Read how to nominate an article for deletion.
Robin Hood Ventures
- Robin Hood Ventures ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
None of the references meet NCORP criteria for establishing notability and anything I find is related either to an announcement or one of their investments or a mention-in-passing. HighKing++ 15:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. HighKing++ 15:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. HighKing++ 15:38, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Horizons Ventures
- Horizons Ventures ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
None of the references meet NCORP criteria for establishing notability and anything I find is related either to an announcement or one of their investments or an interview. HighKing++ 15:33, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. HighKing++ 15:33, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Hong Kong. HighKing++ 15:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Alafia Samuels
- Alafia Samuels ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Having previously declined this as a draft I feel like it doesn't belong in mainspace as there is no visible pass of WP:NPROF. Now I usually try to be very accommodating to the fact that academics rarely receive coverage and am very flexible on what I believe is a pass as per their h-index, but this subject falls quite below that standard. I might be missing something here so an extra pair of eyes would be helpful. As it stands, I don't think this passes notability SNG requirements. nearlyevil665 15:21, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. nearlyevil665 15:21, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Techtro Lucknow FC
- Techtro Lucknow FC ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Not a fully professional. No significant coverage. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Indianfootball98 (talk) 14:59, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Indianfootball98 (talk) 14:59, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Basco Othukkungal
- Basco Othukkungal ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
A semi professional club without any significant coverage. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG Indianfootball98 (talk) 14:55, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Indianfootball98 (talk) 14:55, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
BBC Studio
- BBC Studio ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
All of these are partial title matches or not a match. There's none of these that could conceivably be correctly (or likely to be incorrectly) referred to as just "BBC Studio". (t · c) buidhe 05:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Disambiguations, and United Kingdom. (t · c) buidhe 05:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Agree, suspect functionality. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:36, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- I agree about the articles currently listed (especially if that's all that's there), but maybe we could expand the disambiguation page considerably to actually help people work out which "BBC Studio" it is they are looking for. The articles I would actually consider adding might include pages of both current and historical BBC studios like:
There is arguably a lot of confusion about this and it might be nice to help readers find what they need, given that the term "BBC studio" continues to be used a lot informally, and most of the official names can be hard to keep straight unless you live in one of the areas or work in the industry. Cielquiparle (talk) 11:23, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- I agree with Cielquiparle, converting this to a set index (possibly at a title like List of BBC studios) seems like the most helpful way to go. If this is deleted though it should be redirected to BBC Studios, if it isn't it needs a link and/or hatnote there. Thryduulf (talk) 15:44, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to BBC Studios and have a separate set index page (I had to look that up) such as "List of BBC studios" (lower case "s") to explain what all the different BBC studios are, which could be pointed to from "BBC Studios" as a hatnote. (Happy to work on the set index page if needed.) Cielquiparle (talk) 18:04, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- I wouldn't object to that outcome, although it is my second choice after this title leading to the set index. Thryduulf (talk) 02:05, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Interesting. What do you think about "BBC Studio" (capitalised) vs. "BBC studio" (small 's')? Or does it nor really matter? Cielquiparle (talk) 06:26, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- I wouldn't object to that outcome, although it is my second choice after this title leading to the set index. Thryduulf (talk) 02:05, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- I agree with Cielquiparle's set index idea. This page had been a redirect to BBC Studios when it was created, but the target page was renamed to BBC Studioworks, with another topic being renamed to BBC Studios. Although the current disambiguation page was only created last week, the title has been ambiguous for a long time now. --Joshua Issac (talk) 23:35, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:53, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Osarhieme Osadolor
- Osarhieme Osadolor ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Unexplained PROD removal by article creator, here we are. Fails WP:NACADEMIC; WP:GNG, only potentially significant role held was acting vice-chancellor of the Ambrose Alli University - WP:POLOUTCOMES here helps us, "Civil servants who assume a political office on an interim or caretaker basis are not considered notable just for having briefly held that office, even if holders of the office are normally considered notable." Coverage relates only to appointment/removal - this is not notability. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Nigeria. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Alexandermcnabb: where are you seeing that the subject is a civil servant? If there are additional sources you're pulling from which aren't currently on the page please add them. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:15, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Leaning delete based on current sourcing, willing to reconsider if additional sources are provided. Hope someone can do a non-English source search. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:29, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, As the article creator; going back to the edit summary of the PROD removal here which explain: “The subject clearly satisfy the criteria 6 of wp:NACADEMIC as “The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution” whether as acting or not; he served as the highest official of the university for a period of 10 months where he governed the academic institution”. In Nigeria, the vice chancellor is regarded as the highest level for an academic institution on whether as acting or not; it is appointed based on pedigree within the academic area and this duly satisfy criteria 6 of WP:NACADEMIC; also beyond being a VC, the subject also satisfy criteria 1 and 4 of WP:NACADEMIC as their works has contributed significantly to the academic and research work in Nigeria history with publications like this, this and this which has contributed to the retrieval of Benin and Nigeria artefacts from different part of the world. Kaizenify (talk) 15:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Hermann Neuling
- Hermann Neuling ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
This article has been tagged as unsourced since 2008, so for about 14 years. I did searching for sources in all the links with the article and in a few other google searches. The German article does have a source, but it looks to just be a catalog entry without substance. I can find a few name drops on one of his works, but nothing in a reliable source about him. I found one blog where someone was asking if others had information on Neuling, and another blog that did say a little about him. The first 2 works on Google scholar are works by a different Hermann Neuling, since one predates his birth and the other was published when he was 5, this person was not publishing academic works on German history at age 5 (I use publishing instead of writing not because I think there are 5 year olds writing academic level works on history period, but because academic publishing especially usually takes a while, so a book that comes out of an academic press in 2021 will often have been fully written by mid-2018 or earlier. As far as I can tell there are not sources out there that give indepth coverage of Neuling at the level we would need to have a biography that says anything of substance. John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:14, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Germany. Shellwood (talk) 14:25, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed, I don't think we can find much more than what's here, I've tried. Nothing found. Oaktree b (talk) 16:55, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. A google books search of his name produces pages of results. None significant coverage, but does confirm he created a large body of work. The significant coverage that proves notability can be found as follows:
- 12 mentions here (search inside by surname only) STONESTREET, R. Pedagogical Works for Low Horn. Horn Call: Journal of the International Horn Society, [s. l.], v. 45, n. 2, p. 53–57, 2015. Disponível em: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=100276801&site=eds-live&scope=site. Acesso em: 28 jun. 2022.
- 11 mentions here: STONESTREET, R. Twentieth-Century Solos for Low Horn. Horn Call: Journal of the International Horn Society, [s. l.], v. 47, n. 1, p. 52–56, 2016. Disponível em: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=119061452&site=eds-live&scope=site. Acesso em: 28 jun. 2022. CT55555 (talk) 17:21, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:45, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Synergy Marine Group
- Synergy Marine Group ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Citations are not good. Mostly some press releases and routine coverage. TheMermaidWomen (talk) 14:16, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. TheMermaidWomen (talk) 14:16, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Helen Brocklebank
- Helen Brocklebank ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Notability. The Harper's source is the only cite that might serve to establish notability, and I would argue it's really too weak to do so. These lists of putative movers and shakers are often very shonky.TheLongTone (talk) 14:07, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 14:23, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete no notability per WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG. --Morpho achilles (talk) 14:28, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
List of Miss Universe Myanmar titleholders
- List of Miss Universe Myanmar titleholders ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Does not meet WP:NLIST. This list does not warrant a split from the main page in terms of size. – Meena • 13:35, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Myanmar. – Meena • 13:35, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Gaelscoil an Mhuillinn
- Gaelscoil an Mhuillinn ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Does not appear to satisfy GNG. A Google search provided no RS or significant coverage. – Meena • 13:31, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Ireland. – Meena • 13:31, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:23, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable school that (per WP:NSCHOOL) fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NORG. Noting that the title of the subject is incorrect (the actual school is called "Gaelscoil An Mhuilinn" [one "l" in Mhuilinn] and not "Gaelscoil an Mhuillinn" [two "L"s]), I did a quick WP:BEFORE search. The only news sources I can find are things like this or this. Which amounts to fairly run-of-the-mill coverage in local news sources only. Searches in national news sources (like the Irish Times or Irish Examiner or RTÉ) return nothing at all. Put simply, schools are not automatically notable. And this relatively small and otherwise typical primary school is no exception. Guliolopez (talk) 14:47, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Simon Škrlec (BOBNAR)
- Simon Škrlec (BOBNAR) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Slovenian drum teacher. No notability whatsoever in evidence - fails WP:GNG; WP:MUSICBIO, under-sourced and promotional. Promotional can be edited out, notability can't be edited in. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:22, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, and Slovenia. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:22, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. Biggest claim to fame is being a touring drummer with a borderline notable band. That is simply not enough. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 13:27, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Mark Bryan Wilson
- Mark Bryan Wilson ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
His list of roles is extraordinary, a career that has spanned being Shelly the Hamster; Cairo Street Camel; The Bat (assistant) - whatever an assistant bat does. He may have 'slimed' Bill Murray but he is not notable per WP:GNG; WP:NACTOR. Coverage is not substantive or independent. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:12, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and United States of America. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:12, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Tender Claws
- Tender Claws ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Fails WP:GNG, let alone WP:CORP - games developer with no independent coverage, very poor sourcing attempts to disguise a patently commercial and non-notable article. When you're presenting a gaming company as interesting because one of its games is unplayable, you're in the weeds, folks... Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:51, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and United States of America. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:51, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect To The Under Presents along with Samantha Gorman as a WP:ATD. Since their game is notable, there's definitely a place for them on Wikipedia, but it's probably just a redirect as of now. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:45, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Steph Hodgins-May
