![]() |
To honour SlimVirgin who is part of Wikipedia's fabric. Good-bye Sarah.
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220705022054im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c9/Penpeculiar_250px.gif/220px-Penpeculiar_250px.gif)
GOCE March drive newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive update
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 Backlog elimination drive! Here's the mid-drive newsletter. Participation: We have had 58 people sign up for this drive so far, which compares favorably with our last drive, and 27 have copy-edited at least one article. If you have signed up but have not yet copy-edited any articles, please consider doing so. Every bit helps! If you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Join us! Progress report: Our target of completing the 2010 articles has almost been reached, with only 56 remaining of the 194 we had at the start of the drive. The last ones are always the most difficult, so thank you if you are able to help copy-edit any of the remaining articles. We have reduced the total backlog by 163 articles so far. Special thanks: Special thanks to Stfg, who has been going through the backlog and doing some preliminary vetting of the articles—removing copyright violations, doing initial clean-up, and nominating some for deletion. This work has helped make the drive a more pleasant experience for all our volunteers. Your drive coordinators – Dianna (talk), Stfg (talk), and Dank (talk)To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. |
test
GOCE February blitz wrapup
Guild of Copy Editors Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Blitzes/February 2014 wrap-up
Participation: Out of seven people who signed up for this blitz, all copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: During the seven-day blitz, we removed 16 articles from the requests queue. Hope to see you at the March drive! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Baffle gab1978. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by
|
Met releases images/ Note to self
http://www.nbcnews.com/slideshow/met-digitizes-its-collection-releasing-350-00-images-free-n719661
February flowers
![]() |
happy Valentine's! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Gerda.... no flowers here yet, probably not in Germany either, but I always thinks it's down hill to Spring from today... I hope.:O)
- no flowers here, actually one of the coldest days, great ice sculptures in brooks - the pic is from last year --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Today, we have a DYK about Wilhelm Knabe, who stood up for future with the striking school children when he was in his 90s, - a model, - see here. - Thank you for your position in the arb case request, - I feel I have to stay away, but there are conversations further down on the page, in case of interest, - in a nutshell: "... will not improve kindness, nor any article". - Yesterday, I made sure on a hike that the flowers are actually blooming now ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Yay for Spring! It's starting to warm up here too. I do love the winter when there's snow, but around about February it's time to move towards warmth.
- As for the arbitration, I know the arbs are intelligent, and I assume honest, but I don't think the system works and certainly doesn't work without damage to many parties. When there is evidence presented in a request with out context, probably in good faith, or at least I hope so, then conclusions reached can be wrong. I'm afraid I've see this happen too often. Plus long term editors who've been through arbitrations in the past know what a negative impact an arbitration on there own well-being and won't or can't comment; they won't involve themselves for their own health. You can't be around this place involved in contentious situations and not antagonize some people but those situations are not reason to sanction anyone or suggest guilt that requires arb intervention at least not in a system where most arbitrations are run like courts of law and people are " sent to jail". I have seen arbitration where long term conduct was a problem but even in that case, and believe me the editor involved was no friend of mine, the sanctions may have gone too far. We've lost some very, very good editors in arbitrations when other remedies might have worked AND in some case those editors where set up, those of us "in the field", as it where, know what's happening and how things were slanted but the arbs aren't in that same position nor have those insights. Arbitrations are behavioral and are treated like "what's" when the "why's" should be considered as well.
