Sorry, please be aware that unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Please read Wikipedia:Autopatrolled before requesting or nominating another user for this right. Applicants are unlikely to be granted this right if they have created fewer than 25 new articles, excluding redirects and disambiguation pages. Note that this right will not help you create or patrol articles.
I've created 26 articles (see my user page), I have one good article as well as a DYK. to address Ashwarya, sources were admittedly scant but I believe it was enough for inclusion versacespaceleave a message! 23:08, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has created roughly 14 articles. — MusikBottalk 03:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
* note: a large portion of my articles are expansions of redirects versacespaceleave a message! 23:59, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
I'd be interested in your thoughts on Ashwarya. Created by you on 4 June and tagged with notability on 6 June, and later on with Template:Sources exist. What are your intentions? Do you have any? Schwede66 21:28, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello Schwede66, my sole intention was to write about an artist I was interested in. I believe that the topic is notable. versacespaceleave a message! 21:33, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Autopatrolled is for editors who produce "clean" articles that don't need patrolling. By definition, that means that those articles should not have maintenance templates placed. So if there are templates, that's a problem. Therefore my question – do you have any intentions about improving the article so that the maintenance template can go? Schwede66 21:42, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Yes, I do, along with the intention to regularly check all of my articles and do the same to them. And another issue like the one at Ashwarya won't happen again. versacespaceleave a message! 22:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. I've temporarily watchlisted Ashwarya and will keep an eye on progress. Schwede66 23:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
I have created over 25 articles when you include articles that I created by removing a redirect. None of my articles have been tagged with anything thus far. Due to that, I want autopatrolled to help decrease backlog for NPP reviewers by getting the user right. Link20XX (talk) 13:42, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
I have made around 1500 edits and created around 50 articles in the last few months, of which one was promoted to a WP:GA with a DYK (and I am working on various others), so I think I'm reasonable familiar with the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia. The Grsecurity article I made was incorrectly speedily deleted in my opinion, but I never took the effort of starting a deletion review which was recommended by the deleting admin (I added sources to meet WP:GNG for which it was deleted, but it wasn't too different from the original article, so it was speedied). I'm familiar with WP:V, WP:C, WP:N and WP:BLP (I have created 4 biographies). I would like to become an autopatrolling user so I can help the NPP team. PhotographyEdits (talk) 15:18, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Contributed to encyclopedia immensely for last one year in the most controversial topic area i.e caste and indian politics. I have created required number of articles, necessary to get this right. Last time, this right was requested for me by a fellow editor, but since i was new, i was not granted this right, though reviewing admin was impressed by my edit history. On Wikipedia, several administrators have recognised my work, some of them are Bishonen and RegentsPark. Hence, I deem myself fit for this right. Heba Aisha (talk) 00:51, 30 June 2021 (UTC) Heba Aisha (talk) 00:51, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
I would like to add, only few pages are in stub version and others have no cleanup tags and were cleared by reviewier immediately. It shows that i had not violated any policy, specifically regarding WP:BLP, WP:NPOV and WP:RS. I am also aware about various other policies of wiki and follow them to write my articles, which makes me believe that, there is no need for a new page reviewer to review my pages. Heba Aisha (talk) 10:54, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Howdy! I'm applying for this permission because I have created 27 new articles (one of which was created from a redirect), and because I have a need for the tools. Multiple articles that I've created have been of hockey players on the day of their NHL debut (like Jackson Cates or Wade Allison (ice hockey)), which would be at a time that people would be Googling for them. On top of that, one of my most recent articles, Eric Petersen, is on a subject who was a recent Emmy nomination and is a co-lead on a popular new television show. Most of the time, I have had no trouble with having pages reviewed in a timely manner, but it took two weeks for Allison to be reviewed, and Petersen has gone one week without being checked. In terms of trustworthiness, 9 of these 25 articles have been BLPs, and two (Ulysses S. Grant Monument and 2021 pitch doctoring controversy) have been the subjects of recent controversy. I also have 22 good articles, of which 15 are BLPs and 2 are recently deceased persons. Finally, I check all of my articles for GNG or SNG before writing them. Kncny11(shoot) 20:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
There are no tools that come with autopatrolled. What is it that you are expecting? Schwede66 21:20, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
The "tool" in question that I was referring to was to have my new articles marked as reviewed, which takes the burden off of reviewers and allows pages I create to be immediately visible from search engines. This is especially valuable, as I said, in the context of article topics that would be reasonably popular Google searches, such as an athlete on the day of, or shortly after, their professional debut. Kncny11(shoot) 22:24, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
I have created over 80 articles in total. Only one of my articles is tagged with the BLP sources tag and some as stubs. I am familiar with the policies, since I've started expanding and fixing some of my articles and deleting some by me as doing [db-g7] that doesn't meet Wikipedia's guideline. I wasn't familiar with the policies from the beginning, but I am now. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 20:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
I am a regular editor who created 25+ pages. I understand the guidelines like WP:BLP, WP:GNG etc. I am planning to create more pages related to sports personalities. Till now none of my pages got deleted and all the pages are tags-free. Yes, they are stub. Sonofstar (talk) 10:01, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to get the autopatrolled rights, as I have created articles more than eligibility criteria for this right. Also, I have thoroughly read the process, guidelines that what should be keep in mind during marking any article as reviewed. Thank you. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️) 02:56, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
I've created more than 200 articles, most of which I keep a record of here. Most of them are about notable sportspeople and comply with WP:NSPORT. Very few issues have been raised with my articles and most of them avoid getting tagged for notability or content issues. As far as I am aware, I haven't had any taken to AfD or PROD in several years. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC) Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
I can largely confirm that Spiderone does indeed have the required knowledge for possessing autopatral perm. Celestina007 (talk) 22:30, 20 July 2021 (UTC)