seattle Wiknic 2015Template:Seattle Wiknic 2015 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:58, 5 March 2022 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Seattle Wiknic 2016Template:Seattle Wiknic 2016 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:58, 5 March 2022 (UTC) Portland Art+Feminism Edit-a-thon: March 12, 2022You are invited! An Art+Feminism Wikipedia edit-a-thon will be held in Portland, Oregon, on March 12, 2022. Learn more here! Wikipedia is one of the most-visited sites on the internet—and it’s created by people who volunteer their time to write and edit pages. Learn how to edit Wikipedia and be a part of shaping our understanding of our world. In this workshop, volunteer Wikipedia editors will be on hand to train participants on how to get started editing pages and offer ideas for which pages you can pitch in to help improve. Show up at any point during the four hours to get started! Also: Free burritos!! We will be providing vegan, vegetarian, and meat burritos from food cart Loncheria Las Mayos. Alder Commons has a large, fenced playground. Children are welcome! Some computers will be available to borrow, but if you have a laptop, please bring it to use. We will also be leading an online training for new editors at 11am-12pm PST. Please feel free to join that training if you are not able to show up IRL. This event is part of the international month of events organized by Art+Feminism, which is building a community of activists committed to closing information gaps related to gender, feminism, and the arts, beginning with Wikipedia. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:37, 8 March 2022 (UTC) New into linguisticsHey @Peaceray:! It is a great honor for me to write to you. I wanted to tell you that I am a linguistic major and I am going to be editing and creating articles specifically on ethnolinguistics and indigenous languages. I plan to live with native peoples whose languages almost no material is available and add it to Wikipedia. I hope you are great! Yours, --Wondolor (talk) 01:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC).
Francis BoyleWhat's this nonsense about Francis Boyle alleged conspiracy theories? I came across this site by accident and removed an obviously biased slander. There are more than enough reliable sources to justify the removal of the content in question. The origin of COVID-19 is by no means settled. Even the President of the United States and various intelligence agencies called for further investigations. This is pretty much common knowledge by now. There are tons of reports and resources, also from respected scientists. I don't think I need to find you the sources for that. "Editors may not add content solely because they believe it is true, nor delete content they believe to be untrue, unless they have verified beforehand with a reliable source" This should also apply to you. But if you find yourself incapable of following these simple rules, maybe you should ask yourself if you are the right person for a Wikipedia editor. No wonder the website is losing its reputation for unbiased, unpolitical articles. It's a sad development. Even the co-founder of this website warned about editors like you following their agenda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:EC:3706:4200:91E7:7380:2734:C305 (talk) 23:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Mar 27: Wiki-Tent Brunch in Brooklyn
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.) --Wikimedia New York City Team 04:13, 18 March 2022 (UTC) April Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging WikiWednesday tonight + Sunday Wiki-Tent Brunch
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.) --Wikimedia New York City Team 13:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC) Pauli's pronounsHi, Peaceray: When you have a moment, could you go over to the Paul Murray Talk Page and consider my latest comment on the pronouns discussion (@19:47, 21 March 2022), as it pertains to the most recent changes to the article by a new editor who does not seem to understand the "discuss-seek consensus" process? Thanks. PDGPA (talk) 18:18, 23 March 2022 (UTC) Feedback request: Social sciences and society Good Article nominationYour feedback is requested at Talk:Mariam Soulakiotis on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 1 April 2022 (UTC) Feedback request: History Good Article nominationYour feedback is requested at Talk:William of Villehardouin on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 2 April 2022 (UTC) GOCE April 2022 newsletter
Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC) User talk:88.203.104.246Hello, a couple of things about that IP. First, three "only warnings" rather defeats the point of an "only warning", especially when delivered after a "final warning". There's no need to go through all four warnings; once they've been informed that their editing is a problem and that they could be blocked, you can request a block at WP:AIV if they continue. Then you just need to wait for an admin to swing the banhammer. Second, it's not really helpful to pepper them with warnings in such quick succession (like four warnings in two minutes). If you come across an IP on a busy vandalism spree, or a very persistent vandal, you can go straight to AIV. If they've been blocked relatively recently (ie the block expired within the last month or so), it's safe to go straight to AIV and you can notify the previous blocking admin(s). That IP happens to be on my watchlist from when I blocked them last month so I've renewed the block. :) Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:56, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Apr 24: Wiki-Picnic and WikiSeder in Brooklyn
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.) --Wikimedia New York City Team MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC) Harry Styles Personal LifeHello Peaceray! There seems to be some confusion regarding Harry Styles personal life - you may see the talk page for more information about what is going on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Harry_Styles Personally I think that your edit was correct in reverting the change from the Guardian article (as that article talks about his aesthetics) but was wrong in allowing the GQ article to stay up as he has clarified he does not label his sexual orientation in no less than five different interviews, yet Google is prioritizing his answer that he gave under pressure that he doesn’t think he’s bisexual in search results. Today’s interview made a nod to the pressure of that interview, so it feels a little unethical to keep it up, particularly when we have control over what information Google recommends to people when they search “Harry Styles sexuality.” Additionally, the Better Homes and Gardens article from just today offers a lot more perspective than the degraded link to a secondary source from the Sun that is currently linked in the article. Obviously this can all be debated etc. but people have been saying for a long time that that part of his article is not written very well and now that he has a really good and respectful interview with more context, it seems to be time to overhaul the page. Because as it is, it’s a bit like pulling Britney Spears tabloids with degraded links from back when she was super demonized in the media to fill out her wikipedia page personal life section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by H-influenzae (talk • contribs) 00:56, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Apr 27: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.) --Wikimedia New York City Team 02:33, 27 April 2022 (UTC) Feedback request: History Good Article nominationYour feedback is requested at Talk:2003 La Paz riots on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 1 May 2022 (UTC) May 2022 at Women in Red
Help with Kaliflower Commune citationHi Peaceray, thanks for putting the citation to the Chicago Reader in correct format. You asked for Volume/issue number. I found that info but am not sure how to re-open the template & add it. The original print article was published in two parts. Part 1: Sept 27, 1995, Vol. 24, No. 52, p.1 ff; Part 2: Oct 6, 1995, Vol 21, No. 1, p.8 ff. (That is, the articles start on the pages indicated, & then jump around the way magazine articles do, "cont. on p. X". Not sure how to format this.) Can you help me understand how to change the citation correctly? I am an inexperienced Wikipedia editor and appreciate your knowhow! Nadnie (talk) 19:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
May 2022 Seattle meetup
23:21, 3 May 2022 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list.