- I hope the arbs can see their way to move beyond appearances as presented by the requests and understand the repercussions of this arbitration. Littleolive oil (talk) 16:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Amen. Did you see the gorgeous new guide to arbitration, Hammersoft's talk: "Don't!" - That's all. It could be so easy. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Or only when everything else has been tried and then with a more human touch, like actually asking the editor or editors to answer to the specific situations and accusations, directly to the arbs, without the peanut gallery involvement. Littleolive oil (talk) 16:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Did you see Hammersoft's reasoning? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- I just read the thread. I agree with @Hammersoft: and said some of the same in the arbitration with out his clarity. I don't see this though as the fault of the arbs but of the system which may have worked in the early days of Wikipedia but the encyclopedia is too big with too many dark corners and back rooms, and situations which arbs don't know anything about. It takes a big person to retract and RFA at this late date and face the person he was fighting with. But imagine what a precedent it would set if @ProcrastinatingReader: did this, how it could save many, many hours of hurt and grief and change the course of how we deal with difficult situations. Rexx is not an enemy; he always, in my experience, will come back peacefully and discuss. In my early days he reprimanded me for something he thought I had done wrong, I think he was wrong :O), but he has never held that incident against me. I can't imagine that an editor like Rexx who really thought he had used his tools incorrectly would continue to do so. He is thoughtful and takes his Wikipedia work seriously. Why would he not discuss this further knowing how upset PR is in the right environment where neither was under threat. And honestly, PR is not with out fault in this. But this is what disputes are about and the way to fix and heal is not an Arbitration especially with out anything that bridges the controversy and the arbitration. The examples presented by Joe Roe indicate that there was no agreement in one situation suggesting Rexx had used his tools incorrectly; in one situation three admins agreed with the action. Why is that being ignored? There is admin agreement for the action but Rexx is using his tools incorrectly? That doesn't make sense. I find this heart breaking actually. If there's anything we've learned from the Covid crisis is how precious people and time are. Around a table and a meal I have no doubt this could be worked out. If so, then it is fixable here. Neither party has to admit to guilt just to fixing the situation and moving on. Littleolive oil (talk) 18:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Did you see Hammersoft's reasoning? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Or only when everything else has been tried and then with a more human touch, like actually asking the editor or editors to answer to the specific situations and accusations, directly to the arbs, without the peanut gallery involvement. Littleolive oil (talk) 16:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Amen. Did you see the gorgeous new guide to arbitration, Hammersoft's talk: "Don't!" - That's all. It could be so easy. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
....and to make it clear. I don't think Rexx was at fault here beyond feeling frustration. The whole thing is a tempest in a teapot for which a hard working admin pays. Sickening actually. Littleolive oil (talk) 21:24, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
March flowers
![]() |
Today: Carmen for TFA (on my request), with Bizet's music "expressing the emotions and suffering of his characters" as Brian worded it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:38, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you Gerda. No flowers here yet. Might try planting sweet peas now, which never seem to grow here because although spring is coolish, summer is hot and they don't like heat. This is the gardening section of my user page apparently. Littleolive oil (talk) 18:36, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, - the pic is from last year, - I saw the very first of them today. - Can you please delete the thread above. It makes me freeze. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:38, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done. Littleolive oil (talk) 23:14, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- today (IWD): MMMM with a reference to Carmen again --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:43, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- ... and today Bach's cantata composed for today, - perhaps listen. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:49, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- The cantata became FA today, - this is a good recording. You can probably imagine of which emotions and suffering I talked above? ... and that was before it got worse - peace --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- ... and the first performance was on a Palm Sunday which is today, and Yoninah's obituary with the beginning of Passover today - putting some little ego-battles in perspective --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:07, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Gerda. Littleolive oil (talk) 15:31, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for what you said and did for RexxS --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:10, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- The case was designed, whether deliberately or not, so that we had to prove innocence rather than establish guilt. Guilt was immediately established by the very fact that the case was accepted despite RexxS'comment that he would take criticism seriously. It takes a very astute and experienced arb to see past that arbitration setup, and the low hanging fruit- a few diffs-to the less obvious and true crux of the issues. One cannot establish innocence with a few words and diffs especially when the arbs have it in their mind that the proof is in the diffs, and when context requires many more words than what was allowed, along with arbs who are willing to look to the more tedious context rather than diffs for truth. It was a frustrating situation and ugly environment and one I hope to never have to deal with again. Whether RexxS ever comes back to Wikipedia and I doubt if he will, who would given the way the arbitration was set up, he deserved whatever I could do to support him, however small that is and was. He has given so much to Wikipedia; thanks to me not necessary; it's the very least I could do. Littleolive oil (talk) 22:47, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for what you said and did for RexxS --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:10, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Gerda. Littleolive oil (talk) 15:31, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
you've got mail
— Ched (talk) 19:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Your analysis section at the evidence page for RexxS
The Arbitration Committee has asked that analysis be kept to around 500 words. Your analysis over multiple sections is over 950 words. Please edit your sections to focus on the most relevant analysis. If you wish to submit over-length analysis, you must first obtain the agreement of the arbitrators by posting a request on the /Evidence talk page. I understand that this is late in the day, but if you could shorten before the deadline that would be appreciated. Concise analysis is more useful for the committee in making its decision. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 20:14, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Dreamy Jazz, I made a short statement. Could I donate some unused words to Littleolive oil, who speaks for me? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt, word sharing has been previously frowned up by the arbitrators and at the moment simply donating words is not allowed. If you want to make the analysis yourself, you are free to do so in the next hour or so. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Dreamy Jazz, you don't know me, right? I stay short, intentionally so. I don't analyze, I don't rebut, I don't judge. I will miss him. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:14, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt, word sharing has been previously frowned up by the arbitrators and at the moment simply donating words is not allowed. If you want to make the analysis yourself, you are free to do so in the next hour or so. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Gerda thank you. I've been able to reduce my statements.
