Requests for page protection | ||
---|---|---|
This page is for requesting that a page, file or template be protected. Please read up on the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used only to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, the protection is listed in the page history and logs with a short description indicating why it was protected, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. Further discussion should take place on the Talk page of the article. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins do not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism. Note: Editors should not consider requesting page protection as a method for continuing an argument from elsewhere nor as a venue for starting a new discussion regarding article content. If a request contains excessive argument, appears to be intended to resolve a content dispute, includes personal attacks or uncivil comments, or has any other unrelated discussion, it will be removed from this page and no action will be taken.
|
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
|
Kankugapai cita-cita yg tertinggal
- Kankugapai cita-cita yg tertinggal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Bagaimanakah melindungi diri kita dan bisa mengembangkannya 2404:C0:7540:0:0:0:33DD:7EA (talk) 13:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Declined โ Incomprehensible. Favonian (talk) 14:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Note: Google translate did not make sense either. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:16, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Peter Tatchell
- Peter Tatchell (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations โ IP-with-a-cause adding unreliably-sourced/unsourced POV/opinion. Bastunฤฤกรกแธฮฒรกลโฎลญล! 13:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Not done. @Bastun: Is there a history of disruption from non-EC editors? I see you have a content dispute with a single IP address, which is not a reason to protect the article from all editors except extended-confirmed. Both of you have three reverts and therefore both of you have avoided being blocked under WP:3RR. If the IP resumes warring, report at WP:AN3 or directly to me and I will block it. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:01, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
- No, not that I'm aware of, and will do. I'm concerned about BLP violation here, but I'll give you a ping if there's further need. Bastunฤฤกรกแธฮฒรกลโฎลญล! 21:04, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
2021 FIFA Beach Soccer World Cup
- 2021 FIFA Beach Soccer World Cup (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Flix11 (talk) 14:48, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.โcyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:49, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Host featured
- Wikipedia:Teahouse/Host featured (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Highly Visible Template. Qwerfjkltalk 16:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Host lounge/Announcements/1
- Wikipedia:Teahouse/Host lounge/Announcements/1 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Highly Visible Template. Transcluded onto WP:Teahouse Qwerfjkltalk 16:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Talk:List of Jeopardy! contestants
- Talk:List of Jeopardy! contestants (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism โ Repeated addition of message board/forum content asking other users to add individuals who do not meet WP:BLP1E, WP:BLPPRIMARY and WP:SIGCOV.
Disruptive edit history:
- 00:31, 24 August 2021โ
- 15:13, 10 June 2021โโ
- 13:43, 9 June 2021โโ
- 18:00, 5 June 2021
- 16:28, 21 May 2021
- 20:41, 1 May 2021
- 23:25, 30 April 2021
See also:
- Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2021/04#List of Jeopardy! contestants
- Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2021/06#List of Jeopardy! contestants
- Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2021/08#List of Jeopardy! contestants.
AldezD (talk) 17:27, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Declined โ Article talk pages are not protected except in response to severe or continued vandalism. - And stop removing good faith requests for help from the talk page. - jc37 17:45, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
- "...but I didn't provide a reliable source. So, could you please help me do that?" - that is a request for help on a talk page. Talk pages are not article space. - jc37 17:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
And my apologies, I apparently posted a user talk template, instead of article talk. Corrected above. - jc37 18:13, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
- Though awkwardly worded, basically a huge run-on sentence, it seems to be valid use of the article talk page. Instead of reverting it, the complainant should offer a response to it. โBaseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrotsโ 18:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
- So do you think it should be restored? โBaseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrotsโ 19:09, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
- I fixeded it per Baseball Buggs !!!
