Archives: |
/Archive |
References
Outline of underwater diving
Thanks for your efforts. Unfortunately, the red The time allocated for running scripts has expired. issue is still there, starting with the Diving medical research organisations section to the end of the article. Truthanado (talk) 18:45, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Revisiting the article a few minutes later, everything is good now. Maybe there was an issue with cache in my browser. Thanks for the fix. Truthanado (talk) 18:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- No worries Truthanado, It was an interesting learning experience. Let me know if you run into the same problem again. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 05:45, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).
|
|
- An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.
- Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)
- Following an amendment request, the committee has clarified that the Talk page exception to the 500/30 rule in remedy 5 of the Palestine-Israel articles 4 case does not apply to requested move discussions.
- You can vote for candidates in the 2021 Board of Trustees elections from 4 August to 17 August. Four community elected seats are up for election.
Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Alexander Bain (inventor) on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Empty sections
Hi! I saw that you added "Circumscription" to Blastocladiomycota [1] and Neocallimastigomycota [2] and placed {{Empty section}} within them. Are you planning on populating these sections? If not, I am not sure how adding them was useful, and I intend to remove them. TelosCricket (talk) 20:16, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
- TelosCricket, I would add them if I could, but do not have access to the necessary sources. I went to those pages specifically to find out what those taxa include, and the information I needed was not there, so I created the empty sections firstly in the hope that they would notify someone competent that the articles lack basic information on the topic, and thereby encourage its addition, and secondly to notify other readers that they need not waste their time looking for the information as it is not there. I think that makes them useful both to editors and readers, don't you? Maybe you can think of a better way to convey the same information? Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 03:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- I see. In the case of Blastocladiomycota that information is indeed there in the article under the taxonomy section and partially so in the taxon box. In the case of Neocallimastigomycota, that information is in the taxon box. I am therefore going to remove the circumscription sections. TelosCricket (talk) 10:25, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- TelosCricket, in Blastocladiomycota#Taxonomy there is a listing of the taxa currently accepted as contained in Blastocladiomycota, but nothing that I could find that would make it clear why those taxa are in Blastocladiomycota, i.e, the shared characteristics of all Blastocladiomycota that are necessary and sufficient to classify them in this group. The same thing applies to Neocallimastigomycota, only the listing is in a different place. Perhaps you use a different term? Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 12:06, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, my apologies, yes, I misunderstood. I have reverted myself on both pages.
shared characteristics of all Blastocladiomycota that are necessary and sufficient to classify them in this group
is what I would think of as a formal taxonomic diagnosis/description. For Blastocladiomycota that would be found in James et al. 2006 and what I quote below:Zoospore with a single flagellum, side-body complex, nuclear cap of membrane-bounded ribosomes, cone-shaped nucleus that terminates near the kinetosome, microtubules radiate anteriorly from the proximal end of the kinetosome around the nucleus, zoospore flagellum lacks electron-opaque plug in transition zone. Asexual reproduction with zoospores, sexual reproduction through fusion of planogametes, life cycle with sporic meiosis.
- TelosCricket (talk) 15:14, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- TelosCricket, Thanks for the quote, that is exactly what I was looking for. I take it you have access to Taylor & Francis online, which I do not. Now I have to work out what it actually means, as some of the terminology is unfamiliar. If I manage to get that right I will add it to the article in the empty section, and we all win. I have seen it referred to as circumscription, but a "formal taxonomic diagnosis" would be an accurate description and may be more widely understood and therefore "Taxonomic diagnosis" may be more suitable for the section header. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 16:18, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- TelosCricket, in Blastocladiomycota#Taxonomy there is a listing of the taxa currently accepted as contained in Blastocladiomycota, but nothing that I could find that would make it clear why those taxa are in Blastocladiomycota, i.e, the shared characteristics of all Blastocladiomycota that are necessary and sufficient to classify them in this group. The same thing applies to Neocallimastigomycota, only the listing is in a different place. Perhaps you use a different term? Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 12:06, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- I see. In the case of Blastocladiomycota that information is indeed there in the article under the taxonomy section and partially so in the taxon box. In the case of Neocallimastigomycota, that information is in the taxon box. I am therefore going to remove the circumscription sections. TelosCricket (talk) 10:25, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox artist on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Caitlyn Jenner on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 16 August 2021 (UTC)