@Dreamy Jazz: For the arbs. It's impossible to analyze and rebut the amount of evidence/ analysis posted by some editors in 500 words. How can a single editor with a 500 word limit rebut several editors who are posting 1000 words each. Not sure what the answer is. Littleolive oil (talk) 22:56, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for trimming your analysis. I'll pass your comments along. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Conventions for discussion thread formatting
Regarding this edit: as unsolicited advice, please feel free to ignore the following, particularly if you're already aware of it. You responded to your own comment that started with *:
with a comment that started with :::
, immediately following ProcrastinatingReader's comment that started with *::
. Your first comment added a second-level unbulleted list item to a first-level bulleted list item. Your second comment changed the first level list to an unbulleted one, and nested two more unbulleted list items below it. This causes screen readers to announce the closing of three list levels (the third having been introduced by ProcrastinatingReader's comment) and the opening of three new list levels.
To avoid this additional overhead for those using screen readers, and to prevent a more verbose output for those using the visual diff option, you can follow the conventions described at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility § Lists. RexxS has a essay, Wikipedia:Colons and asterisks, and I have my own, User:Isaacl/On wikitext list markup, that also cover this. In a nutshell: use the same prefix as the comment to which you're replying, and then add the character of your choice to it. If you had actually intended to reply to ProcrastinatingReader, this would mean keeping the prefix for that comment and adding a colon to it, like this: *:::
. If you did mean to reply to your comment, then a prefix of *::
, the same as ProcrastinatingReader's, would follow the convention. isaacl (talk) 19:29, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. I see what you are saying. I was responding to PR; I'm not sure why I didn't follow the convention which is something I do know although not why its done that way. I will look over the essays. Thanks. Littleolive oil (talk) 22:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Prefixing a response with
>
characters as a visual indent is an old Usenet/plain text email convention, which I presume influenced the Wikipedia culture of using an additional nested list level for each response, thereby mimicking the appearance of indent levels. It's questionable how much sense it makes semantically for the underlying HTML (maybe you can consider each comment as a creating a new subthread, and thus a new list of comments). HTML's strict hierarchy isn't a great fit to represent comment-reply structures while also trying to imitate the older indentation convention. isaacl (talk) 22:39, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Prefixing a response with
- Same comment from me. I fixed one of your comments here, as did Tryptofish here (I tried to move this, but couldn't figure out where to put it), and I'm too lazy to fix the rest. Can you please stop adding comments in the middle of other editor's, or in the middle of other discussion threads, and indent the responses correctly? It's too difficult to follow the threads otherwise. The WMF's new Reply Tool might help: go to Special:MyPage/common.js and add
if ( $( '#ca-addsection' ).length ) mw.loader.using( 'ext.discussionTools.init' );
-- it gives a reply button that takes care of indenting for you. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 23:30, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- I saw WhatamIdoing's comment as three separate comments although not signed and very difficult to respond to specific to each comment. Her opening comment was placed in the middle of the thread so confusing. I agree my postings were confusing; I apologize. Littleolive oil (talk) 23:34, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
(Echo) notifications
Regarding this edit: note just changing the user name in a pre-existing comment won't trigger a notification, if that's what you wanted to do (I know some people just like to have a pointer, whether or not a notification is generated). Notifications based on mentioning a user on a talk page will only work in a freshly signed comment and not one that modifies any existing text. The easiest way to also ping someone when just fixing a single name is to include a link to the user's page within the edit summary. isaacl (talk) 20:25, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Ok. I had no idea. I can add a note and re sign too which should work. Thank you. Littleolive oil (talk) 20:35, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Happy Easter
![]() | |
wild garlic |
---|
You may be interested in the TFA on Easter Sunday that played a role in my life! ... and my silent hope for a resurexxSion. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:30, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for caring. Littleolive oil (talk) 15:06, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- On this day in 1742, He was despised was performed for the first time, and when I wrote it in 2012, I didn't only think of Jesus. Andreas Scholl sang that for us, - you are invited to a Baroque stroll. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220705022054im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Internet-group-chat.svg/48px-Internet-group-chat.svg.png)
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:32, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
![]() | |
Nine years! |
---|
