This page was last edited or modified by Feminist (talk · contribs · count · logs · email) on Monday 1:08:50 August 23, 2021 UTC.
Wikipedia:Babel | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Search user languages |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 |
Nomination of List of artists influenced by Christina Aguilera for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of artists influenced by Christina Aguilera until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
HĐ (talk) 02:27, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Lilia Tarawa
Hello! Your submission of Lilia Tarawa at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Lcmortensen (mailbox) 10:47, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Lilia Tarawa
Now that the proposal was promoted, what happens next? Nexus000 (talk) 11:58, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Wait for it to appear on the main page. feminist (talk) 03:40, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Lilia Tarawa
— Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 April 2021
- From the editor: A change is gonna come
- Disinformation report: The Trump Organization's paid editors
- In the media: Fernando, governance, and rugby
- Opinion: The (Universal) Code of Conduct
- Op-Ed: A Little Fun Goes A Long Way
- Changing the world: The reach of protest images on Wikipedia
- Recent research: Quality of aquatic and anatomical articles
- Traffic report: The verdict is guilty, guilty, guilty
- News from Wiki Education: Encouraging professional physicists to engage in outreach on Wikipedia
The Signpost: 25 April 2021
- From the editor: A change is gonna come
- Disinformation report: The Trump Organization's paid editors
- In the media: Fernando, governance, and rugby
- Opinion: The (Universal) Code of Conduct
- Op-Ed: A Little Fun Goes A Long Way
- Changing the world: The reach of protest images on Wikipedia
- Recent research: Quality of aquatic and anatomical articles
- Traffic report: The verdict is guilty, guilty, guilty
- News from Wiki Education: Encouraging professional physicists to engage in outreach on Wikipedia
Thoughts and prayers
Please do not link every mention of thoughts and prayers to that article. The article is primarily about a US slacktivism controversy, so only uses about that subject should be linked. The article should really be named Thoughts and prayers controversy. I am going to go through and remove all those links leaving only the ones that apply. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 16:34, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- DAMMMIT! There's over a hundred of them! Well, that will keep me busy for a while. Applicable policies are MOS:LINKQUOTE, WP:OVERLINK (Everyday words understood by most readers in context) and WP:EASTEREGG. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 18:12, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Our article on Thoughts and prayers is about the phrase. My links to thoughts and prayers are limited to situations where the words are uttered in response to deaths from disasters, accidents, terrorist acts, etc. Situations where the use of the phrase is notable. I would also argue that the phrase may not be familiar to readers who are not familiar with Christian traditions. I believe that these links, or at least most of them, are appropriate. feminist (+) 05:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- The first thing people see when they click on the link is a protest sign that says "F*uk your thoughts and prayers". That is turns any page you linked into a covert attack page. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 14:39, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- I agree that the top image is provocative. I have swapped its position with another image in the article where the phrase is less obviously attacked. Although an image as illustration is useful for readers, I'd imagine finding an image of the phrase in a non-critical context would be difficult, given that it is usually spoken as opposed to in a visual form. feminist (+) 14:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Your lack of objectivity in this distresses me. You obviously are using Wikipedia to push political agendas. If there was not a controversy about the phrase the article would not exist and in fact did not exist until the controversy happen. It is not about the phrase in any sort of NPOV manner and you know it. Changing the image does not fix that. I see you have done a lot of editing on Wikipedia and I would think you would know better. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 14:57, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- I agree that the top image is provocative. I have swapped its position with another image in the article where the phrase is less obviously attacked. Although an image as illustration is useful for readers, I'd imagine finding an image of the phrase in a non-critical context would be difficult, given that it is usually spoken as opposed to in a visual form. feminist (+) 14:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- The first thing people see when they click on the link is a protest sign that says "F*uk your thoughts and prayers". That is turns any page you linked into a covert attack page. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 14:39, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Our article on Thoughts and prayers is about the phrase. My links to thoughts and prayers are limited to situations where the words are uttered in response to deaths from disasters, accidents, terrorist acts, etc. Situations where the use of the phrase is notable. I would also argue that the phrase may not be familiar to readers who are not familiar with Christian traditions. I believe that these links, or at least most of them, are appropriate. feminist (+) 05:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
On second thoughts, MOS:LINKQUOTE suggests caution with links in quotations—apologies for not taking that into account sooner. I am reverting my link additions within quotations. feminist (+) 15:46, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, sorry if I got dramatic. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 18:41, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Asking for your input on NationBuilder Talk page
Hi Feminist, I am a COI editor working for NationBuilder, whose article you created in 2019. I pinged you recently asking for your input at Talk:NationBuilder where I posted an edit request. Any chance you could take a look when you have a moment? Thanks, Sorcha at NationBuilder (talk) 19:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
- Doing... feminist (+) 07:07, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Feminist. Following up here to ask if you could please take another look over the Notable use cases section of the NationBuilder article and either remove the Advert tag if "advertising" is no longer an issue, or to fix the section so that this is the case and then remove the tag. I really appreciate all your work on this article – thank you for creating it back in 2019 and maintaining it so that it continues to be a valuable resource for the public! Sorcha at NationBuilder (talk) 12:55, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
- Sorcha at NationBuilder, please make a {{request edit}} on Talk:NationBuilder. feminist (+) 01:08, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Feminist. Following up here to ask if you could please take another look over the Notable use cases section of the NationBuilder article and either remove the Advert tag if "advertising" is no longer an issue, or to fix the section so that this is the case and then remove the tag. I really appreciate all your work on this article – thank you for creating it back in 2019 and maintaining it so that it continues to be a valuable resource for the public! Sorcha at NationBuilder (talk) 12:55, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Category:Critics of Planned Parenthood has been nominated for deletion
Category:Critics of Planned Parenthood has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:47, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 June 2021
- News and notes: Elections, Wikimania, masking and more
- In the media: Boris and Joe, reliability, love, and money
- Disinformation report: Croatian Wikipedia: capture and release
- Recent research: Feminist critique of Wikipedia's epistemology, Black Americans vastly underrepresented among editors, Wiki Workshop report
- Traffic report: So no one told you life was gonna be this way
- News from the WMF: Searching for Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: WikiProject on open proxies interview
- Forum: Is WMF fundraising abusive?
- Discussion report: Reliability of WikiLeaks discussed
- Obituary: SarahSV
Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive
Hello Feminist:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 900 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.
Further input for NationBuilder?
Hi again. First of all, I want to thank you for your previous edits in response to my requests at NationBuilder. A few days ago, an editor placed an "Advert" tag above the notable use cases section. Would you be able to take another look to see if you agree or disagree that such a tag is appropriate? Perhaps you can either remove the tag if you think it was placed incorrectly, or make the necessary changes to the content so that the section no longer has any hint of advertising, which is something I, as a disclosed COI editor, did not intend to add. I appreciate any help you can provide with this matter. Sorcha at NationBuilder (talk) 15:45, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Feminist. Thanks so much for improving the "Notable use cases" section of the NationBuilder article. I think the renamed subsections make it seem far less promotional. If you agree that the section is now no longer written like an advertisement, could you please remove the advert tag? If not, I'd love to keep discussing to determine what additional changes you feel might be necessary to bring that section in line with Wikipedia's guidelines. Thanks again for all your help. Sorcha at NationBuilder (talk) 22:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 July 2021
- News and notes: Wikimania and a million other news stories
- Special report: Hardball in Hong Kong
- In the media: Larry is at it again
- Board of Trustees candidates: See the candidates
- Traffic report: Football, tennis and marveling at Loki
- News from the WMF: Uncapping our growth potential – interview with James Baldwin, Finance and Administration Department
- Humour: A little verse