May 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Zafar Mahal (Mehrauli), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:56, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Ok I will provide a citation. Tamjeed Ahmed (talk) 10:15, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Kinda looks like you are creating new accounts just to give yourself user awards. That's not ok. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:49, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
| |||
---|---|---|---|
A barnstar for you!
|
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. LearnIndology (talk) 15:14, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Asar-us-Sanadid
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Asar-us-Sanadid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.mpositive.in/tag/bagh-e-nazir/ and https://vikramjits.wordpress.com/2017/08/25/athar-us-sanadid-by-sir-syed/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. firefly ( t · c ) 14:13, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Siege of Delhi - Nepalese contribution
You have repeatedly inserted the following paragraph into the narrative of the article on the Siege of Delhi, presumably to justify the inclusion of Nepal and its flag in the article's info. box:
Rana Jang Bahadur, the de-facto ruler of Nepal, dispatched 3,200 Gurkha soldiers to aid the British. A few months later, Jang Bahadur arrived with more reinforcements. In the Awadh theatre, Nepal’s army turned out to be very useful to the British.[1]
There are several objections to this paragraph. Firstly, it is directly copypasted from the source. Even if the copypasted text is only a few sentences, the practice is frowned upon by the community. Secondly, the source does not mention the Siege of Delhi at all, except for two unrelated sentences: "The Great Indian Rebellion began to unravel after the British captured Delhi in September 1857." and "By January 1858, Delhi had been long pacified."
The mention of 3,200 Gurkhas dispatched by Jang Bahadur does not appear in any source on the siege. {The Gurkhas in the besieging army belonged to regiments which had been raised for the Company's army in 1815.) The Nepalese contribution in the Awadh theatre was several hundred miles from Delhi, and took place from February 1858 onwards, months after the Siege of Delhi ended.[2]
In short, the information and the reference you have inserted are not relevant to the article. (The site supports the view that Jang Bahadur and Nepal aided the British during the Indian Rebellion, to be sure, but not in any material way during the Siege of Delhi.)
Your assertion that "it is clearly mentioned in the section The siege June through July, that the maharaj of patiala helped the british army" also does not stand up to examination. The text merely states that "A regiment of Sikhs from Patiala defected to the rebels and made their way to Delhi...[3]" It does not state where this regiment was stationed or whether or not it formed part of the besieging army. The supporting cited source is apparently no longer available. Again, the Maharaja of Patiala may well have supported the British, but does not appear to have contributed to the Siege of Delhi. Please do not make assertions not supported by the text.
I will revert again. If you in turn revert, without citing a much more pertinent source, I will regard it as edit warring and turn the matter over to the administrators. HLGallon (talk) 10:31, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Nepal and the Great Indian Rebellion". DNA India. 2019-09-29. Retrieved 2021-06-04.
- ^ Edwardes, Michael (1963). Battles of the Indian Mutiny. London. pp. 126–140. ISBN 330-025240-4 Check
|isbn=
value: checksum (help). Unknown parameter|publishr=
ignored (help) - ^ http://dailysikhupdates.com/untold-story-sikhs-participated-1857-revolt-british/ The untold story of The Sikhs Who participated in the 1857 Revolt against the British
2020 Delhi riots
Can you please read the talk page as to why the content you added was not there, its been discussed ad infinitum and rejected. He has not yet been prosecuted so its inclusion may violate wp:blp. Its in the wrong place anyway. In addition, it is poorly formatted, can you self revert and take it to talk?Slatersteven (talk) 12:08, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Slatersteven (talk) 12:09, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Note the page is under 1rr, so you may in fact now need this
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Slatersteven (talk) 12:10, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Read wp:brd, if you are reverted make a case at talk.Slatersteven (talk) 12:17, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Also read WP:NOTDUMB, shouting does not make your argument any stronger.Slatersteven (talk) 12:26, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 Delhi riots. 331dot (talk) 12:50, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Tayi Arajakate. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Rahul Roushan seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 16:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Slatersteven (talk) 12:53, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi! Mr. Slatersteven, all edits that I made were correct and The Wire is an acceptable Wikipedia source. Tamjeed Ahmed (talk) 12:58, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Make your case at the edit war report, so admins can see your justification.Slatersteven (talk) 13:23, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Tamjeed Ahmed (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
- You really need to read wp:editwar and the guidance for appeals. The reason you were blocked is because you edit warred after being asked to discuss it. your first comment at talk was this [[1]], your last revert was [[2]], half an hour later. You edit warred whilst it was being discused.Slatersteven (talk) 15:03, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Oct 21
You really need to read wp:npa wp:v and wp:or.Slatersteven (talk) 11:44, 6 October 2021 (UTC)