I hope your break gives you rest and tranquility. Thank you for having tried the impossible, - it must have been exhausting. Look at a beautiful Main page, perhaps: all pics about nature. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:28, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Memories on the Main page today, Psalm 115 thinking of Yoninah, Christa Ludwig and Milva, - voices that made the Earth a better place. Sad that the psalm hook didn't appear on Earth Day as planned, but better pictured and late than going unnoticed ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:05, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your continued thoughtfulness and kindness, Gerda. A sad day for Wikipedia, saying good bye to Sarah. Littleolive oil (talk) 03:33, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
- Yes, see my talk today, and look for her name. - Top: it's rare that a person is pictured when a dream comes true, and that the picture is shown on the Main page on a meaningful day. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:53, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you
I believe I'm something of an unwelcome presence at the talk page in question, but I wanted to thank you for the post you made at G's talk page; it has given me some things to think about going forward. Primefac (talk) 21:12, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
RfC on racial hereditarianism at the R&I talk-page
An RfC at Talk:Race and intelligence revisits the question, considered last year at WP:FTN, of whether or not the theory that a genetic link exists between race and intelligence is a fringe theory. This RfC supercedes the recent RfC on this topic at WP:RSN that was closed as improperly formulated.
Your participation is welcome. Thank you. NightHeron (talk) 22:48, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
June flowers
![]() |
my thanks in pics and music --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
added: missing SlimVirgin, and RMF festival opening --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you Gerda. I miss her too, as well as Rexx. One a loss we could not have prevented one we could. Littleolive oil (talk) 00:22, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
GOCE June 2021 newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors June 2021 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, our first newsletter of 2021, which is a brief update of Guild activities since December 2020. To unsubscribe, follow the link at the bottom of this box. Current events
Election time: Voting in our mid-year Election of Coordinators opened on 16 June and will conclude at the end of the month. GOCE coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Have your say and show support here. June Blitz: Our June copy-editing blitz is underway and will conclude on 26 June. Drive and blitz reports
January Drive: 28 editors completed 324 copy edits totalling 714,902 words. At the end of the drive, the backlog had reached a record low of 52 articles. (full results) February Blitz: 15 editors completed 48 copy edits totalling 142,788 words. (full results) March Drive: 29 editors completed 215 copy edits totalling 407,736 words. (full results) April Blitz: 12 editors completed 23 copy edits totalling 56,574 words. (full results) May Drive: 29 editors completed 356 copy edits totalling 479,013 words. (full results) Other news
Progress report: as of 26 June, GOCE participants had completed 343 Requests since 1 January. The backlog has fluctuated but remained in control, with a low of 52 tagged articles at the end of January and a high of 620 articles in mid-June. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Tenryuu and Twofingered Typist, and from member Reidgreg. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 12:38, 26 June 2021 (UTC).
Justin Trudeau
Hi, I noticed that you recently edited the Justin Trudeau Wikipedia article. Please read the Justin Trudeau talk page, and join the discussion. Thank you,Peerreviewededitor (talk) 05:27, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for joining the discussion. I like how you mentioned that we should stick with what the sources say. I'm a little curious as to why you removed the warning label on the JT page. These were zero sources backing up the various government programs in the Covid-19 section of the article. On the other hand, I added many sources describing the PPE shortage related to the funding cuts to the National Emergency Strategic Stockpile, the failed CanSino deal which delayed Canada's acquisition of vaccines, and the Telford contract where Trudeau's chief of staff's husband's firm received a government contract to administer the rent subsidy program (these programs are usually administered by the public sector). I don't like it when the discussion devolves into whether additions are positive or negative. I did not make the claim about "poor judgement", that was another editor. I'd like to focus on whether the specific additions are based on what the sources say. Can you please respond to these three topics: 1. PPE shortage, 2. CanSino, 3. Telford Contract, in their respective areas on the JT talk page? Peerreviewededitor (talk) 01:20, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
The content can be sourced and probably is in “mother” articles on the topic. I have very poor internet resources right now or I would add the refs.myself. It’s not puffery to add factual content that can be easily sourced. Nor is content that happens to be positive puffery. I don’t have the internet connection for awhile to add the refs, but I will as soon as I can. As for the content you tried to add, again, I’d have to look at it later but from what I remember you are weighting the content too heavily. When editors are desperate to add pejorative content and remove more positive content just before an election I become very uncomfortable.
