The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
Should the lede contain information on the criticism of Biden's Afghanistan withdrawal (see refs at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Joe_Biden/Archive_16#Lead_sentence_about_Afghan_withdrawal) with the following possible wording (which is similar to the content at Presidency of Joe Biden)? VickKiang (talk) 07:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section
Should the manual of style require citations in the lead for contested statements about BLPs? The current text is generally considered to contradict itself on this point; see discussions here for details and general implications about what this would mean for the text. --Aquillion (talk) 04:43, 8 May 2022 (UTC) |
Hi, everyone. There was recently some discussion regarding the article's infobox pic. Do you think the main infobox picture should be changed? Here is an example:
Thank you all! Gamle Kvitrafn (talk) 20:10, 6 May 2022 (UTC) |
Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia
Should Larry Sanger's criticisms of alleged ideological bias on Wikipedia be included in Claims of bias section? Sources discussing Sanger's criticisms include The Times, The Independent, and The Telegraph, among others. There has been discussion in the above section, at NPOVN, and a previous RfC on the matter. Endwise (talk) 08:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music
This RfC is in response to a recent edit war regarding Supertramp, a band that formed in London and had a mix of English, Scottish, and American members. What default position should we take when a band is formed in one country, but contains members who are from elsewhere?
Some other bands to consider are the Velvet Underground (American, even though John Cale is Welsh), the Monkees (no nationality given), and Fleetwood Mac (British-American). ili (talk) 20:33, 26 April 2022 (UTC) |
Two editors object the addition of content regarding opinion polls for Gabriel Boric during his presidency [1][2]. There are claims that the content in question:
My question is what do third parties think about these claims and do they find my revised addition of content [3] appropriate for this article? Dentren | Talk 10:11, 24 April 2022 (UTC) |
Hi, shall we call this sub-heading
-or-
Discussed above on this talk page and also highlighted in this diff Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 23:12, 23 April 2022 (UTC) |
Should the article on Rod Steiger include an infobox? 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 00:55, 23 April 2022 (UTC) |
Should this article discuss the 1996 sale of the Ministry of Defence's housing stock, and if so, in what form?
– Arms & Hearts (talk) 17:56, 21 April 2022 (UTC) |
Should the L'Équipe interview be covered in the lede, or would it's inclusion be undue? - Floydian τ ¢ 19:54, 13 April 2022 (UTC) |
Is this information with this citation alright to include on the page?
On 5 April 2022, it was revealed that Truss was among 405 MPs who have charged energy bills to the public purse by claiming expenses for their heating bills since April 2019. The investigation revealed that Truss had claimed £1,548 for gas and electricity since April 2019.[1] Helper201 (talk) 16:56, 12 April 2022 (UTC) |
- ^ Williams, Martin (5 April 2022). "Revealed: MPs have claimed £420,000 to heat their second homes since 2019". openDemocracy. Retrieved 10 April 2022.