DSM-5 question
Hi Legitimus,
Do you know the page number for what is cited to the DSM-5 in the lead sentence of Breast fetishism? Crossroads -talk- 04:15, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- The DSM doesn't mention "breast fetishism" by that specific name, but "partialism" is mentioned on page 701, in the section regarding Fetishistic Disorder. The paragraph is as follows:
"It is not uncommon for sexualized fetishes to include both inanimate objects and body parts (e.g., dirty socks and feet), and for this reason the definition of fetishistic disorder now re-incorporates partialism (i.e., an exclusive focus on a body part) into its boundaries. Partialism, previously considered a paraphilia not otherwise specified disorder, had historically been subsumed in fetishism prior to DSM-IIΙ." Legitimus (talk) 12:51, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. Crossroads -talk- 06:10, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Child grooming page
Legitimus, why are you creating me much problem to add the legal part mention in brakets at the beginning of the article regarding Child grooming and you even want me to start a discussion in the talk page despite already explaining you the reasons why should be added as a post-edit explanation? 151.46.64.34 (talk) 12:48, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- I was not the only person to revert you, and you do not seem to understand proper procedure editing. Articles are meant to follow the manual of style and the top-most section must follow even more rigorous standards, including being concise. Long sentences set in parenthesis tend to be poor writing form for the first sentence of an article.
- Now, please post your reasoning in the talk page for the article to allow others to weigh in. One potential outcome is your addition simply needs to be rephrased more cleanly in a way that can be incorporated into the sentence rather than as a parenthetical.
- I personally find it strange how you feel the need to point out such an oddly specific definition in the lead sentence of an article that already includes language that covers it. I also find it strange that you are being so emphatic about working in this "legal age of consent" language considering your IP address is from a nation that for one, is non-English-speaking, and second where that age is 14 years old.Legitimus (talk) 13:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)