|
|||
Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
WP:AFCRC
No admins actively patrol AFCRC, so I recommend you make your requests at WP:AN or similar venues. Qwerfjkltalk 17:44, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
New message from IAmChaos
Message added 07:14, 26 April 2022 (UTC). You can at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Happy Editing--IAmChaos 07:14, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Liberia
Uncostructive? I simply stated she won a Nobel Prize, probably you wanted to stress that that piece of information was superfluous. No, I have a profile in the Italian Wikipedia and I have been writing articles for Wikipedia for 3 years, more or less; from time to time I make tiny edits here. Nice to meet you :) --2.36.52.78 (talk) 10:08, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. It has been restored. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:39, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry? Ahahah, that's all right! Officially, I left Wikipedia since I had troubles with other colleagues, I even won the Wikipedia t-shirt, which is something I am proud of. Even if I left Wiki.it, I still like to make some edits here and there on wiki.en, in particular, I like to add new links in order to link different voices, so that users can see the big picture. Have a nice day --2.36.52.78 (talk) 18:03, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Free Radio
Hello, LaundryPizza03,
That was a very fast page move, I just deleted that page through a PROD. Were you aware of the PROD or were you watching the Deletion log? I'm just curious because the page move happened just a few minutes after I deleted the disambiguation page. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 22:21, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- I put the page in my watchlist when I saw the PROD, as a reminder to do this after the page got deleted. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:13, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment on Wikiproject Mathematics
Your comments on WikiProject Mathematics directed to a new user posting in good faith are biting and can be perceived as mockery. Would you consider editing your post? SamuelRiv (talk) 01:22, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
What appears mocking is citing NOR and RS (on a Talk page) when the user simply said that they couldn't understand a section of an article. This appears to be something of a non sequitur. The user's past contributions seem to only have been in good faith. Their complaint is hardly uncommon for technical articles, especially for those introduced early in school like the commutative property. SamuelRiv (talk) 02:43, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- Then I don't know how I should have responded. Maybe I should have done nothing, since another user had gotten to cleaning the section before I did. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Replication Crisis
Hi there, thanks for all your hard work on Wikipedia. I just saw that my edit on Questionable Research Practices in the article Replication Crisis was reverted. If you go to the source article by Glick, you will see that he got the 10%-20% estimate from Table III, which includes not only data from the FDA but also from one of his earlier studies on "university scientists". Judging from the general tone of the article, especially the first sentence of the abstract ("Approximately 10–20% of all research and development (R&D) funds are estimated to be spent on questionable studies, which are characterized by misrepresentation of data, inaccurate reporting, and fabrication of experimental results.") I don't think this estimate is focusing on the medical field between 1977 and 1990. However, I think you are right that it's a good idea to mention the time frame and source here. How about something like "according to medical researcher J. Leslie Glick's estimate in 1992, about 10-20% of R&D involve QRP?" Tommyren (talk) 20:57, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Perhaps. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
List of Ford factories
FYI, that copyvio you helped with the removal and revdel of on List of Ford factories has been restored by the same IP, with a mostly-gibberish edit summary. --Sable232 (talk) 21:20, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Done. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Re: Accusation of sockpuppetry
LaundryPizza03, please see this report at the TAB (Spanish Wikipedia). This behaviour happened since August 2019. Thanks for raising this. Amitie 10g (talk) 18:23, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Amitie 10g: I opened a discussion about this issue at WT:SOFTWARE. Since this is alleged to be an LTA, should I cross-link the discussion from ANI? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:27, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
List of Airline of Wallis and Fortuna
Thankyou for nominating this non-list article for deletion. I am still puzzled why we have articles that are lists of nothing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:07, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
List of fictional antiheroes
Hey bro, can I edit the antihero list? There are some antiheroes missing from the list, from anime and manga CrocodileOtoishi (talk) 15:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- @CrocodileOtoishi: The inclusion criteria for the list are currently being negotiated. In the meantime, I would recommend that you provide for each entry at least two independent, reliable, secondary sources which characterize a character as an anti-hero. Unsourced entries will be removed. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Arbitration case opened
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing/Evidence. Please add your evidence by July 9, 2022, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 11:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)