Creemore revert
The last edit by the IP restored the article to the October 30th version which didn't include all the brewery promotion. When you reverted them, you put it all back in, obviously unintentionally.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:54, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Thank You for fixing Hurricane Alex article 👍
To/Do (mostly a test)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:40, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Darwin's Darkest Hour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Midland City, Ohio (February 3)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Midland City, Ohio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Midland City, Ohio, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, NoahDavid771!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
|
Apologies for forgetting to add a summary of my changes to /* Orthodox traditional views */ on the page about Junia (New Testament Person)
Hey NoahDavid771, thanks for your diligence in correcting errors and vandalism on the "Junia (New Testament Person)" page. Apparently I forgot to add an explanation of why I was removing that text. I have now redone that removal, but with a summary and explanation. For your convenience, here is a copy of that explanation:
"I removed the text about scholarly views of Junia's gender and apostleship because they seemed out of place in the section on the Orthodox Church's views traditional views. However, I've copied most of this section into the sections "Junia's gender" and "Apostolic status" so as to preserve the information. (Sorry for forgetting to write a summary the first time.)"
Once again, I apologize for the confusion. Now that I've explained it, would you agree that this makes more sense?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.59.222.140 (talk) 15:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Surviving Death
Thank you for your help patrolling new changes on Wikipedia, —PaleoNeonate – 14:18, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
February 2021
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to David Moyes have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:50, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:35, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Requesting some article expansion help
Greetings,
Please do visit Draft:Irrational beliefs and help expand the same if you find interested in the topic.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku (talk) 13:28, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Rollback granted
Hi -noah-. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Daily Mail reference at Jules Koundé
Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Jules Koundé. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Carlos Cruchaga has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Noah!💬 16:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)CSD tagging
Hello, Noah,
Before you tag any more pages for speedy deletion, please review the CSD criteria at Criteria for Speedy Deletion. Also, if an administrator removes a CSD tag you placed on a page, do not replace the tag with the same criteria. It just becomes a form of edit warring. Liz Read! Talk! 04:00, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Dan
Hey, Just drop onto my dad's page occasionally and add facts /remove incorrect info. I'm adding real fact..if a journo interviewed me it would be verifiable as far as the Wiki rules reads at a glance. Im not really interested in fighting with pedants on the ins and outs of verifying info. Its my dad. I know what he did...I sat and watched writing/filming etc...held his hand as he faded away in his last hours .I could trawl the internet for links and scraps but ...meh...I think if I was trolling Trump or Thatcher's pages with abuse ,the denizens of Wiki would have some valid points to remove my edits. In my case and on my dad's little page , its an irritant.
I hope I'm putting this chat in the correct box Noah. Regards Dan
Your submission at Articles for creation: Zakk Cervini has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Noah!💬 16:16, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Thank you for reviewing Jan Owen article!
Thanks so much, Noah; greatly appreciated; my first article! Feels good:-)
Have a few others in mind but will concentrate on doing more editing for now, to improve my Wiki skills.
Actually, 'Jan Owen' does need a disambiguation page, since there are now three:
- 'Jan Owen', the poet, is the default
- Jan Owen (artist)
- Jan Owen (social entrepreneur)
So, will read up about how to create one of those pages, and give it a go.
Thanks again
David — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidetalg2 (talk • contribs) 03:34, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi again, Noah
Your critique of the first draft of the Jan Owen (social entrepreneur) article was spot-on. The descriptions of the roles of the various organisations she has been involved in did tend to 'peacock' language. Overall, the text didn't scan particularly well, especially from an encyclopedic perspective. Commendations on your eye.
I have endeavored to address those short-comings in the re-submitted article. To my eye, at least, the article has been greatly improved; can but hope you concur!
Thanks again for your help with this.
David
Hi Noah
(I hope this is the right way to respond to your message; am a newbie! Please advise if otherwise!)
Thanks so much for your helpful comments and pointers on how to improve my article on Jan Owen (social entrepreneur); greatly appreciated! I am glad it passes the Notability requirements, and look forward to improving the text.
Would be most grateful for any examples where the text is inappropriate. On my reading, each sentence is a flat statement, with no peacock terms. The language reads to me as formal, impersonal, and dispassionate. Each statement of fact is supported by a citation. Honestly, I am at a loss as to how to improve it?!
Having non-government leaders (or 'non-profit leader', which I think is the preferred term in the US?) publicly recognised is so important, in my view, and Wikipedia is a key way to do that.
Stand ready, willing and able to follow your guidance to improve my first effort!
Thanks again,
David — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidetalg2 (talk • contribs) 23:50, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi again Noah
Your observations are most helpful; I see what you are saying. There are peacock-like terms in the description of what the organisations do. I will edit those back.
Thanks again for your help; hugely appreciated.
