|
|||
A.P.
Hey SD, hope you're well. You've added at Aurel Plasari that he's of Aromanian origin. If Aurel Plasari was of Aromanian origin, I would be the first to support its addition but he hasn't called himself of Aromanian origin. I think that as you've seen from my editing I'm supportive of Aromanian rights and against the invisibilization of their culture under state-propagated projects. The two sources which you found about Plasari are unfortunately part of a specific trend among certain Islamic groups lands which are usually funded by Turkey or Saudi Arabia. These groups tend to attack historians who disagree with them and use the term "Vlach" as a slur. Gazeta Impakt is actually directly financed by the Turkish embassy and has a reputation for spreading conspiracy theories. In the article about Plasari, the author attacks Plasari as an "anti-Albanian Vlach" because he produced a new translation of Marin Barleti's History of Skanderbeg. The comment by Arben Llalla reproduced in Gazeta Tema is part of the same narrative. I want to remove the references to his origin from the article, but I want to firstly discuss the issue with you.--Maleschreiber (talk) 21:23, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Maleschreiber, thanks for messaging me first about this. I am aware of your good faith when dealing with Aromanian topics, but, if I'm honest, this context seems a bit strange to me. I find it a bit strange that Saudi and Turkish-backed Albanian newspapers would invent that an historian they disagree with is Aromanian rather than just using this already existing "fact" or "rumour" against him assuming that it is in fact true (not sure if I am making myself understood), although I have zero knowledge of this so I can't speak too much about it. Leaving aside those two sources, I have been able to find a few more that refer to Plasari as an Aromanian/Vlach [1] (from 2001, before the 2016 anti-Albanian thing) [2] (this only thanks Plasari for clarifications on Aromanian topics, wouldn't serve as a source in the article but still may show he's at least related to them, if only academically). I've also seen several comments on newspapers and forums talking about him and saying he's Aromanian. And on the second of the two sources cited on Plasari's article about his supposed Aromanian ancestry [3], they refer to Plasari as Aromanian and make no further comment on that. By the way, from what I see, those anti-Albanian allegations were made by someone not related to the newspapers, Arben Llalla, another historian per here [4]. From what I see so far there is not much reason to doubt that Plasari is Aromanian, could you provide some kind of source that shows that Gazeta Impakt and Gazeta Tema have done such actions in the past or that there could be some other reason why they could be considered unreliable on Wikipedia? Maybe you might also be able to find more appropriate sources (if there are), as you speak Albanian (I assume, sorry if it is not the case). The language barrier has been the biggest obstacle I have encountered when making edits about the Aromanians on Wikipedia, so I am struggling to find more sources about this and I might have misread the two already present sources on the article and have missed something that would clearly make both sources inappropiate otherwise. Tell me if you find anything about this. And again, thanks for discussing this issue first! So far my interactions with other users when discussing Aromanians topics have been mostly (if not fully) hostile, so I appreciate it. Regards. Super Ψ Dro 22:10, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hello SD, Gazeta Tema is reproducing a comment of Llalla who called him part of a "hidden lobby". They're not endorsing his opinions. But the RFE article is RS. Plasari's father Anastas[5] was an early leftist and anti-religious writer in 30s Albania who was later put to prison for anti-Yugoslavism in early Communist Albania. When the pro-Yugoslav faction was liquidated he was released. His origin was from Voskopoja/Moscopole and he lived in Romania for a while[6]. We can replace the two articles from Tema with RFE and write more specifically that his father was of Aromanian origin from Voskopoja/Moscopole. How does that look to you? PS If you need sources about Aromanian history, you can e-mail me and I'll see what I can find in my database. --Maleschreiber (talk) 05:51, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Sure, it sounds good to me. Thanks for offering help with sources, but so far I am not focusing in writing long and detailed articles, so what I manage to find in the Internet is enough for me. My main objective is to increase the knowledge about the Aromanias in Wikipedia and mentioning them in those places where they have been forgotten (here) but where they were or are still present, and I believe having many needed pages on the Aromanians is better than having a few top-quality pages, at least for now. Again thanks for discussing the issue, I've went ahead and replaced the two sources with RFE's article. Super Ψ Dro 21:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
I need help for improving the page about the romanian legion italy(ww1)
you can see from my contributs that i tried to make a stub about the romanian legion in italy. the stub is a stub from https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legione_Romena_d%27Italia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vladdy Daddy Silly (talk • contribs) 00:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Right now I don't have much free time. I may add something in the future but I don't guarantee anything. Super Ψ Dro 21:26, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Trianon Syndrome
Please cooperate. You have no author rights. Xx236 (talk) 14:34, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
"controversial"?
