|
|
IP Rangeblock Calculator | IP Range Edit Check | Checkusers | Oversighters |
Bureaucrats' noticeboard (4 threads) |
---|
Bots noticeboard (2 threads) |
---|
Arbitration Committee noticeboard (4 threads) |
---|
Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard (7 threads) Most recent:
|
---|
Original research noticeboard (12 threads) |
---|
External links noticeboard (5 threads) |
---|
Dispute resolution noticeboard (5 threads) |
---|
Village Pump (idea lab) (11 threads) |
---|
Village Pump (WMF) (6 threads) |
---|
|}
Administrative backlog
WP:AIV
Reports
Bot-reported
- 2604:cb00:262e:3000:b0bb:e456:5300:652 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Tripped 10 abuse filters in the last 5 minutes: (details). DatBot (talk) 00:35, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
User-reported
CSD / PRODs
WP:UAA / WP:RFPP
Bot-reported
- Drummerwhitey1 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 13:41, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- This username matched "whitey" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Fionaeasymarketing (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- UrUrMom (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Spamaccount91208012 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "spam" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:30, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
- Pj500 team (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
Current requests for increase in protection level
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
|
Greater Sylhet
- Greater Sylhet (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: An editor repeatedly attempts to restore the content, despite the content of the article being merged with another article Sylhet Division. This editor has had multiple warnings on his talk page, and has now resorted to editing with his IP. I would also request Sylhet region (another redirect) and Sylhet Division also be protected as the person is actively damaging it and edit warring. Cheers. UserNumber (talk) 14:05, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:47, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:47, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Boundaries between the continents of Earth
- Boundaries between the continents of Earth (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry through IPs (note: named account is unrelated). CMD (talk) 14:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Fully protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:51, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Question: @Ritchie333: Check my work? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:53, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Arkhip Kuindzhi
- Arkhip Kuindzhi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous unsourced changes by IPs to nationality. Mellk (talk) 17:53, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:06, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: Regular admin action. Might want to consider WP:ARBEE if needed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:06, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Revolution of Dignity
- Revolution of Dignity (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:ARBEE. Disruptive editing by IPs and new accounts continues on this page. RGloucester — ☎ 22:22, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:30, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: Regular admin action. Any admin can undo without an act of ArbCom --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:30, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: @RGloucester: May soon need an upgrade to WP:ECP --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
|
Sharon, Ariel
- Sharon, Ariel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent with the target article, Ariel Sharon. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 21:40, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- This is a new request with a different desired result CreecregofLife (talk) 22:21, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- I don’t see any vandalism and the target page is ECP. I’m not seeing a case for reducing protection of the redirect to SP. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:44, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- In which case the redirect should be unprotected. There is just simply no reason for this redirect to be fully protected. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 02:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- It was protection due to reasons that you cannot see ([1]). Couretsy ping @NawlinWiki: (CC) Tbhotch™ 02:47, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Neveselbert, the case you put forward doesn’t hold up - Vandalism? Consistent with the target article? Nor can you see the BLP violation, now deleted, that necessitated the protection. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:58, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- I did notify NawlinWiki, but they appear to be inactive. I waited a day before requesting unprotection here, which was declined and archived before I had the chance to respond. So I've since requested a reduction in the protection level, to SP which would be consistent with the level for the redirect's target. I don't believe the rationale for locking the page still holds up, since the subject of the redirect has since died, voiding any possible further violation. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 03:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- The target page is ECP not SP. If only you were clear in your initial request - you asked for SP due to persistent vandalism, consistent with the target page. Why don’t you start again and ask for a lowering of protection to ECP without any mention of vandalism? It won’t be lowered further than that because the page falls under arbitration enforcement as it can be reasonably construed as belonging to the Arab–Israeli conflict. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:11, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry of course, I've struck out the mention of vandalism and I apologise for not being clear in my initial request (I did mean ECP, not SP, sorry again for the confusion). ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 04:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Of course it could be lowered to ECP, but why? Is there an urgent need to do so, an article to be written? Or is the intent just to synchronize the protection levels? Lectonar (talk) 08:26, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- An argument against "synchronizing" the protection levels is that the article currently has 690 watchers while the redirect has 3. Undesirable changes to the redirect by an EC user are thus much more likely to go undiscovered. Favonian (talk) 09:12, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think this is a particularly controversial redirect, like Hitler for example. The vast majority of redirects in Redirects from sort names are not protected, let alone fully protected, like this. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- You still haven't answered the basic question: why? Why does it need to be unprotected? Are you planning on turning into an article that differs from it's current target? Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- I originally wanted it unprotected to tag the redirect, which has since been done by an admin. It's still however tagged as a fully-protected redirect, which I think is unnecessary for the reasons I've given. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not sure how this page got protected at all. The protection log says it was protected because of persistent vandalism. There have only been 3 edits to the page, and none of them were vandalism. As far as I know, if the target of a redirect is getting vandalized, that doesn't justify protection of its redirects. My vote would be to unprotect it altogether until there is evidence that it is actually a target for vandalism. —ScottyWong— 16:04, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- The explanation may be found in the deleted revision log. Someone moved the article (when that was still possible) to an unpleasant/derivative name involving the words "War Criminal", and a bot obligingly fixed the double redirect. Then it got deleted, recreated with the proper target and protected. As there's no need for changing the current redirect that cannot be handled with an edit request, I prefer keeping it fully protected. Favonian (talk) 16:27, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- Just move-protect it, that way it will never happen again. As for edit protection, semi is enough. 103.149.248.196 (talk) 00:25, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- The explanation may be found in the deleted revision log. Someone moved the article (when that was still possible) to an unpleasant/derivative name involving the words "War Criminal", and a bot obligingly fixed the double redirect. Then it got deleted, recreated with the proper target and protected. As there's no need for changing the current redirect that cannot be handled with an edit request, I prefer keeping it fully protected. Favonian (talk) 16:27, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not sure how this page got protected at all. The protection log says it was protected because of persistent vandalism. There have only been 3 edits to the page, and none of them were vandalism. As far as I know, if the target of a redirect is getting vandalized, that doesn't justify protection of its redirects. My vote would be to unprotect it altogether until there is evidence that it is actually a target for vandalism. —ScottyWong— 16:04, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- I originally wanted it unprotected to tag the redirect, which has since been done by an admin. It's still however tagged as a fully-protected redirect, which I think is unnecessary for the reasons I've given. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- You still haven't answered the basic question: why? Why does it need to be unprotected? Are you planning on turning into an article that differs from it's current target? Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Of course it could be lowered to ECP, but why? Is there an urgent need to do so, an article to be written? Or is the intent just to synchronize the protection levels? Lectonar (talk) 08:26, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry of course, I've struck out the mention of vandalism and I apologise for not being clear in my initial request (I did mean ECP, not SP, sorry again for the confusion). ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 04:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- The target page is ECP not SP. If only you were clear in your initial request - you asked for SP due to persistent vandalism, consistent with the target page. Why don’t you start again and ask for a lowering of protection to ECP without any mention of vandalism? It won’t be lowered further than that because the page falls under arbitration enforcement as it can be reasonably construed as belonging to the Arab–Israeli conflict. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:11, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- I did notify NawlinWiki, but they appear to be inactive. I waited a day before requesting unprotection here, which was declined and archived before I had the chance to respond. So I've since requested a reduction in the protection level, to SP which would be consistent with the level for the redirect's target. I don't believe the rationale for locking the page still holds up, since the subject of the redirect has since died, voiding any possible further violation. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 03:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- In which case the redirect should be unprotected. There is just simply no reason for this redirect to be fully protected. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 02:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- I don’t see any vandalism and the target page is ECP. I’m not seeing a case for reducing protection of the redirect to SP. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:44, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- This is a new request with a different desired result CreecregofLife (talk) 22:21, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:08, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator NawlinWiki. — Wug·a·po·des 00:11, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Jennifer Winget
- Jennifer Winget (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: There is no vandalism or sock puppetry going on with this page anymore and neither is ECP required for this page now. ArnavSharma602 (talk) 04:31, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- That's probably due to the strict protection, it's not an indication that the behaviors will improve CreecregofLife (talk) 05:34, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- No vandalism or sock puppetry is a feature of protection! @NJA. Pinging NJA, the protecting administrator, for their input (though they have not edited for a while). Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:12, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Alexa Demie
