No edit summary Tags: New topic Source |
(reflist + →Golden: new section) |
||
Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
:@[[User:Cemsentin1|Cemsentin1]] see what [[WP:RS]] is. Those state sponsored / [[WP:COI]] websites can't be used for facts, especially in such edits as yours. And we already have [[WP:RS]], see the NYT source I pointed out in the talk page. Also, I asked you to post your comments in the article's [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:1993_Summer_Offensives&diff=1063692627&oldid=1062256072&diffmode=source talk page], how hard can it be? [[User:ZaniGiovanni|ZaniGiovanni]] ([[User talk:ZaniGiovanni#top|talk]]) 13:40, 9 January 2022 (UTC) |
:@[[User:Cemsentin1|Cemsentin1]] see what [[WP:RS]] is. Those state sponsored / [[WP:COI]] websites can't be used for facts, especially in such edits as yours. And we already have [[WP:RS]], see the NYT source I pointed out in the talk page. Also, I asked you to post your comments in the article's [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:1993_Summer_Offensives&diff=1063692627&oldid=1062256072&diffmode=source talk page], how hard can it be? [[User:ZaniGiovanni|ZaniGiovanni]] ([[User talk:ZaniGiovanni#top|talk]]) 13:40, 9 January 2022 (UTC) |
||
{{reflist talk}} |
|||
== curious of your opinion == |
== curious of your opinion == |
||
Line 225: | Line 227: | ||
[[File:Information_icon4.svg|link=|alt=Information icon|25x25px]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:NPOVN-notice--> Link: [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Agdam]] Thank you. [[User:Abrvagl|Abrvagl]] ([[User talk:Abrvagl|talk]]) 10:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC) |
[[File:Information_icon4.svg|link=|alt=Information icon|25x25px]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:NPOVN-notice--> Link: [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Agdam]] Thank you. [[User:Abrvagl|Abrvagl]] ([[User talk:Abrvagl|talk]]) 10:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC) |
||
== Golden == |
|||
I see you have made [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Izzeddin_Hasanoghlu&diff=1089929677&oldid=1089903569 this talk post]. You said you found the discussion through [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LouisAragon&oldid=1089574939#Tone this talk page thread] (presumably because you watch LA's talk page). If this is true, then you ''must've'' seen [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LouisAragon&diff=prev&oldid=1089574939 my post to that talk page] where I explain that I monitor Golden's edits and have not seen any instance of [[WP:TE]]. I also explained there that good faith is not an optional thing on Wikipedia; it's a conduct guideline everyone is expected to follow.<br />It is precisely ''because'' I believe in the assumption of good faith, I have not concluded that you found the discussion because you were [[WP:HOUNDING]] Golden (a person you were in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Blue_Mosque,_Yerevan&diff=1089929814&oldid=1089618685 middle of a dispute with]) in order to take pot shots at him on an article talk page. No, it's probably as you said; you saw my post to LA's talk page and decided to read what the thread was about.<br />Still, I have to wonder why you thought what Golden did more than a year ago was relevant to the article about [[Izzeddin Hasanoghlu]]. I mean.. ''8'' diffs?? [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Karakoyun,_Armenia&diff=990623301&oldid=809765376&diffmode=source This one] goes back all the way to November 2020.<br />I don't know what your intentions were here. If I didn't [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]], I would speculate it was an attempt to intimate a contributor in a [[WP:BATTLEGROUND|battleground]] topic area by demonstrating how much dirt you have on them because you think they are [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&type=revision&diff=1073005756&oldid=1073003751 part of] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&type=revision&diff=1073015598&oldid=1073014623 some sort Wikipedian-child-trafficking ring]. –<span style="font-family:CG Times, times">[[User:MJL|<span style="color:black">MJL</span>]] [[User talk:MJL|‐'''Talk'''‐]]<sup>[[User:MJL/P|☖]]</sup></span> 19:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:02, 26 May 2022
Thank you
Thank you for your kind words, I appreciate it more then you know. I have had the chance to read your comment, I will have a more thorough review of it as soon as time permits. Regards, Archives908 (talk) 18:45, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Archives908: Take your time, and many thanks to you for your contributions. Please notify me in here what you think is the appropriate way to deal with the Sockmaster’s edits (at least the ones confirmed with biased/political sources) once you evaluated the situation more. Take care and thanks again.--ZaniGiovanni (talk) 19:42, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' noticeboard