- Steph Hodgins-May ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Fails WP:NPOL - an candidate unelected to any post of public service. Arguably also fails WP:GNG, coverage is routine political announcements, interviews, stories about her parents, trivial. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:53, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Politics, and Australia. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:53, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep The impact of Hodgins-May on the Greens electoral fortunes within the Victorian Jewish community is significant and enough to keep the page under WP:GNG. The general discussion about whether the Greens are anti-semitic or anti-Zionist will often include references to Hodgins-May, and the incident is regularly referenced in campaigns when the Greens are running candidates. I am inclined to agree with your other points, that without the Jewish communal angle she would not be notable enough for an article, but because of her impact within that community I am a strong keep on this one.Playlet (talk) 13:30, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. I'm not persuaded that a subject's "impact" is a valid reason for inclusion, however where that impact is evidenced by RSs then of course policies such as WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO etc may be met. In this instance she may fail WP:NPOL however there seems to be a substantial number of RSs on the page that would meet the other relevant requirements. Additionally, a database search of Australian and NZ newspapers (wider and deeper than Google) revealed 229 results, which I haven't perused, but that would seem to indicate there would be ample RSs available. Cabrils (talk) 03:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:NPOL. Additionally, the only sources which are not trivial passing mentions or interviews with any in-depth coverage are all pieces about her backing out of debate after she learned in was being hosted by a Zionist activist group, and all in Jewish press which understandably took an interest. It caused a bit of a local scandal in the Jewish community, but to my mind runs afoul of WP:BLP1E issues and neutrality issues as the sources themselves have a certain bias. If your greatest claim to fame is backing out of a debate that doesn't make you encyclopedically notable.4meter4 (talk) 04:08, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is the subject notable? If so under what guideline?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 08:10, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:42, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
2021 Maurice Revello Tournament
- 2021 Maurice Revello Tournament ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
The tournament was cancelled, and as a result, it fails WP:GNG, as there is not significant coverage about it. There doesn't look to be much other coverage about it (other than saying it's cancelled, and a team list). There is already an article for the 2022 Maurice Revello Tournament, which covers the fact that the 2021 edition was postponed for 6 months i.e. it's not the 2022 edition Joseph2302 (talk) 09:42, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and France. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:42, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:31, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect as possible search term. GiantSnowman 18:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:39, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I do not understand this article - the tournament is the Toulon Tournament, and has its own page - in fact, Maurice Revello Tournament is a redirect to Toulon Tournament. There is no need whatsoever for this article about when it wasn't a tournament, even by the wrong name. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Richard Schlesinger (filmmaker)
- Richard Schlesinger (filmmaker) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. Have examined sources in the article and online, and can only find very minor roles, or non-notable projects. Edwardx (talk) 12:38, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, France, and United States of America. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:56, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG, sourcing inadequate, marginal body of work. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:11, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
YugaTech
- YugaTech ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Fails to meet WP:GNG. (Proposed deletion reason was: Multiple issues: The notability of the site or its founder has not been demonstrated (Abe Olandres redirects here); tone may be a bit promotional; almost all sources are primary sources citing itself, if there are any sources to begin with.
) 84.250.14.116 (talk) 12:31, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and Philippines. Shellwood (talk) 13:53, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- I also noted earlier at Talk:YugaTech both this article and the redirect were created by authors who have both been banned for sockpuppetry. 84.250.14.116 (talk) 15:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Question is this Tatt award enough for notability. I've seen several news articles about it but I'm not sure about its relevance in their industry. --Lenticel (talk) 01:55, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:33, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Hervé Renoh
- Hervé Renoh ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG. Cannot find anything substantial in the article or online. Edwardx (talk) 12:30, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and France. Shellwood (talk) 12:31, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
LinkMe
- LinkMe ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
WP:NCORP, WP:SERIESA, non-notable startup. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 12:07, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 12:07, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:28, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete An App. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:12, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Teddy Partridge
- Teddy Partridge ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 10:57, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and England. Joeykai (talk) 10:57, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- I would be shocked if someone with 160 appearances for Manchester United was non-notable (for the 160 games, see here). BeanieFan11 (talk) 13:01, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. A player with 160 caps and 18 goals for Manchester United,[3]. Has book coverage [4][5] and with certainty plenty of period newspaper coverage. Still on the record books as one of the oldest players to play for Manchester. Joeykai did you even try searching or looking him up? Because this is a very bad nomination.--Mvqr (talk) 14:12, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Thapaswini Poonacha
- Thapaswini Poonacha ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Does not meet WP:NACTOR or WP:BASIC. No significant coverage and 1 recorded role. – Meena • 10:58, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Women. – Meena • 10:58, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions. Bears (talk) 11:04, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I found an entry on IMDB which ain't sufficient to keep the page. The cinemaexpress article does not do justice either. VV 11:45, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Razaq Obe
- Razaq Obe ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Appointed to non-elected minor regional role in the Ifedore local government of Ondo State. That's too marginal a role for WP:NPOL and he otherwise fails WP:GNG. Article tagged for promo/notability and rightly so. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:50, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Nigeria. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:50, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Frames Per Second Films
- Frames Per Second Films ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Film production services company doesn't seem to meet WP:NBIO - lacks in-depth coverage in sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Shellwood (talk) 12:28, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
A Noble Spirit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Happy to keep based on Mx. Granger's sources. (non-admin closure) FOARP (talk) 11:21, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- A Noble Spirit ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Fails WP:GNG, let alone WP:NFILM. Whilst the generic nature of the name of the film makes it hard to find sources, nothing in the way of significant coverage turned up in my WP:BEFORE. All sources appeared to be just bare mentions of the film in a long list of films due to be shown at the Nanning film festival. The absence of a corresponding ZH-language article is another indicator that this is non-notable. For the avoidance of doubt, the sources on the page are not reliable, independent coverage, but instead essentially promo/advertising of the film and/or user-created - the Douban and Entgroup pages are IMDB-style database listings. FOARP (talk) 10:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and China. FOARP (talk) 10:11, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- I searched a bit and found some Chinese-language sources about the film: [6] [7] [8] [9]. I suspect a more thorough search would find more. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 10:42, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Just Disgusting!
- Just Disgusting! ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Except for a minor award (that probably doesn't count towards GNG) this article is unsourced, and I could find another ref that has a passing mention that definitely isn't GNG: From Just Disgusting, by Andy Griffiths, a book that was read to one of my sons in school recently
. IMO fails notability and should be deleted. There is a section of this at the Andy Griffiths article, it's no better, relying on Goodreads and Amazon reviews. Fails all guidelines for WP:BK, there isn't two significant, reliable, indepedent refs, the award is too minor to be major to met Criteria 2 (that article also has a notability tag). It also only has a plot summary, which also is not suitable for article per WP:BK. VickKiang (talk) 10:01, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:07, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to Just!. The series seems to be notable, as it was the basis for a TV show and there's some coverage for the books along these lines, but the individual books aren't. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 12:56, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Shanghai Film Dubbing Studio
- Shanghai Film Dubbing Studio ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Does not satisfy GNG; no WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources. – Meena • 10:00, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and China. – Meena • 10:01, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. The corresponding article on zh.wikipedia cites several sources that appear to be reliable for this topic. A bit of online searching turned up others as well: [10][11][12] —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 10:58, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
List of Manhattan Beach municipal parks
- List of Manhattan Beach municipal parks ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Does not satisfy WP:NLIST. – Meena • 09:56, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography, Lists, and California. – Meena • 09:58, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Why not have this as part of a list including all the parks in LA county? Category:Parks in Los Angeles County, California Dream Focus 10:27, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- TY for your very good question. There are 88 incorporated cities in Los Angeles County (pop ~10 million), many operate their own parks. The county also operates parks. (There are also state parks within the city although those are already well covered.) The jurisdictional boundaries are moderately important, even if every single municipal city park is not. I was imagining that ultimately the larger cities in LA county (Glendale, Long Beach, Pasadena, Torrance, Santa Clarita) would have similar lists. There are also various trails, bike paths and beaches which sometimes have multiple “stakeholders” or cross the territory of multiple cities.
- List of parks in Los Angeles - CITY - 21 have extant articles
- Los Angeles County Department of Parks and Recreation - COUNTY - 183 parks mentioned, mix of cities and unincorporated areas, also manages Kenneth Hahn State Recreation Area on behalf of the state etc.
- List of Santa Monica municipal parks
- List of Culver City municipal parks
- Beverly Hills, California#Landmarks - 5 mentioned are municipal parks, 1 county-operated park
- Which is to say that a single list might get unwieldy. This list is part of a nascent organizational attempt! jengod (talk) 13:35, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- TY for your very good question. There are 88 incorporated cities in Los Angeles County (pop ~10 million), many operate their own parks. The county also operates parks. (There are also state parks within the city although those are already well covered.) The jurisdictional boundaries are moderately important, even if every single municipal city park is not. I was imagining that ultimately the larger cities in LA county (Glendale, Long Beach, Pasadena, Torrance, Santa Clarita) would have similar lists. There are also various trails, bike paths and beaches which sometimes have multiple “stakeholders” or cross the territory of multiple cities.
