Goldblooded (talk | contribs) (Stop posting this stuff on my talk page. I already know and ive apologised.) |
Jasper Deng (talk | contribs) (→Listen please...: new section) |
||
Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
[[User:Goldblooded|Goldblooded]] ([[User talk:Goldblooded#top|talk]]) 13:33, 22 July 2011 (UTC) |
[[User:Goldblooded|Goldblooded]] ([[User talk:Goldblooded#top|talk]]) 13:33, 22 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Listen please... == |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] While we have no rule against it, please don't remove other peoples' comments on your talk page if they're trying to help you. Also, '''[[WP:VAND|vandalism]] has a ''specific'' definition,''' that does not include the comments of other. Dr. K removed your comments as "vandalism" not because it ''was'' vandalism, but because your comment was a blatant violation of [[WP:NPA|no personal attacks]]. Comments like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Blade_of_the_Northern_Lights&diff=prev&oldid=440902313 this] will get you blocked from editing. Please stop.[[User:Jasper Deng|Jasper Deng]] [[User talk:Jasper Deng|(talk)]] 22:17, 22 July 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:17, 22 July 2011
Siegmund Weltlinger
This article, which I see you have recently created and worked on, is very clearly vastly better than the one about which we have had discussion. I would, however, ask you to go back and re-read it, as some parts of the article do not make sense. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Marseille Siegfried1.jpg
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20221005183329im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thank you for uploading File:Marseille Siegfried1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:14, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
- You need to provide an indication of how the image is licensed. Is it Public Domain for example? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:00, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Marseille Siegfried1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Marseille Siegfried1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:50, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Siegfried Marseille
- Because whether or not the article gets deleted the facts must be correct.
- I am curious if you manage to find information that I couldn't. I researched Hans-Joachim Marseille's life for 15 years now, travelling to Africa and Berlin, visiting the German achives in Kornelimünster and Freiburg, I even once spoke to Eduard Neumann before he died.
I truly wish you good luck with the article but I stick with my opinion that he is borderline with respect to the WP:SOLDIER criteria. MisterBee1966 (talk) 04:10, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Some general advice
Hello, Goldblooded. I thought I should come by and share some thoughts with you. I know you're upset with the AfD for Siegfried Marseille, but please understand that this is not personal. At this point, I think it would be wise to take a step back from the discussion there and let it run its course. You've made your argument, and you're only going to antagonize editors who would otherwise have no problem with you. You might consider taking a break from Wikipedia altogether for a few days. Let things cool off a bit and think about what has happened.
Perhaps the best option at this point is to userfy the article so you can continue working on it without it being under threat of deletion. Once you get the article to a point where you think it satisfies the objections of those who have advocated its deletion, you can request that it be moved back into the article space. Another option is the article incubator, where you can find help from other editors who work there.
I've been on Wikipedia for a long time now—just about five years—and I've seen a lot of editors come and go. Quite a few have left involuntarily, and I would be disappointed if you followed in their footsteps. Trust me, I know how frustrating it can be for someone to revert your edits to an article, attempt to have something you wrote deleted, or insult you, but you can't retaliate in kind. I know from experience that participating in these kinds of disagreements will only drag you down. You have to be the bigger person, shrug off any negative comments, and if need be, disengage from the situation completely. I know it's difficult to stop yourself from needing the last word, but you'll feel better about a disagreement if you just walk away from it.
Let me know if there's anything I can do to help you work through this. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 02:21, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Re your message
I thought I'd reply here to be sure you see it (not sure if you're watching my talk page). I did get your email though only this morning (I probably don't check my mail as often as I should). It's disappointing that you feel the way you do, but as I said in an earlier post your sanctions were self inflicted. You shouldn't have been insulted by another editor - that was wrong - but you reacted badly and went on to cross a number of lines. The most serious of these was edit-warring (repeatedly removing/restoring edits). This almost always results in a block, and always if the three revert rule is broken. Another was messing with other editors' posts (especially after being warned not to), and a third was maintaining a confrontational and overly protective attitude to your article after others had pointed out some issues with it (see WP:OWN). Taken together these are what got you blocked. The reason I protected your talk page for the duration of the block was that you removed the block message and started posting further inflammatory messages; this was in essence what you'd been blocked for and I didn't want you to dig yourself deeper and get your block extended. The only reason talk pages normally remain editable while blocked is so that blocked editors can post unblock requests. However I should probably have informed you at the time that's why I locked the page - I apologise for not doing so and any upset this may have caused you.
You don't have to take any further advice from me, but you do have to edit by Wikipedia's rules if you want to stay here. Like Parsecboy above there are many other editors that would be happy to help you out - maybe you might even consider adoption by a more experienced editor until you learn the ropes? Regards, EyeSerenetalk 10:26, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- May I suggest User:Worm That Turned? --The Σ talkcontribs 03:31, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
WP:Articles for Deletion
While you may be upset or significantly disagree with the result of an AfD, it is not appropriate to reopen it after it has been closed by an admin. As stated at WP:Articles for Deletion#How an AfD discussion is closed, "If there is some concern over the validity of the closure, questions may first be asked of the person who closed the AfD, and, failing satisfaction there, raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review." Singularity42 (talk) 20:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Message added Singularity42 (talk) 20:15, 12 July 2011 (UTC). You can at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
General Article Creating Advice
I never thought I could create content until User:SuggestBot inspired me with a 1-sentence stub article. That article was about a former country, so it could not be deleted for being non-notable. 30 edits and a history merge later, I turned this into this. I duplicated the feat with this, and even got a shiny award when the article was featured on the main page. Unfortunately, my attempt to write an article about a video game, Backyard Monsters, was smashed to pieces by the 302-centimeter-thick Novel of Deletionism, First Edition.
Short version: Write an article about something inherently notable, like a former country. If you want, you can find references with Google and expand this 2-sentence stub. Alternatively, you can help fight vandalism.
Some people here think that teenagers haven't got the mental capacity write articles. Prove them wrong. --The Σ talkcontribs 00:02, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Marseille Siegfried1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Marseille Siegfried1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:27, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
|
License tagging for File:Algerian Troops 1939.png
Thanks for uploading File:Algerian Troops 1939.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of List of last occurrences
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20221005183329im_/https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on List of last occurrences, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 23:20, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Algerian Troops 1939.png
Thanks for uploading File:Algerian Troops 1939.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:16, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
- Apparent mistag? Sorry Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:30, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
No problem , you can find it here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bastille_Day_Military_Parade
Goldblooded (talk) 13:33, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Listen please...
While we have no rule against it, please don't remove other peoples' comments on your talk page if they're trying to help you. Also, vandalism has a specific definition, that does not include the comments of other. Dr. K removed your comments as "vandalism" not because it was vandalism, but because your comment was a blatant violation of no personal attacks. Comments like this will get you blocked from editing. Please stop.Jasper Deng (talk) 22:17, 22 July 2011 (UTC)