The following is a list of users who have volunteered to act as mentors to Good article reviewers. New reviewers are strongly encouraged to contact one of the editors below on their user talk page for assistance and advice on using the Good article nominations process, applying the Good article criteria, and producing a good review. All reviewers are welcome to contact mentors for advice on individual issues.
Mentor list
|
Mentors often specialize in reviewing articles within a particular area. They also may have expertise in a particular aspect of the Good article process. This is indicated after their user names below. If you wish to mentor new reviewers please add your name to the list.
- Nehrams2020 (talk · contribs) – Can assist with issues concerning images, inline citations/references, GA sweeps, and GA nominations general questions. A list of the reviews I have performed can be seen at my GA subpage.
- bibliomaniac15 (talk · contribs) – Mostly experienced with CVG and organism GAs, but I'm pretty sure I can handle image, citation, and general questions about GAN.
- Yamanbaiia (talk · contribs) – Manual of Style enthusiast.
- Juliancolton (talk · contribs) – I can help with pretty much anything related to the GA process.
- OhanaUnited (talk · contribs) – Sweeps, references, weasel words, and jargon words
- Ceranthor (talk · contribs) – Open to helping with anything.
- Majoreditor (talk · contribs) – I am happy to help with most any type of review.
- Sanguis Sanies (talk · contribs) – Anything Film and Television related, I'll take stab at anything else: the two GA articles I helped were both Law related.
- Mm40 (talk · contribs) – Quality of prose and reference formatting are strong points in my reviews. History, arts, or sports related articles, see here for my reviews.
- Nikkimaria (talk · contribs) – anything not pop culture or sports is probably fair game for me.
- Arsenikk (talk · contribs) – Transport (my field of excellence), video games, economics, business, politics, government, geography, places and engineering; I'm better at content, referencing, images, aesthetics and MOS than prose.
- Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) – Art, Architecture, Theatre, Film, most topics really, but I tend to avoid American sports, TV shows and contemporary pop music.
- Aircorn (talk · contribs) Willing to help out in most topics.
- Hahc21 (talk · contribs) – I love to help, mostly on inline citations, referencing and original research. Mainly on music and video game related articles.
- Ritchie333 (talk · contribs) - I've improved over 100 articles to Good article status and reviewed nearly 150. I'm particularly keen on music, albums and places/geography articles.
- Adityavagarwal (talk · contribs) - More than happy to help.
- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk · contribs) - I have around 60 reviews done so far. I tend to review music related articles. Happy to mentor anyone.
- FunkMonk (talk · contribs) — I mainly work on zoology articles, but have an interest in art (broadly speaking) and history as well.
- Iazyges (talk · contribs) — I mainly work with history, but happy to help out where needed.
- Gog the Mild (talk · contribs). I have nominated 80 GAs, mostly on military history. I have reviewed 180, and would be happy to mentor on anything outside popular culture and sport.
- Kingsif (talk · contribs) – Happy to help with prompts for applying criteria to articles. And will take on pop culture and sport. (GA reviews)
- Buidhe (talk · contribs) — happy to help with most topics.
- The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) – I'll help with any subject and have a reasonably broad understanding of things like MOS etc. I think I've reviewed around 500 GANs and have around 200 GAs.
- Eddie891 (talk · contribs) – History-related topics, literature, willing to take a stab at others not music or sports
- Barkeep49 (talk · contribs) - happy to help advise and guide on a variety of topics except science/math
- Kavyansh.Singh (talk · contribs) – I mainly work on American politics and history. Willing to give general for with any topic. (GA reviews)
|
|