Welcome!
Hi Abrvagl! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Jr8825 • Talk 17:43, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello!
I really need to communicate with you from e mail, could you send your gmail? 78.190.1.110 (talk) 18:07, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, Sorry, I do not want to share my personal details on Wikipedia, especially with anonyms IP user, whom I do not know. Please use talk page or WP:EMAIL Abrvagl (talk) 20:43, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. Thank you. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 10:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
- This has now concluded. You are formally warned that further instances of edit warring, including slow motion edit warring, will result in sanctions. Thryduulf (talk) 14:38, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for notifying me and sorry for late reply (I had an emergency surgery and was not able to reply). I respect the judgment of the administrators and will accept the warning. However, I never intended to edit a war. I just having difficult time while being ignored, like here [1].
- Another example is 2020 Ghazanchetsots Cathedral shelling, where I made an good faith edit[[2]], which was reverted saying that if Saadats nationality is Azerbaijani, then her response is related to official Azerbaijan[3]. Although I proved that edit was justified and agreed helping to raise RfC for other proposals, other user did not self-revert, saying that stable version of article shall be keep until RfC. This does not make sense to me, how the valid edit linked to the RfC?
- If there such Wikipedia policy, that article shall not be edited at all until there is RfC, then why other used added two low quality sources to the article? One of which is Russian search engine result[4], which refers to non-existing online publication Kdpconsulting.ru (when you click it it opens some unknown https://runews.biz/). The second one[5] is also unknown news paper agency(or personal blog), which wrongly calls Saadat as male and focus on her nationality calling her Azerbaijani journalist, where in reality she is working for TASS and holds Russia citizenship
In the same vein, Azerbaijani journalist Saadat Kadyrova revealed to the Russian TV audience that the church bombing was justified. He compared the residents to terrorists.
- I will also ping Rosguill, gents can you please advice what is the best way to act in such situations? Thanks in advance! Abrvagl (talk) 06:47, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- The best way to resolve situations like this is to request additional input but uninvolved editors, whether through an RfC, 3O, or DRN. The rule is not that the
article shall not be edited at all until there is RfC
but rather that specific changes should not be reintroduced once objected to until a consensus in favor of them has been reached, whether through RfC/DRN/3O or simple talk page discussion. Changes distinct from those that have been objected to yet are fair game for continued editing. Meanwhile, your own belief that you have conclusively proven something is not sufficient: you need to explicitly win over other editors to your suggested edits. signed, Rosguill talk 14:55, 21 June 2022 (UTC)- You right, thinking back, now I see that if it is obvious that consensus is not reachable, then it is always better to involve other editors, rather than trying to convince editor which disagree with you. I also note that I shall be more BOLD. Thanks for advice. Abrvagl (talk) 20:38, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- The best way to resolve situations like this is to request additional input but uninvolved editors, whether through an RfC, 3O, or DRN. The rule is not that the
Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. Thank you. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 13:16, 21 June 2022 (UTC)