Archive 1 May 2007 to Jan 2008 Archive 2 Jan to April 2008 Archive 3 April to 15 May 2008 Archive 4 15 May to 30 June 2008 Archive 5 1 July 2008 to 26 August 2008 Archive 6 27 August 2008 to 10 October 2008 Archive 7 11 October 2008 to 13 January 2009 Archive 8 14 January 2009 to 26 February 2009 Archive 9 27 February 2009 to 9 April 2009 Archive 10 6 April 2009 to 1 June 2009 Archive 11 2 June 2009 to 25 August 2009 Archive 12 24 August 2009 to 14 November 2009 Archive 13 14 November to 8 January 2010 Archive 14 8 January 2010 to 19 February 2010 Archive 15 18 February 2010 to 22 July 2010 Archive 16 29 July 2010 to 23 October 2010 Archive 17 22 October 2010 to 22 December 2010 Archive 18 22 December 2010 to 12 March 2011 Archive 19 9 March 2011 to 18 May 2011 Archive 20 19 May 2011 to 21 July 2011 Archive 21 20 July 2011 to 18 October 2011 Archive 22 18 October 2011 to 26 December 2011 Archive 23 27 December 2011 to 27 January 2012 Archive 24 27 January 2012 to 31 March 2012 Archive 25 31 March 2012 to 5 June 2012 Archive 26 7 June 2012 to 1 September 2012 Archive 27 4 September 2012 to 29 November 2012 Archive 28 30 November 2012 to 1 February 2013 Archive 29 2 February 2013 to 15 April 2013 Archive 30 15 April 2013 to 4 June 2013 Archive 31 28 May 2013 to 2 July 2013 Archive 32 Archive 33 Archive 34 Archive 35 Archive 36 Archive 37 Archive 38 Archive 39 Archive 40 Archive 41 Archive 42 Archive 43 Archive 44 Archive 45 Archive 46 Archive 47 Archive 48 Archive 49 Archive 50 Archive 51 Archive 52 Archive 53 Archive 54 Archive 55 Archive 56 Archive 57 Archive 58 Archive 59 Archive 60 Archive 61 Archive 62 Archive 63 Archive 64 Archive 65 Archive 66 Archive 67 Archive 68 Archive 69 Archive 70 Archive 71 Archive 72 Archive 73 Archive 74 Archive 75 Archive 76 Archive 77 Archive 78 Archive 79 Archive 80 |
Your GA nomination of John Crakehall
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Crakehall you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 13:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of John Crakehall
The article John Crakehall you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:John Crakehall for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 16:01, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of John Crakehall
The article John Crakehall you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John Crakehall for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 17:01, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Galtung (noble family)
Hey, I saw you reverted an IP on Rollo making unsourced family claims. Because of the unsourced edit I checked their edit history and found the article I linked in the subject headline, and they seem to have been adding the same original research, only more substantional as it has gone unchecked for months. In fact there appears to be several IP editors there doing the same thing. I reverted their most recent unsourced edits, and will be taking a look at it more later once I have time, and since you are likely more knowledgeable about the subject than me I was wondering if you wanted to help by taking a look assuming you are able and have the time. On first glance I can see the same claims made about Rollo on the article, unsourced which will be my first step to remove. The issue is that there seems to be way more than that which is either incorrect or original research. The article likely needs a bit of cleanup, if not full reversal to a earlier state. Cheers.
