WikiProject Media | (Rated Project-class) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1, 2, 3 |
Publicising peer review discussion
This article had press coverage; for this reason, I think this peer review about it requires attention. Thank you.
RfC re: Ronan Farrow reporting at NBC News
Dr. Vin Gupta/NBC & MSNBC Medical Analyst AfC
Dear Colleagues,
Hopeful you might be willing to provide an additional review of this AfC for a very prominent health policy analyst for NBC News. "Dr. Vin Gupta wikipedia" is a very common search and yet there is no page dedicated to him, something Im trying to rectify so viewers can be informed when he's on air.
Link here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Vin_Gupta
Thank you,
Caroline
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Nefarious: Merchant of Souls FAR
I have nominated Nefarious: Merchant of Souls for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. GamerPro64 20:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Hotstar#Requested move 2 March 2022
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Hotstar#Requested move 2 March 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 03:56, 9 March 2022 (UTC), Adding WP Media to this. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:16, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Geo TV#Requested move 18 February 2022
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Geo TV#Requested move 18 February 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 18:44, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Players' Tribune Requests
Hi editors, I'm M and I work with Minute Media. I had made some requests over at The Players' Tribune Talk page and while they were initially implemented, they were later reverted due to some questions from another editor. I was hoping someone here might be willing to take another look at my requests, as I think they improve the page and help bring it more in compliance with Wikipedia rules. I know I can't make changes myself because of my conflict of interest, so I'd really appreciate any help you can offer! M at MinuteMedia (talk) 21:26, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
User script to detect unreliable sources
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.
)
and turns it into something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Category:Former Warner Bros. Discovery subsidiaries has been nominated for discussion
Category:Former Warner Bros. Discovery subsidiaries has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 23:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)