Hello, ZaniGiovanni. Please be aware of this notice, where you are mentioned. Parishan (talk) 21:50, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Lake Sevan
Hello Zani, I was going to ask if you want to talk about the Lake Sevan issue? It appears we are in disagreement here. - Creffel (talk) 11:08, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Zani, I am once again requesting that we resolve our disagreements via civil discussion. I have asked you to do so approximately 4-5 times now. I have even offered a compromise on my most recent edit - Creffel (talk) 19:51, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- I will take a look. --ZaniGiovanni (talk) 19:53, 29 April 2021 (UTC)/
- I took a look at your edit, seems like you didn't even open the source abt the info that you claim is "sourced info". Read my reply in the page 1, and stop edit-warring. I will not tolerate your disruptive behavior, your account will be reported along with the suspicions of sockpuppetry. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 20:04, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Creffel (talk) 09:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Please read it as soon as you can. Thanks. --Blablubbs|talk 10:08, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Blablubbs: I emailed the information to the checkuser team instead, thanks. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 10:40, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
A thank-you, and an inquiry
Hi, ZaniGiovanni, thank you once again for the wonderfully kind message you left on my talk page; I appreciate it a ton, and thank you, too, for all your work.
As you are obviously more experienced and well-read on the rules and customs of Wikipedia, could I possibly ask you for your opinion at Talk:Zod_gold_mine? We obviously need more consensus than merely two opinions (so far) as to whether to rename the page, so I would appreciate your thoughts immensely. Have a great day -- BaxçeyêReş (talk) 01:54, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- My pleasure @BaxçeyêReş:. I saw the RM vote today actually as I edited once in that article and I have it watchlisted, but generally I would advise not to leave messages about voting in other editor's pages as it may be seen as canvassing. But understandably, you're new on wiki and wanted an additional opinion, and you probably were not even aware of the rule to begin with. As I said, I was going to take a look at the RM regardless, but right now I'm sort of busy IRL. If needed for advise/help, you can message on my page. Wish you a smooth road on the wiki journey. Sincerely, ZaniGiovanni (talk) 03:38, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oh no, I had no clue about the canvassing thing! I'll obviously refrain from doing so in the future; thank you a bunch for all your kind words and for making me cognizant of how to move forth on this intricate yet wonderful website. BaxçeyêReş (talk) 22:10, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Let's solve our problems?
Hey ZaniGiovanni, I hope you are well.
I'm just passing by here and wanted to ask if you want to solve our disagreements and talk? I think we have our disagreements and perhaps you really thought that BaxçeyêReş was an honest editor, but it seems not, and so the user was appropriately blocked for sockpuppeting. I am here to talk anyway.
I have my own concerns about your edits for example, but I wanted to ask you first: do you have any concerns you personally would like to discuss? you clearly disagreed with some of my recent edits and I want to get to the bottom of this in a cooperative manner. I can also explain what my concerns with your edits were if you have the time, and we can solve whatever problems come up together. - WimpyDood (talk) 03:30, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Arman Tsarukyan
HI ZaniGiovanni, Pls note that your edit has been reveted as heritage info should not be in the lead section (intro) but body text - see WP:ETHNICITY. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:39, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- I wrote and cleaned up the article per the source MOS:ROLEBIO. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 09:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lake Hopatcong, New Jersey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Record.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Reliability of the Source
Hello.
