Archive 1 May 2007 to Jan 2008 Archive 2 Jan to April 2008 Archive 3 April to 15 May 2008 Archive 4 15 May to 30 June 2008 Archive 5 1 July 2008 to 26 August 2008 Archive 6 27 August 2008 to 10 October 2008 Archive 7 11 October 2008 to 13 January 2009 Archive 8 14 January 2009 to 26 February 2009 Archive 9 27 February 2009 to 9 April 2009 Archive 10 6 April 2009 to 1 June 2009 Archive 11 2 June 2009 to 25 August 2009 Archive 12 24 August 2009 to 14 November 2009 Archive 13 14 November to 8 January 2010 Archive 14 8 January 2010 to 19 February 2010 Archive 15 18 February 2010 to 22 July 2010 Archive 16 29 July 2010 to 23 October 2010 Archive 17 22 October 2010 to 22 December 2010 Archive 18 22 December 2010 to 12 March 2011 Archive 19 9 March 2011 to 18 May 2011 Archive 20 19 May 2011 to 21 July 2011 Archive 21 20 July 2011 to 18 October 2011 Archive 22 18 October 2011 to 26 December 2011 Archive 23 27 December 2011 to 27 January 2012 Archive 24 27 January 2012 to 31 March 2012 Archive 25 31 March 2012 to 5 June 2012 Archive 26 7 June 2012 to 1 September 2012 Archive 27 4 September 2012 to 29 November 2012 Archive 28 30 November 2012 to 1 February 2013 Archive 29 2 February 2013 to 15 April 2013 Archive 30 15 April 2013 to 4 June 2013 Archive 31 28 May 2013 to 2 July 2013 Archive 32 Archive 33 Archive 34 Archive 35 Archive 36 Archive 37 Archive 38 Archive 39 Archive 40 Archive 41 Archive 42 Archive 43 Archive 44 Archive 45 Archive 46 Archive 47 Archive 48 Archive 49 Archive 50 Archive 51 Archive 52 Archive 53 Archive 54 Archive 55 Archive 56 Archive 57 Archive 58 Archive 59 Archive 60 Archive 61 Archive 62 Archive 63 Archive 64 Archive 65 Archive 66 Archive 67 Archive 68 Archive 69 Archive 70 Archive 71 Archive 72 Archive 73 Archive 74 Archive 75 Archive 76 Archive 77 Archive 78 Archive 79 Archive 80 |
Your GA nomination of Rohese Giffard
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rohese Giffard you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Johannes Schade -- Johannes Schade (talk) 09:21, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).
|
|
- Several areas of improvement collated from community member votes have been identified in the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines. The areas of improvement have been sent back for review and you are invited to provide input on these areas.
- Administrators using the mobile web interface can now access Special:Block directly from user pages. (T307341)
- The IP Info feature has been deployed to all wikis as a Beta Feature. Any autoconfirmed user may enable the feature using the "IP info" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features. Autoconfirmed users will be able to access basic information about an IP address that includes the country and connection method. Those with advanced privileges (admin, bureaucrat, checkuser) will have access to extra information that includes the Internet Service Provider and more specific location.
- Remedy 2 of the Rachel Marsden case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to delete or reduce to a stub, together with their talk pages, articles related to Rachel Marsden when they violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.
- An arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been closed.