I'm trying to AGF here but in what universe is this not controversial? valereee (talk) 19:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Also please archive your user talk. It is long enough to be problematic for some users. I can help you set up auto archiving. My user talk archives after 7 days. valereee (talk) 19:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Mehh. I don't really care about this issue. I only wanted to list an ethnicity for the Kiradjieff brothers as all other entries had it but I saw the article and talk page and it appeared that ethnicity was disputed between Macedonian and Bulgarian. So based in Slavic speakers of Greek Macedonia I added "Slavic Macedonian". Note that I did not refer to ethnic Macedonians, the titular ethnicity of North Macedonia, as those are simply called "Macedonians" in this website. I don't know Wikipedia's common practices in this topic area and maybe a better choice could have been made from my part (like Slavic-speaking Macedonian maybe) but I wasn't assigning a Macedonian or Bulgarian ethnicity to the brothers. And yes, I was going to archive this talk page after the year started but I forgot, thanks for reminding me. I appreciate the offer but I'd rather manually archive it myself as I want the archives to be divided in years (which I think auto archiving doesn't do). Super Ψ Dro 20:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Drom, the fact ethnicity is disputed is absolute evidence this was a controversial edit. Your edit summary called it not controversial. People are totally going to complain about that. Ethnicity is an incredibly controversial subject. Nothing, literally NOTHING, about it is ever non-controversial. valereee (talk) 21:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Mehh. I don't really care about this issue. I only wanted to list an ethnicity for the Kiradjieff brothers as all other entries had it but I saw the article and talk page and it appeared that ethnicity was disputed between Macedonian and Bulgarian. So based in Slavic speakers of Greek Macedonia I added "Slavic Macedonian". Note that I did not refer to ethnic Macedonians, the titular ethnicity of North Macedonia, as those are simply called "Macedonians" in this website. I don't know Wikipedia's common practices in this topic area and maybe a better choice could have been made from my part (like Slavic-speaking Macedonian maybe) but I wasn't assigning a Macedonian or Bulgarian ethnicity to the brothers. And yes, I was going to archive this talk page after the year started but I forgot, thanks for reminding me. I appreciate the offer but I'd rather manually archive it myself as I want the archives to be divided in years (which I think auto archiving doesn't do). Super Ψ Dro 20:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
![]() | |
Two years! |
---|
Your comments
I cannot beleive that you actually said "the Tatars are an ethnic group with a subgroup living in Crimea". There are numerous disambiguation pages, heading notes, etc to unsure that any person unfamiliar with qirimtatarlik is immediatly removed from such blatant misconception. Such claims about qirimtatarlar being part of the Tatars (ie, Kazan Tatars) go to show your deep-seated ignorance or arrogance of the subject matter here. I suggest that to avoid a block you publicly apologize and, like I have suggested MANY times, bother to read about Crimean history (special emphasis on the origin of the ethnonym and the ethnogeneis of the nation as Crimean converts to Islam which had nothing to do with the so-called Tatars). Furthermore I have to admit that I am quite concerned by the attempts of an self-admitted Romanian nationalist who blatantly exibits the most basic ignorance on another nation to exhert so much control over self-labeling and self-identification and insists on dragging out the disscussions as long as possible. I know we are supposed to assume good faith here, but you obviously should be aware of your own subject-matter knowledge deficiencies (as well as self-admitted status as a non-native English-language user), yet you really give a vibe that you are either indifferent to the need to self-educate further. Frankly I hope you are not a sockpuppet of any one of the very...colorful...personalities I have previously interacted with on Crimea matters on Russian Wikipedia. But anyway, I hope you do reconsider your behavior and finally withdraw from the discussion and finally take a chance to educate yourself to get rid of your misconceptions about Qirimtatarlar before making any further comments to contributions to Crimea related matters here.