- Alexa Demie (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because this article is missing essential information that is already publicly known . 96.246.147.136 (talk) 23:49, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @96.246.147.136: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:50, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Formatting fixed--CreecregofLife (talk) 23:58, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- My guess is that the IP's here due to the content dispute over her birthdate. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 00:17, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Please use an edit request on the article talk page to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:14, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. — Wug·a·po·des 23:42, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
List of programmes broadcast by Zee TV
- List of programmes broadcast by Zee TV (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: The page is rarely edited because of extended confirmed protection. Reducing it to semi-protection will help editors to update the page when necessary. Thank you. Shinnosuke15, 06:02, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- From what I see it's had 500 edits in about the last year. I've seen pages come through here the past few days whose last 50 edits go back years. Seems it's updated rather reasonably CreecregofLife (talk) 06:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. There are still ongoing sock problems so reducing the protection is a bad idea. — Wug·a·po·des 23:43, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Jeremy Stangroom
- Jeremy Stangroom (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2008, the last 50 edits go back to 2008, the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. Terasail[✉️] 23:12, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Unprotected I'm watching the page and will reprotect if the problem returns. — Wug·a·po·des 23:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Española Valley High School
- Española Valley High School (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2011, the last 50 edits go back to 2017, the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. (Protecting admin @User:LadyofShalott) Terasail[✉️] 23:14, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- I'm ambivalent on this. I don't think it needs protection, but given the history and fact that it's a school I'm not sure how successful unprotection would actually be. Welcome more thoughts. — Wug·a·po·des 23:51, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Surya Das
Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2008, the last 50 edits go back to 2021 (Mostly due to the fact that 1 user made 65 edits on 6 June 2021), the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. Terasail[✉️] 23:19, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Unprotected Watching the page and will reprotect if problems return. — Wug·a·po·des 23:54, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa
- Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2009, the last 50 edits go back to 2020, the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. Terasail[✉️] 23:21, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Not unprotected Despite the protection a number of problematic edits still get through, so I don't think unprotection would be successful. — Wug·a·po·des 23:55, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Miccosukee
- Miccosukee (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2009, the last 50 edits go back to 2014, the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. (Protecting admin @User:Cuchullain) Terasail[✉️] 23:23, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Unprotected A 13 year protection for a content dispute is rather long. Watching the page, will reprotect, etc — Wug·a·po·des 23:58, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Steve Levy
- Steve Levy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2016, the last 50 edits go back to 2016, the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. Only 3 edit request have been made since the page has been protected and it does not get a lot of pageviews. The protection did its job and has not been providing anything useful since then (Protecting admin @User:Ponyo) Terasail[✉️] 23:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- I would want input from Ponyo before acting on this. I'd hesitate to completely unprotect in any case. — Wug·a·po·des 00:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Ziad Abu Ein
- Ziad Abu Ein (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2016, the last 50 edits go back to 2015, the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. No edit request have been made since the page has been protected and it does not get a lot of pageviews. Terasail[✉️] 23:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Not unprotected Protected as an arbitration enforcement action (30/500 restriction) which is still in place. — Wug·a·po·des 00:02, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Rosebud (1975 film) & Rosebud (film)
- Rosebud (1975 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Rosebud (film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotection: Page has been protected since 2016, the last 50 edits go back to 2014, the page protection is no longer providing a reduction in vandalism and is only prohibiting unregistered users from making edits. No edit request have been made since the page has been protected and it does not get a lot of pageviews. Terasail[✉️] 23:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Not unprotected Protected as an arbitration enforcement action (30/500 restriction) which is still in place. — Wug·a·po·des 00:02, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
Jeremy Corbyn
- Jeremy Corbyn (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
On Jeremy Corbyn's page, it states 'He sits as an independent as of January 2022.' change this to 'He sits as an independent as of March 2022.', as he is still an independent.
He sits as an independent as of January 2022. ---> He sits as an independent as of March 2022.
