1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 |
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 256Drg (talk • contribs) 09:40, May 3, 2021 (UTC)
Alha
Could you look at the content dispute? To me, neither preferred veersion is good. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:26, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Deepfriedokra: That and Udal of Mahoba are a mess and I think we should just revert to some version before these two new editors arrived on the scene. Perhaps @Bonadea: has ideas? --RegentsPark (comment) 15:31, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- I see you've reverted and fully protected, for the best. --RegentsPark (comment) 15:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- I would happily see both TBANned at this point. My impression is caste warfare/glorification --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:37, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- I dropped a CS CASTE notice on Iamritwikaryan's (littered with warnings) talk page. --RegentsPark (comment) 15:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Why do we even need a separate page on Udal of Mahoba? TrangaBellam (talk) 17:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- I dropped a CS CASTE notice on Iamritwikaryan's (littered with warnings) talk page. --RegentsPark (comment) 15:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- I would happily see both TBANned at this point. My impression is caste warfare/glorification --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:37, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- I see you've reverted and fully protected, for the best. --RegentsPark (comment) 15:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Unexplained addition or removal across multiple pages
Hi, some user @Smith Jats is editing multiple pages and adding/removing things without any explanation. All without any source. Please check the user contributions. Thank you. Krayon95 (talk) 02:55, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
You talk my page.Smith Jats (talk) 11:23, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Need your attention here
Dear Admin, I checked that you have blocked the user ( for 1 week ) who created this page [[1]], is such caste based Wiki project allowed? I have not seen any similar example till date. I think the above newly created page should be deleted. Akalanka820 (talk) 17:53, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Is this statement true?
"You are not allowed to use large quotations in "quote=" parameter. It should not exceed more than 25 words in general." RegentsPark Is this correct? MehmoodS (talk) 16:10, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- @MehmoodS: Not to my knowledge. Imo, quotes should be avoided (because they are lazy) but if there is a quote less than 25 words you probably don't even need the quote= parameter. --RegentsPark (comment) 16:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- RegentsPark Thanks. Just wanted to confirm as an editor used this excuse to revert my changes. [2] and here is my change that was reverted.[3]. Before my change, in the article, in infobox, result section, the quotes were incorrect or you can say mis-represented as those weren't the correct quotes about the conclusion of the war but rather about initial war. And when I corrected the quote as it seemed necessary due to many disruption on the page, two editors reverted the change without any discussion. Seems like they are pushing POV. Even they are using two unreliable sources by Y.G. Bhave and Barbara West where earlier is a scholar in humanist and the latter is anthropologist. Not historians. MehmoodS (talk) 16:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- @MehmoodS: The diff you've provided above has the edit summary "Copyvio and POV pushing", and there is a a talk page discussion on the result. The 25 word limit is, of course, not the case but Aman.kumar.goel seems to have moved on from that reasoning. The reliability of the sources is best evaluated at WP:RSN and you will need consensus on the result since you're changing it from the status quo. You could ask for more eyes on WT:IN. --RegentsPark (comment) 17:53, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- RegentsPark Thanks. Just wanted to confirm as an editor used this excuse to revert my changes. [2] and here is my change that was reverted.[3]. Before my change, in the article, in infobox, result section, the quotes were incorrect or you can say mis-represented as those weren't the correct quotes about the conclusion of the war but rather about initial war. And when I corrected the quote as it seemed necessary due to many disruption on the page, two editors reverted the change without any discussion. Seems like they are pushing POV. Even they are using two unreliable sources by Y.G. Bhave and Barbara West where earlier is a scholar in humanist and the latter is anthropologist. Not historians. MehmoodS (talk) 16:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete the article
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tripura_People%27s_Front as it is not notable one. Wikifulness (talk) 12:23, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- I can't do that. You will need to try WP:PROD and, if that does not work, then try WP:AFD. --RegentsPark (comment) 15:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Page moving