Feedback request: Social sciences and society Good Article nominationYour feedback is requested at Talk:William C. Young on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 5 May 2022 (UTC) ANIAppears to be much ado about nothing, but some IP user from Talk:Harry Styles neglected to notify you about a filing. Zaathras (talk) 01:02, 11 May 2022 (UTC) a question...Why are you consistently stalking my edit page? I'm not saying your changes are necessarily awful, and it feels like you are specifically screwing with me (I mean, I can see no other reason for specifically going out of your way to meticulously document MY edits; don't you have a profession and/or education and/or interest set of your own that you can pursue?). These are MY pages that I am working on and if you were interested in collaborating, you might have had the courtesy of asking me (and also not METICULOUSLY GOING THROUGH EVERY EDIT I DO WHEN I AM NOT AROUND, AND SPECIFICALLY MINE). Like I said, I appreciate that they are not "bad edits", HOWEVER, there is NO REASON TO EDIT STALK MY PAGE, it is incredibly disrespectful, and it serves no purpose other than to upset me. Thanks 40.133.234.46 (talk) May 11, 2022, 23:41.
Thanks for your effort to repair the disambiguation page for 'TMI'... however, for some reason someone reverted your edit; perhaps you could find a solution for this? I am actually seriously concerned that words like 'lone' and (worse) 'only' do not have some sort of definition. Perhaps more peculiar, only has no link to any actual definition at all. That'd be like making Richard Cheese the top option under 'cheese' and quark (cheese) the top entry for quark (eg, the particle). I've been trying to start a conversation with an administrator on here but I have not yet received a reply, in that case in regards to rather incredibly dangerous redirects (sort of similar). Dunno if perhaps you'd be willing to look into this (and really, the disambiguation page for 'only' and the redirect page for 'begins' is kind of intensely nothing like the meaning of 'only' (or 'begins') that most people would think of). Thanks. 40.133.234.46 (talk) 21:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
I see that instead of replying to my request you have started to edit stalk (pardon, "monitor") the pages I am currently working on again. Would you mind perhaps addressing what I was asking you for help with -- which was not going, one by one, through the pages I am currently working on, SOLELY because I am the one currently working on them? In fact, if you could stop doing that, and perhaps focus on someone else who is actually making insane edits and harassing people on this site, it would be totally appreciated (because, really, there's thousands of them). Thanks so much! 40.133.234.46 (talk) 22:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
May 22: Wiki-Picnic and Hackathon in Brooklyn
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.) --Wikimedia New York City Team 02:18, 19 May 2022 (UTC) May 25: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.) --Wikimedia New York City Team 00:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC) Would you consider becoming a New Page Reviewer?
June events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging June 8: NYBG Environment of The Bronx - Editing Wikipedia for Beginners
Feedback request: Social sciences and society Good Article nominationYour feedback is requested at Talk:Localisation (humanitarian practice) on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 1 June 2022 (UTC) NYC Wiknic, June 26Hold the date. Meetup/NYC Wiknic in Crotona Park, Sunday June 26. Watch Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Wiknic June 2022 for further details as they become available. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2022 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for June 4Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gruithuisen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gruithuisen Domes. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: History Good Article nominationYour feedback is requested at Talk:Castro Sweep on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 9 June 2022 (UTC) June 22: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.) --Wikimedia New York City Team 14:50, 21 June 2022 (UTC) Sun June 26: Bronx Wiki-Picnic
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.) --Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:46, 23 June 2022 (UTC) Women in Red in July 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging Lessons on editing would be goodCould you please point me to any lessons on editing? Bradford Bear (talk) 16:49, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: History Good Article nominationYour feedback is requested at Talk:Henry Boyle, 1st Earl of Shannon on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC) Feedback request: Social sciences and society Good Article nominationYour feedback is requested at Talk:Margaret Nygard on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC) |