This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taylor Swift, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taylor Swift on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Taylor SwiftWikipedia:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTemplate:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTaylor Swift articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on October 7, 2020.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
"In its 159th charting week, 1989 returned to the Australian top 10, climbing from No. 12 to No. 9, outcharting its successor Reputationsource and making it only the fourth album being placed in the top 10 that deep in its chart run, following Ed Sheeran's+ and x and Adele's21source." --2A02:B98:473C:71D4:54FD:46B8:BD37:C533 (talk) 15:22, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: This strikes me as quite a bit too much detail to include in the article. In addition, I'm not sure where it would fit into the article since there's currently no written discussion of the album's chart performance in the article. (Singles charting is written, album sales is written, but album charting is in tables.) ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 19:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Bad Blood Remix
I’m a little confused as to why the "Bad Blood" Remix (ft. Kendrick Lamar) is listed as a single from the album when it wasn't even on the album to begin with. The remix version was clearly the version that was promoted as a single, and the solo version was treated like any other song that wasn’t a single. So, with that in mind, I’m proposing that we take "Bad Blood" out of the Infobox, and that we adjust the "Bad Blood" page so that the Infobox in the lead says "song" (because the solo version was only a song) and then we include another Infobox in a different section that says "single" (because the remix version was a single). I don’t know how this managed to slip between the cracks of GA/FA review when the song isn’t even on the album to begin with. D🐶ggy54321(let's chat!) 12:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Doggy54321: Judging from the promotional campaign of 1989, I believe it is fair to say "Bad Blood" was a single from the album. Billboard reported that it was specifically the fourth single, as did Republic Records. Oftentimes, a "single" report may be skeptical, but this single had a very specific order of being the fourth (to note, both Billboard, a magazine that closely observes the US music industry, and Republic Records said so). Typically, a single may indicate that the song itself is on the album tracklist, but I believe in this digital age, as long as a song serves as a promotional tool for an album, as specified by the label and the artist, then it is qualified. It may be noted that the solo version was (probably) released to US A/C radio. HĐ (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Requested move 1 June 2021
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose Covers or not, the Ryan Adams album charted in the top 10, so I do not think it can be said to be so obscure that no one would look for it. I'm also still not convinced partial disambiguation is ever especially useful. Nohomersryan (talk) 21:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose pageviews do show a dominance though I'm not sure its enough and partial disambiguation is generally a bad idea. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:13, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose moving to incomplete disambiguation per reasons stated by everyone else. D🐶ggy54321(let's chat!) 11:52, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Including the name of the artist in the title about a song or album is generally helpful and not awkward, and incomplete disambiguation is undesirable, and it's not a TWODAB since there are four other albums topics listed on the dab page besides these two, and the Ryan Adams album is quite notable – not just something obscure, but rather a top 10 in the US market. — BarrelProof (talk) 14:18, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: I agree with the reasons provided by everyone else. Lord Clayton7 (talk) 12:21, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.