Designs of the coat of arms of Ukraine by Heorhiy Narbut
- Designs of the coat of arms of Ukraine by Heorhiy Narbut ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
I am not sure how I see this as an independent article outside of Coat of arms of Ukraine, I can't see people searching for this full title, maybe Heorhiy Narbut and Ukraine coat of arms, and he doesn't seem to be mentioned on the main article. So maybe a merge? Govvy (talk) 09:23, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:33, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Govvy I found a Ukrainian article and I think it's pretty notable and many books and academia papers are published on this topic. Narbut is the crator and designer of many basic stuff like coat of arms, hryvnia currency, etc. Молдовський винний погріб (talk) 10:36, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Oppose deletion the topic is notable, but should be expanded a little bit. It's more about historic page. I've already addea a list of literature there. --Молдовський винний погріб (talk) 10:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Reply @Молдовський винний погріб: There are two locations, the coat of arms page I mentioned above and Heorhiy Narbut article, I simply don't see the need for this article which you created. Govvy (talk) 10:49, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Govvy I didn't create, I linked it to a Ukrainian one. let ask the author to explain. but I see that it's a romm here for this article. @(W)rid(t)ing High please help with your article Молдовський винний погріб (talk) 10:52, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Franklin D. Azar
- Franklin D. Azar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Fails WP:GNG - wholly unremarkable personal injury lawyer, the usual coverage of cases he has been involved in, no independent in-depth coverage. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:27, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and United States of America. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:27, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete a personal injury lawyer with no actual claims to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:51, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I accessed The Wikipedia Library and did a meta search in the "search the library" box at the top of the page. I searched "Franklin D. Azar" (with the quotes) and got 146 results. Note that, unlike a Google search, this is a search of curated, proprietary databases. Yes, some of the hits were from PR newswire, but since they are included in The Wikipedia Library I think they should carry some favorable weight indicating notability. Moreover, the results did include some peer-reviewed articles. Leaving off the quotation marks in the search retrieves over 17,000 results. Searching "frank azar" (with the quotes) brings up 83 results. The articles retrieved span a period of twenty years and include reporting in major newspapers. After no-fault insurance law was aboloshed, Azar became an early pioneer in torts-based accident compensation. This and other significant coverage establishes sufficient notabliity for a Wikipedia article, as indicated by The Wikipedia Library. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 14:01, 28 June 2022 (UTC).
- Keep I'm new on Wikipedia, but just wanted to chime in: I'm in Colorado and Frank Azar is well known here. I added some information about his involvement in a famous Anna Nicole Smith case, and about the road they named for him. Does that help show his notoriety? User:Preasserrano (talk) 14:35, 1 July 2022 (UTC).
- Delete No obvious notability in sourcing. Is Coloradans know his name, but that's a matter of local interest to those in need of a personal injury lawyer. Unless sourcing appears that suggests he's notable outside of his own PR, I can't see reason to keep. ~ Pbritti (talk) 20:52, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:31, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Stroker Serpentine
- Stroker Serpentine ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Fails WP:ANYBIO & likely advertisement. Created a sex avatar in a video game. Limited media coverage from non-specialist sources and single lawsuit does not clear standards for inclusion. JJLiu112 (talk) 07:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:55, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:31, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Redhill (communications agency)
- Redhill (communications agency) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Promo page by paid editor with declared COI, no evidence of notability, links are all PR sites and paid ads. Previously speedied. JamesG5 (talk) 06:50, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Singapore. Shellwood (talk) 08:11, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of notability, from either the sources in the article or elsewhere. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 11:40, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete And should have been speedied again. SALT this time. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:20, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Ian Garry
- Ian Garry ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Fails WP:NMMA. Page was created under the old guidelines that were abolished, participation based criteria was removed and we can't pretend like it didn't happen. Otherwise Garry fails the other criteria, his highest ranking by FightMatrix is 99th, which is far short of the top 10. Also never appeared in Sherdog's top 10. ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 05:59, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Martial arts, and Ireland. Shellwood (talk) 08:10, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Jason Perry (politician)
- Jason Perry (politician) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Fails WP:NPOL and, in my opinion, WP:GNG too. I didn't tag it for speedy deletion (based on the previous AfD), since he was recently elected to a different position (Mayor). -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:54, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and England. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:54, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Keep I can’t really believe we’re doing this when I think there was a consensus previously that a Directly Elected Mayor of a London Borough does meet the notability standard (the dispute before was whether a candidate did, and I think the agreement was that they didn’t). He has the 2nd largest personal mandate of any politician in London (after only Sadiq Khan) as he is the Directly Elected Mayor of London’s Largest Borough. He is no less notable than 3 of the other 5 Mayors (Lutfur Rahman of course being extremely notable). The only difference in terms of status between Mr Perry and Mr Egan, Mr Glanville and Ms Khan is the party they represent. If Editors do choose to delete this article we should of course be reviewing all others in London and reaching the same conclusion (with the exception previously described for Lutfur Rahman who does have a different level of notability).
- Keep London Boroughs means pretty big mayors. WP:POLOUTCOMES gives us "Mayors: Mayors of cities of at least regional prominence have usually survived AFD, although the article should say more than just "Jane Doe is the mayor of Cityville" and additionally, "precedent has tended to favor keeping members of the main citywide government of internationally famous metropolitan areas such as Toronto, Chicago, Tokyo, or London." (my bold). Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:22, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Rowdysim
- Rowdysim ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Doesn't appear to be notable; none of the sources are independent. Created as part of a massive article drive of poorly translated and/or not-notable book articles (ANI thread for context: [13])
Actually, I don't even think a book by this title exists. (It's presumably a mistake, with "Rowdyism" intended, but it seems unlikely to me that a book entitled شغب would be translated in this way. ar-wiki article on that word for comparison: [14]) asilvering (talk) 05:15, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Saudi Arabia. Shellwood (talk) 08:12, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Should have been speedy, creation by a blocked user, one of a number who appear to have been involved in an ill-conceived attempt by a university-based group to create Arabic/English book-related WP content that got most of 'em blocked. Entirely without merit. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Whitby Wizard
- Whitby Wizard ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Notability Happyecheveria (talk) 00:29, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries and England. Happyecheveria (talk) 00:29, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Close. No reason given for deletion (or any reason for anything at all really). Thincat (talk) 08:40, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. I came to this puzzled too why it was up for deletion. --Bduke (talk) 11:37, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Clearly notable. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 12:48, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable even when defunct. --Mervyn (talk) 16:16, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. How can this stub be 'Clearly notable' based on a single source that says nothing more than 'it closed' (from a low-circulation local newspaper?) Clearly fails WP:N there's no prospect of this article being any more than a single sentence based on the complete lack of in-depth coverage by any source. JeffUK (talk) 16:54, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete owing to a lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Very clearly fails to meet WP:N. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:59, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: "Keep" !votes need to elaborate further. Citing a relevant notability guideline, how is this museum notable?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:33, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- The fact it is seen as "the quirkiest science centre museum in the U.K" and "it was inspired by the world famous Exploratorium in San Francisco and the Questacon Science Circus based in Canberra" makes it interesting as these are famous museums. It does however need sources other than the local newspaper, but I think that needs someone closer to the museum than I am. --Bduke (talk) 02:02, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Not the most detailed nomination I've seen, but sort of cuts to the chase. If you want The Express as higher circulation coverage, here it is, but it's a pretty passing mention. Other than that, notability is absent. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:19, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:26, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Azhagu Nila
- Azhagu Nila ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Cannot find any reliable sources; besides Wikipedia is not a database. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:22, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Shellwood (talk) 08:07, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
The Queen's Platinum Jubilee Concert
- The Queen's Platinum Jubilee Concert ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Non-notable, run-of-the-mill concert scheduled to take place next month; one of a hundreds of similar events in this never-ending festival of mawkishness. I can't find any independent, outside coverage that says more than "this will happen". – Joe (talk) 16:55, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Royalty and nobility, and Australia. – Joe (talk) 16:55, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep or Draftify: This is the first time a Jubilee concert is taking place in Australia, and we can hope more sources will appear near to the day. I will then improve it, but I don't see why there's a rush to delete this now. Peter Ormond 💬 21:32, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. If it is kept it also needs to be renamed given the existence of Platinum Party at the Palace, which was also a Platinum Jubilee Concert (and what I assumed this article was about until I read it). Queen's Platinum Jubilee Concert (Brisbane) or Queen's Platinum Jubilee Concert (Australia). Also per WP:THE. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:08, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: Seems to meet notability guidelines, it makes sense it's quite a stub before the event, this can be expanded after the fact. El Dubs (talk) 21:59, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Question - Are there any other articles of this type - like The Queen's Golden Jubilee Concert, for example? GoodDay (talk) 22:46, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of notability Nick-D (talk) 06:41, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Red Allen, Kid Ory & Jack Teagarden at Newport
- Red Allen, Kid Ory & Jack Teagarden at Newport ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Appears not to meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for albums. Barring the two references; one of which is for the label and the other is an Allmusic review; i found no other references for this release. The helper5667 (talk) 18:31, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. The helper5667 (talk) 18:31, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 00:28, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:XY. Fails WP:NALBUM per nom. Nothing found in my WP:BEFORE aside from AllMusic. SBKSPP (talk) 00:03, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to Red Allen, as bandleader who played on all the tracks. There is original coverage in Billboard, as well as brief (brief) mentions in the usual guides, like Larkin, and jazz histories. Caro7200 (talk) 15:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:07, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Charles Gregory Pestana
- Charles Gregory Pestana ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Usher of the Second Magistrate's Court in Singapore is not a position that confers notability. There is press coverage of the subject but this is “local” in the context of the time and it does not amount to a GNG pass. Mccapra (talk) 02:43, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Singapore. Mccapra (talk) 02:43, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: According to this, the Malaya Tribune was distributed across Malaya, Siam, Java, Sumatra and Borneo, and the Morning Tribune was also distributed in Johor. According to this, the Saturday Tribune was also published in Ipoh, Penang and Kuala Lumpur. According to this, The Straits Times also had offices in London and Kuala Lumpur. Would the sources from the Morning Tribune, the Malaya Tribune, the Sunday Tribune and The Straits Times be enough to pass GNG? Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 03:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - Notability is shown through significant coverage, as noted above by Somebodyidkfkdt, for the subject in the reporting by the Morning Tribune, Malaya Tribune, Sunday Tribune and The Straits Times. Meets WP:GNG to show notability and passes basic criteria for WP:BASIC. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 06:30, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Sources 3 to 7 are trivial coverage of his death where each article has a single paragraph announcing his death while the rest are lengthy records of who turned up at his funeral wake. Source 1 and 2 has some coverage but the articles are only due to his retirement. This does not present WP:SIGCOV While the newspapers are regional in nature, the coverage is entirely local to Singapore. The article will be WP:RUNOFTHEMILL with no establishment of notability of the BLP subject. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 06:46, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- WP:RUNOFTHEMILL is an essay, and source 3 also gives significant coverage. WP:AUD states that regional media is a strong indicator of notability. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 07:02, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Source 3
- Paragraph 1 - 1 sentence mentioning subject has died.
