Should the Reactions section be present in the article (as in diff)? Please answer Yes or No and why. --StellarNerd (talk) 19:41, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How should the subject's nationality be described in the lead and short description?
A) Lead: Timothée Hal Chalamet is an American actor. Shortdesc: American actor (born 1995)
B1) Lead: Timothée Hal Chalamet is an American and French actor. Shortdesc: American and French actor (born 1995)
B2) Lead: Timothée Hal Chalamet is a Franco-American actor. Shortdesc: Franco-American actor (born 1995)
C) Lead: Timothée Chalamet is an American actor with dual French citizenship. Shortdesc: American actor with dual French citizenship (born 1995)
It will be nice to have a solid consensus derived from an RFC on this point, as it has been a frequent topic of disagreement. I've taken the three most recent wordings, and as the second and third options are still in favor of including French nationality I've labeled them B1 and B2. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I just happened to notice four pins on his uniform in the image. In the Star Trek universe, this implies the rank of captian, which he only temporarily is in a few episodes. Should this be changed to an image with only three pins? interstatefive (talk) - just another roadgeek 20:58, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Here to discuss the removal of gothic metal and gothic metal bands by DarknessGoth777. The template is for gothic subculture. The section is "Associated music". Gothic metal is associated with gothic subculture. I'm not saying it is or is not a gothic rock subgenre or have any intent on removing gothic rock. I'm saying gothic metal has an associated connection to gothic subculture, even if it may be less so than gothic rock. So my question to the rfc, is this alright to add or not? Helper201 (talk) 17:32, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Should the Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander names for locations be included in the lead and infobox of articles? Poketama (talk) 16:09, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article states: ″The psychological community has not accepted parental alienation as a diagnosable mental condition″ but the linked source says in its conclusions: ″There is almost no dispute among mental health professionals who work with children of divorced parents that PA occurs in many children whose parents engage in persistent, intense conflict.″ ″The inclusion of PA in the next editions of DSM and ICD will facilitate research regarding this mental condition, will strengthen the awareness and understanding of clinicians for PA″. How is it possible? This looks like an abuse of the source. Twilight 15:13, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please choose one of the three options, preferably together with a motivation and reliable sources that explicitly support the party's political position.--Scia Della Cometa (talk) 19:20, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comments needed on after extensive debate on wether or not it can be mentioned that authors have criticized the field of economics for being pseudoscience under the criticism section.
Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.