Note: if I've made a clearly bad block, such as something that appears to be vandalism at first glance but actually has a good explanation, please unblock without waiting for me to come back online. If it's something less clear, please at least get consensus on AN/I first. Thanks.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 |
Please add new comments in . Thanks. |
---|
No RfXs since 00:32, 16 June 2022 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online |
Any info on ORDER OF EASTERN STAR?
I just acquired some really cool stuff from the order and few names curious about..thanks 47.201.8.250 (talk) 18:15, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
BaltimoreLink images and LocalLink 80 clarifications
Re: your comment on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents about my bus edits, I would like to address it, but that page is not related.
Can you link me to the image which is mis-attributed? There is a bug in the way the Mapillary API version released last year that broke user attributions, so it's easy to see how that happened, but I need to know which one so that I can fix it. (See the recent posts in this query for documentation on the bug, I try to keep track of these things but it is helpful to know if something slipped through the cracks so I can tell which particular areas are likely to have several authors with overlapping sequences: https://forum.mapillary.com/search?q=image%20author)
I would contend that the quality concern you raised about the pictures is not relevant here. The pictures I have uploaded are higher resolution than the "decent" pictures which depict routes which don't exist anymore. The one for CityLink Gold was carefully selected to show a stretch of North Avenue which was resurfaced in 2021 specifically for the bus route, which wouldn't have been in older pictures. (It also shows it at a critical point on the route, where it connects to North Avenue rail station).
The fact that the resolution is higher means that there is much more room to do crops and color touch ups to improve the visibility/clarity while retaining the text on the destination ticker and that sort of things. If you have specific feedback as to which images could use those touch ups, that would be helpful. I am linking some examples of the type of color and cropping touch ups I typically do, but bear in mind that color touch ups in particular can be quite time consuming so those wouldn't get done right away. The uploads here of the "Weathering Steel" are not ideal, but it is difficult to get a good picture of because of position + poor lighting positions. The second image is what I was able to produce with some color replacement techniques to make it look as close to it does in real life as I could.
That's the best example of how color correction specifically can be useful, but there are some post-touch up images that had better starting points that look better (see my Mondawmin, Reisterstown, and JHU station images for example).
I will work on the description for the LocalLink 80 article but know that there are quite a lot of updates to make across the articles for each route so it will take time to get to them all. The biggest reason they have to be moved before the bodies are changed is because the number changes mean that there would be naming conflicts if they were changed one at a time first. Old 29 and current 29 are completely different so you would have to deal with there being two "29" articles if you did them separately without moving them first. It gets hairy in a number of ways with out changing the titles first; "stranded" and duplicate route articles that represent short lived alternate forms of other routes from the old system should really be incorporated into the article for the route they are connected to, which is much harder to do without applying updates across the system first.
The LocalLink 80 route also does not look like current route 91 on the MTA website as you suggested, it is maybe vaguely in the same cardinal direction but they are definitely not the same route. The current 80 serves the Garrison Boulevard corridor, which is not covered by the current 91 at all. You also have to bear in mind that with bus routes, the designations are not solely based on streets and stops, but the time table as well. One of the most notable features of the 80 is it is one of the highest frequency routes in the city, where as the 91 runs a much lighter schedule and has significantly less passenger demand.
Cheers --Middle river exports (talk) 00:40, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Alright, I've spotted the attribution error, it was kylejamal's image of the 80 route. I've fixed that now, thanks for finding. That shot of Garrison is very good so I think it only needs some lighting touch ups really. You have to make compromises with transit photographs because obviously these are moving targets, people just record their sequences on auto-capture to get as much as possible. Cosmetic changes can come later.
- It's likely I'll come across a better GD picture at some point, the topography of that intersection makes things a bit weird. It's two bridges on top of each other and a train track sandwiched in between so it's hard to get everything in view. The other places that would work really well for that route are Berea and Walbrook. Middle river exports (talk) 01:44, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).
|
|
- Following an RfC, a change has been made to the administrators inactivity policy. Under the new policy, if an administrator has not made at least 100 edits over a period of 5 years they may be desysopped for inactivity.
- Following a discussion on the bureaucrat's noticeboard, a change has been made to the bureaucrats inactivity policy.
- The ability to undelete the associated talk page when undeleting a page has been added. This was the 11th wish of the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey.
- A public status system for WMF wikis has been created. It is located at https://www.wikimediastatus.net/ and is hosted separately to WMF wikis so in the case of an outage it will remain viewable.
- Remedy 2 of the St Christopher case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to place a ban on single-purpose accounts who were disruptively editing on the article St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine or related pages from those pages.