Just here to discuss why exactly you believe a Stanford-press-approved book from a 3rd party author dealing specifically with Azerbaijanis is not reliable enough for you? Please elaborate further. Thank you - WimpyDood (talk) 13:57, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
- @WimpyDood I already explained in my edit description, but I'll also add in the talk page of the article. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 14:00, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Hey, just be careful
I've seen your name pop up a few times now on various drama-boards. You might want to read Wikipedia:ANI advice as a bit of a heads up. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 16:12, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- MJL I'm gonna be honest I don't understand what you mean by "drama-boards", but thanks for your concerns regardless. Best, ZaniGiovanni (talk) 16:19, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- [Thank you for the ping] Sorry, that probably isn't a term that translates well. There are places like WP:AE, WP:AN/I, etc. that are well known for hosting "drama" (spectacles of conflict). Most users find themselves more productive and happy when they aren't finding themselves there very often. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 16:26, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- No worries MJL and thanks for the explanation, you're very correct. With best, ZaniGiovanni (talk) 16:32, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- [Thank you for the ping] Sorry, that probably isn't a term that translates well. There are places like WP:AE, WP:AN/I, etc. that are well known for hosting "drama" (spectacles of conflict). Most users find themselves more productive and happy when they aren't finding themselves there very often. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 16:26, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- I guess I should follow this up just a bit. In the future, I recommend using WP:AE over AN/I if you are okay to do so. For both Verman1 and Toghrul R you would've been able to (the former because of a topic ban, and the latter because of an awareness for DS that still apply).
Further, I get that some users are really disruptive in the WP:ARBAA2 space, but with Toghrul R this makes the third Azeri editor you've reported in the last 2 weeks ([1][2][3]). All three are also administrators on azwiki, too.
You're treading some pretty dangerous ground right now. People might begin to feel you are using the dispute resolution processes to remove perceived opponents rather than dealing with genuine disruption (even if genuine disruption is the underlying cause). –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 16:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC)- Hey MJL, hope you're doing well. Firstly, wanted to say that I appreciate your thoughts, and they are in fact very informative. You're always welcome on my talk page if there is anything to discuss.
- A couple of my thoughts and my perspective. I had two options with both of the editors: A) edit-war to no end and be no better than them; B) report them in the "drama-boards" (as you say:)) and stop what seemed like endless disruption. I choose the latter, and the community agreed with me. I think it's the better option if the user refuses to talk and blindly re-reverts, breaking guidelines in the process. And their ethic aspersions on top (in another user's talk page) were really disturbing. I didn't even know the user was an admin in a different project (later after they told in ANI I checked their profile and oh well), but I don't think it changes anything.
- As I said, I really appreciate your concerns and to see an experienced editor like you expressing their thoughts and giving advice is always welcome. Hope you'll also appreciate mine. With best, ZaniGiovanni (talk) 17:25, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- There is one more option besides those two. Let me explain...
- I will just say that, as an outside observer in regards to the Azerbaijani-Armenian conflict (at least as far as it plays out on Wikipedia), it can be very difficult for each side to explain where they are coming from. I spent a lot of time two years ago on azwiki, and I was pretty taken aback by how bad some things were there. The one thing that became abundantly clear for me is that there is staggeringly little truth in what the Azerbaijani people get told about the Armenians. Folks are told, "The Armenians killed your family. They are tricksters who lie and deceive." and there just isn't anyone around to push back against that narrative. It's really sad if you ask me.
- When someone like Toghrul R lashes out with blanket statements that how you're biased for being Armenian or whatever the next situation is, try to remember that they are coming from a place of ignorance. That is not meant to excuse their actions because it is still wrong to imply someone is biased by virtue of their nationality, but it's important to recognize when someone says something like that out of ignorance versus when they say it out of hate. Just calmly leveling with the other editor can go a long way in these kinds of situations. They might not listen, but it's always important to at least present the chance for them to improve because sometimes they will.
- By the way, I'm sorry that this is so long. There's just obviously a lot that can be said about this specific topic, though.