- Paragraph 2 - 2 sentences mentioning his age and family and funeral details.
- Paragraph 3 - 1 sentence mentioning his retirement and his previous job.
- Paragraph 4 - 1 sentence mentioning his hobby.
- It failed to provide any significant coverage of subject beside a typical obituary of death time/place, family, past job and hobby. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 07:14, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- If the rest of the sources are not significant coverage, wouldn't he then be able to pass WP:BASIC, since there are five sources which aren't significant? Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 10:57, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Sources 3 to 7 are still trivial coverage which would not amount to WP:BASIC (just imagine putting up obituary notices in multiple papers in different countries). Also, if a person is notable, there should be coverage over his life, not only at retirement and death. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 01:46, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- In my opinion, if he wasn't notable, there would not be coverage of his retirement. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 03:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Sources 3 to 7 are still trivial coverage which would not amount to WP:BASIC (just imagine putting up obituary notices in multiple papers in different countries). Also, if a person is notable, there should be coverage over his life, not only at retirement and death. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 01:46, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- If the rest of the sources are not significant coverage, wouldn't he then be able to pass WP:BASIC, since there are five sources which aren't significant? Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 10:57, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Source 3
- WP:RUNOFTHEMILL is an essay, and source 3 also gives significant coverage. WP:AUD states that regional media is a strong indicator of notability. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 07:02, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG on coverage and WP:JUDGE on role in life. Seems relatively uncontroversially so to me in both cases... Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:50, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: As the article's creator, I am not sure if I am allowed to do this, if I am not, can someone just strike out the keep? I believe the first two sources count towards GNG as they are both regional papers and are about the subject. I think the other five sources together also count towards notability per WP:BASIC. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 10:59, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:04, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Al Saad Indian School, Al Ain
- Al Saad Indian School, Al Ain ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
No significant coverage from the sources ChristinaNY (talk) 04:00, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and United Arab Emirates. ChristinaNY (talk) 04:00, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:55, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep- This 2016 article from Khaleej Times does an in-depth coverage of the school whereas articles like this one from May 2019 as well as this one from August 2021 by indiansgulf.in discuss the academic achievements of the school besides other references in which the name of the school is itself the headline. Hence, in my perception the school meets the notability criteria to the customary extent. Derivator2017 (talk) 14:30, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete IndiansinGulf, apart from having an existential issue with the use of the definite article, is not RS, having no editorial policy - in fact, it's essentially a blog/bunch of RSS feeds and will publish anything submitted. The rest is all sourced to the school and/or marginal. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:43, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Authoritarian enclave
- Authoritarian enclave ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
One sentence "article" that could easily be covered elsewhere, though I have no idea where. I'd suggest draftifying, but hasn't been edited by the creator since the day it was created over 3 weeks ago. BilCat (talk) 18:33, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:41, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep notable topic as evidenced by the cited sources. AfD is not cleanup or a way to force article expansion. If you are proposing a merge this is the wrong process (t · c) buidhe 18:46, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per the above. —QueenofBithynia (talk) 19:15, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, there are heaps of sources on this. --StellarNerd (talk) 19:17, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Dictionary, wiki isn't. Oaktree b (talk) 22:38, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- DELETE. This is not Wiktionary. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 19:40, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle (talk • contribs) 19:42, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. A cursory glance at the sources suggest there is potential for far more than a single sentence on this topic, although this may not ultimately be the best location for it. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 04:00, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete or Draftify: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. –Ploni (talk) 02:46, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as a political concept, it's perfectly apposite; there's a broad range of multi-disciplinary academic literature which discusses the phenomenon. That a dictionary and an encyclopedia will have similarly titled entries is obvious; the presence of Cloud, Water, Temperature, Economics or State etc does not make this encyclopaedia a dictionary. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 13:13, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:01, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep its notable topic. Henriklars (talk) 06:40, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NOTDICTIONARY — Preceding unsigned comment added by Not the droid you're looking for (talk • contribs) 14:29, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Anand Mishra
- Anand Mishra ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Different enough that it's not a G4 (the one deleted in January had more sourcing), but still no evidence this person is notable Star Mississippi 19:58, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, and India. Star Mississippi 19:58, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping to all those still active from prior AfDs: @GSS, QueerEcofeminist, NeverTry4Me, Venkat TL, and Onel5969: Star Mississippi 20:03, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Assam-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:45, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete we lack the substantive coverage that we need to justify an article. Not every police officer is notable, even those who rise somewhat through the ranks. We need good sourcing to show notability and that is lacking here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:48, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:53, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Ana Ugalde
- Ana Ugalde ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
A search across Google (incl. Google Books, Scholar etc.) returns just a single source – an entry within a reference book – which is already cited in the article. Article would also be an orphan if not for a single mention elsewhere – the fact that she decorated a room at a museum. Fails WP:GNG. Jkaharper (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Women, and Mexico. Shellwood (talk) 20:52, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 00:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - She meets our notability requirements of WP:ANYBIO per criterion #3:
The person has an entry in a country's standard national biographical dictionary (e.g. the Dictionary of National Biography)
as she has a verifiable entry in: Jules Heller; Nancy G. Heller (19 December 2013). North American Women Artists of the Twentieth Century: A Biographical Dictionary. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-63882-5, Page 551 and 611. Netherzone (talk) 00:29, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- That isn't a "standard national biographical dictionary", being limited to one gender, one profession and one century (although covering more than one country. Johnbod (talk) 00:35, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Netherzone:, that is not a dictionary of national biography and its the sole existing source for her that I already identified above. There are no others. How do you suggest ever expanding the article? --Jkaharper (talk) 08:22, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- That isn't a "standard national biographical dictionary", being limited to one gender, one profession and one century (although covering more than one country. Johnbod (talk) 00:35, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The one source does not meet the tight description of what a standard national biographical dictionary is. Wikipedia needs to be built on multiple secondary sources. This is not happening with this article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:47, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The reference book returned, as described in the nomination, has a bibliography section for each artist bio. It's not visible on Google Books, but compare to the bibliography for the previous entry in the book. It seems premature to delete the article without verifying whether there are further sources below the bibliography header.--Jahaza (talk) 01:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep the source for the entry in North American Women Artists of the Twentieth Century: A Biographical Dictionary turns out to be "Alvarez, Jose Rogelio, et al. Enciclopedia de México. Secretaria de Educacion Publica, 1987," so this would seem to meet WP:ANYBIO.--Jahaza (talk) 01:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep WP:ANYBIO. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:01, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:39, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Geetika Mehandru
- Geetika Mehandru ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
It does not satisfy the WP:CSD G4 C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:30, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:30, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Women. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:40, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: I don't believe that things have drastically changed since the last AfD, 8 months back. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:41, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Administrator note Despite talking to C1K off-wiki about this, I remain very confused why he un-tagged this despite not being able to know whether it was a G4, then AfD'd it with G4 as the rationale, and then again un-tagged it for CSD... But, for what it's worth, I would have declined the G4. The new film and Hindustan Times coverage make this ineligible. No comment on suitability for deletion more generally. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 04:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, also: @C1K98V, if you want this article deleted, it qualifies for G7 speedy deletion. Is that what you want? I'm having trouble parsing. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 04:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Scott Presler
