Should the Reactions section be present in the article (as in diff)? Please answer Yes or No and why. --StellarNerd (talk) 19:41, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How should the subject's nationality be described in the lead and short description?
A) Lead: Timothée Hal Chalamet is an American actor. Shortdesc: American actor (born 1995)
B1) Lead: Timothée Hal Chalamet is an American and French actor. Shortdesc: American and French actor (born 1995)
B2) Lead: Timothée Hal Chalamet is a Franco-American actor. Shortdesc: Franco-American actor (born 1995)
C) Lead: Timothée Chalamet is an American actor with dual French citizenship. Shortdesc: American actor with dual French citizenship (born 1995)
It will be nice to have a solid consensus derived from an RFC on this point, as it has been a frequent topic of disagreement. I've taken the three most recent wordings, and as the second and third options are still in favor of including French nationality I've labeled them B1 and B2. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Fictional filmography section does not make sense to me. If this is accurate, can someone please explain? How is a character created in 2004 appear in TV series and films prior to 2014? These appear to be the credits for Kevin Dillon and not the character Johnny Drama. I propose removing it completely, unless there are specific appearance of the character IN OTHER fin other films or TV series.Lovewiki106 (talk) 06:09, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Recently there was controversy over what map or other image, if any, should be placed in the article's lead, eventually an RfC was held, with the conclusion that there was consensus against the proposed maps due to concerns over original research, but given that the only users who took part in it were ones who were already involved in the dispute, I thought it was appropriate to at least have further discussion on this issue.
I made some proposals which were already mentioned above:
How are Filmfare Glamour And Style Awards, Vogue Beauty Awards, Hindustan Times Most Stylish Awards, and GQ Awards not considered to be notable awards? These are important awards which are awarded every year to public figures. Please do not remove these awards as these are notable awards of high importance. These awards are mentioned on all other celebrities' pages as well. Please refrain from making unnecessary changes. SaUp2014 (talk) 16:15, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Here to discuss the removal of gothic metal and gothic metal bands by DarknessGoth777. The template is for gothic subculture. The section is "Associated music". Gothic metal is associated with gothic subculture. I'm not saying it is or is not a gothic rock subgenre or have any intent on removing gothic rock. I'm saying gothic metal has an associated connection to gothic subculture, even if it may be less so than gothic rock. So my question to the rfc, is this alright to add or not? Helper201 (talk) 17:32, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What should be included about the persona non grata resolution against Claire Danes in Manila? We are currently discussing WP:BLP and WP:PMC violations in this RFC, and at BLPN. Assistance and input is appreciated.
The 'Thriller' album’s available certification has crossed 50M units. According to widely used reliable sources and existing formula for claimed sales calculation, should Thriller claimed sales be raised to 100m as it is mostly reported?TruthGuardians (talk) 15:42, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Let's try and settle this issue. I have started an RFC here. There's a disagreement going on whether "pop" should be listed in the infobox. So instead of participating in that, I have decided to open up an RFC here. Here are the options:
Support the removal of pop
Oppose the removal of pop
Choose between one of the two options with your rationale in the poll below. MoonJet (talk) 20:20, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A recently closed RfC here at WikiProject Music established consensus that navboxes of musician articles should not include discographical entries (albums, songs) that do not have their own articles, as these are not navigable links and so are outside the functional purview of the navbox. It was pointed out in this discussion that many band/ensemble navboxes also include names of bandmembers, even when those bandmembers are not linked to their own independent articles, and WP:EXISTING currently has a single exception for bandmembers. (I was unable to find any discussion on the insertion of this guideline, only this discussion challenging it in 2012.) Should unlinked or redirect bandmembers be included in navboxes (keeping WP:EXISTING as is), or should the consensus on discographical materials be extended to cover bandmembers as well, and WP:EXISTING be updated? Chubbles (talk) 02:05, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.