1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41 |
Moles
United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) has got more moles that caused you to semi-protect it in May. In the last few days we've seen attempts by 212.187.244.81, 185.104.136.29 and 78.149.2.89 to remove the factual sentence PlainAndSimpleTailor fought so hard against. FDW777 (talk) 07:48, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note. Could I ask that you file a new SPI report; that will make it easier to process and track. Thanks. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Filed a few minutes ago at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PlainAndSimpleTailor. FDW777 (talk) 16:39, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Another report
Hey @RoySmith:! I have another report from this [1] if you want kindly check it? The user keep changing the report, dates and etc and trying to delete his own account. Thanks! Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 16:41, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Tech News: 2021-38
18:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
SPI Sairg
Thank you for overseeing Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sairg. Is there a way you could look at it anew? To me, it is a WP:DUCK. Unfortunately, other admins and users, who have followed these puppets—Berean Hunter, JzG, etc.—have become inactive and I am finding it difficult preventing single purpose accounts from doing their thing. These are long term socks and they are relentless. By not identifying them, I am afraid we have made life easier for them. In this regards, I invite you to please keep a close watch on Chutia kingdom and Chutia people.
One of the main problems I see is that there are actually three masters associated with Sairg. The original master (who looks inactive now) was a SPA for the Ahom people. The other master is a SPA for the Chutia people and they used to edit war against each other using multiple accounts, and that is how they were snagged as masters. But since they are closely related, at least geographically, one of them got associated with Sairg. I invite you to look at the edit patterns of the latest case not with Sairg, but with the immediate preceding socks, listed in the SPI.
There is a third sock that SPAs Boro people, which also got included in Sairg, for some reason. I am aware that sock is currently active as well.
So, please advise me what I should do next?
Chaipau (talk) 15:16, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Chaipau Thank you for your note, but I don't see that I can do anything else with the evidence that's been presented so far. The SPI process is not perfect, and sometimes the socks win. The best I can recommend is that you keep watching these accounts and when you have better evidence, open a new report. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:29, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
What could be the best possible way to get the Sairg master sorted out so that the three different masters are differentiated? I ask because I see two of the masters still active and I seem to have exhausted pathways to address this. I have also left a note on the SPI where I think I miscommunicated.
Chaipau (talk) 12:52, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Please also note, that one of the evidence, the map, has been deleted at commons: [8]. Chaipau (talk) 12:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 September 2021
- News and notes: New CEO, new board members, China bans
- In the media: The future of Wikipedia
- Op-Ed: I've been desysopped
- Disinformation report: Paid promotional paragraphs in German parliamentary pages
- Discussion report: Editors discuss Wikipedia's vetting process for administrators
- Recent research: Wikipedia images for machine learning; Experiment justifies Wikipedia's high search rankings
- Community view: Is writing Wikipedia like making a quilt?
- Traffic report: Kanye, Emma Raducanu and 9/11
- News from Diff: Welcome to the first grantees of the Knowledge Equity Fund
- WikiProject report: The Random and the Beautiful
Tech News: 2021-39
22:20, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
September 29: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon + Annual Members' Meeting NYC
September 29, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon + Annual Members' Meeting NYC | |
---|---|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.
|
Upcoming events:
- Prospect Park photo contest, ongoing
- Latinx Art Wikipedia Edit-a-thon, October 6
- Wiki-Pavilion Picnic NYC in Prospect Park (with WikiProject Craft + WikiConference North America), October 10
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 04:42, 28 September 2021 (UTC)