- Scott Presler ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Proposed deletion for lack of notability. Citations in the article are covering a trash cleanups he organized in Baltimore. This article was deleted in 2019 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Presler Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 23:03, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- I can expand the article, I just got it started as a jumping off point. I was not aware that there was a previous version of this article that was deleted, so my apologies for not taking note of that! I do think the trash cleanups were a very significant event that generated enough headlines to warrant notability. I've seen Presler pop up over the past couple of years in Fox, The Daily Beast, The Baltimore Sun, The New York Post, and the Washington Post. I will be adding more to the article, but I do believe that when all is said and done, the article will meet the standards of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." GeorgeBailey (talk) 00:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for replying to this @GeorgeBailey. Here are some of the notability guidelines used for articles about people, these are what I used when establishing if the article was notable. Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (people). Before I nominated this article I looked at a couple articles in the American political activists category and compared the types of sources cited in those articles to the ones I found covering Presler and I didn't think it passed the requirements for notability. I tried to look into his work with Rise PAC but couldn't find much of their website or by searching Google News. I gave it a good try when I was looking but it's completely possible that I missed something. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 01:32, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- I can expand the article, I just got it started as a jumping off point. I was not aware that there was a previous version of this article that was deleted, so my apologies for not taking note of that! I do think the trash cleanups were a very significant event that generated enough headlines to warrant notability. I've seen Presler pop up over the past couple of years in Fox, The Daily Beast, The Baltimore Sun, The New York Post, and the Washington Post. I will be adding more to the article, but I do believe that when all is said and done, the article will meet the standards of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." GeorgeBailey (talk) 00:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conservatism, Politics, and Maryland. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:27, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as a Baltimorian, I can say he is a nobody who showed up to get his 15 minutes of fame. As a Wikipedian, he's also a nobody and isn't notable. There is no in depth coverage, nothing sustained and he fails GNG (and whatever niche n criteria you want to throw in there. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:34, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- F it, delete. Started to edit and expand but got a revert from the above user. The language above seems like there would be no negotiation that would lead to anything. It's not a battle that I feel like fighting. Dr vulpes, you can blank it. GeorgeBailey (talk) 22:47, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- You can expand it and work on it while it's at AFD, but without removing the notice. PRAXIDICAE🌈 22:49, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Of note is that the "F it, delete" !vote and notions therein such as "started to edit and expand but got a revert", "seems like there would be no negotiation that would lead to anything" and "It's not a battle that I feel like fighting" are not based upon Wikipedia's deletion policy.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:30, 5 July 2022 (UTC)- @Northamerica1000 when I looked at the revert I felt it was mostly appropriate then inappropriate, they were putting the AfD notice back as it had been removed. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 04:59, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable fails GNG. Henriklars (talk) 08:20, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Peter Andrew Jestyn Phillips
- Peter Andrew Jestyn Phillips ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Despite the very impressive list of roles, they're all support roles or trusteeships, with only CUP presented as a CEO position. Coverage is passing, CVs or corporate announcements. WP:BUSINESSPERSONOUTCOME - "Corporate presidents, chief executive officers and chairpersons of the boards of directors of companies listed in the Fortune 500 (US) or the FTSE 100 Index (UK) are generally kept as notable." CUP is not FTSE listed . Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:52, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, News media, and Business. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:52, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:54, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- I'm going to suggest a weak keep. I do appreciate that this is a good-faith nomination that will probably lead to much healthy discussion; and it's tricky, because the majority of information about him is indeed various corporate announcements. However, I think we need to look at the bigger picture. It is not right to view CUP from the perspective of a FTSE 100 company. Its significance isn't measured by share value and pounds. Its significance is two-fold; firstly it is one of the five main UK examining boards, which makes the CEO position extremely influential in UK education (and outside UK too). Secondly, the CUP is the world's oldest publisher and printer, and it gave up actually printing things during Phillips' reign, which means our readers may have curiosity about who was in charge at this historically-meaningful moment. His trusteeships are not run-of-the-mill (Nuffield foundation; can't get much more influential than that). We would accept him as notable had he been editor of a journal, and yet as CEO of a publisher of many journals, and former president of The Publishers Association we don't. If he'd been any one of the things he'd been, I'd happily delete, but his career has tentacles in so many parts of UK education, media and health, and at such high levels, that I think it almost expected we should have something to say about him. And it's impossible to reduce him to a redirect, because there are too many targets. The difficulty is making sure that the sourcing for an article about him is good, and not entirely press-releases, given that this sort of career creates a lot of routine press. Elemimele (talk) 12:54, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:25, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment As AfC approver I will not vote but I would like mention that I approved it based on the notability of CUP which is also the Queen's Printer and was granted letters patent in 1534.Gusfriend (talk) 07:26, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Jimmy Jan
- Jimmy Jan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Fails WP:GNG, only three sources, and two are his social media pages. Search results brought up articles about the subject from WP:NYPOST and WP:DAILYMAIL, not suitable for Wikipedia. User talk:Malmmf 15:55, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 June 27. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:13, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep on the basis it does pass WP:GNG. Having done a search of sources:
- The Global Herald - information about his return to the slopes
- Pedestrian TV - covers his search for love which went viral
- WST Post - covers his search for love
- The Independent - covers his search for love
- Men's Health Australia magazine covers his life and injuries
- NZ Herald brief coverage of the incident and search for love
- Perth Now covers search for love
- Newcastle Weekly covers his accident
On this basis, although the article might be a stub its notable enough to keep? He's clearly a viable search time and the story went viral to attract international coverage from British and New Zealand media outlets. Passes WP:GNG. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:26, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 22:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:20, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
2022 L'Open 35 de Saint-Malo
- 2022 L'Open 35 de Saint-Malo ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Reviewed during new page patrol. No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. No GNG type sources and use of the SNG wp:seasons way in requires primarily prose as an indicator of such which this misses by far. The only reference is their own website. Tagged by others for such issues since May with no references added North8000 (talk) 02:00, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Tennis, and France. ––FormalDude talk 07:47, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No national coverage in French sources, only local coverage in Ouest-France or on tennis websites. Would appear to be a low-level tournament. Oaktree b (talk) 21:23, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Sources don't have to be national in scope or "general interest" for them to count towards GNG. In my searches I have found [15] [16] and [17], which along with the sources Oaktree b mentions (but does not link to) should be enough to meet GNG. The nominator should also be well aware that GNG passing sources don't need to be in an article for an article to survive NPP (they only need to exist). Iffy★Chat -- 20:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:48, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I limited my searches to only .fr websites and get: [18]. First one in Ouest-France is [19], "Five good reasons to go to the open 35 de tennis this weekend", appears to be a brief mention of 5 good things at the tournament. [20] talks about the opening of the tournament. I didn't think they qualified as substantial articles, mostly brief mentions. Other mentions of the Kinesiologists at the tournament and how local students are going to it. Nothing terribly notable about these articles, reliable, yes, substantial, no. Oaktree b (talk) 03:54, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete fails GNG. Henriklars (talk) 08:16, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep – I think the sources linked by Iffy as well as the other sources that are referenced above which exist but aren't in the article are enough to get this one over the WP:GNG line. Adamtt9 (talk) 11:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Government Senior Secondary School Chabutra
- Government Senior Secondary School Chabutra ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Fails WP:NSCHOOL. There are some news links which mention the school, but nothing in depth. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:44, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, India, and West Bengal. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:44, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:55, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
List of Toon In with Me episodes (2022)
- List of Toon In with Me episodes (2022) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- List of Toon In with Me episodes (2021) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
No evidence that either of these pages meets WP:LISTN. I could see an article about each TV season (i.e. like Grey's Anatomy (season 17)) assuming it is significantly covered in RS and is not better covered at the main article for the series. This list is not such an article and entirely lacks independent perspective, failing WP:NOTPLOT. (t · c) buidhe 01:48, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. (t · c) buidhe 01:48, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Lists of episodes are usually encyclopedic, but these are effectively unsourced, and the "plot summaries" are likely copyright violations. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:21, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Lists. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:22, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Neutral If the episode list doesn't fit in the main article for the notable series, it is acceptable to have a spinout article to hold the valid content. This however is just a copy and pasted official description of episodes found on IMDB and elsewhere. Dream Focus 04:47, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose To have episode lists for shows that premiere daily to be broken up into years is not an uncommon practice. Since this nomination was posted, and after previous editors have commented, I have added a substantial amount of sources to each episode list. As for the summaries, the list of featured cartoons takes up space and can create the appearance of too much plot. In reality each's episode is only aground 1 single sentence each, which is far from excessive.Grapesoda22 (talk) 06:00, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Is the show just a guy and his puppet introducing classic cartoon shorts? Dream Focus 06:48, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- It is so much deeper than that. It is a true life changing masterpiece. It is the greatest thing mankind has ever created. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- I detect sarcasm Dronebogus (talk) 11:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- It is so much deeper than that. It is a true life changing masterpiece. It is the greatest thing mankind has ever created. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Weak delete. How does this meet WP:LISTN? Frankly, most lists of episodes are problematic. What's the difference between a TV guide and an encyclopedia again? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:57, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Nagahan
- Nagahan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
This village is not notable on its own. The only coverages are about the Nadahan wedding bombing, so it should be redirected there. Furthermore, the name could be wrong. Is it Nagahan or Nadahan? Neocorelight (Talk) 23:00, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Neocorelight (Talk) 23:00, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:16, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Merge I think that this article is not notable enough for it's own article with its lack of references... but it should be merged and redirect to Nadahan wedding bombing until more references are found or the notability is established (See WP:TNT). 𝙷𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚘𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚝 👋❤️ (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔🤔) 00:40, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Nothing to merge since all the information came from the bombing article. Neocorelight (Talk) 00:46, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:10, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect Agree on lack of content to support a merge. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:52, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Caladbolg
