FC Barcelona is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 11, 2012. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other talk page banners | |
---|---|
FC Barcelona released 2021/22 Third kit
The new Barca third kit released today which is only wear in Champions League, we can’t find the number or code for the third kit. JoseNike (talk) 19:56, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
The kit deserves to be the new away kit for barcelona because it was made for UCL but barcelona have crashed out of the competition Maxsoa 810 (talk) 18:48, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
FC Barcelona Third/UCL code color
| pattern_name3 = Third/UCL | pattern_la3 = _barcelona2122uh | pattern_b3 = _barcelona2122uh | pattern_ra3 = _barcelona2122uh | pattern_sh3 = _barcelona2122uh | pattern_so3 = _barcelona2122uh | leftarm3 = 4055C0 | body3 = 4055C0 | rightarm3 = 4055C0 | shorts3 = 4055C0 | socks3 = 11152B |alt3 = |filetype3 = JoseNike (talk) 01:41, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Featured article review needed
This 2010 promotion to FA has not been maintained to standard since the FAC nominator retired.
- There is uncited text.
- There is considerable MOS:SANDWICHing due to images being chunked in incorrectly that affect the layout and professional look of the article.
- There are incomplete citations.
The article should be brought to WP:WIAFA standard or submitted to WP:FAR. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:50, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- Further reading needs to be pruned. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Requested move 3 April 2022
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Calidum 05:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
FC Barcelona → FC Barcelona (football) – This is not strictly Wikipedia about football, so it should not promote the football section above the others (and FCB also has, for example, a beach soccer section - also called FC Barcelona). Accordingly, the football section should be specified in parentheses. Soorma221 (talk) 08:17, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Strong oppose as per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. This team is definitely the most prominent one. Pageviews also show this.Kpddg (talk) 02:10, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Strong oppose the football team is a clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. This is not a "football bias" like the nominator claims, but it's entirely clear that the football team is what almost everyone is looking before, because they're the most famous of the teams, and the one covered most in news stories. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:07, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 18:46, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose clear PRIMARYTOPIC. GiantSnowman 18:47, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per previous (PRIMARYTOPIC, by a long way). Nampa DC (talk) 13:38, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Confused Is this request for every team with multiple sections or just about FC Barcelona? La Fuzion (K lo K) 17:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Strong oppose, the football club is clearly PRIMARY.--Ortizesp (talk) 01:38, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Strong oppose redundant disambiguation for page which is very clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. --SuperJew (talk) 07:28, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- 100% oppose based on reasons above, but we do have Galatasaray S.K. as a general sports page instead of the senior men's version. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 13:31, 7 April 2022 (UTC)