Also, I was wrong to say Verman1 was an azwiki admin. That user is just autopatrolled there. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 04:45, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
RE: Email
Hey. Sorry, but I rarely if ever disclose my email address to users who haven't been active for, I dunno, a year'ish. Regards, El_C 20:21, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Germany–Taiwan relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central News Agency.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of John J. Pershing
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John J. Pershing you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:20, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of John J. Pershing
The article John J. Pershing you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:John J. Pershing for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 07:21, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Tilly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springer.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
New message from ToBeFree
Message added 23:22, 5 October 2021 (UTC). You can at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:22, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Armenian genocide
How's it going? I just saw that you reverted an edit I made to the Armenian genocide article. I'm not looking really to contest your revert, but am just curious about why from your point of view it needed to be reverted; just to let you in the loop, from my point of view the edits in question were just a series of light copyediting that didn't change the article in any significant way. Again, I'm not looking not looking to contest your revert, nor am I upset about it, but if you'd explain to me any issues you had with my edits on the article it would be much appreciated. Regards, Dabberoni15 (talk) 18:40, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Dabberoni15 Hi there, everything's alright, what about you? Upon double-checking, I think the edits were fine. Maybe you can leave the mention of Turkish national movement as 'nationalistic', better for the reader and more suiting. I'm just careful with the article, as I noticed that most of the changes are being discussed before implementation. Cheers, ZaniGiovanni (talk) 07:07, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hi ZaniGiovanni, everything's alright here as well. Thanks for the quick reply. If you don't mind, I'm going to reinsert my edits into the article, but adhere to the suggestion that you mentioned. If you feel there are any issues with it, or any of my other edits, please don't hesitate to let me know. Adios, Dabberoni15 (talk) 09:29, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hi also, I am also curious why you reverted my edit and would like to explain my edit to you personally. As I removed the wl to Armenian Genocide at Mehmed Reshid, I did it in sight that if this article will ever become a good article, which is what I hope for every Wikipedia article, the WL in question should be removed per MOS:NOTSEEALSO.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 12:35, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @Paradise Chronicle, your edit wasn’t in the genocide article. Regarding its content, I wasn’t aware of MOS:NOTSEEALSO, good to know. Thanks for the explanation. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 12:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hi also, I am also curious why you reverted my edit and would like to explain my edit to you personally. As I removed the wl to Armenian Genocide at Mehmed Reshid, I did it in sight that if this article will ever become a good article, which is what I hope for every Wikipedia article, the WL in question should be removed per MOS:NOTSEEALSO.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 12:35, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Shusha survey
Hi. Could you please keep your comments to the Threaded discussion section? The survey part is not for discussion, any comments need to go to the section specifically provided for that. That is how it works. As Robert McClenon wrote in the previous RFC: Do not reply to other users in the Survey. Back-and-forth discussion may be conducted in the Threaded Discussion section. I don't want to move your comments, maybe you can do it yourself. Thank you. Grandmaster 10:27, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
- Done. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 11:22, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Victor Maghakian
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Victor Maghakian you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 23:41, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Victor Maghakian
The article Victor Maghakian you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Victor Maghakian for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 19:01, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
1993 Summer Offensives