Proposed deletion of Lie Detector (TV series)
![Notice](https://web.archive.org/web/20220729190203im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Lie Detector (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Sources are directory listings, minimal sourcing found.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:29, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Lie Detector (TV series) for deletion
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220729190203im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lie Detector (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:55, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 May 2022
- From the team: A changing of the guard
- News and notes: 2022 Wikimedia Board elections
- Community view: Have your say in the 2022 Wikimedia Foundation Board elections
- In the media: Putin, Jimbo, Musk and more
- Special report: Three stories of Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war
- Discussion report: Portals, April Fools, admin activity requirements and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19 revisited
- Technology report: A new video player for Wikimedia wikis
- Featured content: Featured Content of April
- Interview: Wikipedia's pride
- Serendipity: Those thieving image farms
- Recent research: 35 million Twitter links analysed
- Tips and tricks: The reference desks of Wikipedia
- Traffic report: Strange highs and strange lows
- News from Diff: Winners of the Human rights and Environment special nomination by Wiki Loves Earth announced
- News from the WMF: The EU Digital Services Act: What’s the Deal with the Deal?
- From the archives: The Onion and Wikipedia
- Humour: A new crossword
Genuinely curious...
...as to why you felt these reverted edits required RD2. (please ping on reply) Primefac (talk) 01:22, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Is WP:ANI#Dan Wescher a sufficient explanation, or do I need to be more specific? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:50, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Fixing ping to Primefac. I hope. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- My only thought is that it's not like we're trying to hide all mention of her, since we have had some pretty public discussions about it, so I guess I'm wondering what makes "why is she not on this article" at the talk page different than the same discussion at AN. While I find no issue with removal as a dead-horse situation, that specific post did not seem to meet RD2, that's all. It's not really a hill I feel any sort of strong urge towards defending, of course, so I suppose I'll just continue keeping an eye on things as I have been, and if others feel like things need RD, I'll leave that to them. Primefac (talk) 20:10, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- I do see your point, but given the argument made in Archive335 that even having a BLP-compliant article would be harassment, I'd rather err on the side of caution here. As you say, it's been discussed, so if someone wants to connect the dots, do the research, and make the case without harassing BLP details, I can see that being done. That did not seem to be Wescher's goal here. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:58, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- My only thought is that it's not like we're trying to hide all mention of her, since we have had some pretty public discussions about it, so I guess I'm wondering what makes "why is she not on this article" at the talk page different than the same discussion at AN. While I find no issue with removal as a dead-horse situation, that specific post did not seem to meet RD2, that's all. It's not really a hill I feel any sort of strong urge towards defending, of course, so I suppose I'll just continue keeping an eye on things as I have been, and if others feel like things need RD, I'll leave that to them. Primefac (talk) 20:10, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Fixing ping to Primefac. I hope. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 50
Books & Bytes
Issue 50, March – April 2022
- New library partner - SPIE
- 1Lib1Ref May 2022 underway
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC) (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).
|
|
- Several areas of improvement collated from community member votes have been identified in the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines. The areas of improvement have been sent back for review and you are invited to provide input on these areas.
- Administrators using the mobile web interface can now access Special:Block directly from user pages. (T307341)
- The IP Info feature has been deployed to all wikis as a Beta Feature. Any autoconfirmed user may enable the feature using the "IP info" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features. Autoconfirmed users will be able to access basic information about an IP address that includes the country and connection method. Those with advanced privileges (admin, bureaucrat, checkuser) will have access to extra information that includes the Internet Service Provider and more specific location.
- Remedy 2 of the Rachel Marsden case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to delete or reduce to a stub, together with their talk pages, articles related to Rachel Marsden when they violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.
- An arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been closed.
The Signpost: 26 June 2022
- News and notes: WMF inks new rules on government-ordered takedowns, blasts Russian feds' censor demands, spends big bucks
- In the media: Editor given three-year sentence, big RfA makes news, Guy Standing takes it sitting down
- Special report: "Wikipedia's independence" or "Wikimedia's pile of dosh"?
- Discussion report: MoS rules on CCP name mulled, XRV axe plea nulled, mass drafting bid pulled
- Featured content: Articles on Scots' clash, Yank's tux, Austrian's action flick deemed brilliant prose
- Recent research: Wikipedia versus academia (again), tables' "immortality" probed
- Serendipity: Was she really a Swiss lesbian automobile racer?
- News from the WMF: Wikimedia Enterprise signs first deals
- Gallery: Celebration of summer, winter
Administrators' newsletter – July 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).
|
|
user_global_editcount
is a new variable that can be used in abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. (T130439)
- An arbitration case regarding conduct in deletion-related editing has been opened.
- The New Pages Patrol queue has around 10,000 articles to be reviewed. As all administrators have the patrol right, please consider helping out. The queue is here. For further information on the state of the project, see the latest NPP newsletter.