DavidDavidetalg2 (talk) 22:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
PS: Jan is a woman - in Australia, Jan is a common female name; blame the Brady Bunch!.
Request on 10:22:13, 4 March 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by EmmaP89
- EmmaP89 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Cottonwood Technology Fund ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Hi Noah David,
Thank you for taking the time to review my draft Cottonwood Technology Fund. I was surprised to learn that you did not give permission for the publication, because it was written in the exact same style as the Wikipedia article about Sapphire Ventures: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sapphire_Ventures
Please note that I am NOT the author of the Wikipedia article about Sapphire Ventures. I used it as an example. Could you please explain to me why the article about Sapphire Ventures was approved and mine about Cottonwood Technology Fund was declined? I don't see major differences. Many thanks for your help!
EmmaP89 (talk) 10:22, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Your decline of Georges Bettembourg
Hi Noah, thanks for reviewing my draft of Georges Bettembourg. I have reasonable experience in creating pages and am quite active on AfD discussions so I was surprised that you declined to publish the page, given it squarely satisfies WP:GNG. I appreciate the workload you'll be under so understand why you provided only a template explanation for your reasons, but the draft indeed includes 4 "significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject". The subject existed prior to the internet so sources are limited but those cited are completely satisfactory. Could I ask you to please reconsider or provide more reasoning? Thanks in advance,Cabrils (talk) 04:19, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Sinyo Adi
The article Sinyo Adi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable film, fails WP:NFILM
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 22:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Your decline of Ahmed Kamel
Hi, thanks for reviewing my article about the artist Ahmed Kamel. He has a german (here) wiki-article, so I translated this with help of a native-speaker. We included several reliable, secondary sources in english, different to the german wiki-page. Please tell what I should do now and where are the "peacock terms" in this article? I don't understand why the community is declining this article again! What to do better? I am a wiki-author in Germany since 2013 and do publishing several pages every week. --Gnomad (talk) 15:05, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, just because someone is notable in another language doesn't necessarily mean they are notable here. The criteria for the notability of an artist is:
Authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, and other creative professionals:
- The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors.
Ahmed Kamel does not satisfy this.
- The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique.
Ahmed Kamel does not satisfy this.
- The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
Notable (as in it is an article), so Ahmed Kamel does not satisfy this.
- The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.
(a) No (b) No (c) No (d) No Therefore, Ahmed Kamel is not currently suitable for inclusion on Wikipedia. Noah!💬 15:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hello again, this is not correct. I wonder if you are a connoisseur of the art scene? There are several points to look further on.
- There are more secondary references that cover specifically the artist and his work. Regarding the notability of the prizes/grants, Kamel has received the prestigious art grant of Germany's Ministry of Foreign Affairs in a personal meeting with the current Federal President of Germany (then Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier).
- Kamel´s work has been a substantial part of acclaimed exhibitions, e.g., „Cairo. Open City.“, which was awarded the prize for „The Exhibition of the Year“ in 2013 by the International Association of Art Critics - and exhibited at: Museum Folkwang, Essen, Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe Hamburg, Photography Museum Braunschweig, 5th European Month of Photography, Berlin (Germany’s largest photography festival), and East Wing, Doha, Qatar.
- His works are part of the permanent collections of Museum Folkwang, and The Ministry of Culture of Egypt.
- His work has been featured on TV as well as in national and international journals and newspapers, e.g. Westdeutscher Rundfunk, TAZ Die Tageszeitung, Universes in Universe/Nafas, Al-Hayat , Al-Ahram, or Akhbar el-Yom. --> points b)c)d) Thanks, --Gnomad (talk) 19:48, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Yole Marinelli moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Yole Marinelli, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Machine translations
Please do not create machine translations in general but especially do not do so without WP:ATTRIBUTION. Tjisadane is a copy of id:Tjisadane (film), Sinyo Adi is a copy of id:Sinyo Adi, Mustika Ibu is a copy of id:Mustika Ibu and this is a copy of Donald Trump and there are countless others cross-wiki. Please take the time to go and properly attribute any edits you've made that were copied from elsewhere. Thanks. CUPIDICAE💕 16:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- I did not know about that translation policy, I will attribute it now. Noah 💬 16:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- I am also concerned about your comment here. What about iMDb meets WP:NFILM when it doesn't even meet our requirements for being reliable? CUPIDICAE💕 18:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Article for Hoth band.
