/Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3 /Archive 4 /Archive 5 /Archive 6 |
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Der Bazar at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Der Bazar
Still waiting on a response at Template:Did you know nominations/Der Bazar. Thanks, Gatoclass (talk) 11:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- I have just understood your request, sorry for the late response. Should I give the quotations here or in the related DKY page, thank you, --Egeymi (talk) 11:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you again. The intro to the article says "It was redesigned as Illustrirte Damen-Zeitung (meaning Illustrated Women's Magazine in English) from 1 January 1857." Does that mean that the magazine Der Bazar was renamed Illustrirte Damen-Zeitung? Or does "Illustrirte Damen-Zeitung" refer to the magazine's subtitle? Thanks, Gatoclass (talk) 15:54, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, it should have been "its subtitle was changed to Illustrirte Damen-Zeitung". Thank you for the message, I haven't recognized it, so I will correct it, --Egeymi (talk) 16:36, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Egeymi, but I can't complete the review until you have supplied a QPQ. Gatoclass (talk) 05:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Here is my QPQ, I am not familiar new rules and I cannot find the related information. Based on your response I will try to do what is needed, thanks, --Egeymi (talk) 15:35, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- That's not a QPQ, it's a list of DYK credits you've been given. Since you have more than five DYK credits, you must provide a QPQ for each new DYK nomination you make. That means that you must review somebody's else's DYK nomination before your own can be approved. Instructions on how to review can be found at WP:DYKR. Thanks, Gatoclass (talk) 15:56, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Okay thank you Egeymi (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- You can also use the reviewers' template to help you do a review - it basically contains a checklist of all the things you have to check. There is a link to the reviewers' template in the DYKToolbox of every DYK nomination, so you should have no trouble finding it. Cheers, Gatoclass (talk) 16:04, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Okay thank you Egeymi (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- That's not a QPQ, it's a list of DYK credits you've been given. Since you have more than five DYK credits, you must provide a QPQ for each new DYK nomination you make. That means that you must review somebody's else's DYK nomination before your own can be approved. Instructions on how to review can be found at WP:DYKR. Thanks, Gatoclass (talk) 15:56, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Here is my QPQ, I am not familiar new rules and I cannot find the related information. Based on your response I will try to do what is needed, thanks, --Egeymi (talk) 15:35, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Egeymi, but I can't complete the review until you have supplied a QPQ. Gatoclass (talk) 05:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- QPQ has been completed and details were added to the page, thanks again, Egeymi (talk) 18:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Der Bazar
![]() | On 17 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Der Bazar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that German fashion magazine Der Bazar had many spin offs, including Harper's Bazaar? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Der Bazar. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Der Bazar), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Precious
Saudi Arabia magazines
Thank you for quality articles such as Faisal bin Abdullah Al Saud (born 1950), Nayef bin Abdulaziz, Der Weg (magazine), Annabelle (magazine), Der Bazar, 1,324 as of today, for copy-editing, for "try to fill the gaps since I consider it significant", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2670 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:22, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Dear Gerda Arendt, thank you very much for this precious prize which means a lot to me. Because whenever I saw it on the pages of other editors, I thought that maybe one day I would get it too. You made my day. Best, --Egeymi (talk) 17:24, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- You are welcome, and seeing what you gave us I'm a bit ashamed that it took me so long to notice, just because I meet so many on the Main page that I don't look behind the scenes. Nice to meet you. The article is also featured on Portal:Germany, DYK? - I have Aga Mikolaj on the Main page, ITN. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:47, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Dear Gerda Arendt as Rumi stated everything waits for its time. So today is the time for it. So happy for Der Bazar to be featured on Portal:Germany, DYK? I have looked at Aga Mikolaj, a short but successful life of a woman. Just amazing, --Egeymi (talk) 17:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- You are welcome, and seeing what you gave us I'm a bit ashamed that it took me so long to notice, just because I meet so many on the Main page that I don't look behind the scenes. Nice to meet you. The article is also featured on Portal:Germany, DYK? - I have Aga Mikolaj on the Main page, ITN. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:47, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Writer's Barnstar |
Thanks for turning Derviş Vahdeti and Volkan (newspaper) into blue links - as well as the hundreds of other articles you've put together previously. It's much appreciated! Jr8825 • Talk 13:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC) |
- Dear Jr8825 thank you very much. You're very kind, best, Egeymi (talk) 19:04, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
Season's greetings and Merry Christmas to you and your family. Have a wonderful holiday season. Cheers! RV (talk) 03:34, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Category:Great-granddaughters of Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia has been nominated for merging
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220704232257im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
Category:Great-granddaughters of Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 12:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Category:Granddaughters of Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia has been nominated for merging
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220704232257im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
Category:Granddaughters of Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 12:08, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Sulayman Ibn Abdullah
Hello Egeymi, I noticed that you reverted an edit (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1076691070) .