Your GA nomination of Rohese Giffard
The article Rohese Giffard you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rohese Giffard for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Johannes Schade -- Johannes Schade (talk) 15:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Robert of Bridlington
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Robert of Bridlington you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 08:21, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Robert of Bridlington
The article Robert of Bridlington you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Robert of Bridlington for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 13:01, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Robert of Bridlington
The article Robert of Bridlington you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Robert of Bridlington for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 20:02, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Rehese Giffard
Dear Ealdgyth. Thank you very much for the the Barnstar of Diligence, only my 2nd barnstar, which I have probably not merited, as I found afterwards that I have forgotten about the misplaced "Use British English" and "Use dmy dates" templates that appear below the References section in the article but should, according to MOS:LAYOUT, appear above the Infobox. Please quickly correct this before somebody sees it. I am sorry that I still had to bother you with such a request after the passing of the GA. With many thanks for your kindness and best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 07:07, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bartholomew of Exeter
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bartholomew of Exeter you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 00:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
Views/Day | Quality | Title | Tagged with… |
---|---|---|---|
100 | House of Blois (talk) | Add sources | |
14 | Wigmund of Mercia (talk) | Add sources | |
14 | Choctaw horse (talk) | Add sources | |
62 | Miles Christianus (talk) | Add sources | |
6 | American White and American Creme Horse Registry (talk) | Add sources | |
20 | Library Network of Western Switzerland (talk) | Add sources | |
11 | James Wilson Carmichael (talk) | Cleanup | |
18 | Behavioral endocrinology (talk) | Cleanup | |
7 | Oath of Salisbury (talk) | Cleanup | |
27 | Abbey of Sainte-Trinité, Caen (talk) | Expand | |
7 | Torigni-sur-Vire (talk) | Expand | |
3 | Flora Tasmaniae (talk) | Expand | |
33 | Wulfstan (died 1023) (talk) | Unencyclopaedic | |
170 | Monarchy of Germany (talk) | Unencyclopaedic | |
10 | Wynebald de Ballon (talk) | Unencyclopaedic | |
165 | Macrocystis pyrifera (talk) | Merge | |
9 | Sumas Mountain (British Columbia) (talk) | Merge | |
3 | Acanthobrahmaea (talk) | Merge | |
25 | Geoffrey II, Count of Anjou (talk) | Wikify | |
21 | Blessed Martyrs of Drina (talk) | Wikify | |
280 | Invasions of the British Isles (talk) | Wikify | |
1 | Canterbury election of 1205 (talk) | Orphan | |
3 | Illegitimate receiver (talk) | Orphan | |
5 | Ateronon (talk) | Orphan | |
4 | Ralph Walpole (talk) | Stub | |
6 | Katharine Keats-Rohan (talk) | Stub | |
8 | David C. Douglas (talk) | Stub | |
3 | William fitzWimund (talk) | Stub | |
4 | William FitzGilbert (talk) | Stub | |
7 | Who Killed Thomas Becket? (talk) | Stub |
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:58, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Lyfing (archbishop of Canterbury)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lyfing (archbishop of Canterbury) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Johannes Schade -- Johannes Schade (talk) 11:20, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of William of Canterbury
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William of Canterbury you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 08:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Lyfing (archbishop of Canterbury)
The article Lyfing (archbishop of Canterbury) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lyfing (archbishop of Canterbury) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Johannes Schade -- Johannes Schade (talk) 11:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Battle of Shiloh
Hello Ealdgyth—I want to simply get your opinion on the Battle of Shiloh. This article at one time was a Featured Article, but it has been demoted to C-Class. I plan to upgrade it to Good Article. I have five source books sitting on my desk right now. The article currently gets over 30,000 views (yes, 30,000) per month. My plan, like I did with the Battle of the Wilderness, is to complete the replacement article in a sandbox—then let people from WikiProject Military history look it over before I replace a vital article with so many views. It seems to me that the current article is "bloated" with way too much detail, but the argument against removing some of the bloat is the huge number of views. I definitely think the two maps under Background and plans are awful, some of the sketches do not add anything, and the Honors and commemoration section does not belong. Those have to go, in my opinion. (I have already started working on the article in my sandbox2, but I need to go back and replace some of the citations that use the Official Record instead of a source book.) What do you think about the extra detail currently in the Battle of Shiloh article? TwoScars (talk) 16:04, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of William of Canterbury
The article William of Canterbury you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:William of Canterbury for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 11:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bartholomew of Exeter
The article Bartholomew of Exeter you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bartholomew of Exeter for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 00:42, 19 June 2022 (UTC)