- Caladbolg ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Send this one to PROD and was reverted, with an invitation to take it to AFD. There isn't significant coverage of this object in reliable independent sources, which means it fails WP:GNG. The current state is completely WP:OR. It's not that I think there is zero coverage based on WP:BEFORE / WP:POTENTIAL, but there is not enough coverage independent of the fiction to write a meaningful out of universe article. Jontesta (talk) 01:11, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jontesta (talk) 01:11, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. The subject of significant scholarly discussion. I've added some, and will follow up with more later. --Nicknack009 (talk) 07:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Good start, but righ now WP:SIGCOV is not shown. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Merge to Fergus mac Róich. Currently fails SIGCOV GNG requirement for stand-alon article, IMHO. But this has potential to be rescued, and I hope Nick will ping we when they are done with their expansion so I can reconsider my vote. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. As part of a WP:BEFORE exercise I have found (and in some cases added) several sources which support a claim to notability. From what I can find, several chapters of several books (from several authors) are dedicated to the subject. And, in at least one case, an entire book seems to be. Personally I think there is more than sufficient coverage of the subject (as a stand along topic) to warrant a standalone article. If others disagree, then - at the very least - the relevant content should be merged and the title redirected to a sub-section of the Fergus mac Róich article. While, personally, I don't think a merge/redirect is the right course of action (as it confuses the connection with other subjects, like Gáe Bulg and Caledvwlch and others), outright deletion is definitely not appropriate. Guliolopez (talk) 10:25, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Mythology and Ireland. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:38, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Sourcing is sufficient to meet WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:38, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Reconsider this AFD in light of recent editing to the article
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:09, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Needs work but (altogether now) AfD isn't cleanup. Sourcing is there, you don't wanna go messing with Irish mythology... Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:55, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Sashi Cheliah
- Sashi Cheliah ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Fails WP:BIO basics, mostly a WP:BIO1E person only known for being a winner of a reality show, which generally fails GNG guidelines. Suggest redirect to MasterChef Australia (series 10) instead. SanAnMan (talk) 21:51, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Food and drink, Television, and Australia. SanAnMan (talk) 21:51, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Speedy Keep. One a group of Mass nominations largly based on a false premise, the claim of one event. egs Jackson was known for two series, 2014 and 2020. McKay is curently getting attention for the current season as well as the one she won. Cheliah also was in the current season. Chan is also a TV host with two seasons of a show titled with her name. Lazy nominations lacking any real before. duffbeerforme (talk) 06:50, 21 June 2022 (UTC)- Delete. Fails WP:BLP1E and WP:SUSTAINED. All of the independent significant coverage is from the time of the competition win and therefore fails BLP1E. All of the other sources are either trivial, unreliable, or lack independence. On a side note, I support the nominator's decision to not use a multi-AFD and nominate these individually for procedural reasons.4meter4 (talk) 19:13, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Cheliah returned to Masterchef in 2022 and got coverage from that, making it more than one event. Maintaining a profile with coverage such as Galletly, Jessica (31 January 2021), "Sachi's master stroke", Sunday Mail (Adelaide). Also got coverage last week for an upcoming launch of a restaurant in Chennai "A MasterChef's Chennai debut", The Hindu (Chennai, India), 24 June 2022. There is also a (really bad) review of his restaurant in Lethlean, John (22 February 2020), "REVIEW", TheAustralian. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:15, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Appeared in multiple seasons of the program, winning one of them. Satisfies WP:SUSTAINED. WWGB (talk) 00:58, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Larissa Takchi
- Larissa Takchi ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Fails WP:BIO basics, mostly a WP:BIO1E person only known for being a winner of a reality show, which generally fails GNG guidelines. Suggest redirect to MasterChef Australia (series 11) instead. SanAnMan (talk) 21:53, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Food and drink, Television, and Australia. SanAnMan (talk) 21:53, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Speedy Keep. One a group of Mass nominations largly based on a false premise, the claim of one event. egs Jackson was known for two series, 2014 and 2020. McKay is curently getting attention for the current season as well as the one she won. Cheliah also was in the current season. Chan is also a TV host with two seasons of a show titled with her name. Lazy nominations lacking any real before. duffbeerforme (talk) 06:50, 21 June 2022 (UTC)- Keep. Plenty of sources, seems to have ongoing notability after the show, if not the most clear-cut case in this group. The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:53, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
KeepSeems to just about meet WP:GNG. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:29, 22 June 2022 (UTC)- Weak keep Barely meets it.. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:45, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:BLP1E and WP:SUSTAINED. All of the independent significant coverage is from the time of the competition win and therefore fails BLP1E. All of the other sources are either trivial, unreliable, or lack independence.4meter4 (talk) 19:11, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Takchi is maintaining a profile with coverage such as Byrne, Fiona (2 May 2021), "Wedding of the week", Herald Sun and Moustafa, Abi (29 September 2021), "Bun in the oven! Former MasterChef winner Larissa Takchi announces she's expecting her first baby with husband Luke Dominello", Daily Mail Australia. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:22, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: Interviews do not meet the WP:SIGCOV standard, as they are not independent of the subject. - SanAnMan (talk) 13:41, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:57, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Correspondences (journal)
- Correspondences (journal) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Article PRODded with reason "Non-notable journal. Not indexed any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by creator with reason "It is a notable journal in the field, listed in Directory of Open Access Journals and funded by the European Society for the Study of Western Esotericism. Furthermore, important scholars such as Wouter Hanegraaff have published in the journal." None of this, including the trivial content that was added at the same time, are proof of notability and this still fails NJournals and GNG. Hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 22:24, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 22:24, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable journals, fails WP:GNG and WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:31, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- I do not think the article should be deleted. the Directory of Open Access Journals is selective, as they only accept journals that meet high quality standards and exercise peer review. Furthermore, the fact that it is funded by the ESSWE and listed on their website is significant. The ESSWE is the most important scholarly society in their field. Simply measuring the article on the basis of WP:NJournals is no argument for deletion. This essay has no official status within Wikipedia. Anyway, I will try to improve the article a bit the following days. Schenkstroop (talk) 23:03, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comments: 1/ ESSWE: the citation to ESWE is rather trivial, they list a great many resources and what "they" say is actually stuff copied verbatim from the journal's website. 2/ NJournals is designed to make it easier for academic journals to become notable. But you're right, it's only an essay (albeit one that has been used as a guide to notability for journals for a decade or so), so you're free to ignore it. In that case, the article needs to meet GNG, which only very few journals do. But if you can find a few sources independent of the journal that discuss it in depth, you're done and I'll withdraw the nom. --Randykitty (talk) 07:03, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Okay fine, delete it. Schenkstroop (talk) 21:13, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete this journal is non-notable and not indexed in any selective database. There is lack of independent sources to support the standalone article at this point. The journal fails WP:NJournals and WP:GNG.~ Nanosci (talk) 13:47, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Merge and Redirect to European Society for the Study of Western Esotericism#Publications.4meter4 (talk) 16:37, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete, merge or redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:44, 27 June 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:52, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Billie McKay
- Billie McKay ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Fails WP:BIO basics, mostly a WP:BIO1E person only known for being a winner of a reality show, which generally fails GNG guidelines. Suggest redirect to MasterChef Australia (series 7) instead. SanAnMan (talk) 21:45, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Food and drink, Television, and Australia. SanAnMan (talk) 21:45, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Speedy Keep. One a group of Mass nominations largly based on a false premise, the claim of one event. egs Jackson was known for two series, 2014 and 2020. McKay is curently getting attention for the current season as well as the one she won. Cheliah also was in the current season. Chan is also a TV host with two seasons of a show titled with her name. Lazy nominations lacking any real before. duffbeerforme (talk) 06:52, 21 June 2022 (UTC)- Delete. Seems to have completely dropped out of the public eye shortly after her first season aired before reappearing for the current series. The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:57, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:BLP1E. All of the independent significant coverage is from the time of the competition win and therefore fails BLP1E due to WP:SUSTAINED. All of the other sources are either trivial, unreliable, or lack independence.4meter4 (talk) 19:15, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:34, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. BLP1E does not apply. McKay won Masterchef in 2015, was a mentor in 2019 and is competing in 2022. Each of these attracted coverage. She has maintained a public profile outside those periods such as a publicised 2017 visit to India as reported in South Africa, "India visit for chef McKay", Post (Durban, South Africa), 29 November 2017. Other articles from the tour include "Love chocolates? The Fat Duck chef Billie McKay tells what goes on inside Heston Blumenthal's kitchen", Financial Express (India), 17 November 2017 and "MasterChef - Australia says Indian food is adventurous", New Indian Express (Chennai, India), 18 November 2017. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Appeared in multiple seasons of the program, winning one of them. Satisfies WP:SUSTAINED. WWGB (talk) 00:59, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Duffbeerforme. StAnselm (talk) 16:43, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:46, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Kedar Prasad Guragain
- Kedar Prasad Guragain ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Mayor of a medium-sized city. Does not pass WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:09, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Nepal. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:09, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, minor notability, fails WP:NPOL. 174.93.92.251 (talk) 03:27, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per mom. Mccapra (talk) 05:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was procedural keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 03:29, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
BNS Jamuna
- BNS Jamuna ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Trying to add refs, I have found nothing to support the article. Fails WP:GNG basic. Hence nominated. Will happily withdraw the nomination if anyone can add satisfactory refs to support the article. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 01:56, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Will happily withdraw the nomination if anyone can add satisfactory refs to support the article.
