±
vn-40 | This user talk page has been vandalized 40 times. |
CCI
Thank for taking a look at TDKR Chicago 101's contributions. I knew that it was bad, but I didn't realize that it was that bad. I wonder how no one has raised issues before me and how his contributions made it to ITN multiple times with so many copyright violations. I wonder if someone should mention it to ITN. SL93 (talk) 03:52, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- @SL93 The violations were more close paraphrasing based, which Earwig is not so great at picking up. Unfortunately, a lot of people think that a score of 15-20% means that there are no issues, even though they really should be looking at the text is highlighted, not the percentage. I personally don't think this needs to be brought up at ITN; as long as TDKR is aware with the copyright issues with his edits and does not repeat them in the future, the issues with his current editing have been adressed. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 04:12, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thank you for all that you do to help keep Wikipedia safe from vandalism! — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 04:41, 18 June 2022 (UTC) |
Arbitration case opened
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing/Evidence. Please add your evidence by July 9, 2022, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 11:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)