Autopatrolled
User:Itcouldbepossible
- Itcouldbepossible (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
I have created around 50 articles. I am requesting autopatrolled rights so that new page reviewers doesn't have to spend time to review my pages. It would make their job a little easy, and they would be able to review other articles, which are actually needed. The NPR always has a huge backlog. Itcouldbepossible Talk 15:08, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Since 45 of those were created in the last two weeks and were mostly quickly-reviewed stubs,
Not done for now. Thank you for thinking of the NPP backlog but we need to see a quite significantly longer track record. Also, unless you're only interested in creating stubs, we need to see long articles that show you're familiar with our content policies. – Joe (talk) 08:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot Joe for reviewing my request. Possibly you are right in thinking that I shouldn't have autopatrolled rights at this moment, but just to add, I have developed quite a few drafts extensively, and also a few articles. Some of them are Nayantara (TV series), Harano Sur (TV series) and Gaatchora. If you are talking about creating big articles, then I mostly focus on bengali TV shows, which you might already know from my user page. Those recent stub creations were create articles on the species of some things that which I had read about recently. I am currently being mentored by FormalDude, and you can see the mentorship here and here. I had requested for this right because if I go for creating stub like articles (though not all) in the future again, I don't have to contribute the NPR backlog again. If you have seen my talk page archive, then only once an issue was raised regarding one of my creations, that too a minor one, which is solved now. Would you suggest me when and after meeting what criteria I can reapply again, and the request would get accepted. Thanks again for you kind explanation. Sincerely, Itcouldbepossible Talk 11:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Itcouldbepossible, like I said, it's a question of time. Autopatrolled is only useful for editors that regularly create new articles and only safe to give to editors whose creations we can be sure don't need review. You've created a good number of articles, but almost all of them are copy-and-paste stubs created on a single day. Which is fine – but it gives me no an indication of whether you will be a prolific creator in the long term or whether your future creations on different topics are likely to need review. If you want something concrete: wait six months and reapply if you're still creating articles regularly and haven't encountered any problems with them. – Joe (talk) 16:35, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Joe Roe Thanks for you kind kind reply sir. I understand what you said. I thought this might be too early to ask for autopatrolled rights, since I am really new out here. I need to show experience in article creation, and gain trust from the community. Thanks for all your kind help. I will prepare myself in the meanwhile. Sincerely, Itcouldbepossible Talk 02:21, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- Itcouldbepossible, like I said, it's a question of time. Autopatrolled is only useful for editors that regularly create new articles and only safe to give to editors whose creations we can be sure don't need review. You've created a good number of articles, but almost all of them are copy-and-paste stubs created on a single day. Which is fine – but it gives me no an indication of whether you will be a prolific creator in the long term or whether your future creations on different topics are likely to need review. If you want something concrete: wait six months and reapply if you're still creating articles regularly and haven't encountered any problems with them. – Joe (talk) 16:35, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot Joe for reviewing my request. Possibly you are right in thinking that I shouldn't have autopatrolled rights at this moment, but just to add, I have developed quite a few drafts extensively, and also a few articles. Some of them are Nayantara (TV series), Harano Sur (TV series) and Gaatchora. If you are talking about creating big articles, then I mostly focus on bengali TV shows, which you might already know from my user page. Those recent stub creations were create articles on the species of some things that which I had read about recently. I am currently being mentored by FormalDude, and you can see the mentorship here and here. I had requested for this right because if I go for creating stub like articles (though not all) in the future again, I don't have to contribute the NPR backlog again. If you have seen my talk page archive, then only once an issue was raised regarding one of my creations, that too a minor one, which is solved now. Would you suggest me when and after meeting what criteria I can reapply again, and the request would get accepted. Thanks again for you kind explanation. Sincerely, Itcouldbepossible Talk 11:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
User:Moondragon21
- Moondragon21 (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
Prolific new article writer (about 2177 new entries). Have looked through contributions and found few issues. Schierbecker (talk) 09:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hmm... tough one. On the one hand, there are a lot of notifications about deletion nominations and draftifications on his talk page. On the other, very few of these seem to have stuck. Extending AGF, we could assume that the high number of articles he's created is magnifying the normal 'error rate' (on his part and on reviewers'). I've checked his more recent creations and don't see any issues myself. This user also a legitimately "prolific" article creator so granting autopatrolled is going to help the NPP backlog an appreciable amount. So on balance,
Done. Thanks for the suggestion. – Joe (talk) 16:55, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
User:PopePompus
- PopePompus (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
I've created 29 articles about Astronomy and my home state of Iowa. None have been deleted. I plan to create quite a few more Astronomy-related articles, and since I'm quite familiar with the notability requirements as well as the layout of such articles, I don't think they need to be patrolled. PopePompus (talk) 01:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
User:KHR FolkMyth
- KHR FolkMyth (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
User created 26 clean articles about folktales, most of them through AfC. As the topic is mostly not a hot one like bios or politics, I think the autopatrol right can be given (there are thousands of articles at AfC). Please note that I've no connection to the editor, though I accepted several KHR's articles at AfC. Artem.G (talk) 13:53, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Endorse — user’s creations are clean. RB Talk to the Beans? 13:59, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
User:Silence of Järvenpää
- Silence of Järvenpää (t · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools • sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · rollbacks · logs (blocks • rights • moves) · rfar · spi)
Used created 27 clean articles on music. Please note that I've no connection to the editor. Artem.G (talk) 13:00, 16 June 2022 (UTC)