Please see: WP:DINC and do not disrupt AfD to make a point here or with Geostubs. Star Mississippi 02:35, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Racial tension in the United States
- Racial tension in the United States ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
These topics are covered elsewhere on the project and this is duplicative. Bruxton (talk) 01:20, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
TNT this is an important article however it shouldn't be a bunch of links Greenhighwayconstruction (talk) 01:40, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Delete Poorly written stub and it is not needed. There is already Racism in the United States which provides the actual context. Centralknights (talk) 06:56, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:11, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Delete. Covered already in the other articles linked, as noted, and overall too broad and vague a title. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 10:10, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:45, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per A3. It contains only see also links, and is not a disambiguation page]. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:46, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Robin Radhakrishnan
- Robin Radhakrishnan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Does not meet WP:NACTOR because there are no significant roles in multiple notable productions. The subject also lacks significant coverage. Apparently one of the contestant of Bigg Boss which is alone not sufficient for notability per WP:BIGBROTHER. TheWikiholic (talk) 01:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. Shellwood (talk) 08:12, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Jake Thiel
- Jake Thiel ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Fails WP:GNG, lacks WP:SIGCOV, and fails Wikipedia:Notability (sports). Only trivial mentions in references. --Gri3720 (talk) 22:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople--Gri3720 (talk) 22:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Keep. This user clearly has not done WP:BEFORE. These four sources [23], [24], [25] and [26] passes WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:23, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- I do not believe that two articles about player (and several others) constitutes a general notability. You are correct about one thing, however; I do not consistently go around nominating articles for deletion as I do not feel it is productive to the overall benefit of Wikipedia as a universal source of information.--Gri3720 (talk) 22:37, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 June 20. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:43, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep A simple search here has brought about clear WP:GNG passing coverage, which is unsurprising for a fully international player in 15s and 7s who participated in the Olympics. Afd is not clean up. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:47, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The first source only has a 42-word paragraph devoted to him, which fails Wikipedia:One hundred words (and even the more lenient 50 word threshold mentioned in the essay). The second source literally boils down to "Thiel was injured", so that fails even worse. The third source is borderline SIGCOV (74 words) but seems to be a blog. The fourth one is also borderline merely mentioning him and giving a few quotes by him) but even if we count that that is only one source. The other sources on the page are not convincing either (the Canadian Olympic Committee is not independent of a Canadian Olympian, and the CBC link only mentions Thiel in a list). 2 borderline SIGCOV sources with one questionable reliability is not enough for GNG. 12.148.188.220 (talk) 04:39, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Per your 100 words link, ". Fifty such words would likely be significant.", in article one the word count is higher than 50. Not sure how you came to 42. The third source is not a blog. Its the official website of Rugby Americas North, the international governing body of the sport in the continent. That with the fourth source is enough to justify WP:GNG, yet alone the first two among others. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:00, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NSPORT. Sources do not address the subject "directly and detail" as required by these guidelines. All of the sources linked above are trivial mentions, with the primary focus being on the wider issues not Thiel himself. The Abbynews source has only four sentences directly about Thiel in the entire article, with the majority of the article devoted to coverage of the wider Canadian Rugby team heading to the Tokyo Olympics. This Americas Rugby News has only two sentences. TSN has one sentence. The Times Colonist piece is an interview, which therefore lacks independence from the subject and cannot be used to prove WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 16:32, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Plenty of sources to satisfy GNG. Essays are neither policy nor guideline and just because one person comes up with an arbitrary number and writes an essay about it doesn't make it anything more than someone's opinion. And in any case it's irrelevant as Sportsfan mentioned because the sources have more words than that. Smartyllama (talk) 17:51, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. "Local boy makes it big"-type coverage doesn't count for much, especially when it's just a few sentences. Two sentences organized in a "paragraph" doesn't make them SIGCOV. And no matter how much content there is, if it's contained within quotes from the subject or an associate it is not independent coverage and does not count toward GNG. JoelleJay (talk) 22:50, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- But all four sources do pass WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:53, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- ...how? When is two sentences ever SIGCOV?
Captain Phil Berna and vice-captain Jake Thiel return from injury to bolster Canada's squad for the HSBC Spain Sevens in Malaga, but coach Henry Paul still has a lengthy list of absent players... Thiel was injured in Dubai, where the Canadian men finished 11th and 12th.
Passing mentions like this don't count toward GNG for other bios, why should they for sportspeople? JoelleJay (talk) 23:19, 4 July 2022 (UTC)- The first source is about the article and another subject, meets GNG. The second source is a toss up. The third source is about the subject (the title) and lastly the fourth source is an entire bio on him by the largest newspaper on Vancouver Island. The combination of these sources clearly demonstrates coverage has been met. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:58, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter at all if the subject appears in the title of an article, or if the article is ostensibly "about" the subject, or even the prestige of the source; if there isn't significant coverage of the subject within the article it cannot contribute to GNG. And quoted/"he said this" content from an interview also never contributes to GNG. The point of SIGCOV isn't just to show that other people have given a subject attention (e.g. appearing in headlines, being interviewed, being mentioned in a major publication) -- it's to show they've received attention and substantial, in-depth, independent commentary. GNG isn't supposed to be an indicator of notability, it's supposed to actually establish it. The first source has a two-sentence blurb on him -- if this was sufficient to count towards GNG any high school state champ from somewhere with two newspapers would get a pass. The second is clearly routine injury coverage that does not count towards GNG. The third is another two transactional sentences in what seems to be a group WordPress blog. The fourth has half a sentence "introducing" him, with the rest being straight quotes. Does not count towards GNG. JoelleJay (talk) 04:15, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- The first source is about the article and another subject, meets GNG. The second source is a toss up. The third source is about the subject (the title) and lastly the fourth source is an entire bio on him by the largest newspaper on Vancouver Island. The combination of these sources clearly demonstrates coverage has been met. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:58, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- ...how? When is two sentences ever SIGCOV?
- But all four sources do pass WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:53, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WikiVirusC(talk) 00:55, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Margaret Namulindwa Kigozi
- Margaret Namulindwa Kigozi ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Head of marketing at a probably notable company. The ceo might be notable , but not lower rank executives. The refs are promotional notices. DGG ( talk ) 00:49, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. Mccapra (talk) 05:50, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and Uganda. Shellwood (talk) 08:14, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Utterly, totally unremarkable exec. Fails WP:GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:56, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Rudy Treminio
- Rudy Treminio ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Does not appear to be notable; the only sources I could find are press releases, interviews, and podcasts. The AP source in the article is paid content copied from another website. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 00:08, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United States of America. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 00:08, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The single source that looks reliable, AP, is actually a press release: SOURCE: Rudy Treminio Vexations (talk) 12:23, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:45, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Rocco Basile
- Rocco Basile ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
promotional and non-notable Ref one is a trivial mention, The other refs refer to a trivial local promotional honor. DGG ( talk ) 00:42, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - notability exists. Agree, with tone being promotional which should be fixed. He is the recipient of an award-cum-resolution from the NY Senate per this. Meets WP:ANYBIO. 174.93.92.251 (talk) 03:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and New York. Shellwood (talk) 08:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Gina Cunningham
- Gina Cunningham ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Sourced with pr, failed find any organic coverage. Doesn't pass WP:GNG. Amon Stutzman (talk) 00:20, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete oozing with slick words, no notable sources found. Oaktree b (talk) 01:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Women, and Massachusetts. Shellwood (talk) 08:09, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment - there is local coverage on Cunningham and here are the top three I could find: coverage of her,[1] her art,[2][3] and her restaurant.[4] I don't find anything that is coverage beyond Miami. DaffodilOcean (talk) 10:00, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ Ackerman, Elise (June 6, 1996). "Insult to Injury". Miami New Times.
- ^ Roth, Minhae Shim (February 10, 2017). "Miami Artist Takes a Stand for Immigrants in For All Boat People". Miami New Times. Retrieved 2022-07-05.
- ^ Uszerowicz, Monica (February 17, 2017). "Emergency Protest-Performance Honors Standing Rock's Water Protectors and Miami's Displaced "Boat People"". www.vice.com. Retrieved 2022-07-05.
- ^ Kohen, Helen L. (1995-02-13). "Haiti's mini-mecca on South Beach". The Miami Herald. pp. [1], [2]. Retrieved 2022-07-05.
- Keep – Overall, the subject meets WP:BASIC. WP:BASIC has no stipulations that source coverage needs to be non-local. Here's another source, although it does not provide significant coverage. That said, this !vote is a bit on the "weak keep" side, because the article is salvageable, but it presently reads like a resume and press release, and is a bit essay like. Also, WP:BEFORE searches are not turning up much else to qualify notability other than the sources presented in this discussion. North America1000 11:51, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Some interesting bits and bobs, but I tended to find the most interesting stuff is the not sourced stuff. While a (Personal attack removed) person floating paper boats on the Ganges is great copy, it's not the stuff of notability which, beyond the OR and PR, is hard to establish here. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:00, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Alexandermcnabb: Topic notability on Wikipedia is not based upon what you personally find interesting. It is based upon Notability guidelines. See also: WP:NNC, where it states, "Notability guidelines do not apply to content within articles or lists". North America1000 15:29, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Perry Mattfeld
- Perry Mattfeld ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
She belong to non notable actress and possibly UPE by the creator of the article. I don't see anything rather blogs and Nigerian fake newspapers. User: Gartuwaso 12:51, 05 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. This appears to be a bad faith nomination. The "creator" of this article merely created a redirect and is an editor in good standing. It has been extensively edited by others since, including myself - so I don't know who the nominator thinks might be a UPE. No substantiation about the sources either, the most cited source is this which is a newsletter of a respected organization. MB 00:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- You only provided one reference which you claimed to be reliable source but isn't really reliable source, and even if it's reliable it has been use more enough in the article (Almost 4 times) and the remaining references which were reused are highly non independence reliable source and no any significant coverage.Gartuwaso (talk) 01:38, 05 July 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 July 5. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:10, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. I agree with MB's comments. Not a single shred of evidence of UPE has been presented or of use of "fake newspapers." Lack of WP:BEFORE by the nom is noted as well. MarnetteD|Talk 00:28, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep meets WP:GNG. 174.93.92.251 (talk) 03:32, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and California. Shellwood (talk) 08:14, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep bad faith nomination, revenge nom by Gartuwaso based on my nomination of their articles for deletion. I can assure you I wasn't paid for this (or anything else for that matter) and I only created a redirect. But Mattfeld is notable at this point under NACTOR, though I have no objection to this being returned to a redirect as I do agree the sources aren't stellar, but they also aren't "nigerian fake newspapers" (lmao) PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Alan L. Olsen
- Alan L. Olsen ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Non-notable accountant. Fails WP:GNG. Amon Stutzman (talk) 00:09, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Montana. Shellwood (talk) 08:07, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Gege Gatt
- Gege Gatt ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Run-of-the-mill lawyer, AI researcher. Fails WP:GNG. Amon Stutzman (talk) 00:05, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Opinion pieces in the Times of Malta, rest are press-releases/name drops. Nothing notable here. Oaktree b (talk) 00:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Businesspeople, Law, and Malta. Shellwood (talk) 08:09, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Pay After Getting Job
- Pay After Getting Job ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
WP:GNG. Is this actually a thing anywhere outside India? If not, it ought to be specified. In either case, the references I could find are scarce and rarely WP:RS, but then again, I don't read Hindi. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 00:05, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 00:05, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete could be a subsection in an article about universities or post-secondary education in India?. No sources elsewhere found. Oaktree b (talk) 00:09, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Education. Shellwood (talk) 08:11, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
One Tree Planted
- One Tree Planted ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Coverage is just brief mentions/namechecks. Fails WP:NORG. Amon Stutzman (talk) 00:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete sources are all press-releases. Paid-for editing is a concern also. Oaktree b (talk) 00:06, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Vermont. Shellwood (talk) 08:10, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Innovative Bioresearch Ltd
- Innovative Bioresearch Ltd ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
WP:SERIESA and WP:GNG and WP:CORP. The only WP:RS references are articles by, rather than about, the company. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 00:01, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 00:01, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per my discussion at User_talk:Ingenuity#innovative_bioresearch_ltd_page. I can find hardly any reliable sources, and nowhere near enough to meet WP:NCORP. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 00:04, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- This is not true. references are scientific publications, and news articles covering the research like this one from one of the most notable medical news outlets http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/310017.php DaneDN (talk) 00:38, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: That'd make it WP:PRIMARY and hence ineligible. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 12:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- We also added another very good reference from Aktien - Börse - Aktienkurse (wallstreet-online.de)
- Innovative Bioresearch Announces Publication of Pioneering Pilot Study Exploring SupT1 Cell Infusion as a Cell-Based Therapy for HIV in Humanized Mice - 26.04.2016 (wallstreet-online.de) DaneDN (talk) 01:15, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Wrong. Added additional sources:
- https://irishtechnews.ie/the-rise-of-branded-cryptocurrencies-and-what-it-means-for-regulators/amp/
- https://www.tecnomedicina.it/archos-collabora-con-innovative-bioresearch-per-promuovere-safe-t-min/ DaneDN (talk) 12:23, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_News_Today — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaneDN (talk • contribs) 00:46, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- @DaneDN: The nature of the sources forms the key objection to WP:NCORP notability. Not only should the sources be reputable, but they must also operate with an independent fact finding voice. Also per WP:CORPDEPTH, the coverage should be non-routine. Sources based on what the company or its principals says about it, including interviews (e.g. Cryptotrends), are not considered independent. Announcements like wallstreet-online.de are not considered routine in nature, lacking necessary depth. That one also looks more like a press release. • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- If you read Medical News today disclaimer they claim this:
- "Medical News Today has strict sourcing guidelines and draws only from peer-reviewed studies, academic research institutions, and medical journals and associations. We avoid using tertiary references. We link primary sources — including studies, scientific references, and statistics — within each article and also list them in the resources section at the bottom of our articles. You can learn more about how we ensure our content is accurate and current by reading our editorial policy."