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:09, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah yeah, I've already rectified that. It really is not that much of a deal. If you believe I am going to get blocked for this misunderstanding, you can try your luck and go ahead and mention this into the report. I equally recommend reading about the English Wikipedia rules to you, that goes before anything here. I don't know much about the Crimea Tatars? Yeah, sure, I can admit this and continue on with my life. I don't need to know Crimean Tatar history to edit on Wikipedia. But you do need to know the rules of the very place in which you are participating. And the rules prove you wrong. It's also a bit amusing that you are resorting to talking only now that I've reported you, and not before when this dispute was much smaller. Why did you not explain that linguistic controversy on the template's talk page? Isn't it your work as a knowledgable user on the topic to point this out to people not familiarized with it instead of asking them to "educate themselves"? By the way, I haven't commented much on this at ANI, but your constant aggressive tone is leaving you in evidence. I will remind you you've already been threatened with a block, and that was before the report, in a random isolated template talk page. Acussing me of being a sockpuppet will only make the mind of the admin that will act on the report clearer when deciding the outcome. But, if you're unsure, you can go ahead and start a sockpuppet investigation. It sure will be a funny incident to look back to some years from now in my Wikipedia history. Super Ψ Dro 20:49, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- "It really is not that much of a deal"...again, making my jaw drop. You would know that the term Tatar vs qirimtatar is actually a really, really, really HUGE deal IF you bothered to read the articles that the template in question linked to and that I gave you a link to (specifically the one on the infamous Ukaz 493 which normalized the use of "Tatar" and status of derecognition instead of the proper ethnonym of Qirimtatarlar/Крымские татары as a distinct ethnic group). The lack of capitalization in use of the word tatar to refer to qirimtatarlar is crucial to help further differentiate from those you mistakenly thought qirimtatarlar was part of. Frankly given such dispute over the term detatarization, I'm considering renaming the article to something else entirely (something along the lines of Slavification of Crimea, cleansing of non-slavic elements in Crimea, etc) and giving the article a slightly more broad scope to go with that (accompanied by mention of the few Greek, Italian, Armenian, Roma, and other elements cleansed from Crimea in the mid 1940's)--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:30, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note you do not own the article. If you move it without consensus on the talk page at this point you will be blocked and it will be moved back. Canterbury Tail talk 21:43, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- "It really is not that much of a deal"...again, making my jaw drop. You would know that the term Tatar vs qirimtatar is actually a really, really, really HUGE deal IF you bothered to read the articles that the template in question linked to and that I gave you a link to (specifically the one on the infamous Ukaz 493 which normalized the use of "Tatar" and status of derecognition instead of the proper ethnonym of Qirimtatarlar/Крымские татары as a distinct ethnic group). The lack of capitalization in use of the word tatar to refer to qirimtatarlar is crucial to help further differentiate from those you mistakenly thought qirimtatarlar was part of. Frankly given such dispute over the term detatarization, I'm considering renaming the article to something else entirely (something along the lines of Slavification of Crimea, cleansing of non-slavic elements in Crimea, etc) and giving the article a slightly more broad scope to go with that (accompanied by mention of the few Greek, Italian, Armenian, Roma, and other elements cleansed from Crimea in the mid 1940's)--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:30, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello
How many Russian troops are in transnistria? Do they move through Moldova? 2600:6C48:617F:DABB:595F:F91B:CAEF:59FF (talk) 15:18, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, I've just messaged Putin about this. He told me they are 3,000 soldiers and also gave me their full names and surnames, home addresses, family members and favorite meals. He also told me they move through Somalia. I expected Cambodia to be honest, but Putin sure is a box of surprises. Super Ψ Dro 17:18, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Northern Maramureș, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dragomirești.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
"Moldavian Republic" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Moldavian Republic and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 16#Moldavian Republic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thesmp (talk) 21:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
DYK Review for MV Millennial Spirit?
