JXB64
- JXB64 (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser (log) · investigate · cuwiki)
29 May 2022
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Xyonchaser (talk · · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser (log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Two separate attempts (one from each user) to create an unsourced draft about a teenager from Canmore, Alberta, Canada named "Josh Beekmans", portraying him as a child genius with stunning world-beating (and yet somehow completely unverifiable) achievements. I'm fairly sure I hear a duck quacking, and even more certain that the duck's own name is Josh Beekmans, but wanted to file this first to be safe (and so that it's documented if the draft ever comes back for a third time.) Bearcat (talk) 22:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- CU
Clerk declined - the master account is likely
Stale. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 13:10, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Probably the same person, but I don't see clear intent to evade scrutiny. Resubmitting a draft under a new account after a day is sockpuppetry. Resubmitting a draft under a new account three years later is, plausibly, forgetting the password to your old account, or even forgetting that you'd done this before at all. IMO any further submissions can be dealt with in standard fashion for someone resubmitting a non-notable draft, no need to overthink things sock-wise. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 06:33, 2 July 2022 (UTC)