- It is crystal clear that
- 1)Medical News today is a very reliable source.
- 2)They are independent - meaning they only publish news if they find them relevant - they do don't do paid nor promotional articles. They are absolutely a fact finding voice, moreso as they are a medical newsoutlet and must provide accurate medical news.
- 3)They used the peer reviewed academic research as a source of data, and any claim or announcement the compay have made woud have not been mentioned had it not be judged of significant impact in the field, newsworthy and legit.
- http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/310017.php DaneDN (talk) 06:56, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Added another source:
- https://irishtechnews.ie/the-rise-of-branded-cryptocurrencies-and-what-it-means-for-regulators/amp/
- Please explain why this article by IRISH TECH NEWS is not valid. DaneDN (talk) 11:25, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- @DaneDN: The nature of the sources forms the key objection to WP:NCORP notability. Not only should the sources be reputable, but they must also operate with an independent fact finding voice. Also per WP:CORPDEPTH, the coverage should be non-routine. Sources based on what the company or its principals says about it, including interviews (e.g. Cryptotrends), are not considered independent. Announcements like wallstreet-online.de are not considered routine in nature, lacking necessary depth. That one also looks more like a press release. • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
What you say goes against what is claimed by the journal policy. I suggest you to carefully review their eidtorial policy, specifically these points:
"At Medical News Today, we’re committed to providing trustworthy, accessible, and accurate information so our readers are equipped to care for their health and wellness. We use an established editorial process to ensure we’re providing the best possible information.
Our editorial process is the backbone of everything we do. We use this process to make sure that everything we publish meets our high standards.
Our team creates and edits every piece of content based on the four pillars of our editorial process:
1.learning and maintaining trust
2. keeping high journalistic standards
3. prioritizing accuracy, empathy, and inclusion
4. monitoring and updating content continually
These pillars ensure that our readers can always find the timely, evidence-based information they need."
- In addition to explain why is Medical News Today, one of the most important medical news outlets, not an indendent source, can you also explain why Wat is Innovative Bioresearch? - Newsbit is not not considered independent as well?
- Although Medical News Today makes all these statements about itself, the article reports about an effective product announcement (pilot study/progress report). The article is based entirely on what a company principal says. Regarding WP:CORPDEPTH, this definitely fails the depth of coverage test, even if it passed the independence test (questionable). The article is written in marketing-speak supported by primary and business buzz references. • Gene93k (talk) 10:20, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Italy, and United Kingdom. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable crypto startup. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 04:50, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Innovative Bioresearch Ltd is not a crypto start up. It is a pharma start up founded in 2014 that did not produce any blockchain related product before 2018. They expanded their activity in the blockchain space but they remain a pharmaceutical\biotech start up developing drugs and therapies for HIV and Cancer. DaneDN (talk) 07:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Wrong, the article is based on what THE SCIENTIFIC PEER REVIEW ACADEMIC PUBLICTION SAYS. Without the peer reviewed publication as a source, they would never report any info. In fact, they cite the publication (Article: SupT1 Cell Infusion as a Possible Cell-Based Therapy for HIV: Results from a Pilot Study in Hu-PBMC BRGS Mice) as a source of info for the article itself.
- Now, Added another source:
https://irishtechnews.ie/the-rise-of-branded-cryptocurrencies-and-what-it-means-for-regulators/amp/
- Please explain why this article by IRISH TECH NEWS about Innovative Bioresearch, its biomedical research and its blockchain applications s not valid. DaneDN (talk) 11:31, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Added another source:
- ARCHOS collabora con Innovative Bioresearch per promuovere Safe-T min - Tecnomedicina
- Please explain why this independent source covering the activity of Innovative Bioresearch such as cooperating with big electronic companies such as Archos is not valid. DaneDN (talk) 11:55, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: DaneDN seems to be a SPA promoting this company, which of course throws up the usual concerns of WP:PAID, WP:COI and others. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 12:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- It is not. https://www.tecnomedicina.it/is a news outlet specialied in pharma and tech news, which independently covered the news. They have not been paid to report this news. Do you have any evidence to back up such a bold claim? Tecnomedicina - Innovazione e tecnologie digitali al servizio della medicina e della sanità is a very respectable and reputable Italian news outlet and they reported the news because Archos is a very big company.
- Also please explain why this news coverage by IRISH TECH NEWS is not valid.
- https://irishtechnews.ie/the-rise-of-branded-cryptocurrencies-and-what-it-means-for-regulators/amp/ DaneDN (talk) 12:32, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- 1)You fail to provide evidence that https://www.tecnomedicina.it is promoting Archos or Innovative Bioresearch. Such a bold claim needs some serious evidence. Where is the conflict of interest of Technomedicina.it by covering this news? In no way are they affiliated with Archos nor innovative Bioresearch. They covered the news of the cooperation between Archos and Innovative Bioresearch. They describe the deal, confirming that it is real, not just reporting what the companies say, but they explain to the reader what the deal is about. They also describe the kind of application Innovative Bioresearch is developing,using their own words and not reporting what the company says: "Innovative Bioresearch sta costruendo un’applicazione basata sulla tecnologia blockchain. Consiste in un database decentralizzato per i dati clinici e in una piattaforma sociale per la comunità sieropositiva dell’HIV. Consente a medici e pazienti di tutto il mondo di condividere e accedere a informazioni cliniche consolidate al fine di iniziare più rapidamente prove e trattamenti diretti." This sentence was wrote by the journalist and not by the company.
- 2)Irish Tech News is providing some bullet points to highlight what are the most significant developments of the company in the field. They made their own research before reporting this information. The fact that those goals are defined as "nobel" is a personal, independent, opinion of the journalist who wrote the article. They describe the medical initiatives operated by the company and conclude that those are "nobel, important humanitarian goals", nowhere is cited the company saying those goals are nobel, as this is a persoonal opinion of the journalist. In fact, one could argue that it is the opportunity to generate substantial profits by developing an HIV cure that is driving the company and not a humanitarian spirit as this is not a no profit company. They talk in enough deep detail of the blockchain application developed by the company, describing it with their own words and not reporting what the company says. DaneDN (talk) 15:07, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. After reviewing coverage and all the back and forth above, RS coverage is sizzle, not steak, failing WP:CORPDEPTH. With almost zero depth of coverage about the company, the article is a crypto project masquerading as a company profile. The subject biotech with minor published research, that aims to be yet another "disruptive tech" company. Stenographic journalism doesn't add up to notability. As the nom states, Wikipedia is not Crunchbase. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
BObsweep
- BObsweep ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)
Fails WP:GNG. Amon Stutzman (talk) 00:00, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Technology. North America1000 10:19, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Merge to Robotic vacuum cleaner. This gets some coverage, such as reviews in PC Magazine and USA Today, but not finding much else in terms of significant coverage. The USA Today source is written by a staff writer (link) but is a bit promotional in tone. North America1000 10:25, 5 July 2022 (UTC)