195.195.40.250 (talk) 12:10, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Name of page you are requesting an edit to
- Name of page you are requesting an edit to (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The current Google article states: "... the word googolplex, the number one followed by a googol zeroes...". This is incorrect. A googolplex is the number *ten* followed by a googol zeroes. 2601:205:8301:68F0:70F8:233C:CD30:A3FF (talk) 00:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
- My mistake. A googolplex is the number ten to the googol power, but it is correctly described as the number one followed by a googol zeroes. I apologize for wasting anyone's time. 2601:205:8301:68F0:70F8:233C:CD30:A3FF (talk) 00:39, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
2 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 15:48, 24 March 2022 (UTC) |
1 template-protected edit request | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 15:21, 24 March 2022 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled
User:A. C. Santacruz
Thought I'd ask for the permission as a relatively experienced editor so that articles I create don't add to the NPP backlog. I don't have the required 25 non-redirect creations but I think the pages I have created (such as Battle of Mayals, Royal Expedition, and 2020–2022 Chinese property sector crisis indicate I understand the criteria for article creations well enough to not need reviewing. There are other articles (such as History of CBDCs by country) which are not good but were created as splits. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 23:42, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
User:Miankaleh
Hello, good time, I registered on Wikipedia 8 years ago. I started creating an article on English Wikipedia last week. Before that, I wrote a number of articles on Persian Wikipedia. For about a week, I wrote 26 articles in the English Wikipedia about Iran's national and international venues and famous Iranian political figures. If possible, give me automatic patrol access after reviewing articles made by me. I hope with this action, the patrol users of English Wikipedia will have less problems. Most of the topics in the following articles are national and international places in Iran, and the ministers of the previous governments of Iran and among the members of the Islamic Consultative Assembly are people who are very well known but no page has been created for them Miankaleh (talk) 12:33, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
|
Requests for confirmation |
---|
Confirmed
User:Ricksebak
Reason for requesting confirmed rights: I want to change a photo on a Wikipedia page about me. The page is "Rick Sebak" and I am Rick Sebak. Ricksebak (talk) 20:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
|
Requests for extended confirmation |
---|
Extended confirmed
User:LucianoTheWindowsFan
I have since reached 1000 edits! I originally did tons of edits on the Jammes (video game) and didn't realize it counts as a disruptive edit. Never doing that again, I always learn from my mistakes. LucianoTheWindowsFan (talk) 21:17, 24 March 2022 (UTC) |
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer
User:Akevsharma
I have been editing Wikipedia articles for couple of years now. I am familiar with deletion and reviewing policies. I noticed that there is a 10,000+ page list of not reviewed pages. I'd like to help clear the backlog of unreviewed pages. Akevsharma (talk) 10:17, 13 March 2022 (UTC) User:Dandilero
I would like to get this rank to review new pages, especially footballers which is what I mainly edit on Wikipedia. I recently got the rank of Redirect patrol whitelist. Dandilero (talk) 15:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
User:NiklausGerard
Hello, I would like to continue to create and curate the encyclopedia and feel confident that I am ready to accept additional responsibility. I am applying for page reviewer rights after learning the proper procedure in not only editing and creating articles, but also converting them. I have created articles and never had them deleted, and I thoroughly understand the standards in review. I hope to identify drafts suitable for the mainspace and help the community reduce the number. NiklausGerard (talk) 07:53, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
User:SunDawn
Good day! I am applying for this permission because I think I can execute the responsibility of a new page reviewer. I have experience in rollbacks and I enjoy reverting vandalism, but I also want to learn other sides of Wikipedia. New pages reviewer seems interesting to me as it is a side of Wikipedia that I have rarely seen. I have read the guidelines and according to my own opinion, I am able to do the task as outlined. I have been blocked once for WP:3RR violation more than 6 months ago, and I have promised that I would be more careful in that regard. Thank you very much and have a great day to y'all. SunDawntalk 09:45, 16 March 2022 (UTC) User:The Tips of Apmh
I am requesting new page reviewer as I have gotten more experienced with deletion, notability, netrality, advertising, and new drafts in general since I last requested new page reviewer. This time I would instead like a trial if possible, to see if I can correctly handle the right. The Tips of Apmh 14:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC) User:Petewarrior
I've been editing Wikipedia for some time and might be able to help with this workload, if you'll have me. PetéWarrior (talk) 07:34, 19 March 2022 (UTC) User:Elminster Aumar
Hello, I used to be a new page patroller in the past when I was active, then I become inactive for a long while (still used Wikipedia for reading regularly, almost every day). In the past I was a new page patroller, I would like to help the community again by patrolling new pages.Elmisnter! (talk) 00:42, 20 March 2022 (UTC) Elmisnter! (talk) 00:42, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
User:3skandar
I would like to become a page reviewer so that I can help improve the quality of articles on Wikipedia. I am particularly interested in reviewing articles that have been tagged for cleanup or are in need of improvement. I believe that my experience and knowledge will be a valuable asset to the Wikipedia community. 3skandar (talk) 03:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
User:Zippybonzo
|
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover
User:Super Dromaeosaurus