28 August
![]() |
Today, Teresa Żylis-Gara, the second soprano to impress me on stage, died, - long live the memory of her beautiful singing, remembered with thanks. 28 August 2013 was a special concert day: look. After Hillbillyholiday gave me a tree. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:47, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- I'm so sorry Gerda. Littleolive oil (talk) 00:32, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
For being decent and kind to a newbie. GreenForestRanger (talk) 06:27, 13 September 2021 (UTC) |
Thank you for this kindness. I am just returning home and able to connect online on a consistent basis. So sorry I couldn't help you with your article. Best wishes. Littleolive oil (talk) 02:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Peace Day
![]() |
Thank you for your spirit, - a rich harvest! On Peace Day Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Thank you Gerda.Littleolive oil (talk) 16:02, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
September 2021 Guild of Copy Editors newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors September 2021 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the September GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2021. Current and upcoming events
September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today! Drive and Blitz reports
June Blitz: From 20 to 26 June, 6 participating editors claimed 16 copy edits, focusing on requests and articles tagged in March and April. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. July Drive: Almost 575,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 24 people who signed up, 18 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. August Blitz: From 15 to 21 August, we copy edited articles tagged in April and May 2021 and requests. 9 participating editors completed 17 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Other news
June election: Jonesey95 was chosen to continue as lead coordinator, assisted by Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis. New maintenance template added to our project scope: After a short discussion in June, we added {{cleanup tense}} to the list of maintenance templates that adds articles to the Guild's copy editing backlog categories. This change added 198 articles, spread over 97 months of backlog, to our queue. We processed all of those articles except for those from the three or four most recent months during the July backlog elimination drive (Here's a link to a "tense" discussion during the drive). Progress report: As of 18:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 468 requests since 1 January and there were 60 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 433 (see monthly progress graph above). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Thinking of you
![]() |
Hope you are well! - I think of reflection looking at the water. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:47, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Today: memories in friendship --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:08, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- Gerda, thank you for asking. I am doing very well. I find myself busy with my studio and I suppose because Wikipedia has become such a disappoint and heartbreak for me I don't have the same impetus to do much here. I have also been in Canada for several months in an area where I didn't have a good connection so didn't edit much there; we went across the border just after it opened and I spent time with family and the ocean making up if that's possible for time lost during the pandemic. That part of Canada had early one been very stern about controlling the pandemic so by the time I got there it was very safe with only a very few identified cases. The area is a fishing area and there is a tendency to just get the job done. Wearing a mask is a pretty simple action not worthy of too much complaint when there are snow drifts 6 feet high with blizzard winds and power that goes out. That's difficult, a mask not so much. I saw my older daughter, I hadn't seen in 2 years and that was important too. I hope you and your family are well riding out the troubles. Littleolive oil (talk) 04:19, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, understand. What I'm doing is pictured if you click on songs - yesterday's not yet added, so keep checking from time to time. Two choirs singing again, keeping distance rules, which has caused heartbreak in one of them because only about a third of the members could perform the Rossini concert. The other conductor split the group in three small ones performing at different occasions, three services in November, three in Advent, perhaps three on the three days of Christmas. No concert (anyway) until fall of 2022. Today's DYK hook is about an ensemble I heard, with the first singing at the festival since 2019. We had to say something else for DYK, but my picture is in the article, and please enlarge it for the spirit! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:17, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
ACE2021 questions
I have hatted your questions 2-4 to Beeblebrox for not being questions. If you have concerns about an arbitrator's conduct or the conduct of the committee as a whole, there are many places you may raise them, but the question pages are for questions, not comments disguised as questions. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:53, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Please note from the arb election pages [1]
"Responses to questions by that candidate (including answers, requests for clarification, etc)"
- I am relatively fed up with accusations of bad faith. I responded as best I could to Beebelbox's questions to me. You removed my response which hides my response to questions the candidate asked of me. What's going on? And I didn't disguise anything. I am asking some arbs how they will deal with concerns many editors have with arbitration. The arb election is the place to do it, so that I can see if the arbs have the same concerns I do. That's how one determines who to vote for. I believe you are interfering wrongly, but after the last couple of days of false allegations I shouldn't be surprised.Littleolive oil (talk) 21:05, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