Present page has some wrong informations such as ″The 1993 Summer Offensives of the First Nagorno-Karabakh War saw the capture of several Azerbaijani regions by Armenian military units in a series of battles from June to August 1993″ and ″By August 20, Fuzuli, Jabrayil, and Zangelan had fallen″. This offensive began in June 1993 but ended in October 1993. Also, Fuzuli and Jabrayil fell into Armenian hands in 23 August 1993. I added ″After capturing these cities, Armenians reached border of Iran and cut link between districts of Qubadli and Zangilan and unoccupied part of Azerbaijan. Qubadli fell in 31 August. [4] This offensive finalized with occupiation of Zangilan in 29 October 1993.[5]″ with reliable sources. But, you deleted wrongly with using reverting. If you looked at the administrative division map of the Republic of Azerbaijan, you would see that the districts of Fuzuli and Jabrayil are neighbors to Iran[1]You also knew Armenians captured Lachin district in 18 May 1992 and most of Nagorno-Karabakh by July 1993 during First Nagorno-Karabakh war. So, they cut link between districts of Qubadli and Zangelan (Zangilan) and rest of Azerbaijan when Armenians captured them. Consequently, formation of Armenian-occupied territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh was completed after it. Please, you help me to add correct informations. Yours sincerely, Cemsentin1 (talk) 22:23, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Cemsentin1 you didn't add reliable sources, stop repeating that. I already replied and explained to you in the article talk page, and use the article talk page from now on. I don't wish to have this conversation on my talk page. Also that map isn't a source either, and as I already said, not only you added biased non RS sources, but your unreliabe sources contradict New York Times source, Zangilan isn't even mentioned in NYT source. Again, see my comment in article's talk page and use the article talk page from now on. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 22:40, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
What is reliable source ? Are you can explain ? Also, I gave administrative map of Azerbaijan for supporting right objection against your revertion. Wasn't it a reliable source ? Please you leave acting biased. If you looked this map, you could see districts of Fuzuli, Jabrayil, Qubadli and Zangilan. So, you understood value of reverted my sentences:″After capturing these cities, Armenians reached border of Iran and cut link between districts of Qubadli and Zangilan and unoccupied part of Azerbaijan. Qubadli fell in 31 August. [4] This offensive finalized with occupiation of Zangilan in 29 October 1993.[5]″. Yours sincerely, Cemsentin1 (talk) 13:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Cemsentin1 see what WP:RS is. Those state sponsored / WP:COI websites can't be used for facts, especially in such edits as yours. And we already have WP:RS, see the NYT source I pointed out in the talk page. Also, I asked you to post your comments in the article's talk page, how hard can it be? ZaniGiovanni (talk) 13:40, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
References
curious of your opinion
Hey, or barev! I don't know if you speak Armenian so I continue in English. In the Kingdom of Commagene article it's written: "...kingdom ruled by a Hellenized branch of the Iranian Orontid dynasty that had ruled over Armenia..."
But if you go to the Orontid dynasty article theres multiple opinions of historians that say that they were Armenian or they were Iranian. I think it's better to remove any ethnical affiliation of the dynasty from that sentence and if the readers want to know more about it they just read the full article about them with the multiple view points. How you think about it? UserXpetVarpet (talk) 23:13, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- UserXpetVarpet Hi there. There was an extensive discussion in talk and apparently there are dozen of sources about Commagene Iranian viewpoint. You can open a new talk discussion if you want. Cheers, ZaniGiovanni (talk) 07:54, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Victor Maghakian
The article Victor Maghakian you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Victor Maghakian for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 13:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Beshogur (talk) 11:17, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Matsoni
Protected Geographical Indications for Georgian products
Please check this and also note that Armenia lost 2011 court trail in European court over name of the pruduct against Georgia, stop vandalising wikipedia over some petty whims ზურა 6446 11:25, 9 February 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ზურა6446 (talk • contribs)
- ზურა6446 We already have multiple WP:RS for Armenian origin, and in such cases, you do need reliable secondary sources. All you recent accounts that most likely come from the same place just disrupt witout sources or with single primary source, overwriting validly sourced content. That's not how wikipedia works. The wiki article you linked as a "source" is nothing, wikipedia itself can't be used as a source. The common name is Matzoon btw, not Matsoni, WP:JDLI. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 11:33, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the information. Cullen328 (talk) 00:43, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abrvagl (talk • contribs) 17:38, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- ZaniGiovanni don't play so fast and loose with naming noticeboards and concepts like SPAs to new editors, it gives them too much rope than is good for any of us and prevents us from being able to teach them. It's best to not let them know the green room exists until they have plenty experience on-stage, if that metaphor makes sense. If you have issues in the topic area with dispute resolution and don't wish to take the heavy-handed approach of going to DRN or start RfCs, feel free to ping me if you feel a newbie doesn't listen or you see things getting heated. Hope the ANI thing gets resolved quickly and you get to enjoy your weekend :). A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 18:56, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- A. C. Santacruz thank you for the message, much appreciated. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 19:34, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
Robert McClenon (talk) 17:55, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Invite to DRN
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
.