- I am not an expert or even very conversant with the various issues of Scandinavian medieval history - the only reason I have Rollo on my watchlist is because of my interest in Anglo-Norman history - I'm not even that interested in pure Norman history. Maybe a TPS can weigh in? @Srnec and Dudley Miles:? Ealdgyth (talk) 16:51, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, this is outside my field. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:01, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- That is fair enough, it is a pretty specific article, being limited to one old Norwegian family so I was just kind of trying a shot in the dark asking you. I appreciate you asking some others though, I might be able to find someone who can help in some of the more Scandinavian specific projects. Thanks anyway. TylerBurden (talk) 18:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Asaturn editor reported
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Nikolai Gennadievich Nazarov reported by User:Doug Weller (Result: ) Doug Weller talk 20:24, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Working Woman's Barnstar |
For reviewing at least 7 points worth of articles during the January 2022 GAN Backlog Drive, I hereby present you with this barnstar in my capacity as coordinator. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 03:54, 15 May 2022 (UTC) |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
Views/Day | Quality | Title | Tagged with… |
---|---|---|---|
1,352 | ![]() |
Eadwig (talk) | Add sources |
74 | ![]() |
Áed mac Cináeda (talk) | Add sources |
29 | ![]() |
Elias I, Count of Maine (talk) | Add sources |
155 | ![]() |
Robert M. Price (talk) | Add sources |
7 | ![]() |
Hugh of Amiens (talk) | Add sources |
12 | ![]() |
Cultural depictions of William the Conqueror (talk) | Add sources |
6 | ![]() |
Glasgow Fire Service (talk) | Cleanup |
47 | ![]() |
Piracy in the Atlantic World (talk) | Cleanup |
7 | ![]() |
Wold Newton, Lincolnshire (talk) | Cleanup |
12 | ![]() |
Ottir (talk) | Expand |
27 | ![]() |
Counties of Iceland (talk) | Expand |
11,629 | ![]() |
Belgium (talk) | Expand |
174 | ![]() |
Pan Am Railways (talk) | Unencyclopaedic |
35 | ![]() |
Visby lenses (talk) | Unencyclopaedic |
147 | ![]() |
The Lost Vikings (talk) | Unencyclopaedic |
195 | ![]() |
White Tower (Tower of London) (talk) | Merge |
2 | ![]() |
Cybistrini (talk) | Merge |
32 | ![]() |
.zr (talk) | Merge |
4 | ![]() |
Stevenson Macadam (talk) | Wikify |
252 | ![]() |
Lamellar armour (talk) | Wikify |
64 | ![]() |
Trade during the Viking Age (talk) | Wikify |
3 | ![]() |
Rolandmühle (talk) | Orphan |
2 | ![]() |
Paramonov Mill (talk) | Orphan |
4 | ![]() |
Cornelius Vijn (talk) | Orphan |
18 | ![]() |
Eremburga of Maine (talk) | Stub |
465 | ![]() |
House of Normandy (talk) | Stub |
26 | ![]() |
Odo II, Duke of Burgundy (talk) | Stub |
7 | ![]() |
Hakon Sweynson (talk) | Stub |
5 | ![]() |
Henry Wingham (talk) | Stub |
19 | ![]() |
Wilton Castle (talk) | Stub |
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Peter de Maulay pre-FAC review pass done
I've done a pass. No hurry -- I'll be in the UK for three weeks starting the middle of next week, so I won't be able to respond reliably till late June, though I will have my iPad and may have time to edit. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 16:05, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'll be busy after the early part of June .. probably. Garden, horses, stepdaughter visiting... summer fun! Enjoy your trip! Ealdgyth (talk) 16:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Cleveland Bay
About to come off of wikibreak within another day or two - I see this horse article (a 2009 FA promotion) had been tagged as disputed. Without asking you to get into any drama, does this one need to be added to the potential FAR list? Hog Farm Talk 15:41, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Probably want to ask @Justlettersandnumbers: who placed the tag. He's still around... Ealdgyth (talk) 16:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, Ealdgyth, thanks for the ping! As far as I recall, Hog Farm, my reason for adding that tag without starting any talk-page discussion was the claim that it is "It is the oldest established horse breed in England", already challenged twice on the talk-page, in 2011 and 2013. However, the page probably needs a fairly comprehensive overhaul. For example, a statement that "the breed has experienced a resurgence in popularity since the 1970s" does not really chime with a total reported population world-wide of 43. Regards to both, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:28, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Tamworth