My sympathies. It was clearly a question. A well crafted one, since I think we both appreciate, all be it perhaps from different directions, that questions that don't leave a candidate with any way to answer truthfully and look good, are a useful tool at election time. Beeblebrox can and should be able to defend the decision of ArbCom to view the RexxS case as something that couldn't be realistically passed back to the community for resolution. That is literally the role, to explain such things to an often upset and angry community. Its a matter of fact, after all, that RexxS had already broken his RfA promise to do better, and nothing had actually happened at the community level. And RexxS certainly seemed content to conveniently forget this promise (or similar past statements, such as this idea he was reluctant to even accept the tools if it was going to be a contentious award). I personally found his reluctance to let six months elapse after his most recent personal attack delivered on the eve of his candidacy (calling another editor a prat if I recall) to be quite alarming. I certainly don't subscribe to the idea that ArbCom have sole purview over Admin conduct, but really, where was the evidence there was any appetite to address these matters anywhere else? Popularity and conviviality outweighed policy at every turn it seems. Shades of Fram influencing decisions, perhaps, although I do appreciate the significant differences, and genuinely mean no offence there. Slim was a good person, and I saw what others saw in her last postings, the raw emotion and sheer regret, and apparently want to forget now. FromTheDepthsOfDarkestMoo (talk) 14:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- For clarification regarding the revert I had made, the poster above is a blatant sock, and I saw it fit to remove obvious trolling by the sock. That said, as Littleolive oil has reverted me, I'll let it stay. JavaHurricane 16:38, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. I tend to let things stay on my talk page whether I agree or not. But thanks for watching and the action. Littleolive oil (talk) 16:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- Have you considered simply reposting the question in an unambiguous form? I feel like you're rewarding a bully by simply letting the matter drop. I would do it on your behalf to save you the stress, but part of the system here is making sure the victims suffer for questioning authority. Advocates are strictly prohibited. It's a shame, but the causes are known and well documented. Maybe it will change in time, but surely not while ArbCom is composed of people who get away with doing what he did to you. In extremis, you could stand. Be the change, and all that. KongPingWut (talk) 17:42, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Also, as I'm sure you know, but if not, SlimVirgin did post publicly about the pain and stress Wikipedia caused her in her final months. There was a dispute with David Gerard over the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes article, and she was clearly upset by how it was handled. ArbCom isn't directly to blame for that, but if you look, there's not a lot of difference in the arrogant and dismissive way Gerard spoke to her, and the way Beeblebrox spoke to you. This is the effect of having such people in power. KongPingWut (talk) 17:51, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
![]() |
Thank you for analyzing my question, under my "dangerous thoughts" where I moved it for context. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:25, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
memory of SlimVirgin pictured again --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:42, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you Gerda. Littleolive oil (talk) 02:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
December 2021 GOCE Newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors December 2021 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the December GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since September 2021. Current and upcoming events
Election time: Our end-of-year election of coordinators opened for nominations on 1 December and will close on 15 December at 23:59 (UTC). Voting opens at 00:01 the following day and will continue until 31 December at 23:59, just before "Auld Lang Syne". Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. December Blitz: We have scheduled a week-long copy-editing blitz for 12 to 18 December. Sign up now! Drive and Blitz reports
September Drive: Almost 400,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 27 people who signed up, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. October Blitz: From 17 to 23 October, we copy edited articles tagged in May and June 2021 and requests. 8 participating editors completed 26 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. November Drive: Over 350,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 21 people who signed up, 14 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. Other news
It is with great sadness that we report the death on 19 November of Twofingered Typist, who was active with the Guild almost daily for the past several years. His contributions long exceeded the thresholds for the Guild's highest awards, and he had a hand in innumerable good and featured article promotions as a willing collaborator. Twofingered Typist also served as a Guild coordinator from July 2019 to June 2021. He is sorely missed by the Wikipedia community. Progress report: As of 30 November, GOCE copyeditors have completed 619 requests in 2021 and there were 51 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog stood at 946 articles tagged for copy-editing (see monthly progress graph above). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Distributed via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Cary Grant/Rita Hayworth
I also said she had a small role, which is the case, and the person who accepted my change seemed to agree. 142 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.112.235.125 (talk) 20:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
in friendship
![]() | |
in friendship |
---|