Hello. I see that you have declined my submission for my article about the band Hoth. Your reason was that they did not receive any charting, gold albums, or awards, saying that it makes them unnotable. Although you are correct in saying that, you are incorrect in saying that those reasons make them unnotable, as according to Wikipedias notablilty requirements, they say that for a band or musical artist to be notable, they must follow ONE of their criteria, not all. Now, the first criteria is that they must be directly written about in 3 or more independant reliable sources, which i cited in my article. Therefore my article IS notable, and you were incorrect in declining my article. If you think that i am incorrect in saying that, please explain to me why. Thank you, Cboi Sandlin (talk) 18:52, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Request on 18:59:11, 12 March 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by DianeKelly
- DianeKelly (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Mackenzie Lee Foster ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Requesting assistance on draft for Mackenzie Lee-Foster. I am confused as to why it gets rejected as my sources are reliable publications. I made the changes that were recommended by the last reviewer. Please help.
DianeKelly (talk) 18:59, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
Mz7 (talk) 20:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Your review of 'List of world records in life saving'
Thanks for the feedback. I am new to Wikipedia and appreciate all the help I can get. In terms of reliability, I have now included at the very beginning a key reference to the ILS records page. The Intl Life Saving Federation is in fact the only governing body who can officially ratify times, making them unquestionable. I have also updated all of the secondary references, by adding whatever information was previously missing and using the correct style in the citations. I trust that was all you meant with your comment: "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources." But in case you implied further improvements I'd appreciate if you could be more specific with your directions. Best Creiamo (talk) 01:11, 14 March 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Creiamo (talk • contribs) 01:00, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Susan David has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Noah 💬 21:48, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Mirrorman
I dont understand, there are sources in the article that can be verified. Floris Vleppenstein (talk) 01:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) The sources are mostly links to other Wikipedia articles. You can't use Wikipedia as a source for itself, as anyone can (and does) write anything and there is no established body for fact checking. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Bertus Borgers
Hi. I've declined the A7 tag on this, as I quickly found a source that shows Borgers has collaborated with Golden Earring. The CSD policy requires every revision of an article to meet the criteria, and this article has a history of people doing minor edits, with at least one source being added and then taken out. So I don't feel comfortable making a unilateral call on it. I've left a PROD tag on the article, because two sentence permastub isn't very useful, and if nobody's prepared to put the work in to improve it in 16 years, it's probably not going to get done. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Draft:Pennaal
Hi Noah,
Would you be willing to take another look at my draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Pennaal_-_the_music_series? I saw you rejected it based on a lack of notability referencing the general notability guidelines. I think the subject satisfies those based on their language based notability in Malayalam and mention of such in the language media. I'm curious to get your thoughts on how I could improve from here.
Thank you for your time. Tomyworld (talk) 18:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Tomyworld: I have looked at it again. The general notability guideline states that it needs in-depth coverage in reliable news sources. Not just passing mentions. For example, it would need an article in a major Malayam news source Then, looking at it from the Musical notability, Pennaal has not been on the chart of any major radio station, nor has it reached the national charts, won an award, or been certified gold or above. So, it is lacking notability. When it reaches either one of those, it will satisfy notability. Noah 💬 18:17, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Noah, Thanks for this input. If you see the references, they all are leading news channels in Malayalam - TV or newspapers. They mention it as the first ever initiative of this kind. I understand the point on awards - but thats the way forward. I can see Wiki pages for very low profile singles or movies which do not have any significance. I can show many such. Atleast, this one passes through the lives of women and acclaimed by media. There is a speciality in the song for each stage that is potrayed. Very upsetting to see this bias. Tomyworld (talk) 15:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Please slow down
Please slow down with AFC, as well as elsewhere. You've accepted a number of dubious, promotional or poorly sourced drafts and gone around and subverted a CU's direct request not to tag a disruptive sock. VAXIDICAE💉 18:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Also can you please explain what this move was? VAXIDICAE💉 19:04, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, I thought I had moved it to the Draftspace. Noah 💬 19:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- That doesn't address any of the other mind-boggling bad accepts/attempt at SPI clerking. VAXIDICAE💉 19:14, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, I thought I had moved it to the Draftspace. Noah 💬 19:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Reliable source
Hello -noah-. Tell me what a reliable source is. Nick (talk) 19:02, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hello @Nick: A reliable source is either something related to the subject the article is dealing with (eg. for a cricket player, some kind of publication relating to cricket) or a major news outlet that is believed to publish true information. Noah 💬 19:11, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Request on 20:00:02, 18 March 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by TimTheDragonRider
- TimTheDragonRider (talk · contribs)
- User:TimTheDragonRider/sandbox ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Hi Noah, you recently reviewed (and declined) one of my article drafts (Grabauornis). I was wondering if you could give me some pointers on how to properly reference, since the article was copied / translated from the Dutch article. TimTheDragonRider (talk) 20:00, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
TimTheDragonRider (talk) 20:00, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- @TimTheDragonRider: I added one more source so it could be verifieded. Noah 💬 13:13, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- @-noah-: Can I resubmit it then?
Sig
Your sig with the yellow and shadow is almost unreadable. Please consider changing (at the very least) the colour. Thanks. Primefac (talk) 01:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)