Could you contribute at Talk:Tamworth, Staffordshire#Vikings sacked Tamworth? Dudley Miles (talk) 22:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
FA sources
Hi! I am planning to take Louis H. Bean, a short biography of a pollster, to FAC sometime in future. I have probably used most of the scholarly sources available. One of the source I use is this, an interview of Bean by Jerry N. Hess. It does have lot of information on his career, but I have not used it extensively as it is after all an interview. I don't want the article to be "Louis H. Bean by Louis H. Bean". Would that be an issue for comprehensiveness and/or sourcing during the FAC? Do you have any other suggestion on sourcing or anything? Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 15:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- At a very quick glance, nothing looks horrid there. I'm eye-ball deep into the Core Contest, so I don't have a lot of time to spend looking at it - and frankly, New Deal isn't exactly my topic area .. heh. It's not screaming "horridly sourced" at me at least... sorry for the brevity. Ealdgyth (talk) 16:02, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Walter de Gray
Hello! I'm pleased to tell you that I've begun reviewing the article Walter de Gray you nominated for GA-status, according to the criteria. This process may take up to seven days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 11:00, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- I've left a handful of exceedingly small points on the review page. Tim riley talk 12:29, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Walter de Gray
The article Walter de Gray you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Walter de Gray for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 16:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- Congrats in person. I too have a Lord Chancellor up for GAN, but he wasn't also Archbishop of York, but Lord High Executioner and a modern major-general. We shall see how he fares in comparison with Walter. Would you be comfortable with my reviewing Sigeric and/or Robert of Bridlington, or would that seem too many reviews by one reviewer of a fellow editor's GANs? Tim riley talk 18:22, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sigeric (archbishop)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sigeric (archbishop) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 13:00, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sigeric (archbishop)
The article Sigeric (archbishop) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sigeric (archbishop) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 19:21, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Always precious
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 04:52, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society
Dear Ealdgyth,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 13:40, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
Views/Day | Quality | Title | Tagged with… |
---|---|---|---|
23 | ![]() |
Henryk Mandelbaum (talk) | Add sources |
122 | ![]() |
Transnistria Governorate (talk) | Add sources |
92 | ![]() |
Miklós Nyiszli (talk) | Add sources |
18 | ![]() |
Roza Robota (talk) | Add sources |
114 | ![]() |
The Holocaust in Hungary (talk) | Add sources |
46 | ![]() |
Kerala Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation (talk) | Add sources |
122 | ![]() |
Proto-Indo-European society (talk) | Cleanup |
17 | ![]() |
History of the English fiscal system (talk) | Cleanup |
79 | ![]() |
Antisemitism and the New Testament (talk) | Cleanup |
17 | ![]() |
Reichsuniversität Straßburg (talk) | Expand |
105 | ![]() |
Indian maritime history (talk) | Expand |
285 | ![]() |
Zahi Hawass (talk) | Expand |
64 | ![]() |
Thunderstone (folklore) (talk) | Unencyclopaedic |
9 | ![]() |
De donis conditionalibus (talk) | Unencyclopaedic |
195 | ![]() |
Evidence and documentation for the Holocaust (talk) | Unencyclopaedic |
322 | ![]() |
Occupation of Poland (1939–1945) (talk) | Merge |
318 | ![]() |
Kapo (talk) | Merge |
24 | ![]() |
Prisoner functionary (talk) | Merge |
101 | ![]() |
Battle of Largs (talk) | Wikify |
249 | ![]() |
Race and sexuality (talk) | Wikify |
363 | ![]() |
Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service (talk) | Wikify |
5 | ![]() |
Ka-Nefer-Nefer (talk) | Orphan |
3 | ![]() |
Bridge County (talk) | Orphan |
1 | ![]() |
Asahel Thomson (talk) | Orphan |
9 | ![]() |
We Wept Without Tears (talk) | Stub |
30 | ![]() |
Kars dog (talk) | Stub |
7 | ![]() |
Rose Meth (talk) | Stub |
31 | ![]() |
The Drowned and the Saved (talk) | Stub |
22 | ![]() |
Brzezinka (talk) | Stub |
5 | ![]() |
Jack Fischel (talk) | Stub |
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)