Thank you for being around! - Happy new year, in friendship! - One of my pics was on the Main page, DYK, and even made it to the stats. - In this young year, I enjoyed meetings with friends in real life, and wish you many of those. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you Gerda. I have missed many friends for over two years now. One day. Soon. Littleolive oil (talk) 23:33, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- good to have you here, and your empathy --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:08, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for your support! - Sunday flowers and sounds, don't miss the extraordinary marriage of the beginnings of the theme of Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern, BWV 1, and Prayer for Ukraine - here! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220705022054im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Internet-group-chat.svg/48px-Internet-group-chat.svg.png)
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Always precious
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. Thank you for constant supportive empathy! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:14, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for your always thoughtful kindness. Happy Easter Gerda-Happy Spring. Littleolive oil (talk) 14:44, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
- thank you, enjoying both, more on my talk, - going outside right now --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:46, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
April songs
Ukraine day today: Maks Levin DYK, expanding Kyiv Symphony Orchestra (have tickets), and creating Anthony Robin Schneider, the bass who could be heard opening the singing in Beethoven's Ninth twice on 10 March 2022, live in Frankfurt, Germany, and recorded in Auckland, New Zealand, singing "Freiheit!" (freedom) instead of "Freude" (joy), in a tradition started after the Fall of the Wall. In case of interest. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:29, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Dove sono (Where are those happy moments ...?) - concert with Kyiv orchestra and Aleksey Semenenko (quite a story!) tonight, Symphony with war and peace in the subtitle --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
GOCE April 2022 newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors April 2022 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the April newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since December 2021. Election results: Jonesey95 retired as lead coordinator. Reidgreg was approved to fill this role after an 18-month absence from the coordinator team, and Baffle gab1978 was chosen as an assistant coordinator following a one-year break. Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu continued on as long-standing assistant coordinators. January Drive: Of the 22 editors who signed up, 16 editors claimed 146 copy edits including 45 requests. (details) February Blitz: This one-week effort focused on requests and a theme of Africa and African diaspora history. Of the 12 editors who signed up, 6 editors recorded 21 copy edits, including 4 requests. (details) March Drive: Of the 28 editors who signed up, 18 claimed 116 copy edits including 25 requests. (details) April Blitz: This one-week copy editing event has been scheduled for 17–23 April, sign up now! Progress report: As of 11 April, copy editors have removed approximately 500 articles from the backlog and completed 127 copy-editing requests during 2022. The backlog has been hovering at about 1,100 tagged articles for the past six months. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220705022054im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Internet-group-chat.svg/48px-Internet-group-chat.svg.png)
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
May music
![]() |
I like my talk today (actually mostly from 29 May - I took the title pic), enjoy the music, two related videos worth watching! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:07, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Thank you, Gerda and now, quite suddenly, it's June. Littleolive oil (talk) 02:17, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
June GOCE newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors June 2022 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the June 2022 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since April 2022. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Blitz: of the 16 editors who signed up for our April Copy Editing Blitz, 12 completed at least one copy-edit, and between them removed 21 articles from the copy-editing backlog. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: 27 editors signed up for our May Backlog Elimination Drive; of these, 20 copy-edited at least one article. 144 articles were copy-edited, and 88 articles from our target months August and September 2021 were removed from the backlog. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: our June Copy Editing Blitz, starting at 00:01, 19 June and closing at 00:59, 25 June (UTC), will focus on articles tagged for copy edit in September and October 2021, and requests from March, April and May 2022. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 07:12, 14 June 2022 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 209 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 1,404 articles. Election news: Nominations for our half-yearly Election of Coordinators continues until 23:50 on 15 June (UTC), after which, voting will commence until 23:59, 30 June (UTC). All Wikipedians in good standing (active and not blocked, banned, or under ArbCom or community sanctions) are eligible and self-nominations are welcomed. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220705022054im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Internet-group-chat.svg/48px-Internet-group-chat.svg.png)
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:32, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Today
![]() |
Today is a birthday. Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:13, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20220705022054im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Internet-group-chat.svg/48px-Internet-group-chat.svg.png)
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:32, 2 July 2022 (UTC)