|
||
Prior to Oct 2017, I hand-archived.
These are the old archives:
- Archive 1 (21/9/05 - 13/1/06)
- Archive 2 (13/1/06 - 6/5/06)
- Archive 3 (6/5/06 - 30/6/08)
- Archive 4 (4/7/08 - 24/9/08)
- Archive 5 (24/9/08 - 9/1/09)
- Archive 6 (10/1/09 - 18/4/09)
- Archive 7 (20/4/09 - 18/1/10)
- Archive 8 (25/1/10 - 7/6/10)
- Archive 9 (16/6/10 - 10/10/10)
- Archive 10 (11/10/10 - 19/01/11)
- Archive 11 (23/1/11 - 27/01/12)
- Archive 12 (1/2/12 - 4/9/12)
- Archive 13 (22/10/2012 - 2/9/2015)
Hello and welcome to my talk page. I'll respond to your comments here, unless you ask me to reply on your talk page. If I've left you a message on your talk page and you reply there, there's no need for you to come here and tell me; if I expect a reply I'll be watching your talk page so I'll find out about it anyway. Cheers!
WP:SNG
I'm posting here is response to your post at WP:ANI#Disruptive POINTy AfD !votes and racist comparisons by Johnpacklambert, rather than take that discussion off-topic. I think we agree about WP:CRIN. Just because we could write a stub about a cricketer doesn't mean we have to. Another example is WP:NSPECIES - do we really need an article about an extinct animal known from a single tooth? or even about a species known from a single publication? In many cases, readers would be as well or better served by a redirect to a well-written list. Yrs, Narky Blert (talk) 09:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- I agree completely. I've long thought that these little ministubs would be better presented as parts of a list, for example List of species in genus whateverus, or List of Derpshire cricket players, or Numbered asteroids (12000-13000). Reyk YO! 10:47, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Sanity check
See Talk:Habib Miyan#Redirection. Am I missing something here? The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 16:36, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
CalConnect
Hi, I'm writing in regard to your recommendation for removal for the CalConnect page. The goal of my prior edit was to begin remaking the page to be more useful and less buzzwordy. Do you have any recommendations for doing this? Perhaps a piecemeal approach is less useful than a wholesale overhaul? (Apologies for the time lapse between then and now... pandemic.)
Thanks, Atlauren (talk) 19:39, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Polar mesospheric clouds
An article that you have been involved in editing—Polar mesospheric clouds—has been proposed for merging with Noctilucent cloud. If you are interested, please follow the (Discuss) link at the top of the article to participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Pierre cb (talk) 05:33, 2 August 2021 (UTC)