Hello, I noticed that you made several very helpful edits and links to MV Millennial Spirit. I recently submitted a DYK nomination for that article, and was wondering if you would be interested in reviewing it? If so, please let me know, it'd be a great help! Fritzmann (message me) 01:29, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Hello. Sorry, but I never reviewed a DYK before, and I don't feel too motivated right now as to learn how. I'd rather leave it to someone else. Thanks for creating the article by the way. Super Ψ Dro 09:55, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for your efforts
![]() |
The Current Events Barnstar | |
Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
Awarded for efforts in expanding multiple articles to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC) |
or Russian warship, go fuck yourself
I suspect that you've been waiting a long time to get the right context to put this into an edit summary. Nicely done. Laurel Lodged (talk) 15:49, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Bego Turks
Why you redirected a sourced page back to Ada Kaleh? It was about the Inhabitants. This are two pages. I first created the name with Ada Kaleh-Turks but as sources said they was named Bego Turks. Ada Kaleh is the Island, and Bego Turks the page for the Inhabitants --Nalanidil (talk) 14:43, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nalanidil, Ada Kaleh was a small island with a small Turkish community. There's no reason for us to give all Turkish communities abroad their own article. The information about them can be perfectly covered either at the article about the island or at the article about the Turkish minority in Romania. The need for a separate article on the Ada Kaleh Turks is diminished by the fact that the main reason Ada Kaleh was not another irrelevant Danubian island was because of its Turkish community. Super Ψ Dro 18:24, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- i understand what you mean, to be honest i was amazed too by the term bego turks, because seems to me an invention around the turn of the century 1899-1900. Also the one source about the alleged Turkish-Kurdish-Albanian-Arabic mix population does not seem trustworthy to me. The majority of sources in different languages write turks on ada kaleh, nothing else. Nalanidil (talk) 23:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Super Dromaeosaurus, I've converted the RfD into an AfD, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bego Turks. RfD is for discussing redirects, not articles, not even ones that have been turned into redirects immediately preceding the nomination (see also this thread for what can acceptably fall within the range of this venue). – Uanfala (talk) 23:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- I have a question why it is not ok to have an own Article about the Turks from Ada Kaleh but from Greece, every Turkish Group have there own page have a Look: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turks_in_Greece
- You cant compare the Turks from Ada Kaleh with the Turkish-Tatarian-Muslim Roma Population from Dobruja, the History and Background is different.
- We should renamed the Page in Turks from Ada Kaleh Nalanidil (talk) 12:30, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Page mover granted
Hello, Super Dromaeosaurus. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.
Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.
Useful links:
- Wikipedia:Requested moves
- Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Primefac (talk) 10:41, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
April 2022
You appear to be at Wikicommons once in a while and I thought to ask if you could look at the map for the 2022 Ukraine invasion by Russia. The current 'animated version' of the map seems only to go up to 24 March. Could you look at this and see it some updates are possible; its almost 2 weeks old. ErnestKrause (talk) 15:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I have never edited svg files, and I don't have any idea of how to edit gifs. Super Ψ Dro 15:43, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Other uses
Hello, Super Dromaeosaurus. You seem to be a little confused about the correct use of the {{Other uses}} template. For example, on two articles, you added {{Other uses|Vladimir Frolov
as a hatnote. Per WP:INTDABLINK, we actually want the link (which in this case is the part of the value before the {{!}}
Vladimir Frolov (disambiguation)}}{{!}}
) to go to the redirect that contains the word "disambiguation" in the title. So really, all you needed to write in these cases was {{Other uses|Vladimir Frolov (disambiguation)}}
. Hope this helps! --R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:08, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you a lot! I was actually confused as to how use this and didn't know where to search about it. Your help is appreciated. Super Ψ Dro 16:54, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
New RM needed?