This should be a mistake since I wrote it more aligned with the sources than the previous version.
What I edited: "He elaborated his grandfather's book, Kitab at Tawhid, interpreting them in the context of Ottoman invasion of Arabian Peninsula. Sulayman's works served as a manual for later Wahhabi scholars to make sense of the major tenets of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab. Based on Sulayman's approach, Classical Wahhabi scholars would formulate a novel doctrine of Takfir that expanded beyond the traditional paradigm of early Wahhabis and excommunicated most of the political opponents of the Second Saudi state"
Source: QUOTE
"Inspired by ‘Abdullah’s position against the Shi’ite sects, his son Sulayman Ibn ‘Abdullah (1785–1818) devoted his efforts to the work of interpreting the book of al-Tawhid written by his grandfather Muhammad Ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab.... Sulayman was the first Wahhabi scholar to elab- orate further his grandfather’s notion of kufr and iman on which his successors in Al al-Shaykh later on based their ideas of excommunicating not only the Shi‘ite sects, but also non-Wahhabi Sunnis... Ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab and his son ‘Abdullah considered the tenets of the Shi‘ites and Zaydis as deviation from Islam. However, they abstained from labelling them kuffar, even though they hinted that such deviation leads to kufr... Unlike in the time of Ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab, Sulayman witnessed strong Ottoman interference as well as the Egyptian military campaign which led to the gradual dissolution in 1818 of the Wahhabi-Saudi state in Najd.. To defend the Wahhabi creed, Sulayman and other Wahhabi scholars, who had found shelter in some sedentary and nomadic localities, began to articulate a new version of takfir beyond that of the first generation. To a great extent, the new version of takfir involved Al al-Shaykh and other Wahhabi scholars in reinvigorating and giving new meaning to the traditional concept of takfir. They used takfir in order to reconsolidate the Second Saudi State established in 1824 and extended it to include even those scholars who had taken sides with the Egyptians and Ottomans "
END QUOTE
Rest of the pages in the ref elaborate how later Wahhabi scholars acted upon Sulayman's doctrines. So I think it was probably a mistake on your part
(shadowwarrior8.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:00, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the message, but you are changing the name of the subject and reference type, distorting the author names etc. So all these will be reinserted. Egeymi (talk) 13:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Noted. Thank you Egeymi. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 13:47, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
![]() |
Happy First Edit Day, Egeymi, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Isro! (talk) 16:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC) |
Happy Birthday!
Trifon
Trifon (disambiguation) is an excellent name page, but not such a good disambiguation page. Disambiguation pages should simply be a list of articles whose titles can be easily confused with (in this case) Trifon. References and details, such as name information, aren't included.
May I would suggest that the contents of Trifon (disambiguation) be moved to Trifon (given name)? The DAB page could include Trifon, Trifon (given name), Saint Trifon, Tryphon (disambiguation), and All pages with titles containing Trifon. I would be happy to help, if you dont feel like dealing with it. Leschnei (talk)
- I put together a possible DAB page here - let me know what you think! Leschnei (talk) 13:51, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Category:Defunct magazines published in the Soviet Union has been nominated for merging
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220704232257im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
Category:Defunct magazines published in the Soviet Union has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:22, 2 July 2022 (UTC)