- Dear Zani, I raised DRN on the dispute that we having on the Anti-Armenian sentiment in Azerbaijan talk page.
- When you have time, please provide your summary of the dispute on the DRN.
- Thanks in advance,
- Regards,
Hello, from a DR/N volunteer
This is a friendly reminder to involved parties that there is a current Dispute Resolution Noticeboard case still awaiting comments and replies. If this dispute has been resolved to the satisfaction of the filing editor and all involved parties, please take a moment to add a note about this at the discussion so that a volunteer may close the case as "Resolved". If the dispute is still ongoing, please add your input. 13:06, 7 March 2022 (UTC)A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me!
File:Border War.png
The 41 square kilometres (16 sq mi) slither of territory shown as occupied by Azerbaijan in File:Border War.png, does correspond to the places where the battles took place and which are occupied by Azerbaijani troops. The problem is, that this file lacks sources. However, there are no other maps at all about this topic and which shows occupied territory. That is why a map is desirable, in order to visualize this conflict, like any other conflict and topic. The original uploader of this map is Azerbaijani, and I am curious where he got the data. I asked for sources from this user in his Wikimedia Commons page. I could not find any sources with maps myself. If you can find sources with maps, that would be great. Multituberculata (talk) 07:30, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Three-revert rule
Dear editor, you twice reverted my 1, 2, 3 and 4 valid edits on the Anti-Armenian sentiment in Azerbaijan page without a solid justification. In particular this edit, which you reverted, but not addressed, included removal of the BLP concern and not properly attributed statements. Please take your time to read the discussions on the talk page here and here and consider addressing raised concerns.
Sincerely, --Abrvagl (talk) 06:05, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Gandzasar monastery
We should specify and mention the historical input of Caucasian Albanians, as indegenous christians of the region and their legacy should be respected. All of my material is sourced, all are from Armenian original sources.
Your stand on reverting follows some propogating agenda — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arran Shah (talk • contribs) 02:51, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- This is the first and last warning of WP:NPA. If you come to my talk page, I expect a civil conversation. Most of the sources you added are old primary sources that can’t be verified, and the Turkish source is very racist against Armenians and talks about Armenians in a derogatory way. Plus, it’s an opinion piece. And you really would benefit from reading WP:EW and WP:CONS. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 03:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Link: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Agdam Thank you. Abrvagl (talk) 10:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Golden
I see you have made this talk post. You said you found the discussion through this talk page thread (presumably because you watch LA's talk page). If this is true, then you must've seen my post to that talk page where I explain that I monitor Golden's edits and have not seen any instance of WP:TE. I also explained there that good faith is not an optional thing on Wikipedia; it's a conduct guideline everyone is expected to follow.
It is precisely because I believe in the assumption of good faith, I have not concluded that you found the discussion because you were WP:HOUNDING Golden (a person you were in the middle of a dispute with) in order to take pot shots at him on an article talk page. No, it's probably as you said; you saw my post to LA's talk page and decided to read what the thread was about.
Still, I have to wonder why you thought what Golden did more than a year ago was relevant to the article about Izzeddin Hasanoghlu. I mean.. 8 diffs?? This one goes back all the way to November 2020.
I don't know what your intentions were here. If I didn't assume good faith, I would speculate it was an attempt to intimate a contributor in a battleground topic area by demonstrating how much dirt you have on them because you think they are part of some sort Wikipedian-child-trafficking ring. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 19:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)