For Ukrainian Insurgent Army's fight against Nazi Germany? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, I'd support it if one was stated. Possibly it could be moved to "Ukrainian armed resistance against Nazi Germany". Super Ψ Dro 13:16, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Mulțumesc!
Thanks for your suggestion, I'll have a look at the sources you suggested (obviously as it's Transnistria state media, it's probably not that reliable!) Fourdots2 (talk) 00:02, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- No problem. If what we're using them for is to cite refutations of certain claims by Transnistrian officials, I think it's okay for Wikipedia. Super Ψ Dro 08:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Cool. I'm currently adding some stuff from Russian Wikipedia about Krasnoselsky and those links will be quite useful too. Fourdots2 (talk) 09:58, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
No worries. Unfortunately some of the Transnistrian government sources seem to be difficult to access (I read something about how they are blocking access outside the territory because they're worried about hackers or something, lol) so I haven't been able to verify all the sources from the Russian article Fourdots2 (talk) 18:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
But I wanted to see a giant dromaeosaurus...
"This page has been edited by Super Dromaeosaurus."
"Oh cool, I bet his user page is going to be a gigantic picture of a dromaeosaurus!"
"...oh, it's not...o...o.k.."
Fephisto (talk) 12:11, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry but I don't post pictures of myself here, for privacy reasons. Super Ψ Dro 12:40, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Ukrainian song: Місто Марії (City of Mary)
Some sources:
- https://1plus1.ua/novyny/a-vperse-v-zitti-napisav-pisnu-na-prohanna-svatoslav-vakarcuk-napisav-pisnu-pro-mariupol-misto-marii-ta-rozpoviv-istoriu-stvorenna-treku
- https://focus.ua/culture/513213-misto-mariji-vakarchuk-napisal-pesnyu-posvyashchennuyu-zashchitnikam-mariupolya-video
- https://history.rayon.in.ua/news/507881-okean-elzi-prisvyativ-pisnyu-zakhisnikam-mariupolya
- https://uzhgorod.net.ua/news/167008
- https://www.0352.ua/news/3376198/pravedne-misto-marii-svatoslav-vakarcuk-prezentuvav-pisnu-prisvacenu-podvigu-zahisnikiv-mariupola-video
- https://gordonua.com/bulvar/news/menja-porazila-eta-prosba-vakarchuk-rasskazal-po-chej-prosbe-pochti-za-mesjats-napisal-pesnju-misto-mariji-posvjashchennuju-zashchitnikam-mariupolja-1607027.html
--Txkk (talk) 11:19, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Alright, I see sources have talked about this song. Sorry for the revert. But it'd be better if the Ukrainian page was expanded so that this notability is more apparent. Super Ψ Dro 11:20, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Battle of Voznesensk for deletion
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220620100517im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Voznesensk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Aromanian National Day
Please read my replies in the talk page and correct the text.Madalinfocsa (talk) 06:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Yes loved this barnstar. Dolon Provas (talk) 10:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC) |
- Many thanks. But why? You didn't give me a reason and we don't seem to have coincided before. Super Ψ Dro 13:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Romanian Brazilians page
Hello, i made an article about the romanian diaspora in Brazil(Romanian Brazilians) but it got deleted without any explanation, i think it's because an article with the same name got deleted due to being too unsourced in November, i'm a bit upset because my article used sources that were used in the article about the Romania-Brazil relations and also because Romanian diaspora in Brazil doesn't have an article while most of European diaspora in Brazil does (more than 40k Brazilians have full of partial romanian ancestry). Can i remake the article or is there a problem? Vladdy Daddy Silly (talk)
- Hello. I haven't read the article so I don't know what quality did it have. I'd recommend waiting to see if the admin that you messaged restores the article and then you should put some more work on the article to ensure it does not get deleted again. I think six sources and two sections in the article can make it aesthetically pleasing and make it more evident that the topic is notable (if it truly is), although this is definitively not a standard or rule, just expand the article a bit more. For now do not recreate the page until the admin responds. Super Ψ Dro 13:09, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, i read that the admin who deleted it restored the page as a draft but i can't find it, do you know how? Vladdy Daddy Silly (talk) 20:41, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- It seems they didn't yet. They first asked you if you are okay with it. Super Ψ Dro 20:50, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, i replied to her yesterday but she didn't respond. Vladdy Daddy Silly (talk) 21:31, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Wait a bit, admins are often busy. Still, if she hasn't replied in a few days, be aware you still have WP:RFU to recover the page. Super Ψ Dro 22:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, i did it and it got restored.
