The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
Talk:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
Should the previous background section ("A") be reduced in size? Is the shortened background section ("B") better or worse? (View change as a diff here.) (See previous discussion 1, previous discussion 2.) Jr8825 • Talk 01:10, 15 June 2022 (UTC) |
How should the first sentences of the lead be worded?
The new proposals were formulated as a result of the discussions above. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 12:16, 14 June 2022 (UTC) |
Talk:Hypothetical Axis victory in World War II
Recently there was controversy over what map or other image, if any, should be placed in the article's lead, eventually an RfC was held, with the conclusion that there was consensus against the proposed maps due to concerns over original research, but given that the only users who took part in it were ones who were already involved in the dispute, I thought it was appropriate to at least have further discussion on this issue.
I made some proposals which were already mentioned above:
Other suggestions would be welcomed. -- 2804:248:f650:6600:86f:165c:bba5:8f4 (talk) 04:51, 11 June 2022 (UTC) |
Should the first sentence of Yoruba art#History end in the word Africa, or in the phrase sub-Saharan Africa? --Tryptofish (talk) 22:29, 10 June 2022 (UTC) |
Talk:Winston-Salem, North Carolina
There have been several edits to the info box on the page recently (including by myself), revolving around the discussion to delete or keep the major Interstates & US Routes and the Airport in the info box. Myself and the other editor cannot agree, and I wanted to open it up for comment before we continue to undo each others edits.
Sheehanpg93 (talk) 18:42, 9 June 2022 (UTC) |
Talk:List of longest-reigning monarchs
See #14th : Elizabeth II for Jamaica section above. I've noticed the inconsistency with having Elizabeth as 2nd and 14th longest-reigning monarch(s?), and other wikipedians have. But at least one wikipedian (two ? I'm not sure what Peter O. thinks about this specific number question) disagree, the discussion can't go further. There's also the more general issue of having two separate Elizabeth entry (one for Jamaica and one for the other countries), me and others are also against it, but it seems to me that it's less important as it's a presentation issue, not an inconstistency issue. Elfast (talk) 12:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC) |
Talk:Suicide by jumping from height
Should this article about a particular method of suicide continue to include (i.e. keep) a list of specifically-named notable people who have died by this particular method? Does such a list have substantial value to explain or illustrate the topic of this article? Or should the existing list be removed (i.e. remove) with the consensus that it not be replaced without a new future consensus to do so?
The list in question is, as of this writing, the list beginning with "Prominent examples of autodefenestration include..." followed by a list of linked names. What this RFC is not: This is not on the question of whether such a list should not be included (a) due to concerns about either sensitivity for the surviving friends and relatives of people on the list, (b) due to concerns about whether such a list publicizes suicide in a way that might empower or encourage living individuals to kill themselves by this method of suicide or in general, or (c) similar concerns. This RFC is also not about the sentence beginning "The highest documented suicide jump..." What this RFC is: This is only about whether the list benefits this article under ordinary Wikipedia principles for inclusions of lists of things in articles. Please weigh in by beginning with Keep or Remove or Other meaning, respectively, Keep the existing list in the article, Remove the existing list from the article and do not replace it without a new future consensus to do so, or Other and explain. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 18:59, 6 June 2022 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch
This RfC concerns List of countries and dependencies by population.
Proposed by: Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC) |
Should Disney's political affiliations be included in the infobox? The section "World War II and beyond: 1941–1950" explains in several sentences his partisan affiliation and allegiance. Here are some more sources on his political involvement: 1, 2, 3. Disney was lightly involved in Democratic politics, but during The Second World War and the Cold War Disney became known for his conservative and staunchly anti-communist views. His brother Roy, who was also politically active, has his party in his own infobox.
I, personally, do not feel strongly one way or another about including this, but would love to gage other editors' opinions. -- Titi68999 (talk) 17:09, 3 June 2022 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board
Should the Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander names for locations be included in the lead and infobox of articles? Poketama (talk) 16:09, 31 May 2022 (UTC) |
Should this article include reference to Yasuke as a samurai? natemup (talk) 01:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC) |
Looking at reliable sources, how should we describe the political position of the Italian Social Movement?
Please choose one of the three options, preferably together with a motivation and reliable sources that explicitly support the party's political position.--Scia Della Cometa (talk) 19:20, 28 May 2022 (UTC) |
Comments needed on after extensive debate on wether or not it can be mentioned that authors have criticized the field of economics for being pseudoscience under the criticism section.
Pauloroboto (talk) 19:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC) |
How should the the film's subject/content be described in the article's lede paragraph? Abecedare (talk) 21:48, 19 May 2022 (UTC) |
Should Ghar-ilchi be merged with Nezak Huns#Decline: Rashidun and Umayyad invasions? TrangaBellam (talk) 07:26, 19 May 2022 (UTC) |