The page titled Thori (tribe) has been recently moved to Kalash tribe without explanation. Including unexplained removal of content. Recent editors are @Virendra Raghuwanshi and @Smith Jats. Seems like it was done in imitation of Kalash people. Please check. Thank you. Krayon95 (talk) 15:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- I undid the move. If you could restore the last best version, I'll keep watch on it. --RegentsPark (comment) 15:59, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Nupur Sharma (politician)
Thank you for the protection. Can you please also take a look at the related event article 2022 BJP Muhammad remarks controversy. It is currently unprotected. Venkat TL (talk) 12:56, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- I semi-protected that one but will continue to watch it. --RegentsPark (comment) 13:01, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. I almost got blocked for asking this Venkat TL (talk) 13:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Jeypore Estate
May I know why have you removed my edit? I am providing a legitimate source of Raphael Rousseleau. MasterClass8x (talk) 19:28, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- @MasterClass8x: I'll respond on the article talk page in a little while. Best to keep it there. --RegentsPark (comment) 19:39, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Deletion
Rashmi Samant has been created in contravention of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rashmi Samant racism row. TrangaBellam (talk) 17:44, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Alha
Hello sir why did you remove information from alha? while the source support that information. 2409:4053:C94:8FC1:0:0:88C9:A807 (talk) 03:27, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Could you please take that to the article talk page? --RegentsPark (comment) 13:10, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- @RegentsPark ur admin what do you think was the thing I added wrong? What would be your opinion on the talk page? 2409:4053:E12:7A94:0:0:8149:EA0D (talk) 08:46, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- The Alha page sees a lot of sock activity so I routinely revert any significant change that has not shown to be a consensus change. I have no opinion on the content itself and suggest you post your suggested changes on the talk page and get consensus if you want them to be incorporated in the article. --RegentsPark (comment) 14:38, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- @RegentsPark ur admin what do you think was the thing I added wrong? What would be your opinion on the talk page? 2409:4053:E12:7A94:0:0:8149:EA0D (talk) 08:46, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Help!
It looks like we've run into a biased editor here. The term Kafir was used in that movie, but neither the term nor a link to it is being allowed.—2402:8100:281D:D59A:0:0:0:1 (talk) 15:10, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- That's a content issue that is best resolved through discussion on the article talk page. If you're unhappy with the exclusion of the word, you can always try dispute resolution or a WP:RFC. --RegentsPark (comment) 16:05, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
ANI
Good Evening. In your recent ANI close, you said that I show up at "every report that involves VenkatTL", but to be exact, there were multiple long ANI threads against Venkat TL where I didn't show up[4][5] and had no plans to show up here either until Hemantha dragged me into the controversy.[6] I hope you either modify the wording or remove it. Thanks.Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 17:23, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi. I'll take a look in a bit. Best wishes. --RegentsPark (comment) 19:25, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Modified. --RegentsPark (comment) 20:14, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HatsuneMilku (talk • contribs) 13:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- The thread is here. Primefac (talk) 13:10, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hmm. Perhaps time to start selling admin NFTs. That way I can keep my addiction and make some money!--RegentsPark (comment) 13:40, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
1630
Hi RegentsPark
Why did you revert[7] my edit[8] to the article 1630 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)?
Per WP:REVEXP, a revert should be explained. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:31, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @BrownHairedGirl:. Apologies, I assumed that the edit was made by a bot. The link you added appears to point to a site that's not in English and appears to be an online casino site. --RegentsPark (comment) 21:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- I did not add a link. I simple extracted the original URL from the archived link, so that readers can check the original, which has now been usurped.
- This is standard practice for archived links. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- I see. Feel free to re-revert. --RegentsPark (comment) 21:29, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have restored my edit[9], but with
|url-status=usurped
. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)- Thanks. Apologies for the confusion. --RegentsPark (comment) 21:32, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have restored my edit[9], but with