- Here is the draft page if you wanna take a look at it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Romanian_Brazilians Vladdy Daddy Silly (talk) 21:31, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Nice. From what I see, the problem this article has had are its sources. You should get rid of the Bessarabian Romanians organization's source as it isn't necessarily a reliable source. You should use academic journals or newspapers. România liberă is an ok source, you should search more of that type. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Romania can be used but I'd recommend not depending much on it. It's valid to use it to cite population figures. You should aim for sources that aren't directly connected to the subject (like a Brazilian Romanian association or the Romanian embassy in Brasilia), but that talk about it from an outsider position. Another thing you can do to improve this article is to go to this category [8] and list on it Brazilians with Romanian descent, but only with the respective source citing this claim. Super Ψ Dro 07:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Wait a bit, admins are often busy. Still, if she hasn't replied in a few days, be aware you still have WP:RFU to recover the page. Super Ψ Dro 22:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, i replied to her yesterday but she didn't respond. Vladdy Daddy Silly (talk) 21:31, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- It seems they didn't yet. They first asked you if you are okay with it. Super Ψ Dro 20:50, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, i read that the admin who deleted it restored the page as a draft but i can't find it, do you know how? Vladdy Daddy Silly (talk) 20:41, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
read desc
Super Dromaeosaurus, please let Vif122vf to see my writings, because his reverts are illegal. I won't give a reason to all my edits again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ádám Kolláth (talk • contribs) 07:49, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Don't revert
Don't revert my edits, here are my reasons: Wends edit:
I changed fake edited Daco-Romanist map saying "East romance peoples" in Transylvania when no source mentions them with the original picture. Here's my proof:
Original map: Https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-381f2302c1699fb9c1bc2151baa30f2c
This guy falsified the map: Https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-a7b6823427a5cfce33ad9207ecfe2f5e
First Bulgarian Empire edit:
I changed the title in Muntenia from Walachia to Transalpina. The map was of the 9th century, so the region couldn't be called Walachia. The Vlachs settled in the region in the 13th century and established the Principality of Wallachia in the 14th century. A more accurate name is the Latin name Transalpina meaning "beyond the snowy (mountains[=Carpathians])".
United Principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia edit:
The map that showed Transylvania in a similar color to Romania when it wasn't part of it. Romania didn't yet own Transylvania, the map was only misleading.
Principality of Transylvania (1570-1711) edit:
I still didn't take out Romanian from common languages of the principality, I only took out the Romanian county names because Romanian wasn't an official language! You see that at the Saxon sees I left the German names there because German was official. Where are the Hungarian names on Romania's county map by this logic? Blacs edit:
Here are a ton of proofs for Blacs not being Vlachs: https://qr.ae/pvAFYx
Vlachs edit:
The explanation is the same as above.
Union of Bessarabia with Romania:
I changed the outdated ethnic map for another made around the time the union was. I also changed a map that shows regions of Greater Romania instead of the union to a map of the Kingdom of Romania and the Moldavian Democratic Republic.
- To whoever wrote this, that map of Slavic tribes in VII-IX century is a hopelessly false and inaccurate map, as it ignores the existence of Dnieper Balts. If it gets such basics wrong, then the whole map is doubtful.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:22, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
list of romanian words of possible dacian origins
hello, since you are part of the wikiproject romania i would to know why the page about the list of romanian words of possible dacian origins has been changed to this title https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Romanian_words_of_Paleo-Balkan_origin without consensus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:B07:6469:985D:14B4:7476:268E:BD69 (talk) 00:20, 15 June 2022 (UTC)