In December 2021, I was temporarily given this permission for three months by Primefac [2]. As I stated there, I wanted this permission simply for editing more comfortably, and it has indeed been quite useful for me. I believe all the moves I've done over the last three months have been rightful, an exception being a certain one but that was the result of a disagreement (read about it here). Thus, I am asking for being granted this permission again, this time indefinitely. Super Ψ Dro 19:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
User:Styyx
My previous request was declined a few months ago because I didn't have 3000 edits. What I said there still counts. I've been patrolling new pages and draftifying some for a while now. I'm a global rollbacker, which already grants me User:Mhawk10
I am involved in New Page Patrol and AfC; the ability to move pages to the draftspace without leaving a mainspace redirect has been helpful. I believe that my history of page moves while using the tool shows that I can use the tool appropriately and I am seeking to permanently obtain the right. — Mhawk10 (talk) 18:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC) — Mhawk10 (talk) 18:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
User:PhotographyEdits
I have currently around 3700 edits on the English Wikipedia. I have done a whole bunch of page moves over the last year and also made requests for technical moves. I also and engaged in various move discussions. I would like to be granted this right to help out other users with moving pages and be able to do technical moves myself. PhotographyEdits (talk) 21:07, 12 March 2022 (UTC) User:DanCherek
I review reports at CopyPatrol where the bot sometimes flags cut-and-paste moves. When I come across one of those and the move otherwise seems valid, I revert the edits and then post at WP:RM/TR so a page mover can carry out the intended move. This happened earlier today at Direct Factory Outlet: edit → revert → RM/TR → move. I'm requesting the page mover right because it would be convenient if I was able to fix these myself. DanCherek (talk) 23:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC) User:Terasail
I monitor Category:Wikipedia files requiring renaming & Duplicate file names and rename files when they meet WP:FMV/W. suppressredirect would be useful for limited use files for WP:PMRC#10 so that I don't leave unused redirects. Terasail[✉️] 04:36, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
User:Josve05a
I request the right for the same reason and purpose as the template editor right, which was approved for 2 months. I'm gonna update all OTRS templates to use VRT naming instead, and therefore need to move some categories as well (so I need the
|
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer
User:Casualdejekyll
Hi! I do a bit of vandal reverting and stuff. I have read the guidelines and as far as I can tell the only requirements for getting the permission are having a clue about how to use it and wanting it, correct? Honestly don't know whether or not I'll be accepted but I'll have you know I'm a big fan of backlog emptying (I have a good chunk of edits that are dealing with edit requests for example) so this will be another backlog for me to chip at occasionally. ~~~~ casualdejekyll 18:30, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
User:BastianMAT
Hello, I would like to become a pending changes reviewer. I have been on Wikipedia for over 2 years now and have dealt with active vandalism on several pages. I have read the guidelines and will use this constructively and effectively if given. I’m happy to contribute to pending changes and reduce the backlog when Pending changes backlog is high. Thank you, BastianMAT (talk) 12:54, 19 March 2022 (UTC) User:Fragrant Peony
I have made more than 2500 edits, mostly to reduce disruptive editing within the encyclopedia. I understand the policy for handling vandalism, and I would love to help further. Many thanks! Fragrant Peony (talk) 04:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC) User:Wikipageedittor099
Hello, I am requesting permission to review pending changes because I believe I have contributed to Wikipedia long enough to understand what is vandalism and what isn't, and I am an active editor on pages that contain information about living persons and actively changing events. I have made mistakes with edits in the past but I understand how they work, and I understand what qualifies as valid sources and can determine vandalism from simple mistakes. I would like this opportunity to make Wikipedia a better place by reviewing pending changes, and ensuring they contribute to the betterment of the articles. Thanks! Wikipageedittor099 19:56, 22 March 2022 (UTC) User:PerryPerryD
I have been on wikipedia for over a year now, with over 600 edits on my account. I have read and understand all of Wikipedias guidelines very well, and have dealt with AfD Discussions in the past, I want to allow the good changed to go through, and leave the bad out. I promise to make only the best of my ability. Thank you. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 19:33, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback
User:SkyeWolf369
Hello, I am SkyeWolf369 I am requesting rollback rights because my previous request was denied and I have gotten more experience. I would like rollback to help fight vandalism and use more anti-vandalism tools like huggle. Thanks! SkyeWolf369 (talk) 12:49, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
User:SkyWolf369
Re-requesting due to achieving 200 Mainspace edits meeting the qualifications for rollback permissions. SkyTheWolf (Talk) 19:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
|
Requests for template editor |
---|
Template editor
User:Josve05a
I'd like to moninate Josve05a to be template editor, as they are a competent contributor. Some tasks like replacing 'OTRS' with 'VRT' in templates require this permission. I am sure this candidate would perform other template editing competently. Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 20:10, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
|
.
Template:Centralized discussion – Current discussions
)
|
|
- Newbie edits to templates
- Tagged speedy removed
- Tagged possible BLP issues
- Tagged article blanking
- Tagged shouting
- Tagged nonsense characters
- Tagged repeating characters
- Tagged possible vandalism
- Tagged possible userpage spam
- Tagged possible link spam #1
- Tagged possible link spam #2
Barnstars
|