The Real Housewives of Potomac
- The Real Housewives of Potomac (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism โ Vandal magnet, as soon as it is unprotected, it attracts literally legions of IP silly vandalisms. Ifnord (talk) 17:54, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:15, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Note: Last ptotection was for two days and expired eight months ago. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:15, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Operation Warp Speed
- Operation Warp Speed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite full protection: The article is about a past event which expired in early 2021, so there is little more sourced content to add. IP edit warring follows political preferences of Trump vs Biden. I suspect IP edit warring will be permanent, thus justifying the indefinite duration. Zefr (talk) 21:23, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Emirate of Afghanistan
- Emirate of Afghanistan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 21:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:17, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Anwar El Ghazi
- Anwar El Ghazi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Almost all IPs editing the article will change his nationality to Egyptian. Capsulecap (talk โข contribs) 22:13, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
KSI
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 22:25, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Wyoming
Reason: Long-term persistent vandalism, generally occurring every few days. Protection log regarding vandalism goes back to 2011. If the vandalism is not regular enough to warrant an indefinite semi-protection this time round, perhaps indefinite pending changes can be applied, especially seeing as this is a rather high visibility article? Entranced98 (talk) 22:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
|
Dick's Sporting Goods
- Dick's Sporting Goods (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: It's been long enough that I think we can try letting this page go unprotected again. I'd also like it unprotected in order to allow COI editors to implement their own requests once they've been approved by a neutral editor. โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ talk 22:53, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- COI editors shouldn't be implementing their own requests, generally. They should make an edit request, and another editor should implement. โvalereee (talk) 13:19, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Valereee: I thought they were permitted to implement uncontroversial edits? โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ talk 13:35, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- FD, it's not that they aren't permitted, it's that they're very strongly discouraged. And if they're paid, even more so. From their point of view, direct editing by a COI will often draw intense scrutiny, often hostile scrutiny in the case of paid editing, and is quite likely to get the page bannered, and they really don't want that. I've seen it happen that every bit of info that doesn't have an unaffiliated RS -- like number of outlets, which is often sourced to the company website -- gets stripped out. It's better all around if well-intentioned COI editors just make edit requests and let some other editor decide to make the edits. It's slower, and they won't get everything they want, but that's actually good. โvalereee (talk) 13:41, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, @FormalDude, forgot to ping! โvalereee (talk) 14:37, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- Makes sense. Thank you for the explanation, @Valereee. โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ talk 15:40, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- FD, it's not that they aren't permitted, it's that they're very strongly discouraged. And if they're paid, even more so. From their point of view, direct editing by a COI will often draw intense scrutiny, often hostile scrutiny in the case of paid editing, and is quite likely to get the page bannered, and they really don't want that. I've seen it happen that every bit of info that doesn't have an unaffiliated RS -- like number of outlets, which is often sourced to the company website -- gets stripped out. It's better all around if well-intentioned COI editors just make edit requests and let some other editor decide to make the edits. It's slower, and they won't get everything they want, but that's actually good. โvalereee (talk) 13:41, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Valereee: I thought they were permitted to implement uncontroversial edits? โโ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ talk 13:35, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Note: FormalDude, in the future, please notify the protecting admin via ping โ Muboshgu. El_C 04:44, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Not done. @FormalDude: please inform the COI editor to use the {{request edit}} template on the talk page to propose changes to the article. The fact that such an editor is interested in editing it is ample reason for it to stay protected. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:04, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
- They are aware (and have been submitting some of the best-formatted edit requests I've reviewed). Thank you for your consideration of my request! โโFormalDude talk 21:07, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Yuval Bronshtein
- Yuval Bronshtein (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: The information on this page is out-dated as it has not been updated in a very long time. Bronshtein has since won a World Series of Poker Bracelet and made a very deep run in the main event. Event13champ (talk) 16:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Reason: It's been long enough that this page no longer needs protection. Event13champ (talk) 16:54, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
@Drmies: How say you, Protecting Admin? Favonian (talk) 17:35, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
- I don't know, Favonian--that article was vandalized pretty severely for a while. Personally, as I noted in the log, I don't have any problem with indefinite protection for BLPs that are targets, and when a brand-new account comes along I'm a bit suspicious--but go ahead and unprotect it if you have some faith that this is for the best; we can always reconsider if it goes wrong. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 20:30, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Declined - I too have looked at all the crap in the edit history, and my faith is running low. Event13champ, you'll have to make use of the edit request feature until you've attained autoconfirmed status. Favonian (talk) 20:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Yuval Bronshtein
- Yuval Bronshtein (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: This is a guy who is important in the poker world. He just won a bracelet at the last live WSOP in 2019, and recently won a bunch of other poker tournaments. I think someone should be allowed to edit the page, put up a picture, and mention recent accomplishments. If you're not going to allow anyone to do so, someone from admin should edit the page. Event13champ (talk) 22:32, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Request a specific edit to a protected page
|
=== Name of page you are requesting an edit to ===palmer report
- Name of page you are requesting an edit to (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)palmer report/wikipedia
I would like to request an edit in the header of the Palmer Report page. It now says "Palmer Report in a fake news". It is the term "fake news" I would like changed as it is inflammatory and other editors
have agreed with this. I would like to request "speculative" or "opinion based" or "analysis based" or "theoretical." Barring those can it be reverted to what the header was before which said "partisan"? PR is not in the same category as infowars and in fact were just featured on MSNBC-Brian Williams the other night and MSNBC is an approved source I think. Please don't shut down my request. I am very new so sorry if indenting is not very good. I am trying. Thank you kindly. 2600:6C65:7E7F:B93E:3992:37A7:BB99:C937 (talk) 22:13, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.