Page views for this talk page over the last 90 days |
---|
Detailed traffic statistics |
Removal of pubblications
Hi GizzyCatBella, I saw that you also consider Katchanovski valid to be in the encyclopaedia. Do you think this removal is justified?[1] I have seen in the articles of other academics that the most important publications can be put that way. Am I wrong?--Mhorg (talk) 17:47, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- I think it’s okay to remove it, the article is too short. - GizzyCatBella🍁 18:29, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Are you talking about the whole article or the "publications" section? If you are talking about the section, how could those publications be cited correctly? Mhorg (talk) 19:33, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- I’ll look at it later, but first his notability needs to be established. I personally believe he in notable but other editors think he is not. Everything else can be fixed later. - GizzyCatBella🍁 20:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Are you talking about the whole article or the "publications" section? If you are talking about the section, how could those publications be cited correctly? Mhorg (talk) 19:33, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
One year! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:46, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- 🙂 You’re such a nice person, thank you. - GizzyCatBella🍁 14:28, 18 June 2022 (UTC)